Pages:
Author

Topic: [BTB] The BitBar Information Thread - page 38. (Read 180446 times)

legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 18, 2015, 12:08:29 PM
For some reason windows defender for windows 10 in conjunction with DLing this through Google chrome says its a trojan. Google says it could be malicious and when I click to "keep" it, windows defender steps in  ..but got it synced and only lost 8 bars due to wrong chain so not as bad as I feared. Mastermining is on the wrong chain still it seems also Sad The crypsy link on bitbar.co site is pointed to BTE/BTC  Cheesy

I haven't ran into windows defender complaining, but I hear it's common with several wallets - per to per connections, odd port numbers not registered (or known) to microsoft...

I sent an email to mastermining and ispace.
submitted a ticket to cryptsy about the wallet update - I sure Mullick will have to look through the code to make sure nothing 'weird' was added.

good catch on the bte/btc link - I thought I checked that !
Still have a lot to do on the web site, any suggestions are welcome

geez - I had the link to mastermining wrong too, have .com instead of .net  - it's been a long week   Wink
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
December 18, 2015, 11:01:20 AM
same error even with your git update! Must be me? The NOMP application issues a gettransactions call at start up which my bitbar daemon terminates afterwards :-(
well - let's back up a little. without starting nomp, what happens when you do "bitbard getinfo" ??

Guess I should ask how familiar you are with nomp, wallets, and linix in general.

Thanks for helping here.

Running Centos 6.7 and i used this script to install but modified it for Bitbar: https://github.com/mikeminneman/dogecoind-centos

Ok, so my rpc password does match in both the pool config and bitbar.conf files. I think that is working because the debug log in Bitbar shows the rpc request from node "gettransactions".

Heres my Bitbar wallet "getinfo" - (I started a new wallet so its just downloading again)

  "version" : "v0.4.3.004-5-g903edf9-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60006,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "newmint" : 0.00000000,
    "stake" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 83500,
    "moneysupply" : 14044.44104100,
    "connections" : 1,
    "proxy" : "",
    "ip" : "X.X.X.X",
    "difficulty" : 41.30374091,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1450404332,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""


Heres the error in NOMP:

2015-12-18 15:45:44 [POSIX]     [Connection Limit] (Safe to ignore) POSIX module not installed and resource (connection) limit was not raised
2015-12-18 15:45:44 [Master]    [CLI] CLI listening on port 17117
2015-12-18 15:45:44 [Master]    [PoolSpawner] Spawned 1 pool(s) on 1 thread(s)
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl >'
  what():  read_some: End of file
2015-12-18 15:45:44 [Payments]  [bitbar] Payment processing setup to run every 120 second(s) with daemon ([email protected]:9344) and redis (127.0.0.1:6379)
2015-12-18 15:45:45 [Switching] [Setup] (Thread 1) Loading last proxy state from redis
2015-12-18 15:45:45 [Pool]      [bitbar] (Thread 1) Share processing setup with redis (127.0.0.1:6379)
2015-12-18 15:45:46 [Payments]  [bitbar] Check finished - daemon rpc error with batch gettransactions {"type":"request error","message":"read ECONNRESET"}
2015-12-18 15:45:46 [Payments]  [bitbar] Finished interval - time spent: 995ms total, 3ms redis, 987ms daemon RPC
2015-12-18 15:45:46 [Pool]      [bitbar] (Thread 1) Could not start pool, error with init batch RPC call: {"type":"offline","message":"connect ECONNREFUSED"}

Here the Bitbar debug log that shows the last entry before it terminated due to the above request from NOMP.

Flushed 5740 addresses to peers.dat  78ms
Flushed 5740 addresses to peers.dat  78ms
ThreadRPCServer method=getinfo
ThreadRPCServer method=validateaddress
ThreadRPCServer method=getbalance

Heres the error if i run from the terminal as you can see "getbalance" returns info but "gettransactions" kills it.

# bitbard getbalance
0.00000000
# bitbard gettransactions
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::vector >, std::allocator > > >'
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl >'
  what():  read_some: End of file
Aborted (core dumped)

So it looks like an issue with the wallet when the "gettransactions" call is issued Im guessing there aren't any due to it being a new install. Any thing jump out at you? Maybe I'm missing something obvious....
full member
Activity: 247
Merit: 100
Payment ecosystem for world shipping industry
December 18, 2015, 10:38:58 AM
For some reason windows defender for windows 10 in conjunction with DLing this through Google chrome says its a trojan. Google says it could be malicious and when I click to "keep" it, windows defender steps in  ..but got it synced and only lost 8 bars due to wrong chain so not as bad as I feared. Mastermining is on the wrong chain still it seems also Sad The crypsy link on bitbar.co site is pointed to BTE/BTC  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 18, 2015, 01:02:13 AM
here is a link for windows wallet-qt:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1cnD3W8c0jtaEJ1ajFIeDFSZnc/view?usp=sharing

always backup your wallet.dat file

no changes need to be done to your bitbar.conf file - you don't even need one now  Cool


If your block count does not match http://btb.cryptocoinexplorer.com/ please remove everything except your wallet.dat file from C:\Users\-your name-\AppData\Roaming\BitBar and re-download the chain - simply by running bitbar-qt.exe  that will get you back on the right fork.
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 17, 2015, 09:34:03 PM
same error even with your git update! Must be me? The NOMP application issues a gettransactions call at start up which my bitbar daemon terminates afterwards :-(
well - let's back up a little. without starting nomp, what happens when you do "bitbard getinfo" ??

Guess I should ask how familiar you are with nomp, wallets, and linix in general.
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 17, 2015, 09:31:05 PM
same error even with your git update! Must be me? The NOMP application issues a gettransactions call at start up which my bitbar daemon terminates afterwards :-(
Does the rpcuser and rpcpassword in the pools_config/bitbar.json match your bitbar.conf settings ??
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
December 17, 2015, 07:57:55 PM
same error even with your git update! Must be me? The NOMP application issues a gettransactions call at start up which my bitbar daemon terminates afterwards :-(
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 17, 2015, 06:50:42 PM

Having a few problems setting up the Mullick wallet in linux, every time i sync to the block chain using the afore mentioned process, i then want to initatie my own NOMP but when the application starts i get this error:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl >'
  what():  read_some: End of file

followed by:

Check finished - daemon rpc error with batch gettransactions {"type":"request error","message":"read ECONNRESET"}

I have nailed this down to the wallet, when i run the command "gettranactions" against bitbard the wallet produces the same errors which terminates the daemon. Could anyone advise maybe Spidersbox on how they configure their daemon please?


 i issue certain commands to the daemon i receive a termination error.

this is an old coin and it uses boost 1.47 (I think - might be 1.37)
this is what I used for boost:
sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev

It's the DB that caused me the problems. this coin uses Berkeley DB   4.8.30.NC:
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev
sudo apt-get install libdb4.8++-dev

but the newer Ubuntu (desktop and server) can't find the files.
I had to do a web search to find a way to do it.   not that hard.


I'm running NOMP with this wallet, and haven't had any problems.

Let me know how it goes -
There are several people looking for pools they can use!
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 17, 2015, 06:35:42 PM
I have a better idea - -

WE HAVE AN UPDATED WALLET !!

OK, so it's just the linux wallet. The windows wallet should be compiled and ready in about six hours - I'm still at work.

Wallet:
"version" : "v0.4.3.004-1-ge4d156c-beta"

link:
git clone https://github.com/Bitbarcoin/bitbar.git

updates:
default irc set to 0
dnsseed changed from bitbar.biz to btb.altcointech.net
removed the irritating "wallet is too old" message  -  we don't have a checkpoint server at this time.
Added new checkpoints  -  will help with staying on the correct chain when starting over

all you need in your bitbar.conf file is:
rpcuser
prcpassword

if you want to add more nodes, please get them from:
http://btb.cryptocoinexplorer.com/peerinfo

newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
December 17, 2015, 06:24:20 PM
My wallet is syncing now, but I get the feeling my coins are going to be unconfirmed. The million dollar question is have I lost them or not? Huh

The safest answer I can give you is to backup the addresses you received coins to, perhaps a paper wallet or of the wallet.dat file and come back to it in the future after everyone is on the same chain.

I am on the longest chain, connected to the oldest node but things are not certain even for that.

It sucks, but thus isn't the first time anyone has lost due to split chains.

I myself have been a victim of pools going rouge in the past (anyone remember diggers pool?)

until there is more infrastructure surrounding bitbar all we can do is try to help eachother out by spreading information.

Speaking of, I am excited to share some information concerning possible future developments....

more to come



Should I take the wallet offline the one with the unconfirmed coins? Just keep it as back up?


When I messing with my wallets, I close the wallet if it is running, I copy and paste the Bitbar directory - that way everything is backed up - including the chain you were on.
Once that is done, you can mess with whatever you want, because if you screw it up, you can just delete the Bitbar directory, rename 'copy of Bitbar' back to bitbar, and you are back to where you started.

If you want to start fresh (once you have a backup copy) you can delete everything in the Bitbar folder except the wallet.dat, and bitbar.conf files, start up the bitbar-qt.exe and it will start syncing the chain.


To start out, you can do as Luke suggested and put:
connect=68.191.93.33
in your bitbar.conf file.

After you are caught  up, change the 'connect=' to 'addnode=' and add some of the nodes listed at http://btb.cryptocoinexplorer.com/peerinfo

also remember to add:
irc=0
listen=1

Having a few problems setting up the Mullick wallet in linux, every time i sync to the block chain using the afore mentioned process, i then want to initatie my own NOMP but when the application starts i get this error:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl >'
  what():  read_some: End of file

followed by:

Check finished - daemon rpc error with batch gettransactions {"type":"request error","message":"read ECONNRESET"}

I have nailed this down to the wallet, when i run the command "gettranactions" against bitbard the wallet produces the same errors which terminates the daemon. Could anyone advise maybe Spidersbox on how they configure their daemon please?





 i issue certain commands to the daemon i receive a termination error.
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 17, 2015, 10:15:36 AM
coin dead...
read the thread and answer your own question.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
December 17, 2015, 09:08:35 AM
coin dead...
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
December 16, 2015, 06:46:26 AM
Crypsy not supportet BTB... i can not deposit, crypsy always say about error Embarrassed
Who know exchange links BTB to BTC?
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 05, 2015, 01:30:33 PM


Looks like Mastermining is re-syncing his wallet.
Noticed a few minutes ago a block on the chain for about 22 BTB had 127 transactions - maybe another pool payout??

I received a message from Mastermining that he would be syncing his pool to the explorer at Cryptocoinexplorer.

It looks like he failed to sync, as I saw a message on the site about it. I have isolated my node and will transmit it to him again to hopefully get things straight over there.

Another thing is when syncing, one can use the command

connect=68.191.93.33 in the bitbar conf file to lock onto my node and sync.



He is still off the chain, and mining.

their 'current' block is  142,248
our  current  block  is  142,946
ispace current block is 142,570
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 05, 2015, 12:35:49 PM
I'm glad to see Bitbar moving forward again. It sucks people are going to lose bars.
I'd still like to see some inventive way to zip all the chains together like a zipper, if that makes any sense (not a .zip) and then build a new chain out of them somehow. Then everyone would sync to the new chain and every transaction is there and normal wallet behavior resumes. Maybe some crazy algorithm could compute a new chain out of the old ones somehow? Or recode the wallet so it syncs with all the chains(whut?). Once everyone updates, where there would be clashes in transactions make it so there are "bloated" blocks so block 12345-a is in with 12345-b and 12345-c.
Please pardon my ignorance if you are laughing at me right now. lol I am serious though.
If you could mine your own chain, all by yourself (which would make for a very low difficulty), then hack it into a real chain so you could sell your coins - who else would be doing it ??

The chain forked somewhere between Sept. 18, 2015 and Sept. 30, 2015
I had a successful withdrawal from Cryptsy 09/18/2015 - block 132679
my withdrawal failed 09/30/2015 somewhere around block 134000
we are at block 142954 at the time of this writing.

So roughly 10,000 blocks (so far) won't match each other from the different chains.
I would guess that 80% of those blocks are stakes for 0.00 btb, leaving about 2,000 blocks of pos/pow/transfers (rough estimates)

I believe Cryptsy will do their best to fix the withdrawals.

legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 05, 2015, 11:43:55 AM
I have 125 BTB floating in one chain, and 107 BTB floating in another. Either way I'm out 100+
I would be out a lot more if Bitbar dies.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
December 05, 2015, 10:32:37 AM
I'm glad to see Bitbar moving forward again. It sucks people are going to lose bars.
I'd still like to see some inventive way to zip all the chains together like a zipper, if that makes any sense (not a .zip) and then build a new chain out of them somehow. Then everyone would sync to the new chain and every transaction is there and normal wallet behavior resumes. Maybe some crazy algorithm could compute a new chain out of the old ones somehow? Or recode the wallet so it syncs with all the chains(whut?). Once everyone updates, where there would be clashes in transactions make it so there are "bloated" blocks so block 12345-a is in with 12345-b and 12345-c.
Please pardon my ignorance if you are laughing at me right now. lol I am serious though.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!  Am with you and am serious I could and probably will lose 72 bars
full member
Activity: 247
Merit: 100
Payment ecosystem for world shipping industry
December 05, 2015, 10:05:54 AM
I'm glad to see Bitbar moving forward again. It sucks people are going to lose bars.
I'd still like to see some inventive way to zip all the chains together like a zipper, if that makes any sense (not a .zip) and then build a new chain out of them somehow. Then everyone would sync to the new chain and every transaction is there and normal wallet behavior resumes. Maybe some crazy algorithm could compute a new chain out of the old ones somehow? Or recode the wallet so it syncs with all the chains(whut?). Once everyone updates, where there would be clashes in transactions make it so there are "bloated" blocks so block 12345-a is in with 12345-b and 12345-c.
Please pardon my ignorance if you are laughing at me right now. lol I am serious though.
legendary
Activity: 1294
Merit: 1039
December 04, 2015, 12:31:03 PM
I haven't been in touch with 5mil for a few days, my last communication with him was last Thursday:
Quote
so the natives are getting restless on bitcointalk, and was wondering if you could pop on and announce and plans you might have, thoughts on what to do about the forks...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=196125.580
but haven't heard back - maybe he is having second thoughts ??

If Dreamwatcher is willing to develop Bitbar than WOO-HOO!  I'm all in.

It was beginning to look like I was going to have to learn how to do it.

Perhaps we can get an updated wallet - nothing major:
change the dnsseed from bitbar.biz to btb.altcointech.net
add a few current checkpoints

Once there is a wallet with a newer version, we can tell everybody to update. Hopefully, with the new checkpoints, we can finally get every one (including the exchanges!) on the same chain.


(then onto the wish list - like coin control  Smiley )

 
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
December 04, 2015, 11:53:50 AM
Hello Dreamwatcher,

Didnt see you there when I started my post  Cheesy

Pages:
Jump to: