I don't even consider it as a part time job. Generally what you are doing online like signature campaigns fall into freelancing in which you really don't have an employer. You are self-employed in which you are just looking for temporary or additional way of having extra income. Additionally the amount you can get from a job is much bigger because in Bitcoins we have a limited option on earning more money.
Are you sure a signature campaign does not have an employer? Then who is paying us of our job/task? Isn't it the owner of the campaign? Managed by the manager? Signature campaign does not fall under self-employed category because you are applying for the position or slot.
And they maybe a part time Job or sidejob as the other stated (see bolded word). We are not discussing here about the quality of job or the how the job is created or how long it will last. We are discussing employment and unemployment. If you applied for a campagin and got accepted won't you considered yourself employed? If not then what do you call it?
I disagree with your stance and support the previous poster (whose post I included in the quote). As to me, if we follow your logic there couldn't be self-employed people at all. Ultimately, the difference between self-employed and hired (or employed) lies in the equality (or lack thereof) of the parties involved. When you are employed, you follow the rules of your employer, i.e. you don't have a lot of leeway in respect to negotiating the terms of the contract (e.g. when you should work and how much). This is not the case with self-employment where you can put forward and negotiate your own conditions and provisions
Just the fact that it is still a job to be done is irrelevant and inconsequential to the issue
You just supported my stance rather than refuting it
. The one I quoted said that signature campaign is categorized as self-employed stuff. And your explanation justified my stance . The discussion with my quoted reply solely revolves around signature campaign . 
