Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 3. (Read 230740 times)

So I guess everyone learned the answer to the question I wrote before,
How many 1BY8GQbnueY starts are there in our 67 bit range? The correct answer is 4.

Thank you very much for this information. cctv5go

Thank you for the 1BY8GQbnueY that I want to include in my own system.



So I guess everyone learned the answer to the question I wrote before,
How many 1BY8GQbnueY starts are there in our 67 bit range? The correct answer is 4.

If you find the private key to 67 and you want to send it through mara I think this is the way.  Someone please correct me if i am wrong.

bitcoin-cli createrawtransaction '[{"txid":"12f34b58b04dfb0233ce889f674781c0e0c7ba95482cca469125af41a78d13b3","vout":2},{"txid":"5d45587cfd1d5b0fb826805541da7d94c61fe432259e68ee26f4a04544384164","vout":15},{"txid":"08389f34c98c606322740c0be6a7125d9860bb8d5cb182c02f98461e5fa6cd15","vout":66}]' '{"bc1q0pju92kh0qyaygvnm074mpdhdg28qa357w7usd":6.69}'

The bitcoin address at the end should be replaced with your address otherwise you will send me 6.69BTC.

The output gives you this.

0200000003b3138da741af259146ca2c4895bac7e0c08147679f88ce3302fb4db0584bf31202000 00000fdffffff6441384445a0f426ee689e2532e41fc6947dda41558026b80f5b1dfd7c58455d0f 00000000fdffffff15cda65f1e46982fc082b15c8dbb60985d12a7e60b0c742263608cc9349f380 84200000000fdffffff014021e027000000001600147865c2aad77809d22193dbfd5d85b76a1470 763400000000

After you get the private key you need to sign it.

bitcoin-cli signrawtransactionwithkey "0200000003b3138da741af259146ca2c4895bac7e0c08147679f88ce3302fb4db0584bf31202000 00000fdffffff6441384445a0f426ee689e2532e41fc6947dda41558026b80f5b1dfd7c58455d0f 00000000fdffffff15cda65f1e46982fc082b15c8dbb60985d12a7e60b0c742263608cc9349f380 84200000000fdffffff014021e027000000001600147865c2aad77809d22193dbfd5d85b76a1470 763400000000" '["PRIVATE KEY WIF"]'

The result is what you put into mara slipstream. 





hello this is the first time for me posting or replying here , supposed some did this methode , from 1% to 100 % what is the propability of succes ??

Hey, new to Bitcoin but I have a question that one of you may be able to help me understand.

Given the unfortunate event of puzzle#66
{
  the real solver likely panic and tried to sweep the WIF using electrum (34 inputs and paying only 5.217/B)

  the sniper within a minute made a clean TX (1 input and paying 406.356/B)
}

If saatoshi_rising used a static padding for low entropy puzzles (like #66)

-> "123456789abcdef123456789abcdef123456789abcdef12" + [2832ed74f2b5e35ee]

Would a sniper still be able to find the private key from the public key being exposed in the mempool within 2 block confirmations?

From my limited understanding this would not be possible because the pubkey would be from a 256-bit key, but maybe I am missing something.

Thanks!

1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
1BY8GQbnueYebq5d6CE1wDfbdAWWy33ZyW
HEX:7545bf10859946eca
WIF:KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qbRyCkJQmfJhcqQ1bT4q

A similar example.

1BY8GQbnueY how many do you think are in our 67 bit range?
1BY8GQbnue how many do you think are in our 67 bit range?

I found the answers to these in part.

So I confirmed these with hardware that was not too high, but my range is still far but not as far as space.

At this ATH moment of bitcoin 1 btc will be enough for a lifetime (With a well management investment and with Moderate product consumption a.k.a not living big and burn money) for anyone.


The evidence suggest that it was snatched by someone else. but since the original solver is still unknown then we may only speculate with it.

Lol..May be the creator is also enjoying the drama just like us.

If I'm going to give him 1 btc, I also want to. I live in Africa, and the price of bread here is very expensive, 1 btc can help me!

Also, when the puzzle 66 was solved, didn't somebody (not the solver) grab the money (a bot?) ?

Question for everyone.



Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.

No idea what "desired result" should mean to you, but his code only counts the total iterations, not the number of operations. At each iteration, there is a cycle handling loop and additional code to create new starting points and do additional jumps from base points to the new created points. These are not counted at all in his statistics of his "K" so his SOTA complexity breakthrough is incorrect so basically what I'm saying is that he suffers of so much boredom he can't see his own code bugs, instead he thinks he "invented" some new methods to break ECDLP, who cares that they are actually slower than what we already know?!

Someone who would attack ECDLP in a decent matter would use the correct notation of things, at least.

Now, I never said RetiredCoder is the creator, I just said the keys were probably solved in another way, or were already known to him, or they were solved in a much longer timespan than what he brags about, or with a lot higher costs and resources. Because some things definitely do not add up, logically.

Question for everyone.

Question for everyone.

If you find a effective method to complete 135 are you going to share your method/code ?
We have known for years that if you have money you have a head start in these puzzles if you bothered to read from page 70 odd if not before that.

No one here is going to hand you that.

snippets yes.

Me personally i wouldn't.
I would tip a few people in this forum for the intel posted if that's what helped me other than that why am i putting others in a million dollar race when i have a head start.

Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.

80bit yes, because you can use low DP. For 120-130 and higher - you have to use high DP and you will get big overhead with JLP. And it's not easy to test 120-130bit range to confirm


Yes I started with JLP code a long time ago, but after some time I got enough experience and I created my own software from scratch - much faster and efficient. So it's not a mod.

Lol..May be the creator is also enjoying the drama just like us.

Oh lord, what has become of this thread for the past few days LMAO

The drama around RetiredCoder is just over the top lol

There’s a 50/50 chance that it could be the creator, but even I can’t confirm this. The reason I say so is because when puzzle #120 was solved, if RetiredCoder was the actual solver, you’d expect the creator to wait for the private keys to be revealed before funding the remaining addresses with 1000 BTC. Instead, without knowing who solved it or how it was solved, the creator immediately increased the prize to 1000 BTC.

Another suspicious point is that puzzles #66 and #130 were both solved in the same month. While this could be a coincidence, it still raises questions. The sad part is that we’ll probably never know the truth since the creator isn’t coming forward to address the criticism or clarify any of these doubts.