I'm with you. But, if I were to compare among both Bitcoin forks, then I'd say that Bitcoin Cash is a project of higher quality (in terms of development, innovation, and community support) than Bitcoin SV. As I've said before, the reason for this is obvious. Bitcoin SV has only been focusing on promotion/mainstream attention rather than delivering innovation within its Blockchain network. Not to mention, it has controversial figures such as Craig and Calvin which are doing more harm than good to the crypto industry.
On the other hand, we see Roger actively supporting BCH without bringing unwanted attention. Of course, both chains (BSV and BCH) intend to scale Bitcoin using on-chain block size increase (which could work in the long term). But their success will largely depend on how many people adopt them in the real world. There's no way around it. Speaking of this, BSV has been delisted from top cryptocurrency exchanges in just a few days. This would look bad for the adoption of the BSV project as it loses attention from mainstream investors and traders.
Nonetheless, Bitcoin (BTC) seems to have the safest approach for scaling without sacrificing the network's security and reliability. Of course, the Lightning Network has a certain level of centralization within it, but it's the best way to go instead of scaling on-chain (which prevents most people from affording a full node to support the Blockchain). Just my opinion