Topic: Bounties are STUPID - page 36. (Read 4894 times)
indeed many people who use the account more than 2 purposes to get a lot of coins and directly sell it, it can not be prevented it, but most ico have implemented a kyc system to minimize it
Unfortunately many users who sell distribute hamburger price are distributed prizes.
I have always chosen to keep the rewards in my purse. Surely one day my face will be laughed.
When they arrive that day, they will be very sorry for the opportunity to open a hamburger shop.
I have always chosen to keep the rewards in my purse. Surely one day my face will be laughed.
When they arrive that day, they will be very sorry for the opportunity to open a hamburger shop.
bounties are useful for an ICO to make people known about it and it's one of cheapest way they have to do so.
If project is good then they will have good reviews and community will grow, so I think bounties are still useful.
If project is good then they will have good reviews and community will grow, so I think bounties are still useful.
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
So what is the way you use to marketing your ICO? use Google Ads or Facebook Ads? You must pay real money by that way, but if you pay via tokens of your ICO you will lose nothing if your ICO unsuccess. Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
I do not agree with your opinion bounty campaign is not stupid or futile this is a way of marketing a project to promote their project although the pay is small but it is very influential to attract investors to invest their project
But I don't think it is stupid. Ico owners got investors from it. Of course, Every ICO project owner gets to benefit from the bounty campaign. I asked the CEO of the AMLT Project, he told me that the AMLT got 500 Investors from the bounty campaign and they are too happy about it. Though some bounty hunters are greedy, that doesn't mean bounty programs are stupid, because I have seen many presale investors be greedy.
not all bounty share 2% for bounty i see there is also a 5% or more, not all hunters bounty use multi account there are also play honestly, i think bounty campaign is very good help promote an ico project
If the project is good, it will get good reviews from ICO trackers.
or they can pay for its review.No people will ever invest serious money in anything shilled in signature campaigns.
But they have been doing it for sometime.
although only 2% but for bounty is very large, and do you know if bounty can provide the maximum effect for sales of ico. so do not tell me if ico is a stupid thing, but with a bounty of sale can be done well.
You are very right, With a sales bounty program will be very good. Because with bounty also the project can be much in the know by the people and of course by investors. Indeed bounty is a good promotion for a project. If you say bounty stupid of course it is very wrong. The bounty program is a great choice for a sales project. 
That's funny. In return for that 2 percent and less, you get a really almost free PR company. Tell me, do you know how much it costs to make advertising? So, I think that bounty hunters themselves have the right to choose what to do with the tokens received for the bounty company. For example, I do not sell tokens immediately after their appearance on the exchange, but if someone does so, then he has his own reasons for doing so.
although only 2% but for bounty is very large, and do you know if bounty can provide the maximum effect for sales of ico. so do not tell me if ico is a stupid thing, but with a bounty of sale can be done well.
Well, when you say bounties are stupid, I would say everyone is entitled to his/her own opinnion. Bounties can be very rewarding if and only if you know the intrigues.
Bounty hunters may dump the price of that specific ICO but they play a big role on the success of your project. Its really part of the marketing strategy and I think, without those bounty hunters one ICO may have a hard time to introduce their product in the market.
The bounties used to be good deals back in 2017 during the crazy ICO days. If you got them in time and it was listed on an exchange you could make a huge profit for little work.
These days however it does nothing but hurt the project. Because usually at least 50% of those bounties are sold as soon as an exchange is open and it leads to huge price declines.
The reason they exist however is because its a very cheap way to promote the ICO, much cheaper than Google adwords or other forms of advertisement.
These days however it does nothing but hurt the project. Because usually at least 50% of those bounties are sold as soon as an exchange is open and it leads to huge price declines.
The reason they exist however is because its a very cheap way to promote the ICO, much cheaper than Google adwords or other forms of advertisement.
I think the percentage is really small, but that doesn't mean you should decide or conclude that bounties are stupid
Moreover you are not been forced to participate in bounty.
it is your decision even after reading the terms and conditions
Moreover you are not been forced to participate in bounty.
it is your decision even after reading the terms and conditions
Luckily is it people`s own free choiche if they like or they like not to paticipate on any bounty-campaign. When they do, they agreee with the amount they can get for it. Of course there are good ones and bad ones. But i don`t think that it`s fair to say that they are all stupid.
It is part of their marketing strategy to hire people that will help them spread the word. That is one of their way to advertise their product to reach people. This will attract potential investors. There are many scam ICOs, but there are still legit and have potentials in the future.
do you think bounty paid 
should you think 2% it can be said for free at share, you want 10% ?? 20% ?? how the fate of developers and investors ?? more than 70% is distributed to investors, just look at the token distribution.
should you think 2% it can be said for free at share, you want 10% ?? 20% ?? how the fate of developers and investors ?? more than 70% is distributed to investors, just look at the token distribution. 
What's the point in distributing 2% towards bounties??
Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Maybe you will never have your own coins, because you do not seem to have the imagination of how to attract investors and make decentralization projects reach the goal.Those people will flip the tokens as soon as they get them, and it's usually much less people than it looks like due to multi-account.
Also the quality of the post is very low even for hero and "legendary" members.
If I had a coin I would never ever distribute part of the tokens towards bounties; I'd see that as a kick in the nuts to legit ICO participants.
Yeah one really needs IMAGINATION to do the same fucking thing everyone else has been doing over and over again.
Projects do it because it's effectively free marketing. It costs them nothing to award tokens.
True. Costs devs nothing. Costs ICO participants a fortune.
Jump to: