Topic: Bounty hunters killed ICO? - page 14. (Read 7092 times)
This has become the fall back lies that most project dev tell their investors now. It is laughable that same project dev allocate the same amount to bounty campaign. Are they telling us they don't know what they are doing. From experience, many project that do not have existing products or services that propels demand for the token before being listed on exchange will result in price dump because nobody will buy token that do not have use.
I will start by asking how many percentage of the token is allocated to bounty hunters, some as low as 2%, I think maximum I have seen is 5%. Now tell me how that will affect a project. Most at times even before the tokens are distributed to hunters, the price already dipped. So I don't believe that hunters killed ICO
ICO project before distributing tokens to bounty hunters and airdroppers, they should make sure that there is enough liquidity for the token to prevent it from dumping so early.
I myself am a member of the bounty and I can say that I personally saw how early investors and funds dumped the price of tokens. You ask how I found out? Everything is very simple. Tokens of the bounty participants were specially blocked, and distributed to early investors and funds, as a result, the price went down sharply. If you remove this fact and look at the number of tokens that is allocated to the bounty, then this is a very small part, which can in no way affect the price. Therefore, all the accusations against the participants of the bounty are not substantive and are created just to hide the fact of the drain of tokens by early investors and funds.
I'm not in agreement with the idea that bounty hunters killed ICO. I think the group that should be mentioned for causing more havoc are the scammers and extortioners. Bounty hunters are only contributing to the well being of projects and don't participate in her downfall.
99% from all respondents here are bounty guys (according to signatures) 
I don't think bounty hunters kill ICO just because they dump the price? what about investors that gives so much bonus like 30% - 50%, I think maybe that's the reason why the price is dumping, but I believe if their project is unique and has potential then we do not need to worry it will increase the price for sure.
Agree, the ICO's death does not involve bounty hunters because they are just people who want to receive money from others then work, their contributions and influences only help the project spread, even increase the chance for ICO to complete, they do not harm ICO when it is not in their favor. The one who killed the ICO is probably the developers, the scammers, and a bit related to investors, they contributed largely to the failures, pushing the project to the dead zone, too many scams, garbage and no investors, ICO died like that 1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
It's not true that bounty hunters killed ICO. There are other things that cause ICO to be abandoned. Bounty hunters are only workers who expect rewads when the project is successful. 2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
what you say is true but I don't think the prize hunter is blamed for the death of the ICO token price, now if we think who holds the most tokens ??
Regardless of what is written in the white paper about the allocation of tokens, bounty hunters still should not be blame.
As long as the team is transparent, investors are already expected that they have read everything including bounty allocation before they invested their hard earned money, and when the price dump, they should accept that and just don't think it's the end of the project or it will not recover anymore.
Bounty hunters are also smart, they understand the market situation and though they have the minds of an investor but they don't usually look for long term investment, so if they get something that would satisfy their hard work, they'll dump, there's nothing we can do about it.
As long as the team is transparent, investors are already expected that they have read everything including bounty allocation before they invested their hard earned money, and when the price dump, they should accept that and just don't think it's the end of the project or it will not recover anymore.
Bounty hunters are also smart, they understand the market situation and though they have the minds of an investor but they don't usually look for long term investment, so if they get something that would satisfy their hard work, they'll dump, there's nothing we can do about it.
1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
False.And let me tell you why.
While some ICOs might be affected by Bounty Hunters dumping their tokens, number is so little that is insignificant really.First of all, not all bounty hunters dump their tokens, some are even hodlers, but also, bounty pool is rarely big enough to make such a huge impact on the price.
On the other hand, what really killed ICOs is the fact that 99% of all ICOs were bad projects with sole purpose of raising millions of dollars while giving huge bonuses in private sales, and then those private investors who got 200%-300% bonuses ( and the team itself) dumping tokens while small investors becoming bag holders, and loosing money.And now enough of those small investors lost enough amount of money to kill ICO market.
But yeah, it is easier to blame Bounty Hunters instead greedy teams and private investors that actually caused dumping in the first place.
bounty hunters have a very small share of tokens from projects and they do not affect the price of tokens very much. ICO is killed by the creators of the projects themselves, who raise funds but the project does not implement and most often disappear with the money.
Bounty hunters are not responsible for the death of any ICO or IEO,the blame is all on Developers and project teams,they need bounty hunters to create more awareness for their projects so they must have consider the cost too,with the whole max supply bounty hunters are only been shared 2% to 4% of the token max supply and if dump happens it shouldnt affect the value of the remaining 98 or 96 %
It is just that simpler. investors blame the bounty hunters and the team also begins to blame the bounty hunters to relieve themselves. no one likes to admit their mistakes
Bounty hunters are not responsible for the death of any ICO or IEO,the blame is all on Developers and project teams,they need bounty hunters to create more awareness for their projects so they must have consider the cost too,with the whole max supply bounty hunters are only been shared 2% to 4% of the token max supply and if dump happens it shouldnt affect the value of the remaining 98 or 96 %
Most of the blames are in the bounty hunters because when the distribution is finish for the bounties and the project is listed on the exchane bounty dumpers are soaring surely but its the project fault not us. If they want to make the project stay successful they need to locked the tokens in couple of month just to make sure that the price is still stable when the dumpers came up
Bounty hunters are always want to get paid because of their hardwork but i don't believe that they should be the one to be blame if the price of that certain coin will drop after the unlock because I have observed for many times that even the bounty token was not release yet but the price is already falling down of up to 80% therefore i believe that the investors are the one who do the early dumping as they receive a huge bonuses during ICO sales.
I think the bounty hunter does not kill the ICO. And that opinion will surely make a lot of bounty hunters who think that the wrong opinion. As the bounty hunters, they get only a fraction of the allocated funds are given. Every ICO should have a good developer and a large community. So the project can continue to evolve and if there is a dump of course not blame the bounty hunter.
Very wrong assumptions, Why are most project dumps always attributed to bounty hunters forgetting that the developers and private investors who got these tokens cheap equally hold the larger part of the distribution
Yes, even i don't know why most of the companies will blame the bounties if they don't want to run the bounty campaign better manage yourself and convince the investors to collect the money. Out of huge supply, companies will allocate only 2% to bounty hunters, what about the Team %, Investors %, Advisor % etc.
I don't think bounty hunters kill ICO just because they dump the price? what about investors that gives so much bonus like 30% - 50%, I think maybe that's the reason why the price is dumping, but I believe if their project is unique and has potential then we do not need to worry it will increase the price for sure.
That might be the reason why some of the bounties I joined like in 2018 is still on the stage where they are still trying to sell their tokens and they mentioned that the release of the token to exchanges will happen as soon as they have achived the amount they need in their ICO. Anyway I would keep their token and continue to wait for them to announce more on their plans for the future.
Jump to: