Topic: Bounty and too many participants - page 81. (Read 10495 times)
Nothing we can do with this no limit bounties and unlimited participants. I don't want take part in such bounties because payments are sick
I think, that we will get reward, but the Terms of getting reward and doing posts will be more difficult
This year was very successful for the number of Ico, and also for quality. And accordingly, many people want to get money for simple work.
Daily new bounty participant are increasing in the bounty campaign and it means that reward of total bounty is decreasing and earning from bounty is also decreasing. There is no solution of this problem because every body want to earn the money and no body stop to it.
You are right about that, but don't forget that the ICOs are very week the last couple of months. The market has been falling and this is pushing investors back.
Well, bounty regulation only comes into effect once ICO market gets regulated. And the regulation differs from country to country. This is quite a difficult thing.
It’s kind of weird but this forum is just getting crowded day by day and it seems like many people are here because they wanna join bounty campaigns. Actually i can’t blame them...
Yes I agree more bounty participants less profit,but it is OK so that everyone can join and earn money.I don't want the managers to strict the campaigns to be able to paticipate all who wants.
It was inevitable. People participated in bounty campaigns throughout 2017. Then everyone was told about their earnings on each forum or youtube. You need to be silent if you have a good income. But most people do not understand this. Competition will grow more and more. I think by the end of the year to participate in bounty campaigns(twitter/facebook) will become unprofitable. As it became with the mining of bitcoins on the portable PC a few years ago.
I, too, think, and start to regret. I told some people about this activity. These conversations expanded and brought new competitors And now we see bad conditions for the Bounty campaign participants. I agree. It's going to get much harder to earn money by hunting bounties. I think we won't be able to make great profits from facebook and twitter bounties. The bounty managers have to set more strict rules on these campaigns
This is not what bounty campaigns are about.The main goal is to get their tokens or alt coins into the hands of people and this is the entire reason of having them in the first place.
Now why would the ones holding these bounty campaigns want the participants to get rich from them in just collecting their tokens and selling them off all at once when they get listed on the exchanges?
This would cripple the project if they were an honest one to begin with.
And it is true. Not too many solid projects around that are only around to make the funds they intended to and just run. Not fulfill the goals they put out to the customers at the beginning most of the time.
It was inevitable. People participated in bounty campaigns throughout 2017. Then everyone was told about their earnings on each forum or youtube. You need to be silent if you have a good income. But most people do not understand this. Competition will grow more and more. I think by the end of the year to participate in bounty campaigns(twitter/facebook) will become unprofitable. As it became with the mining of bitcoins on the portable PC a few years ago.
I agree. It's going to get much harder to earn money by hunting bounties. I think we won't be able to make great profits from facebook and twitter bounties. The bounty managers have to set more strict rules on these campaigns
Most likely, the course of bounty campaigns will be aimed at improving the quality of content. Already now I see campaigns that allocate part of the bounty (video, articles, etc.) to the content that is comparable with the signature signature campaign. Perhaps this course will positively affect the bounty of the campaign and significantly increase their effectiveness.
In fact, the problem now is not that too many people participate in the bounty. The problem is that very many projects are fraudulent.
Nobody wants to waste their time on such projects.
Nobody wants to waste their time on such projects.
In my opinion I think all ICo's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICo its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.
I think the best option would be to set limits on the number of participants. Then the bounty would bring a good profit. When there are more than 1000 people participating in one bounty campaign, then the profit will be small.
I like the way Bountyhive manages the participants. Their way makes it more transparent whih part of the bounty is shared for each tier.
I think you are wrong, the more participants there are, the more bounty pools will be, at the same time, more interesting projects will be interested in promoting their ico with the help of bounty for this. It seems to me that at the moment everything is moving in the right direction, though the only problem is the icos scam.
Personally, I try not to join the company where there are a large number of participants, since the originally promised fee will be distributed among the participants, I prefer a more complicated bounty and a smaller number of people.
Bounties evolve. Now we see an increased number of both ICO and participants of the bounties. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. All that we can do now is to act properly, thus not being subjected to natural selection.
Daily new bounty participant are increasing in the bounty campaign and it means that reward of total bounty is decreasing and earning from bounty is also decreasing. There is no solution of this problem because every body want to earn the money and no body stop to it.
Jump to: