Question for the anti-BFL crew:
Why are you guys not dog-piling on Avalon for what would seem to be more likely examples of unethical business practices?
Take for instance this guy's Avalon, which certainly appears to have been run for quite awhile before delivery.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2175901Why does something as seemingly egregious as this, get a pass?
Yet, all hints and allegations against BFL are automatically assumed to be true.
1.) Avalon does not have a history of setting shipping dates in the near future and then missing them by months
2.) Avalon does not have a history of calling people who disagree with them on these boards "trolls", "douches", and "retards".
3.) The guy actually got his Avalon unit
4.) There is only this instance of this sort of thing that I am aware of. That could mean they shipped units that were used for testing. If everyone who got one noticed that it had been run for some time, that would be different.
6.) Avalon's communication with their customers could be a lot better, but their communication is not substituting for their product like BFL's is. Avalon's product works and was well received by the marketplace. There is also a language barrier.
7.) There is not much dust in those pictures. You should see my rig if I run it in my garage with the case lid off. It gets dusty really fast. It is impossible to tell from those pictures for how long the unit has been run. With good filters and a dust free environment, maybe a month? In some converted warehouse in China with poor air quality, maybe a week.
8.) The damage to the unit is way more disturbing, but that is a QA issue and it might be pervasive and it might be an isolated incident. With just 1 complaint of this nature out of 300 units it is hard to tell (the other complaints were shipping damage or loss AFAIK). We will know more with batch 2.