bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 52.

gnaget

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Quote from: Clipse on August 08, 2011, 05:02:03 PM

Well not sure how the digbit admin correlates chrome with attackers but here is hes explaination for chrome user-agent not working:

Code:

Yes, it only limit chrome Chrome/13.0.782.109, because attack are using this.

Easy, he is associating chrome with the attackers because we are the attackers. The stat check system in bh is being mistaken as DDOS attacks by many of the pools. BitMinerUnion moved over today because of DDOS attacks, and I'm sure it was us

c00w

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

I think I have fixed deepbit hopping to work. My changes to the scheduler were not set up correctly. On a visual front i forgot to reverse the byte order for the block number.

EDIT: These changes aren't on github yet. I'm still testing.

Clipse

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Well not sure how the digbit admin correlates chrome with attackers but here is hes explaination for chrome user-agent not working:

Code:

Yes, it only limit chrome Chrome/13.0.782.109, because attack are using this.

bb

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: muyoso on July 31, 2011, 06:44:45 PM

Quote from: djex on July 31, 2011, 06:23:53 PM

So does this mean bclc is safe to mine on now?

Yes and no.

I dont know if they are still delaying stats. If they are, you will still come out ahead on most rounds but efficiency is not going to be fantastic. If they are not delaying stats, then yes its pretty safe to mine on.

Also, the owner of the pool has not been kind to miners. I am going to mine them but constantly keep an eye on whether they are gaming stats or not.

Does anybody have new data on this? Is bclc still delaying stats?

Also, is BTC Guild still delaying stats?

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: joulesbeef on August 08, 2011, 03:05:40 PM

I have polmine on info until i work it out.. i will watch both numbers and see which is a lie when a block is found

What did you find out?

home page:
Current round start:
2011-08-08 16:26:42
Current round duration:
0 dni 7 godzin 24 minut 59 sekund
Valid round shares/total:
124 276

BH shows: 124276 6.58% and mines

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: EskimoBob on August 08, 2011, 04:51:15 PM

Quote from: organofcorti on August 08, 2011, 04:31:37 PM

...
This is not a big deal really but since jumping off at 43% has no purpose when there are more than three pools, change your jump off to say 'difficulty' might obscure you as a hopper, and not lose you coinage.

Do I understand you correctly, that if I set the Penalty below 1, I'll stay longer in that pool and actually lose nothing in the long run?

If you set it for all pools, yes. It might be easier to set the threshold to 1.0*difficulty though.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: organofcorti on August 08, 2011, 04:31:37 PM

...
This is not a big deal really but since jumping off at 43% has no purpose when there are more than three pools, change your jump off to say 'difficulty' might obscure you as a hopper, and not lose you coinage.

Do I understand you correctly, that if I set the Penalty below 1, I'll stay longer in that pool and actually lose nothing in the long run?

GenTarkin

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 1002

slush just got a new block and the hopper didnt switch over to it, its still making sure the other hoppable pools slice accounts are "caught up" =(... I want slush to take priority over those...grr

bb

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: gnaget on August 08, 2011, 04:10:26 PM

Quote

a form of proportional scoring for calculating a fair payout of your shares.

That pretty much kills it. Sounds like a score method to me

Could still mean classic proportional though.

paraipan

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1004

Firstbits: 1pirata

@organofcorti I don't really get what you're trying to say, all the graphs seem to indicate overall eff. > 1 and that's what really matters to me (liked the 4th one)

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Keninishna

hero member

Activity: 556

Merit: 500

Quote from: cirz8 on August 08, 2011, 04:18:30 PM

Quote from: bb on August 08, 2011, 03:50:15 PM

Right now the stats page seems to be fixed.
It appears that the os.curdir line is only used in the except clause?

Yes, working, missed a commit(567d172) to website.py and was only looking at that line, as that line made it work for me Embarrassed

But then again, that was why I asked for logic validation on (d736afc) to begin with, as I don't know any python, at least it turned out to be the correct syntax, just the wrong place Roll Eyes

Only programming skills I have are some faint Turbo Pascal and ANSI C memories from high school some two decades ago Tongue

python is pretty easy to pick up http://hetland.org/writing/instant-python.html at least its suppose to resemble pseudo code

cirz8

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: bb on August 08, 2011, 03:50:15 PM

Right now the stats page seems to be fixed.
It appears that the os.curdir line is only used in the except clause?

Yes, working, missed a commit(567d172) to website.py and was only looking at that line, as that line made it work for me Embarrassed

But then again, that was why I asked for logic validation on (d736afc) to begin with, as I don't know any python, at least it turned out to be the correct syntax, just the wrong place Roll Eyes

Only programming skills I have are some faint Turbo Pascal and ANSI C memories from high school some two decades ago Tongue

simonk83

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: MaGNeT on August 08, 2011, 04:09:35 PM

BTCserv.net found a block, if I'm right

Yep

gnaget

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 102

Quote

a form of proportional scoring for calculating a fair payout of your shares.

That pretty much kills it. Sounds like a score method to me

MaGNeT

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1002

Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na

BTCserv.net found a block, if I'm right

bb

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Is anyone mining mmf again?

Their website used to say:

Quote

We currently have an administration fee of 0.5% on top of the 1% (for a total of 1.5% total fees) and utilize a cheat proof scoring algorithm for calculating a fair payout of your shares.

Now it says:

Quote

We currently have an pool administration fee of 0.5% and utilize a form of proportional scoring for calculating a fair payout of your shares.

paraipan

legendary

Activity: 924

Merit: 1004

Firstbits: 1pirata

Quote from: ewibit on August 08, 2011, 03:51:07 PM

Quote from: gnaget on August 08, 2011, 03:47:19 PM

I have had it running with --startLP and mine_deepbit on both deepbit and btcguild since yesterday, and have yet to submit a single share.

the same here...

+1

ewibit

legendary

Activity: 2955

Merit: 1049

Quote from: gnaget on August 08, 2011, 03:47:19 PM

I have had it running with --startLP and mine_deepbit on both deepbit and btcguild since yesterday, and have yet to submit a single share.

the same here...

simonk83

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Hmm. For some reason, even though I have it set to mine in user.cfg, Nofeemining always starts up disabled when I restart bitHopper....

Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 52. (Read 355823 times)