Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 34. (Read 4570 times)

In my opinion, if in some ICO bounty hunters would be paid in ETH or some other altcoin implicitly means that developers doesn't believe in their own token and project itself. And this is very strange, especially when token is claimed to be better than ETH)

I actually enjoy to be paid in different type of coins as I keep learning different things from every other coin released. But in my opinion ethereum should be added as payment option for security people may choose..

I do not think every bounty hunter can be paid with ETH. However, any project done must be paid with the appropriate coin of the project. It can also help to market and increase the price of the coin I think.

In my own opinion, I think that bounty hunters have the option to be paid in ETH or either ETH worth of that specific coin. Also, I think it is great to receive the project's token as a sign of support for their project

in my opinion most likely for the investors is very good, because many people think, when bounty participants already paid, then the price is more likely to go down. if paid with eth, in my opinion would not be possible, because the new altcoin ico type, and their purpose can be traded their coins in the market.

In my own opinion, I think they cannot do to pay an Ethereum for those bounty participants because mostly they pay tokens to make easily to send and some are not agree to pay an eth. Be grateful and thankful even if it is tokens or eth they pay because some are not paying the participants which is not fair.

It can be better to pay with an already exist coins like ethereum or bitcoin and the payment is weekly instead of paying on undefined time as I can read from some threads. Too many ICO changed their rules regarding bounty and the most sad thing is, they ignored the hunters.

depending on the ico project if eth is paid to bounty participants and knows that there are so few that bounty eth is the fee for most of those who are altcoin but I'm ok with eth because the price is not falling down especially now high the eth price is not the same as the altcoin when the price is lowered

this is inexpedient and in the first place is not beneficial to the participant of the bounty.At first-To increase your profits you will need to wait for the increase in the rate of ETH.and if you get project tokens that shows growth-your profit will increase.It is more advantageous for a member of the bounty to receive tokens than ETH

If this were possible, I would probably be very happy, because the project tokens I participated in will be able to be released only after 6 months, so all my efforts as a whole can be rewarded only after 6 months, it's very long.

Last past day i disagre about paying eth instead of token. But now my mind has changed it will be good if they pay bounty in ethereum. Because there are many uco that didnt give there reward just like what i experience on bezop.

LOL this statement is to selfish and not think about the project ICO and teams itself.
If the project is success, the tokens that bounty hunters get will be much more than if the bounty hunters get paid by eth.
But if the project fail ? how the ICO team project pays the bounty hunters ?

The team assumes you believe the project's potential if you join the campaign which means you are hoping for the profit when  the development of the project continues and the product continues to attract investors. Think of yourself as part of the team and you as marketing personnel as you have been promoting their project.

The team will still prefer to pay in tokens as well because by that they can use the funds to buy back the cheaper tokens being dumped by the hunters.

I think i would like to answer that question in two opinion of mine.

1)            On the off chance that nobody will utilize the Crypto-cash, its esteem will be zero, and its fame will be low. The primary motivation behind the abundance is to promote the task. It is essential to pay abundance individuals, their tokens, for work. Members of the abundance will exchange, mining, trade these tokens. This is critical from the perspective of the improvement of the undertaking and the advancement of the venture. The more tokens fall into various hands, the more troublesome it is to control the market.

And the other is

2)             I concur halfway however I figure it should going to be paid down the middle in Ethereum or Bitcoin and half of the token. Paying bounties with their tokens decreases the speculators certainty to buy in their ICO. This outcomes to lesser ICO gathered turnout sooner or later. I as of now getting paid not as much as what I have done. There's this one social and article abundance I have participated. I spent a day composing a decent article for them. My article got affirmed and been paid with $10 at a token valuation after their ICO. While I make $30 a day in the event that I do other independent expert work other than composing. There's a colossal come up short on the Issue there. In addition the token been exchanged lower than it's ICO cost. That is lamentable.

No, i don't think so.
What's the sense of the bounty? Marketing about this.
I participate in a bounty-campaign only when i'm convince of the project.
Otherwise it is no good marketing.

This would definitely mean less risk for bounty hunters, but I doubt that projects would be prepared to pay in ETH as most of them wouldn't have this kind of capital to spare (creating tokens is basically free, giving out ETH is not).

I think ICO pays bounty participants with their tokens that have a purpose. in order for participants to participate in their token market. so if ICO pays bounty participants with ETH then the participant may not participate in token trade.

One of the main purpose of bounty campaigns is promotion of the product (coin or token). The hunters help to promote the product using the various social media platforms. The product owner does what will benefit him most having considerd certain factors. Using the token to pay is a way of promoting the coin. It enables the tokens to be distributed to a wide range of the community and thereby encourage its utilization. Thus achieving widespread adoption.  However, those that purchased a sizable quantity of product may like to exchange the tokens for fiat or other currency immediately after ICO leading to  massive  sale which may lead to price drop of the token. The project team may have weighed these options to arrive at a decision. It will benefit the bounty participants to be paid in ETH, but, all depends on the amount, of ETH to be paid to the participants. In all, the product owners have an edge in terms of deciding the method of payment. The target is to achieve a win-win for all participants on the project.However, It will be commendable if the project offers an option for payment.

that's right, the project will be dead at the very first day of its circulation in the market, bounty hunters are the one who has the big effect on the price of the newly created altcoin in the market.

it is good to have an eth reward but how would they  used their tokens if they distributed eth? how can their project be successful when no one is holding their tokens. if bounty hunters will receive eth i think they wouldn't buy tokens that  they are promoting. because some of the ICO today's are scam. To have and ethereum reward is a sure profit to a bounty hunters  rather than having tokens, you need to sell it when it will be available in any exchange and for ethereum its already in exchanges.