Better to invest as per DCA once a month. And if you have a lot of money then definitely invest twice a month according to DCA.
Your choice of DCA frequency is not very much connected to whether or not you have "a lot of money", even though sometimes the fees could affect frequency of DCA for those who have very low amounts of money.
But you must be talking on the other side, it is better not to discuss such things here.
You are speaking gobble-dee-gook Popkon6.
Invest according to DCA for present time then you will be successful in holding for long time.
how long you hold is likely a separate decision from the various ways that you choose to accumulate your BTC.
According to the DCA, buying in Bitcoin certainly encourages you to buy more later.
Do you think so? There are ways to fuck up DCA too.. including overdoing it in such a way that you have failed/refused to adequately account for your cashflows and expenses...
DCA will mostly work as long as you don't overdo it.. but surely it has to apply to an asset like bitcoin that has decently strong presumptions of underlying value that will cause the price to go up in the longer run... .so most of the the ways to screw up DCA in regards to bitcoin would be to overdo it..
And of course this thread is not just about DCA.. DCA is not even in the title.. we are talking about buy the dip and HODL.. so those are surely trade off accumulation approaches that should be accounted for in order to attempt to mostly stay topical to the thread, especially in a thread like this.
Successful whaling stocks can certainly be harvested through DCA using such methods.
What the fuck is whaling stocks and why should we give any shits?
We are talking about bitcoin here. Does "whaling stocks" somehow have any relationship to BTC?
I know many are expecting a red 🔴 September with a deeper pullback. Yet in markets, as i told you EOY 2022, when too many people are expecting a scenario to occur, each and every time the opposite happens.
Those are not even your own words, you fuck.. Maybe you could at least put quotes around your long quoting of others in which we can ONLY figure out that they are not your words by having to click on an outside link.
By the way, there is a bit of hyperbole going on in the statement in regards to "
each and every time the opposite happens"
That's bullshit.
Whenever anyone uses absolute language, they are either saying or strongly implying that there is some kind of a guarantee.. which our spidey senses should be going up whenever we see people using those kinds of words in their predictions of the future... or even whether such representation is really even true about the past.