Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 79. (Read 10495 times)
I agree too many members. and I agree that companies need to tighten some rules.
Everything goes to the point of limiting the participants in the company, on the one hand it is correct that it will be possible to get more profits. But with another it can negatively affect all companies. That just people turn their back on this if it is very difficult to get coins.
Why limit the participants? What will the project benefit from limiting the participants?
The bounty manager want more people to promote the project. How is the rewards split is not so important for the manager.
Bounty in addition to a great number of players should have a rivalry with ICO initiatives for getting add-ons. Thus, ICO challenge players need beneficial expertise in addition to they should be showcase this model within a constructive in addition to useful technique. While doing so, ICO challenge players require different thoughts which might be best for this challenge in addition to promote this progress on the challenge.
I think the more bounties the better, that means bounty campaigns succeed with more participants then more and more will know about altcoin so in my opinion that is a good thing, no need to be tightened.
Today there are so many people are participate to bounty.
In Earlier day we can earn huge profit from it. but today we can get huge profit. because of the so many paticipent join to bounty.
But some good bounty managers adding to there bounty paticipent limite.
In Earlier day we can earn huge profit from it. but today we can get huge profit. because of the so many paticipent join to bounty.
But some good bounty managers adding to there bounty paticipent limite.
Everything goes to the point of limiting the participants in the company, on the one hand it is correct that it will be possible to get more profits. But with another it can negatively affect all companies. That just people turn their back on this if it is very difficult to get coins.
Everyone can participate in tv and fb, so there are so many wishing and a small payment. In more qualified companies, such as translation, you can earn more.
That's the problem now to many participants and in some ICO's telegram groups have many members and 90 percent of them are bounty hunters which will not invest and only there for the campaign. I appreciate the initiative of some bounty managers to limit the bounty participants in order to keep the rewards high.
It is true that there are more and more participants, on the other hand there are also many more bounties. The real problem is that their duration has increased enormously, and often the participants are not rewarded, so we work for nothing.
I think they should limit the number of participants, and the grading should be more serious. I see a lot of scoring bounty alike, though there are those who do not do or leave midway!
I also think that recently the number of participants in projects has increased very much. It seems to me that this has a very strong effect on the potential profit of each participant.
I disagree with you. Sure, more people coming to participate in Bounty. If the community will continue to grow quickly in the future, Bounties will create new rules, where old participants could continue their work with a high reward, while newcomers would need to gain more experience before getting high rewards.
More and more prize hunters mean the world of crypto is widespread and the community participates. I also do not think it's a problem because too many campaigns are popping up every day.
Too many participants? I have to disagree with you, Actually, there is a bounty campaign that limits their participants. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting brands, their products.
Yes with the campaign participants who often soar automatically can reduce the results obtained later so we should be able to join as soon as possible if we want to continue to gain an advantage.
The problem is not only this. a large number of participants is not the worst. Much worse is that projects often deceive their participants. Very often people who participate in the bounty do not get anything in the end.
A large number of participants in bounty campaigns became a really big problem. I do not understand why bounty managers do not limit it to at least some adequate figures.
I think it's because they want to have the maximum effect for the campaign - more campaign participants results into more publicity. The campaign is more about the project and not the bounty hunter.
A large number of participants in bounty campaigns became a really big problem. I do not understand why bounty managers do not limit it to at least some adequate figures.
Now bounties are very popular. And many people participate in the bounty. Some managers limit the maximum number of participants and this is good.
Before participating the bounty campaigns you had better search and check the number of participants. Because the less people join , the more people get profit.
Jump to: