Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 80. (Read 10495 times)
Yes I think there should be some regulations to sieve participants but also that doesn't mean we should shut out new participants in doing bounties, there are a lot of bounty campaign that is available only to junior members above which in my opinion already sieve out the newbies and so reward can be abundant for the few participants
Bounty is too many participants, it resulted in our income decreases and also our income is decreasing, bounty project followers are a lot.
Bounty companies just need to make a limit on the number of participants based on their budget. What would people, on average, receive at least $ 30 per week.
That is true, this I said in the first post 
.But it should be more than 30$ per week
.
Bounty campaigns just need to make a limit on the number of participants based on their budget. What would people, on average, receive at least $ 30 per week.
Hello community!
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?
Let's better give that to the bounty managers themselves or the moderators of this forum. As for me, I do not really look at the popularity of the bounty managers. I look at the specific projects. I do not even consider the manager to be the basis of my bounty participation. After all, even the most popular bounty managers have projects that are either scam or clear failure.
At the moment, this is still a big problem, since a lot of people and as a fact all will get very little for all the work that they have done and I think it's not fair
When there are too many bounty participants, it might be a good idea to use your time on one where the split of the allocated tokens is more favorable. So not only do the amount of participants matter, but what percentage is being distributed for those total participants. For example: 5% of 200K tokens being split 10000 ways is the same as 5% of 100K tokens being split between 5000 people.
Given that I see a lot of rich people choose to not drop, because they have found that make up more simple, telegraphic transfer, sets a rich and Twitter is now a lot of people are doing fine major case, and according to the richness of the highlight is that we need a direction, keep in mind the ultimate goal in order to maintain and harmful exchange and confidential strategic distance, this is very fierce.
if in a bounty there are so many participants, I think you should see the total supply first. If the total supply for bounty is large, then it's okay to stay followed. And pray just hope bounty run tight, so only really competent participants who will pass until the final stage bounty. Meanwhile, if the total supply is a little, I think it is better to just leave it and look for other bounty. Other good projects are plenty, so do not worry.
Bounties are full of scams rght now.
it is the current situation and we cannot help it the more people know about it the more the join so slowly people for bounty are increasing and the total bounty for everyone is decreasing we have to deal with it
it,s very simple day by day new people come in this forum and they participate in bounty campaign and invest in bitcoin.it,s not a miracle .slowly forum member large . so must be come bounty reward low but it is a chance for new btc talker and know for bitcoin.
well, some ppl talk about it everywhere, they making their own blogs to popularise bounties, and i dunno why, what point to cut the tree on that you are sitting, not smart at all, but anyway we cant control it, so new ppl coming, some ppl stopping or started to trade etc.
Yes, bounty campaigns are really popular, and the more participants there are, the less reward they get. However, I don't think that it's possible to choose the best of them to be rewarded because "the best" is a very abstract definition. Not everyone agrees with your understanding of "the best".
I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. That is very important in the success of the ico campaign. In other words, many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in that ico. I was one of them.
Yeah, maybe if bounty campaigns require also investment into their ICO, it could be fine for a while.
I say its a fair competition and good to be sharing with each other and the most important is we can grow the ICO and be successful ICO. So we can hold the rewards and hope for several months to give a huge return.
I think its normal because bounty are too good to be true and they could give us surprises by their rewards. Its hard to find in real world so peoples are coming to try them. Well hope that projects are getting more and more to occupy all the participants.
It's not good to join bounty at all that have unlimited participants or too many since it lessens the chance that you'll earn big, the partition may not be what it can give. Unlike before bounty is a good source since few ICO only release and no bounty abuser.
I think its normal because bounty are too good to be true and they could give us surprises by their rewards. Its hard to find in real world so peoples are coming to try them. Well hope that projects are getting more and more to occupy all the participants.
It will be very hard to control. I want to have a good rewards too. I will be very happy if there is a regulation that will give us a fair rewards. Considering that there are a lot of bounty campaign now.
I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. That is very important in the success of the ico campaign. In other words, many people join the bounty and I'm sure many of them invest in that ico. I was one of them.
Jump to: