Topic: Bounty hunters should be paid in ETH - page 37. (Read 4570 times)
Well that is difficult to atttain because the ICO promoter or CEO want their tokens to be utilized. Paying bounty hunters with eth would be an ideal yet this is not the good way on making deal with those greed CEO promoting their project. The best way to get more promising reward even if we were intended to get their tokens is to regulate those ICO. People around promoting the ICO should be transparent and that includes their real identity. ICO that are implementing in this forum should also be regulated from the admin of the forum so as to avoid scam ICO's. This ICO's should be filtered. There are too many ICO.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
There are a lot of bounty hunters who are struggling on selling their tokens because it was dumping after the end of campaign since everyone is selling their coin immediately, well i hope that in the future they will be paying their participants an ethereum immediately.
I'm confused, will paying them bounty hunters in ETH don't have any impact in the ICO project or the coin afterwards?
Cause sending them the tokens will in a way promote the project and the coin.
Anyway, it is then becoming of a trend when some hunters receive their tokens they dump it afterwards. They should learn to hold it and see more profits after a while.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
There are a lot of bounty hunters who are struggling on selling their tokens because it was dumping after the end of campaign since everyone is selling their coin immediately, well i hope that in the future they will be paying their participants an ethereum immediately.
It will be greate! Now 70% of ICO is scam. And bounty hunters take a lot of bountyes because 70% of them - no give money. I think most of hunters agree work better in 1-3 projects, but have pay in ETH, when in 10-20 project whith pay in tokens what price is nothing ))
Well I feel this depends on individual, most bounty hunters are long term investors in most crypto projects so they would prefer to be paid in the tokens believing that soon the price value will exceed that of ether while some just need the cash for their campaign (these are the people that will prefer Eth)
Even I am a bounty hunter, and I would never prefer tokens over ETH under current circumstances. Nowadays in more than 95% of the cases, the bounty campaigns are giving out tokens which are worth nothing. All the effort put by the bounty hunters is going in waste.
Well I feel this depends on individual, most bounty hunters are long term investors in most crypto projects so they would prefer to be paid in the tokens believing that soon the price value will exceed that of ether while some just need the cash for their campaign (these are the people that will prefer Eth)
The eth money you are taking about is the investors money, because investors contributed the eth and the ICO shouldn't use it for any other thing other than the project development, So paying bounty hunters in eth won't make sense, they should pay in their own tokens.
I don't think paying ETH is a better choice.
Because most of the time if I participate in this golden thread, it means that I am optimistic about this ICO project, so I prefer to get the token, not ETH.
Because most of the time if I participate in this golden thread, it means that I am optimistic about this ICO project, so I prefer to get the token, not ETH.
I think you are so right.
In my opinion, the bounty hunters should always do their researches about the campaigns and the new tokens well, and they should join the campaigns which they were found promising.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
I dont think that will happen.
We bounty hunters are not on the right position to make such amends like this.
First of all, they will posts the rules of what the bounty should be and you will just have to live with that.
You can ignore them if you want but you will never find such bounty that will pay you in ETH.
Besides, they want their own tokens to be spread and be on use after the ICO and it will work well if they will also pay using it.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
That'll be a game changer all in all for bounty campaigns.
Receiving Bounty by means of ETH or any other major cryptocurrency other than their respective token will increase the number of interested participants and can directly affect the quality of the content provided by the participants.
EDIT: An option to choose between ETH/other alternatives or their own tokens as a mode of incentive might be a great idea.
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
Your statement has some sense but on the other hand some bounty hunters are attracted to the particular project because of its potential and possibility to get tokens which you can hold for long time.
Yes, you can buy them afterwards in theory but it would be something different.
I think that's the last thing the the people who make icos would do. As a bounty hunter myself, it would be great for me to get my payments in eth equivalent. I would even agreed to get less payments but in eth
Some will agree with you some won't since they say it is risky on the ICO project team but have they ever consider their hunters that receive their tokens then it won't have value after a year!?
How about they pay their bounty half-half? Half is the original token from the project then half with ETH so they don't worry too much if this token becomes useless.
Bounty hunters should get paid in Ethereum because the workers that are doing the campaigns are all gathering Ethereum from investors during the ICO period. Half Half payments is not a smart decision either. How about they pay their bounty half-half? Half is the original token from the project then half with ETH so they don't worry too much if this token becomes useless.
Some will agree with you some won't since they say it is risky on the ICO project team but have they ever consider their hunters that receive their tokens then it won't have value after a year!?
How about they pay their bounty half-half? Half is the original token from the project then half with ETH so they don't worry too much if this token becomes useless.
How about they pay their bounty half-half? Half is the original token from the project then half with ETH so they don't worry too much if this token becomes useless.
please can I get suggestions of bounties that pays in eth if they really exist
am so much in support of it, at least given real compensation for their hard work. it shoudnt always be token
Many of ICOs allocate some of the tokens to participants in bounty campaigns. Don't you think it is better to give bounty participnats reward in ETH?
1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
No, it is totally bad idea, you should be so thankful for free tokens and do not complain about that.1-2% of the money raised is not so much and bounty participants deserve that. Also, it can cause more investors to attract. Because they are no longer worry about the price fall after bounties are paid.
yes I agree if you want eth as a reward of bounty you should join a bounty that will pay you in eth but I think it's hard to find. most of bounty pay the participant with their token and we have to accept it because before joining a bounty we already know the consequences. paying in token is not bad because a few token have good potentian to increase it's value.
The problem with paying in ETH is that the trading won't get kickstarted because investors won't sell and bounty hunters don't own coins.
The problem with paying in tokens is that prices will drop because of coin dumping. Investors don't like that.
One way to prevent mass-dumping is to offer a choice to bounty hunters. Reward hunters that want to get paid in tokens with more tokens.
Another way to prevent dumping is to reward hunters that hold their coins with an additional percentage.
The problem with paying in tokens is that prices will drop because of coin dumping. Investors don't like that.
One way to prevent mass-dumping is to offer a choice to bounty hunters. Reward hunters that want to get paid in tokens with more tokens.
Another way to prevent dumping is to reward hunters that hold their coins with an additional percentage.
This is a good idea, but not many teams will agree to this.
There were several projects where they paid in bitcoins.
If the teams agreed to pay at the ETH every week, this would be a good indicator of the scum.
There were several projects where they paid in bitcoins.
If the teams agreed to pay at the ETH every week, this would be a good indicator of the scum.
It would be attractive, of course, to receive an award for work in ether, but this is unprofitable for many projects. Only the serious and caring about their capitalization projects, pay awards or buy tokens back for ETH. Personally for me it's more interesting to receive the award partly in tokens, partly in ETH, in case of great growth.
Jump to: