Everyone asking "bounties". Hey u can ask those questions on chronobank slack channel. We are coming here for to follow developing news.
I visit this thread like once a week and every time i come here it is about bounties. Is really a mess in here, Chronobank should really hurry up and pay those bounties because this is ridiculous.
that is becuase chrono team is making it hard for them. if they just distribute it at once, these bounty hunters could have move on to another thread and not stick around to keep asking it.
the team is very dishonest about their bounty campaign too.
all the rest of the ICO since the start posts pool of bounty per campaign. if they say they allocate 300,000 tokens for all blog bounties, they distribute the 300k for all. this chrono team is different. they even rejected those blogs after promoting them for several months.
greedy indeed. they bought thier own token and sold them for the late investors and now they are rejecting the blog posts. check how much had been left after taking out almost everyone.
saw this on the chronobank slack channel to which the distribution is already done. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hoG2sOdumReZ0GVCYaj-hGIDrFXXs0X4PDANlhqHAYM/edit#gid=964505233
Draw conclusions and gentlemen!
Never to promote and help the russian projects!!!!!!
A short note on the blog bounty.
Most of the submitted blogs were created using three buttons: "Ctrl", "C", "V". Any user could submit his/her blog post to the form. That is why all the submitted articles were displayed in the form.
Another group of articles was a simple rephrasing or retelling (sometimes incorrect) of the Chronobank.io first page. Most of them lacked uniqueness, originality and quality.
The third group of articles was created by authors who tried to cheat the automated services like plagiarisma.net. They uses synonyms, removed spaces and paragraphs, inserted unknown words, etc. As a result they got absolutely unreadable and senseless texts.
We are strongly convinced the rewards should be adequate to the efforts. We are not responsible for the actions of the bounty program participants who, unfortunately, submitted mostly duplicated and low quality materials. When taking decision on the rewards we took into account:
ย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- uniquenessย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- originalityย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- language qualityย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- content qualityย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- author's own opinion existenceย ย ย ย ย ย ย
- author's analytic abilities
- blog post size
Most of the negative comments come from the authors of rejected blogs. One of the blog posts was rejected because of its small size. It didn't even have 900 characters without spaces. It had about 8 sentences. Unfortunately, we couldn't accept the blog post for the formal reasons. 900+ characters without spaces was our requirement.
