FALSE.
We all know that hunters can and impact token price but this is true only in low liquidity markets.
And liquidity comes form secondary investors and traders.
I see that ICOs where like a wheel, those investors who got huge ROIs from the first bubble ICOs continued to invest because it was too easy in the first time, they reinvested till they made a decision to stop losing money. The made money was lost and investors lost, new investors are very hard to come by.
Topic: Bounty hunters killed ICO? - page 16. (Read 7058 times)
It's a bit dubious remark mate. I also thought that bountyhunters could really make a difference by dumping.
But a lot of projects have a pool of %1-2 shares of advertisers and not all of them are dumping so that's a drop in the ocean.
If the project is solid this is a good way to increase a deposit.
But a lot of projects have a pool of %1-2 shares of advertisers and not all of them are dumping so that's a drop in the ocean.
If the project is solid this is a good way to increase a deposit.
By the way, unless you do marketmaking, token will go definetely down.
we cannot say that all ICOs failed, many ICO projects were successful, and bounty hunters were also involved, ico's failure was not by bounty hunters, the failure of an ICO was caused by a management team that was unable to see opportunities and problems in ico, like they don't predict when it's time to register on the exchange, usually the bounty project is late for listing, they wait for stability so they lose the opportunity to fight to increase prices, and they don't dare to spend the budget to be listed in exchange which is really good.
Scammers killed ICO.
How many ICO's don't paid nothing for bounty ?
How many ICO's don't paid nothing for bounty ?
I think that the biggest dumpers are teams of ICOs. They raise money from token sale, but that is not enough, they want to sell their tokens (30-50% from all existing tokens). WHile bounty hunters have only 2-3% from the total supply. So how can they cause a dump?
Yes, you are right. The main reason for the price drop is from their team. They even extend the time token sales with a bonus of 50%. I wonder. Why are they so enthusiastic to sell out their tokens at such a big discount. In fact, after that, they can not be listed on big exchanges.Fair enoght. Team's working almost 24/7 and when ICO is over everyone (or not) wants to split his/her part. Bad or good, but we can understand them. However they usually take BTC and fiat but hold tokens. At least as far as I'm aware. They lock the tokens.
I think that the biggest dumpers are teams of ICOs. They raise money from token sale, but that is not enough, they want to sell their tokens (30-50% from all existing tokens). WHile bounty hunters have only 2-3% from the total supply. So how can they cause a dump?
Yes, you are right. The main reason for the price drop is from their team. They even extend the time token sales with a bonus of 50%. I wonder. Why are they so enthusiastic to sell out their tokens at such a big discount. In fact, after that, they can not be listed on big exchanges. 
I think that the biggest dumpers are teams of ICOs. They raise money from token sale, but that is not enough, they want to sell their tokens (30-50% from all existing tokens). WHile bounty hunters have only 2-3% from the total supply. So how can they cause a dump?
A lot of people like to blame bounty hunters which is not good enough
Presale investors buy at a massive bonus of over 30%
Where as over 5,000 bounty hunters share just 5% of all total supply.
Ico are killed by project devs themselves and their investors.
Any lack of developments on the token leads to investors with so many bonuses to dump and move on while still in profit
Presale investors buy at a massive bonus of over 30%
Where as over 5,000 bounty hunters share just 5% of all total supply.
Ico are killed by project devs themselves and their investors.
Any lack of developments on the token leads to investors with so many bonuses to dump and move on while still in profit
Bounty hunter is a part of supporting the development of projects in the field of promotion to increase fundraising when ICO, bounty allocation is determined by the team and controlled so it does not go down dramatically, many of the best ICOs have passed the bounty hunter distribution without the constraints of dramatic price reduction
1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
I could say that you got the wrong perception when you think that bounty hunters kill ICO. Bounty allocations is so small that even when dump on the exchange it won't matter. The real reason why token's price dropped is the investors who bought millions of tokens from ICO which were cheap plus a big discounts. They are the ones that can afford to dump. 2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
I do not think bounty hunters are main responsible for dumping price of coins. They get a small amount of bounty allocation. Moreover, not all bounty hunters are in hurry to sell off their bounty tokens. I think other factors like selling coins at a discount of over 70 percent during ICO are more responsible.
I don't think bounty hunters have had a lot of impact on some projects.
Many projects are dead because they do not have true investors. They didn't convince those investors to hold or that it didn't have the potential to live on.
bounty hunters are even paid very little and don't affect the price of tokens much.
Many projects are dead because they do not have true investors. They didn't convince those investors to hold or that it didn't have the potential to live on.
bounty hunters are even paid very little and don't affect the price of tokens much.
1) a project collected funds,
2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
Even if we have millions of bounty hunters its not an accuse that project token drop in price because bounty hunters dump token,thats why we have many bounties using fixed allocation instead of stake allocation and using fixed allocation the bounty participants will be limited 2) Funds allocation (among advisors, bla bla bla and bounty hunters)
3) Considering there are thousands of BH, the price of a token dropped dramatically
4) Investors bought token on ICO see this crap and less people invest in ICOs.
True or False?
...
True or False?
True or False?
False. Bounty hunters cannot influence prices. They do not have such a volume of coins to manipulate the market. When you hear accusations against bounty hunters of a collapse in prices - this is a lie.
Nice avatar
I did not count, but I think so far 99% is False
...
True or False?
True or False?
False. Bounty hunters cannot influence prices. They do not have such a volume of coins to manipulate the market. When you hear accusations against bounty hunters of a collapse in prices - this is a lie.
I totally disagree with the topic, bounty hunters didn't kill ICO. The major issue for most ICO projects was the issue of scam. Many ICOs were outright scam hence you don't expect such to progress since investors became very skeptical. Also lack of strategy contributed to the fall of ICOs, some team members after token sale will be chasing free listing without using funds raised to list on a decent exchange. Most likely when they list on exchanges with low daily volume, the price of the coin is bound to drop drastically since there will be few buy orders.
You are wrong to have said that. In the first place, without bounty hunters, I doubt if a project can be seen or known. Hence, by so doing, they get paid. Every bounty hunter is also an investor!. A project that must stand will stand!
yes that's right, only fundraising is done by development not advisors. so when there are members of the development team who are not honest they often carry away project funds that have been collected to be used in the project development process. and mostly because that is the reason for investors to leave the ICO program and switch to IEO.
Jump to: