Topic: Bounty hunters killed ICO? - page 11. (Read 7058 times)
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
I don't see any reason either why bounty hunters will be the one who killed an ICO if the project team involving are up to the task and well experienced but if we still have a situation where some people still believe the bounty hunters are the causes then I will advice project owners to pay their bounty participants in ETH rather than paying them in their token to avoid future misconception.
You right but you must also know bounty hunter not ICO killer. True fact is when those ICO project have strong team and great plan even hunter have so many token in their hand it will not dumper their price dramatically. As i know even price going down because hunter selling their token if their project good enough price will going up by natural demand.
You are right. If the development team has a good strategy and plan, they can certainly anticipate a price reduction. Not just blaming bounty hunters. In addition, many ICO projects are scams that reduce investor confidence in ICOs. That is why IEO tends to be more popular because the existing tokens or coins are ready on the market.
Bounty Hunters are part of contributing factor to the downfall of ICO but not the main reason behind the downfall. Yes most Bounty Hunters because they are rewarded fast go to dump the token affecting the price crash but we should also remember that some Bounty Hunters are investors too. Some ICO's will never make it to the exchange thereby ripping the investors their money and even wasting Hunters strength and time because nothing is free. Let's not put the whole blame on Bounty Hunters for ICO downfalls
actually I find that ICOs desperately need bounty hunters because they help promote those ICOs as well as attract more investors. So the bounty hunters didn't kill ICOs, but the ICOs killed themselves. Especially those who create ICOs to scam that makes people lose confidence in ICOs and investors don't want to lose their money when investing in scam ICOs
completely agree with you. bounty hunters for ICO is like air for people. bounty hunters advertise projects around the world. rather than individual regions or countries as TV or newspapers do
actually I find that ICOs desperately need bounty hunters because they help promote those ICOs as well as attract more investors. So the bounty hunters didn't kill ICOs, but the ICOs killed themselves. Especially those who create ICOs to scam that makes people lose confidence in ICOs and investors don't want to lose their money when investing in scam ICOs
we are always blamed for dumping. but if you think about the rations for the bounty hunters only a little. if we can blame it, of course they hold most of the funds and resilience should not be affected by the sale of rewards by bounty hunters
Didn't I explain above that why bounty hunters are always blamed if dumping occurs."bounty hunters only accept a very small number of tokens, even the distribution of tokens for bounty hunters is often deducted from the promised allocations, then some distribution projects are carried out in several phases, and some of them are locked on our wallets"
then what do you quote from the statement that I made before??
Bounty hunters are not responsible for the death of any ICO projects,the reason why bounty hunters are needed is to create awareness for ICO projects and without awareness the ICO project might perform worse and it might be hard to reach their softcap target and if bounty hunters decide to sell their share of token from promoting ICO projects it really shouldnt affect the project if the ICO project is good enough.
bounty hunters actually help projects to spreaded to new investors in market.if any word bounty hunter killed ico its totally wrong in my opinion.they totally help projects in crowdfunding that used to developt their projects.so could deliver good products.
Not all like that. You know sometimes we find project with so many bounty hunter who's joined until the end but they just spread the word with low quality. In that case quality is number 1. Good quality and quantity will the best. A week ago im joined bounty and Dev team said they not really impressed with our works. That way im mentioned about quality and quantity.
You right but you must also know bounty hunter not ICO killer. True fact is when those ICO project have strong team and great plan even hunter have so many token in their hand it will not dumper their price dramatically. As i know even price going down because hunter selling their token if their project good enough price will going up by natural demand.
bounty hunters actually help projects to spreaded to new investors in market.if any word bounty hunter killed ico its totally wrong in my opinion.they totally help projects in crowdfunding that used to developt their projects.so could deliver good products.
Your points are really valid, but it is not just the bounty hunters to blame. Lack of business tactics and strategies displayed from the ICO is the main reason in the downfall of an ICO. They don’t know how to handle the coin in the market and eventually end up distributing the coin at a very early stage, causing the investors to dump the coin.
distributing coins without locking periode will make it easy to dumped holders in market.unexperienced team will do this to make their investors happy, but its dillema when it listed to market.moreover if bounty hunter directly sell their reward, price will drop alot and influenced to investors psychology. 
Your points are really valid, but it is not just the bounty hunters to blame. Lack of business tactics and strategies displayed from the ICO is the main reason in the downfall of an ICO. They don’t know how to handle the coin in the market and eventually end up distributing the coin at a very early stage, causing the investors to dump the coin.
It seems very wrong to blame prize hunters for causing the reduction in token prices after being listed on the market, we know that the ICO project allocates funds to bounty hunters just a fraction of the percentage of their funds, so, it is unlikely that tokens obtained by bounty participants can affect the decline in the price of the token that is there is in the market.
Bounty hunters do everything to support and PR the project and its tokens. ICOs were killed by a lot of scammers. I can say that the committed suicide, although did not want to do it. Finally, fraudsters are always opened. It happened with dishonest ICOs. Unfortunately, they made everything to ruin very good and honest projects, and they succeed in it.
To clear out your heading,I just want to tell something. First of all, bounty hunters actually do marketing for the project which can help to get more participants as investor for fund raising. There has almost low percentage to pay them if there has not limited or heavy participants. Actually it happened several times which I have seen in my bounty life.
However,some time bounty hunter got a huge amount of token and they normally not hold and then the price drop because they sell at low price. But I think it is not the only reason to kill ICO system
However,some time bounty hunter got a huge amount of token and they normally not hold and then the price drop because they sell at low price. But I think it is not the only reason to kill ICO system
I respectfully disagree, the percentage allocated to bounty campaigns most times is not enough to influence the price of a project, in fact, i think ico or project owners are hiding behind the excuse of bounty to dump their own price, who are this private investors? have you seen the outrageous bonus given to private investors, they could afford to sell for less without feeling it, they are the real ico killers not hunters.
In the current situation, there is a sluggishness in almost all new projects that run ICO, because most of them run only with the aim of profit for a short time to develop the project. what is certain is that many investors are now watching and are not in a hurry to put their capital in a new ICO, so the influence is quite large.
no, i don't agree with you,,
because the fact an ICO project need bounty hunters to spread the word about the project itself my friend
and not all bounty hunters will dump their rewards after the project listed on exchange mate
because the fact an ICO project need bounty hunters to spread the word about the project itself my friend
and not all bounty hunters will dump their rewards after the project listed on exchange mate
A lot of scam/dead projects killed ICO, not bounty
1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
I think its true the initial price of the token falling down but Bounty hunters always promotes a project and help to raise the funds .So it could be better to come out with a good plan to restrict the hunter to sell the initially .Hopefully it will helps to success the project. 2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
Bounty hunters have helped the ICO to more easily get investors. Bounty hunters work hard to promote the ICO and of course, they also expect Token payouts. Bounty hunters sometimes also become investors so I guess they don't kill the ICO.
Jump to: