if you [email protected]/stats/
you will see that there are very short rounds e.g.
2011-08-08 10:52:22 0:00:46 17295 none
2011-08-08 10:54:07 0:01:45 44326 none
is there any chance to jump in with mine_slush or is this for the reason that it is too long to recognice a new block impossible?
Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy - page 57. (Read 355678 times)
Happy to write one. Anything for a member of Team Hopper on Triplemining!
yeah when was the last time we hopped there, been a while
p.s. if your posting more chart info in the den, i'd like an invite
planning on doing an intro to hopping series there using byteHopper to illustrate points. I should have a spare invite by that point.
Happy to write one. Anything for a member of Team Hopper on Triplemining!
yeah when was the last time we hopped there, been a while
p.s. if your posting more chart info in the den, i'd like an invite
From what I can tell, any of the slicers reduce variance at the cost of payout. I'll try to write a sim mimicking it if someone can post a non code algo for me to translate.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
this is pretty interesting imo, would love to see the sim on this
Once I get enough coffee in me, i am gonna start analyzing your other charts as well
Happy to write one. Anything for a member of Team Hopper on Triplemining!
From what I can tell, any of the slicers reduce variance at the cost of payout. I'll try to write a sim mimicking it if someone can post a non code algo for me to translate.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
this is pretty interesting imo, would love to see the sim on this
Once I get enough coffee in me, i am gonna start analyzing your other charts as well
btw..some silly question..
I really like Ozco and would like to mine there when currently no other pool is good for mining..
Can I setup Ozco 2 times? One time as mine_charity and one time as backup? Is this supported??
I really like Ozco and would like to mine there when currently no other pool is good for mining..
Can I setup Ozco 2 times? One time as mine_charity and one time as backup? Is this supported??
I know you you can set a pool up multiple times, as for mine_charity + backup not sure on that combo
if you are about to use that pool, use mine_slush, cause it is using some obscure reward calculations
can you pls post an entry for pools.cfg for this pool - TIA 
I finished writing some ... things for hopping itzod, btcmp and possibly other pools with harder to reach round shares.
http://pool.itzod.ru/api.phphttp://pool.itzod.ru/apiex.php?act=getpoolstats
http://pool.itzod.ru/apiex.php?act=getuserstats&username=balthazar
if you are about to use that pool, use mine_slush, cause it is using some obscure reward calculations
funny right now how ozco is not releasing next set of stats for 10min when it's at 42%... 20min in now and counting still. Last one updated exactly at 10mins. 
EDIT: ok updated after 22mins stuck at 42% after I posted this.
EDIT: ok updated after 22mins stuck at 42% after I posted this.
btw..some silly question..
I really like Ozco and would like to mine there when currently no other pool is good for mining..
Can I setup Ozco 2 times? One time as mine_charity and one time as backup? Is this supported??
I really like Ozco and would like to mine there when currently no other pool is good for mining..
Can I setup Ozco 2 times? One time as mine_charity and one time as backup? Is this supported??
some errors
Code:
2011-08-08 13:10:15+0200 [HTTP11ClientProtocol,client] Error in pool api for itzod
2011-08-08 13:10:15+0200 [HTTP11ClientProtocol,client] "[Failure instance: Traceback:: No JSON object could be decoded\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1076:gotResult\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1063:_inlineCallbacks\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:361:callback\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:455:_startRunCallbacks\n--- ---\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:542:_runCallbacks\n/home/mgus/bitOri/pool.py:152:selectsharesResponse\n/usr/lib/python2.7/json/__init__.py:326:loads\n/usr/lib/python2.7/json/decoder.py:360:decode\n/usr/lib/python2.7/json/decoder.py:378:raw_decode\n]"
2011-08-08 13:10:16+0200 [HTTP11ClientProtocol,client] Error in pool api for digbtc
2011-08-08 13:10:16+0200 [HTTP11ClientProtocol,client] "[Failure instance: Traceback:: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1076:gotResult\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1063:_inlineCallbacks\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:361:callback\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:455:_startRunCallbacks\n--- ---\n/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:542:_runCallbacks\n/home/mgus/bitOri/pool.py:177:selectsharesResponse\n]"
Would be nice if some smart guy could take some time and write a summary about the 3 different schedulers (old, default, altslice), what they do, how they (should) work and what the pros/cons are..
