the service is bro-bono anyway, right? I guess someone regaining access to his funds will be grateful enough to donate generously.
Hi
Yes, I have been thinking about the best charging model:
If I make the service purely success-based, then I am at the mercy of people who send in false information and cause me to waste CPU cycles (money) for no reason.
If I make the service purely pay-as-you-go, (based on CPU time used), then I cannot charge 'high-end' customers more money than the average.
It may be that some combination of both charging models will be required in the long term - for instance a basic cost-recovery pay-as-you-go model, plus a % recovery fee, or similar.
However for now, yes, it is a pro-bono service.
I'm currently working on several wallet decryptions.
Cheers
Dave