Topic: Bouty and KYC (Read 2873 times)
Yes, must be KYC announce early in the campaign, so that the participants know about it. If participants already know since the beginning, naturally they will also prepare their personal data. But there are some people who do not agree about the project campaign gifts to use KYC. Because according to them handing over private data is too risky.
No time for verify KYC at bounty campaign, when seeing at the first time at bounty tread, I try check needed KYC or not before joining, without KYC for getting payment I will joined and need KYC I will leave their project.
Kyc is just a few steps to know your costumer,and its a part usually when we participate in a bounty,so yes lets coordinate with them and support their needs in times of providingbour self identity for a reasons.,so for us lets just be aware and alert to those unidentified or scammers.
The KYC part should be announced before the bounty commence or early in bounty days for the bounty users to know that KYC is required. Because most of the bounty hunters right now still dont have the valid requirements to pass KYC.
I believe that KYC for bounty participants is a very good thing, because it prevents scam and cheating from unfair bounty participants.
Yes, that's why most bounty campaigns now require KYC. There are too many cheats and there are too many bot/multi accounts. KYC will solve all of these problems, but not 100% but it will limit a lot and honest bounty hunters will get more than the tokensKYC has recently been asked to finish the bouty program. This makes it difficult to update people's information. For example, participants did not update information, or some people were afraid of giving out their information because it was confidential, or some KYC could not be updated because of some program error. .
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
With all the above reasons, participants do not have a bouty so they do not even have their tokens, although they have devoted a lot of their time to working for a long time.
I think the bouty manager should announce KYC as soon as it launches the bouty program instead of announcing it at the end of the program. This will allow participants to prepare KYC from the beginning.
This is what I think too, if you are organizing a bounty that is going to require kyc to get out the rewards of the bounty then you might as well put it at the announcement so that people will know what they are signing up for instead of allowing people to sign up for bounties and after finishing they find out that they have to do kyc which they do not want to do
I believe that KYC for bounty participants is a very good thing, because it prevents scam and cheating from unfair bounty participants.
It is a normal situation for a bounty program that the ICO team requires to do KYC. This process helps to identify a lot of scammers and people that are using multi accounts to earn more from one campaign. KYC process is great and the less participants will pass it, the rewards would be.
If the ICO has the KYC for the Investors then we should do it also as a bounty hunter.
Well, it is not good for anyone of us, it is all for the ICO side goods.
But still It is on the team decisions to make KYC or not.
Well, it is not good for anyone of us, it is all for the ICO side goods.
But still It is on the team decisions to make KYC or not.
I agree with you. If kyc is necessery in that bounty Bounty managers should do that ann before ending time. Also the other thing is in my opinion kyc is really unnecessery for bounties..
Because icos doing that kyc for anti money laundering etc. but in bounties we are not giving any money to anyone.. They are giving to us useless tokens.. so why kyc needed ? for bounties.. terrible.
Because icos doing that kyc for anti money laundering etc. but in bounties we are not giving any money to anyone.. They are giving to us useless tokens.. so why kyc needed ? for bounties.. terrible.
Just tell me why you need to go through KYC to take part in the bounty? it's so stupid, because bounty hunters do not pay anything, they definitely should not figure among investors, because KYC was created for investors.
KYC is a proof of ownership we pass the identity we give to the manager, but KYC is not a decision from the manager, but from the team, it is difficult for us when the KYC process is carried out when the bounty is over, but it is our risk that must be faced as a bounty hunter .
KYC, for Bounty campaign, is not as terrible as it paints. It is what I can see with the experience of the Bounty campaigns that I have participated.
In all the times that I participate, they have given enough time to send the documents. Only participants should be aware of the Bounty manager updates usually in Telegram.
In all the times that I participate, they have given enough time to send the documents. Only participants should be aware of the Bounty manager updates usually in Telegram.
Personally, I am suspicious of those projects where they are asked to send their documents. I do not understand why this is necessary for the project, where the developers themselves hide their personal data.
I have a negative attitude towards KYC in bounty company. But if there is a KYC, it must be declared in the General rules at the very beginning of the company so that everyone knows that the bounty company conducts KYC.
I agree to implement the Kyc program because it can minimize abuse of accounts. But what if the project is scam then we will feel disadvantaged. Is there a possibility to abuse Kyc's data
I have a neutral attitude towards KYC, but I also think that it should be announced from the very beginning of the bounty campaign. Otherwise, it looks like the project just wants to save money, and to pay less tokens to some participants who in principle do not want to give their data and personal information.
I personally consider this a fraud when, by bringing the company to bounty until completion, managers put forward the rules for passing KYC and find reasons for non-payment of laid coins
I agree with you. It's not fair. However, you cannot do anything here, because it is written in the rules of the bounty of campaigns that the rules can be changed. As a result, one has to either not participate in such bounty campaigns or agree to their terms.
many indeed statement regarding KYC is informed at the end of bounty and this is not fair. When does require at least this KYC is informed from the beginning because it will certainly be a consideration whether to follow it or not. many are doubtful against the security of the KYC and surely this will be a hindrance in the results.
I personally consider this a fraud when, by bringing the company to bounty until completion, managers put forward the rules for passing KYC and find reasons for non-payment of laid coins
Although I am against the KYC procedure, I am against this procedure only for investors. But the participants of the bounty must pass it, so much to reduce the number of scams among the participants. But the Manager should announce the need for this procedure at the very beginning. For some reason I can not pass KYC and then all the work was done in vain
Jump to: