Why Now No Faucet?
FYI this site has removed the faucet since long time ago because it got abused. I know it's sounds impossible to abuse faucet when the faucet amount only 2 bits, but yea, there were some abuser who like to do that. 
Topic: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game - page 13. (Read 293500 times)
Why Now No Faucet?
DJ HERPES seems to be prototyping his latest song about bustabit: "runaway rape" (NSFW, and song deletes after 24h)
He still have a decent amount, probably he have not rested well and got exhausted.
or
He probably have a goal to achieve, like turning $1000 into $1000000.
Regardless, he made history. Congrats again Game1, careful now.
or
He probably have a goal to achieve, like turning $1000 into $1000000.
Regardless, he made history. Congrats again Game1, careful now.
Hi there. In the image you quoted it shows a positive net profit. Do you mean, after he reached this net profit, he continued betting big amounts?
Yeah. He actually hit an all-time-high of around 199 BTC in profit, but then began a rather dramatic downfall.
People who in general follow that "aggressively chase your losses" style of playing generally have pretty consistent charts. They make a lot of money for a long time, and then when things go bad, they go really bad. Game1 is a bit special, as he started with < 0.5 BTC or something though
So even though he's now currently at +23 BTC, overall that's still a decent return 
A big congratulations to Game1 for breaking into the >100 bitcoin net profit club:
wow Game1 just 4 days he already lost around 80 btc wow
Hi there. In the image you quoted it shows a positive net profit. Do you mean, after he reached this net profit, he continued betting big amounts?
A big congratulations to Game1 for breaking into the >100 bitcoin net profit club:
wow Game1 just 4 days he already lost around 80 btc wow
A big congratulations to Game1 for breaking into the >100 bitcoin net profit club:
wow Game1 just 4 days he already lost around 80 btc wow
Adding in Ethereum to bustabit would be good, as I believe there are a lot of Ethereum users nowadays, and with so much unconfirmed transaction in Bitcoin blockchain, players need to pay higher miner fees for every transaction if they want to get their deposit fast, so Ethereum does have a bigger market share now in cryptocurrency gambling due to the faster confirmation and lower fees as compare to Bitcoin.
Would people be more interested in litecoin or ethereum support?
Ethereum would be nice.
Litecoin would be nice too. ETC as well. In fact, everything will be better than BTC, probably - due to extremely high fees, of course (maybe there will be consensus with SegWit around August 1st, but with lower fees we'd wait for Lightning Networks, and when they'll be in real traffic [if ever], it's a big question).
RHavar, will you plan to change (or add) altcoins (at least for withdrawals) in current version of Bustabit, or do you plan it for the future one ? And, anyway, is there some +/- ETA for the new version? Thanks!
If there is BBC - Billionaire Boys Club, bustabit have >100btc profit club. Haha. BIG congrats Game1
is there any free scrypt ?
A big congratulations to Game1 for breaking into the >100 bitcoin net profit club:
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
No, I think owning moneypot would be included as having something to do with moneypot, which I already denied.
The post you link to is about the seeding event of bustabit (which used to be called moneypot). I came up with the idea of using a long chain of sha256 hashes and mentioned it to Eric (the creator of bustabit) when he was looking to make his game provably fair.
For the record I'm not an owner of bustabit either. I did once help out with bankrolling the site, kind of. I didn't actually send any coins for use in the bankroll, but I promised I would if they were needed. I also acted as escrow in the sale of bustabit.
I think some people are just lacking in the sarcasm detection department
If you think it is then you are just a trolling here.
You try and build an argument against this statement then will just continue to embarrass yourself.
So just please stop.
You can test this theory with the majority of im services and a way of portraying your intention of being acting funny on the internet.
You will be served quite quickly.
.....chill dude
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
No, I think owning moneypot would be included as having something to do with moneypot, which I already denied.
The post you link to is about the seeding event of bustabit (which used to be called moneypot). I came up with the idea of using a long chain of sha256 hashes and mentioned it to Eric (the creator of bustabit) when he was looking to make his game provably fair.
For the record I'm not an owner of bustabit either. I did once help out with bankrolling the site, kind of. I didn't actually send any coins for use in the bankroll, but I promised I would if they were needed. I also acted as escrow in the sale of bustabit.
I think some people are just lacking in the sarcasm detection department
If you think it is then you are just a trolling here.
You try and build an argument against this statement then will just continue to embarrass yourself.
So just please stop.
You can test this theory with the majority of im services and a way of portraying your intention of being acting funny on the internet.
You will be served quite quickly.
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
No, I think owning moneypot would be included as having something to do with moneypot, which I already denied.
The post you link to is about the seeding event of bustabit (which used to be called moneypot). I came up with the idea of using a long chain of sha256 hashes and mentioned it to Eric (the creator of bustabit) when he was looking to make his game provably fair.
For the record I'm not an owner of bustabit either. I did once help out with bankrolling the site, kind of. I didn't actually send any coins for use in the bankroll, but I promised I would if they were needed. I also acted as escrow in the sale of bustabit.
I think some people are just lacking in the sarcasm detection department
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
No, I think owning moneypot would be included as having something to do with moneypot, which I already denied.
The post you link to is about the seeding event of bustabit (which used to be called moneypot). I came up with the idea of using a long chain of sha256 hashes and mentioned it to Eric (the creator of bustabit) when he was looking to make his game provably fair.
For the record I'm not an owner of bustabit either. I did once help out with bankrolling the site, kind of. I didn't actually send any coins for use in the bankroll, but I promised I would if they were needed. I also acted as escrow in the sale of bustabit.
Also the onerous fees have made me start to consider the possibility of support an altcoin. Would people be more interested in litecoin or ethereum support?
Did you hear about CLAM? I heard it's an up-and-coming gamble coin!
'up and coming' hahaha.
@Rhavar, instead of ltc or eth, how 'bout USD? :p
I'm not the creator of CLAM.
I do know about bustaclam.
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
I do run just-dice which uses CLAM.
My post was intended to be funny. I know Ryan has heard of CLAM.
You are mentioned here:I do know about bustaclam.
I'm nothing to do with moneypot, and never was.
I do run just-dice which uses CLAM.
My post was intended to be funny. I know Ryan has heard of CLAM.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10130578
So you are a moneypot owner?
Not pointing fingers just curious.
That's all.
Are you asking for this just because you hold like a lot of NXT so you can sell it on higher price? Because as I know that NXT has not a good traffic compare to LTC or even doge. So why you asking for NXT instead of other coin that have huge traffic besides btc? This does not make any sense
a/ No, I have just a little budget in NXT, b/ No, I don't plan to sell any of PoS coin in the near future, c/ I had a strong faith into NXT in the past, but I'm not so much happy from the recent developing and also idea with "split" among NXT and NXT 2.0 aka Ardor (even if I'm understand about some issues, that would be solved by this step). So, this is just for clarification (and also I'm mentioned NXT/Ardor or NEM, and maybe NEM would be better idea, see their progress in these days).
I don't understand that "not a good traffic", as you described. You meant that there is not so high volume on exchanges (comparing to LTC or Doge) ? But this is not directly related with scalability and confirmation times (or it would be advantage, on the contrary - when the blocks are almost empty and the network is not overloaded). And if you heard about troubles with continuity of creating block, it was true in the past (each block would be generated in 1 minute, but there were lot of 20-60 min delays in the past), but it was already solved ca year ago. So it's not an issue anymore.
What progress do you mean? If you are saying about the progress on their roadmap, I am sorry because I never follow that, as long as the price keep on increasing. I will use it for sure
And about confirmation time that you compared LTC or doge to NXT. I believe NXT have lower confirmation time because the volume is not really high too so it still low on the transaction. But after they have huge traffic? What are they gonna do? It will be the same as other coins too. Or may be are you going to suggest any lower transaction coin to be implemented here?
For me as long as the coin going to my account, there will no problem at all
Jump to: