Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 38. (Read 4586 times)
They should be in WeLocal Bounty
bounty hunter is not the problem 
. I don't think token price dumped not only because of bounty hunter. I think you also know about Credits bounty campaign . You can take a look at CS token price at the moment to see if it's dumped or pumped. Of course bounty hunter also affect to the price of token but if the project behind the token is really good, people will keep buying and pumping it.
. I don't think token price dumped not only because of bounty hunter. I think you also know about Credits bounty campaign . You can take a look at CS token price at the moment to see if it's dumped or pumped. Of course bounty hunter also affect to the price of token but if the project behind the token is really good, people will keep buying and pumping it. Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
i dont think this will ever happen.. and i dont support this either.. id rather have tokens.. than ethereum what are we suppose to get 0.2eth for 4 to 5 months work? 1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I somewhat agree with this idea. I considered that it was better to be paid in new released tokens because speculative nature can make great profits. But I know think ethereum is safer to go..
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Not every bounty hunters do really like to earn ethereum and some of them are just working in order to earn the ico tokens because some of the ico's platform today is really good for long term investment if the platform is successful.
Yes, but it's not the idea of the ICO. Initially, your reward is to be a part of the project. Besides, some projects are promising to become the Ethereum competitior, so I personally as a bounty hunter strive to get their tokens.
Good suggestion of the month! I agree with you that bounty hunters should be paid in ETH and not in tokens. Some bounty hunters realize (after so much stress campaigning for a project) that the token is worthless when listed in the exchange. But when effort is being compensated with ETH, we have nothing to worry about.
It is a great suggestion... but I really doubt whether the ICO promoters would be willing to pay 0.5% to 1% of their revenues to the bounty hunters. I am sure that 90% of them will oppose this move.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
im sure you're the bounty hunter's that Hit and Run only, no doubt
look dude, every project has the potential to be great and even greater than being paid with ETH, then if the bounty hunters paid with ETH what is the function of the token, the goal of the project is that they hope of the project will growth more and not just getting their promotors run away hold their money
It's nice to hear that, but I still think that this can not be easy, for one simple reason, if it were possible, then bounty hunters would not be needed, I think that this will be a definite incentive for many companies that would and engaged.
I like your offer. That's only the developers of ICO projects do not want to share the currency, but they want to give you their own candy wrappers, which in 80% of cases are worthless, because the project is a scam.
Bounty is a complex form of promotion, projects promote their platforms through bounty campaigns and it is only ideal to pay bounty hunters with their utility tokens for the same reason projects organize airdrops. Which is in order to get their tokens out and give it a wider reach.
Also a lot of people don't have money to participate in ICOs so bounty is a very good way to get those tokens.
Take example projects like Credits, Nucleus.Vision or BABB whose tokens increased in value after ICO. Would I rather be paid in ETH? NO.
Also a lot of people don't have money to participate in ICOs so bounty is a very good way to get those tokens.
Take example projects like Credits, Nucleus.Vision or BABB whose tokens increased in value after ICO. Would I rather be paid in ETH? NO.
Most ICOs pay their own tokens to participate in bounties, as they want to promote their own tokens. Most of the time when these tokens are listed on exchanges their price drops sharply. It is very frustrating for all those who have participated in bounties. So, it would be better for bounty participants if they are paid in Eth.
I've also met several projects paying an award in ETH or BTC, but this is more of an exception. It seems to me that the project can take such a step if they are confident in the imminent increase in the value of their tokens and it is more profitable for them to pay the award in another currency.
This is a superb suggestion. I will donate Merit points for you. It has been frustrating to participate in the bounty campaigns here, as in most cases we are getting worthless tokens which can't be used for any purpose. At least a part of the reward should be in ETH.
Yes it will be good for bounty hunters to be paid in eth but the thing is that most ICO token doesn't equal to eth and most of them only increases when they are being listed. So it's good but somehow risky for the management of the ICO.
Yes it would be best for bounty hunters to be paid in Ethereum but it would probably be a hassle for them and the coins or tokens of the campaign would not be circulated if these hunters would not be given tokens so I think that is one of the reasons why they are giving out their coins/tokens than in Ethereum coin.
You want to be paid in ETH, while that would be good I just want 100% of campaigns to pay out. That would be a much better first step, rather than requesting all ETH payouts. Let's first rid the area of scam campaigns and scam coins then we can focus on the next step which is ETH payments.
I totally agree. I still wondering whether I'm going to get my bounty, its even a bigger concern for me because I do spend a lot of time on bounty. If we could get rid of the scam campaigns and scam coins than I would be ecstatic; and then probably trade it with ETH anyway. So yeah, baby steps- first thing first: get rid of the scammers.
Usually for bounty hunters will be better to receive a reward in ETH. But I'm not sure that the company will be profitable. The more people have this token, the more popular are the company and the coin.
yes, I really agree if a bounty is paid with ETH, although there are already some ICOs paying bounty with BTC (signature campaign only), I think this is a good suggestion.
and indeed the bounty hunter has damaged the market price after they are paid
and indeed the bounty hunter has damaged the market price after they are paid
Jump to: