Buy in the Dip and Hold is indeed a very good and profitable strategy to enter into the current bitcoin market conditions. Even signs of Bitcoin Bullish have started to appear. Therefore, people who buy bitcoins when the price drops and hold will get a satisfying profit.
I agree and maybe everyone will do something like this, because that's the best way to do it. but it looks like the sign you're saying that bitcoin bullish, hasn't been seen and it's only the movement that has been since the last ath formed bitcoin did that. always rising rapidly and falling back down and it seems bitcoin already feels that at the current price it is the most comfortable and stable price.
what you say is certainly true, that buying bitcoins when the price continues to fall, but bitcoins do it very quickly because soon it goes up. bitcoin keep on moving like this, so you have to really pay attention to each movement
before you want to buy or sell it.Regarding the point of your last sentence about needing to watch BTC price moves in the event that you want to buy or "sell" it, we are not talking about selling bitcoin in this thread as a strategy to accumulate bitcoin.
There is discussion about buying on the dip in order to be able to attempt to get more bitcoin based on such dips that happen from time to time.... so sure there is a kind of presumption that we would be buying on dips because we expect the BTC price to go up at some point or maybe even to go up more in the long run - even though in the short run there might be a lot of bitcoin dips.
Surely there are a few advantages in buying on dips in terms of both getting a better price, but also there are ways in which guys may also be able to frame (account for) their bitcoin holdings in such a way that buying on dips ends up bringing down their average costs per BTC... in the event that they want to account for their whole BTC portfolio in that kind of way.
Of course, when I discuss accounting options, some of these kinds of concept can become confusing to people because sometimes there are some forms of accounting that might be required if someone were to have to report to a government agency (such as a tax authority), but it seems that if you want to potentially empower yourself from the buying and managing of your bitcoin holdings, then sometimes there might be ways that you can categorize your own holdings in ways that help to inform you about how you are going to manage your portfolio...
For example, I recall in mid-2015, I had been in bitcoin for a little over a year and a half, and when I started buying bitcoin in late 2013, my very first bitcoin purchase was a kind of private sale and it was 1.24 bitcoin's purchased at $1,500 (so that would be $1,200 per bitcoin)... so that first BTC purchase was for a decently high price, and by the time that mid-2015 had arrived, the BTC price had been bouncing around in the mid-$200s for a long time, and my overall purchasing of BTC at various points in time between late 2013 and mid-2015, had caused my average price per BTC to come down to around $520-ish, even though I started out at $1,200 (as mentioned above)... Also, it could be conceived that my overall BTC portfolio was valued in the negative by more than half if we were going by the then current price of around $250, so that would be something like a 48% valuation ($250/$520).
For my own purposes of attempting to manage my BTC portfolio, I had decided to create a spreadsheet and to create three categories for my BTC holdings in order to help myself to figure out what I wanted to do with parts of my BTC holdings, so I ended up creating three categories. One category was my overall BTC holdings, a second category were all the BTC that I had acquired between mid-2014 and mid-2015, and a third category were all the BTC that I had acquired under $300 (which had mostly happened between December 2014 and mid-2015).
The first category had an average cost per BTC of $580-ish, the second category had a value of around $330-ish and the third category had a value of around $240-ish. So, I used those BTC in the third category as a kind of formula to be able to sell a proportion of them between the price of $250 and $330, and once the BTC price got above $330, then i would be able to use my bitcoin in the second category (which also contained those BTC in the third category) to maintain another formula for being able to sell a portion of those BTC in the second category between $340 and $520. Of course, if I were to continue to buy and sell some BTC while the BTC price ranged between $250 and $520, the overall price of my BTC holdings (those BTC categorized in the first category) would change with the passage of time, and my actual cost per BTC had come down to around $500 by the end of 2015.
I bring up these ideas not in order to derail this thread into the idea of selling BTC, but instead to attempt to provide examples of how any of us might categorize aspects of our BTC holdings in order to attempt to accomplish goals that we want to accomplish or to justify some of our own treatments of our BTC holdings... which also can help to empower us into be able to act when we might not otherwise be able to act.... So for example, if I had ONLY categorized my BTC holdings in terms of my overall costs per BTC, then I might not be able to justify doing anything with my BTC until the BTC price were to go over the cost per BTC of my whole portfolio.. which was then $520 and slowly coming down with my additional BTC purchases.
Instead, I was able to formulate some self-authorized abilities to act to sell portions of my BTC between $250 and $520-ish based on ways of accounting for my BTC into three categories rather than one category.
Regarding how some of us might consider our BTC dips of the recent months, surely we had experienced a dip of about 39% if we conceive of the November 9 ATH at $69k, and the December 3 bottom of $41,967, so in the meantime we have largely been bouncing within the price range of about $44k and $52k, so then there could be some questions about at what points to buy in the dip. So for example, some of us might have already bought down to $42k-ish, and we might have either been saving some cash to buy in case the BTC price dips more, but so far it has not dipped below $42k, but also another practical matter is that nearly a month has past since such dip and maybe we have been spending some additional cashflow to buy BTC at whatever price we are at, or we might be holding some of that money that is coming in so that we can buy on further dip, but surely if more money comes in, then that could justify either just buying at the current price or maybe NOT setting our price targets as low in order to buy again. For sure those are not easy determinations regarding whether new cash coming in might cause justification to just buy at current prices or to change our BTC buying price targets.... yet the longer that we are in bitcoin, the more likely it seems that we should be able to develop some kinds of systems for ourselves regarding how much cash we want to be holding or would we rather to have some of that value in BTC, even if the BTC price might go down from here (presuming that we were to buy at the current price which is at a bit more than $49k as I type this post).
Is the current halving’s cycle peak delayed, or has the cycle been broken. OR this model has probably reached the end of its predicitive potentials? Because no predictive model will be accurate forever. The world is full of unpredictability and chaos.
I think we have some signs that the cycle is coming to an end but I probably wait until end of January or February to see what happens in the next 1-2 months in the market to decide. It is hard to say at this point.
Of course, there can be both psychological and financial justifications to attempting to formulate some kind of a theory for ourselves regarding what we might consider to be amongst the most probable of short to medium term BTC price movements.. even tough for sure we cannot really know with any levels of certainty whether our tentative ideas are going to play out, so new data could help us to change our perceptions.
I do not consider myself to be so rigid in my expectations that a four year model has to perform within exact four year parameters in order to still be an influential factor in terms of overall BTC price dynamics, whether projecting out in the next few months or further out.
I last updated my projections regarding the timeline for our peak on December 16 (my views have not changed too much since December 16) - and so surely I give higher likelihood to the peak coming sooner rather than later, but still I consider that there are some likely blow-off dynamics that are still at play, so if we have not gotten any kind of blow off top, then I have harder times speculating that the top is in (even though as you seem to imply, pooya87) we do not necessarily need a blow off top for this cycle to be over, even though I would consider that to be of minority likelihood.. it is still possible even if it has low likelihood from my perspective.
By the way does anyone knows when they came up with the S2F model? Was it before 2018 or after it? For example if they had come up with it in 2015 that makes it somewhat interesting but not if they came up with it in 2018, that would be just silly lines drawn on history.
Of course, the ideas behind PlanB's model had predated PlanB's publishing of the model, so it is not like he was saying anything really new, but he was presenting the matter in the form of having a kind of data set to back up those kinds of stock to flow ideas. I had recently seen some kind of a tweet or discussion from PlanB in which he stated that he had first published his S2F data in March of 2019 - so it would have been just prior to our April 2019 price rise and so at the time that PlanB published the data the BTC price was then at least a whole standard deviation below expectations and even maybe getting into the 2 standard deviations below expectations.
Of course, the longer that the model is in existence, then there are more data points to put in there, so if the model was plotted out in 2015, there would have been fewer data points in order to have as much confidence in trajectoring out the idea into the future based on fewer data points. So in some sense, pooya87, I am coming to the opposite conclusion to you in terms of the value of the model as time passes. Of course, you seem to be suggesting that there is a kind of invention of the data aspect, so you seem to be emphasizing the projection aspect of the model rather than the value of having more time for the data points to help to inform the model. but sure. maybe there is an aspect of an early 2019 invention.. because that's when the projections were first made within that particular model and PlanB has largely just been inputting new data points with the passage of time (so in the last nearly 3 years since PlanB first published the model), he has been inputting data within the model to show mostly conformity.. but as far as I know, he has not shifted the curve or anything like that, even though there are a lot of folks who accuse him of moving the goal posts along the way - but seems that some of those folks are ongoingly convoluting his discussion of a floor model with his having had created the S2F model and asserting that we are still on-track with the S2F model.