Development was so fast in the last days, so many changes...I feel lost with what to set and what not..I believe others feel confused too..
We need a WIKI!
Development was so fast in the last days, so many changes...I feel lost with what to set and what not..I believe others feel confused too..
We need a WIKI!
Hmm. Ok, that's over my head, we'll have to wait for one of the smart people
I just got a massive super fast scrolly heap of errors and had to restart the client. Could be coincidence but it happened right as bclc hit 43% and I hopped away.
I just got a massive super fast scrolly heap of errors and had to restart the client. Could be coincidence but it happened right as bclc hit 43% and I hopped away.
From what I can tell, any of the slicers reduce variance at the cost of payout. I'll try to write a sim mimicking it if someone can post a non code algo for me to translate.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
I'm sticking with oldDefaultScheduler - I get around 250% on average with that which is about the max efficiency for 10 pools, normally scheduled. Perfect.
So you obviously have polmine set up and I assume ozcoin as well. Polmine shouldn't be touched right now as it's over 43% so I'm not sure why it's mining there... maybe restart bithopper.
At the moment, for me, it's cycling between ozcoin, bitcoins.lc and kiwipool. bitcoins.lc just hit 43% so it'll stop touching that in a sec.
Yes, I have polmine and a bunch of other pools.
Somehow bithopper switches but only for a short time (let's say ~2min) and then goes back to polmine for another 10min or so..
Ozco (with lowest round shares) is completely ignored (I've set it to mine_charity).
switched back to OldDefaultScheduler for the moment
I am not sure if there is an issue or if I understand the hopping method wrong but why does the actual version stick to one pool (polmine in my case) and does not switch to other pools, even if they have very few roundshares shares and much less compared to the other pools. (<43%)
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Is there a number in the "slice" column of the stats page?
No..there is no Slice count..column is empty. Efficiency stays at 0% too.
User Shares are increasing.
Ignore efficiency, you need to manually mess with that by editing the Payout figure. We'll get to that later.
So you obviously have polmine set up and I assume ozcoin as well. Polmine shouldn't be touched right now as it's over 43% so I'm not sure why it's mining there... maybe restart bithopper.
At the moment, for me, it's cycling between ozcoin, bitcoins.lc and kiwipool. bitcoins.lc just hit 43% so it'll stop touching that in a sec.
I am not sure if there is an issue or if I understand the hopping method wrong but why does the actual version stick to one pool (polmine in my case) and does not switch to other pools, even if they have very few roundshares shares and much less compared to the other pools. (<43%)
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Is there a number in the "slice" column of the stats page?
No..there is no Slice count..column is empty. Efficiency stays at 0% too.
User Shares are increasing.
Another issue I've just noticed with the slicing is that if a pool turns red for whatever reason, the slices are lost, so if you're in the middle of alternating between 2 or more pools, and one goes red, it drops out of the slice. Then when it gets picked up again it has to spend however long catching up to the other pools before they get hopped again.
Maybe try and tell it to remember the slice value it was last up to before it turned red, then add some sort of monitor so that when it's available again it resumes from where it was.
On that, it'd be really good to have a timer on api_disable as well that checks every so often if the pool API is back up. ozcoin must have had some issues earlier and by the time I got to it (a couple of hours) it was stuck on api_disable until I manually restarted it.
Maybe try and tell it to remember the slice value it was last up to before it turned red, then add some sort of monitor so that when it's available again it resumes from where it was.
On that, it'd be really good to have a timer on api_disable as well that checks every so often if the pool API is back up. ozcoin must have had some issues earlier and by the time I got to it (a couple of hours) it was stuck on api_disable until I manually restarted it.
I am not sure if there is an issue or if I understand the hopping method wrong but why does the actual version stick to one pool (polmine in my case) and does not switch to other pools, even if they have very few roundshares shares and much less compared to the other pools. (<43%)
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Tried default and AltSliceScheduler..
Is there a number in the "slice" column of the stats page?
Jump to: