Author

Topic: Buy the DIP, and HODL! - page 543. (Read 122884 times)

legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 24, 2022, 02:52:16 AM
[edited out]
I simply wanted a discussion.

Yes... And, we more than sufficiently discussed - way beyond any relevance in regards to the topic of this thread.  


What I truly learned from our discussion/debate is that, the Stock To Flow Model will always be “on target”, Plan B will just move the goal posts again, and adjust the “model”. Cool


The model is already broadly framed, so even if PlanB was talking about specific price targets (floors) such as $98k in November and $135k in December, his discussion does not change the broad parameters in which the model is already framed.


2024 will be the year, then $1,000,000 per Bitcoin during 2026, or it’s invalidated.

Of course, you can do whatever you want Wind_FURY.. you seemingly disingenuine dweeb...

Roll Eyes

Disingenuine? Who? Didn’t you say Plan B can “tweak” the model, move the goal posts, if there’s new data that changes the market’s conditions, now you’re saying it’s “broadly framed”? How convenient.

Yes... maybe you are starting to get it.

Broadly framed.. good to use as a reference.

Didn’t you also ridicule me at the mere suggestion that a 30% price reduction of Bitcoin when it was trading over $60,000?

Perhaps...  I don't recall that specific issue... but it could have been that I felt some need to attempt to ridicule you.. but there might be some need for a context, to the extent that it might be relevant to anything at this moment besides your hurt feelings...


What are you claiming now, that it isn’t ridiculous after all?

Your negating a currently valid model is ridiculous.. and your making up your own wild claims seems a bit ridiculous, too.

Did we have a specific claim that we currently wanted to explore?  Or you just want to whine about hypotheticals?


Plus because of you’re name-calling, you’re starting to remind me of my forum-bestie franky1. He was also one of those people I thought all plebs like me should be learning from.

You are misguided if you are making those kinds of comparisons.. but do what you like.

Do you have anything topical, or you just want to cry over spilt milk or some past issues/grievances that you might have about some vague issues that are only quasi-relevant?
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 24, 2022, 02:45:09 AM
[edited out]
I simply wanted a discussion.

Yes... And, we more than sufficiently discussed - way beyond any relevance in regards to the topic of this thread.  


What I truly learned from our discussion/debate is that, the Stock To Flow Model will always be “on target”, Plan B will just move the goal posts again, and adjust the “model”. Cool


The model is already broadly framed, so even if PlanB was talking about specific price targets (floors) such as $98k in November and $135k in December, his discussion does not change the broad parameters in which the model is already framed.


2024 will be the year, then $1,000,000 per Bitcoin during 2026, or it’s invalidated.

Of course, you can do whatever you want Wind_FURY.. you seemingly disingenuine dweeb...


Roll Eyes

Disingenuine? Who? Didn’t you say Plan B can “tweak” the model, move the goal posts, if there’s new data that changes the market’s conditions, now you’re saying it’s “broadly framed”? How convenient.

Didn’t you also ridicule me at the mere suggestion that a 30% price reduction of Bitcoin when it was trading over $60,000? What are you claiming now, that it isn’t ridiculous after all?

Plus because of you’re name-calling, you’re starting to remind me of my forum-bestie franky1. He was also one of those people I thought all plebs like me should be learning from.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 22, 2022, 03:24:39 PM
[edited out]
I simply wanted a discussion.

Yes... And, we more than sufficiently discussed - way beyond any relevance in regards to the topic of this thread.  


What I truly learned from our discussion/debate is that, the Stock To Flow Model will always be “on target”, Plan B will just move the goal posts again, and adjust the “model”. Cool


The model is already broadly framed, so even if PlanB was talking about specific price targets (floors) such as $98k in November and $135k in December, his discussion does not change the broad parameters in which the model is already framed.


2024 will be the year, then $1,000,000 per Bitcoin during 2026, or it’s invalidated.

Of course, you can do whatever you want Wind_FURY.. you seemingly disingenuine dweeb... and many of us are vary happy with our bitcoin investments, whether BTC over or underperforms models, such as the stock to flow model, and so times like these (when the BTC price is dropping quite deeply), there can be questions about what to do?  Do I buy on the dip, do I hold or do I sell?  And hopefully people are smart enough NOT to sell, but surely when the price is dropping, we know that there are more sellers than buyers, so in that regard the price would not be dropping without sellers... so some people believe that it is the right move to sell some or all of their coins.

In any event, there is nothing wrong with having a vision regarding where the bitcoin price might be in the next four year halvening cycle (which would be 2024 to 2028), but of course, we have to get through the rest of this four year period following the halvening first to see if the Stock to Flow model underperforms during this period, whether such underperforming (if it were to happen) needs to influence the model in terms of either tweaking or invalidating it...  If you are wedded to absolutes, then it seems as if you are referring to your own dumbass interpretation of the model (including maybe following some dweebs on twitter and saying that you believe that they are smart and therefore, you want to listen to what they are saying about the stock to flow model blah blah blah.. maybe just some fantasy ways of interpreting such model)...  

Who doesn't want to buy from Dip. This can reduce your risk. Moreover, if you buy from any asset from dip, it can easily increase your asset later. Bitcoin is in terrible moment today but it will be in good condition or regain the full force with in short of time. If your purchasing skills and circumstances are favorable then of course it is not right to miss that opportunity.
I have buy orders set down every $1k down to $20k.. but it is not like I really even want then to fill.. I would prefer that the price goes up....

Many of us are merely plebs. We don’t have as much capital as you, which is why it’s more practical for us to actually try to buy the DIP.

Don't be ridiculous.  We have talked about some of these concepts before.  You get so caught up in assumptions about supposed capital that some people might have versus other people, and of course, there are differences in terms of people who have been investing all of their lives and people who may well be in their earlier stages of investment.  I would hope that people with more investment experience have built up capital, but their success in building up capital should not disqualify them from being able to understand the better ways to build up capital and to comment on those kinds of strategies, even if they might not be currently employing those strategies because they are already beyond the earliest of wealth building strategies.

I know that I keep repeating that the best strategy is DCA with an amount that is reasonable for you.. whether it is $5 per week or $100 per week or some greater amount if you can afford it. ... however, you want to continue to assert that you are so smart.. and that you have sat on your hands in the past, and you still believe that waiting for a better price is a better strategy.. and I say fuck that nonsense..., Of course, you can play around with part of your budget in terms of waiting, but establish a reasonable DCA strategy with a reasonable amount of your budget, too... Yeah, of course, you can do what you like, but to be claiming that you know better about timing comes off as quite pretentious.. and if you really believe that you know that the BTC price will go down further.. which is a bunch of bullshit..

The last 8 years since I have been in BTC there have been all kinds of people who have proclaimed to have been smarter than BTC and asserting that it has been going down and blah blah blah.. and sure, they can frequently be right until they are not.. and in those cases when BTC decides to reverse and to go up.. you have had better have been prepared for UP.. don't get greedy.. maintain practical ongoing preparations for UP, and it does not have to be your whole budget.. like I keep saying until I am blue in the face..... but no of course, Wind_FURY.. you are smarter than DCA... and you believe that you can time the matter, even though such timing of the matter has not worked for you in the past.. but this time you have it all figured out, right?

 Furthermore, there can be some advantages in being in bitcoin longer in terms of having longer and longer to build up your orders (your buy orders and your sell orders and maybe even just being able to get ahead of the price in various ways to be able to play the BIGGER swings)... so if I am buying every time the BTC price drops $1,000 I am not saying how much I am buying, so it could be $5 each time, and that would be another $75 to get from our current price of $5k-ish down to $20k-ish ($5 each $1,000 drop adds up to 15 buy orders and $75)... Of course, the amounts that are bought each $1k drop could be larger amounts, so work with what you got in terms of strategizing the amounts of your DCAs, your increments and how far down you want to set such buy orders - whether they will ever fill or not and if you want to maintain them or not.

So even if you have complete discretion in establishing the strategies that you might want to employ in regards to regular buying of BTC and buying on dips, it's almost impossible to figure out the bottom of the dip, so I would suggest not wasting too much time on that strategy of trying to figure out the BTC bottom, unless it is merely supplementing some other DCA and more straight-forward and systematized buying on dip strategies that you might be employing.

By the way, as of this morning, I have had 6 BTC buy orders that have filled between $39k and $34k (so every $1k increment), and yesterday, I had realized that mostly I had set all of these buy orders in early September 2021 and the one at $39k-ish I had to reset in mid September 2021 because there was a dip that went down to fill the earlier $39k-ish buy order and so after the price went up above $46k in late September, that $39k-ish buy order was reset.... so much of my orders are already pre-set.. and I am not really in BTC accumulation stage anymore, I am in a kind of maintenance stage... but of course, if the BTC price drops more than 50% from $69k in November down to $34k so far... then for sure I end up accumulating more BTC.. .but it is not like I accumulate 50% more BTC.. I accumulate maybe 1% or 2% more at best in such a streak.. and if the BTC price goes back up to $69k, maybe I end up only having 0.5% more BTC than I had the first time around... perhaps? perhaps?  it is not guaranteed where I am going to end up, even though I have a system that I have been following since about 2015 with some tweaks.. and I consider what I do to be maintenance and really modest in terms of attempts at capital preservation and ways of attempting to somewhat insure my BTC holdings.

Guys should be attempting to tailor to their approach to BTC to their situation... so they have to figure out how much they are still in the early stages of BTC accumulation or have they transitioned more into a kind of maintenance stage of their BTC portfolio management... for sure, there is a lot of attempts to target the discussion at guys who are likely in various accumulation stages.. because many of us have to go through such a stage..and can sometimes question whether we have quite graduated out of such stage.. especially when the BTC prices end up dropping so much (which great levels of volatility is a kind of inevitability in BTClandia, anyhow)..

Seems that we can attempt to build our BTC approach to structure what we do, and not get so tied up into figuring out how much of a dip there is going to be, even though it is hard not to watch it in various ways, especially when extremes seem to be happening.

I know Wind_FURY that you had been proclaiming that you had fucked up a few times in the beginning in NOT beginning to DCA into BTC when you first got into the forum in mid-2016, so at what point did you stop screwing up might merely be something that you can consider in terms of your own situation and maybe how much BTC to continue to accumulate.. presuming that you have not gotten out of BTC accumulation stage yet.

No one is saying that any of these matters are easy in terms of if you have various expenses, and you are trying to figure out how much extra cash that you have on a regular basis and how much to use for buying BTC right away versus waiting for a further dip, in the event such a sip happens.  Part of the reason that I described a structuring down of outstanding buy orders every $1k down to $20k, is not to proclaim how rich I am, because you surely do not need to be rich at all in order to employ such a strategy, but the level of your cash flow is going to help you to determine how much you might want each of your buy orders to be, if you are comfortable to place some kind of buy order down every $1k down to $20k.  

Also, don't get me wrong.  I have no desire for the BTC price to go down, and I could give less than two shits about buying more BTC below $42k, but what choice did I have?  In recent years, I have found it psychologically helpful to me to maintain buy orders down to the 208-week moving average (which is currently at about $19.2k and it moved up 132% in the last year.. which is amazing in itself), but my maintenance of buy orders down to the 208-week moving average does not mean that I want those buy orders to fill.


I believe if plebs want to wait for the lowest point of the market, it will probably during 2023, IF we are indeed in a bear market.

Hopefully people are not so dumb as to be waiting to buy BTC based on some nonsense about some supposed lower price point.. and yeah of course you are presuming a bear market.. and that may be a wee bit premature of a presumption.. but hey.. whatever you do you.  

You seem to have fucked up before by not regularly buying in 2016 and thereafter, and you seem inclined to just repeat pretty much the same mistakes of your past, and you do this on an ongoing basis with your ongoing desires to wait rather than to figure out some reasonable ongoing buy amount.. and sure it does not have to be your whole budget.. you can save some for dips, in case they happen..  sure maybe you will make some of your historical mistakes less worse, but I doubt it.. especially since in bitcoin the best strategy has been DCA'ing because we cannot really know.. even though you want to presume a bear market.. and seems that you have done that several times before and failed to adequately and sufficiently buy BTC during those times that you thought that BTC might be in or going into a bear market.. In any event, does not seem to be a good strategy to be waiting around instead of just buying regularly with a meaningful amount (even if it is only part of your available BTC budget).

In other words, like I said, the best strategy is to figure out a reasonable DCA amount and to do that every week.. $100 per week is a good target.  Another thing is that once you establish a reasonable DCA strategy, then of course, you can hold some additional amounts for buying on dips... and of course, how you divide those amounts are within your discretion to figure out what you believe might be better for you and your situation in terms of both psychology and finances.. and of course, I have been an advocate of time in the market rather than trying to time the market.. especially when it comes to BTC.  

Of course, we have not guarantees where BTC price might be going, even if we can look back and see where the price had been, but just in the case of someone like yourself, there are ways that a $100 per week strategy, and maybe even some lump sum investing along the way, would put you well over 15 BTC by this time and merely investing around $31k during that time. For sure, buying in 2016 and early 2017 would have gotten you the most bang for the buck in terms of front loading possibilities, but even if you had just DCA'ed at 100 per week, you could have pretty easily gotten yourself into supra 15 BTC territories by now, and that kind of an amount is nothing to sneeze at... even if the investment would have been somewhat modestly aggressive.... so of course, if we cut down the amount by 10 and say that you did not have enough money to be able to invest $100 per week, then the amount of the profits would be cut by 10 also.. so instead of being in the supra 15BTC territory, you would be in the 1.5BTC territory.. with an investment of $10 per week instead of $100 per week.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 22, 2022, 03:19:47 AM
[edited out]
I simply wanted a discussion.

Yes... And, we more than sufficiently discussed - way beyond any relevance in regards to the topic of this thread.  


What I truly learned from our discussion/debate is that, the Stock To Flow Model will always be “on target”, Plan B will just move the goal posts again, and adjust the “model”. Cool

2024 will be the year, then $1,000,000 per Bitcoin during 2026, or it’s invalidated.

Who doesn't want to buy from Dip. This can reduce your risk. Moreover, if you buy from any asset from dip, it can easily increase your asset later. Bitcoin is in terrible moment today but it will be in good condition or regain the full force with in short of time. If your purchasing skills and circumstances are favorable then of course it is not right to miss that opportunity.

I have buy orders set down every $1k down to $20k.. but it is not like I really even want then to fill.. I would prefer that the price goes up....


Many of us are merely plebs. We don’t have as much capital as you, which is why it’s more practical for us to actually try to buy the DIP. I believe if plebs want to wait for the lowest point of the market, it will probably during 2023, IF we are indeed in a bear market.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 21, 2022, 12:37:04 PM
Who doesn't want to buy from Dip. This can reduce your risk. Moreover, if you buy from any asset from dip, it can easily increase your asset later. Bitcoin is in terrible moment today but it will be in good condition or regain the full force with in short of time. If your purchasing skills and circumstances are favorable then of course it is not right to miss that opportunity.

Yes.. one thing is talking about buying on the dip, and another thing is putting such matter into practice.. and we need details regarding that rather than mere overview theories.

Accordingly, you could have "favorable circumstances" and skills.. but you can still fuck things up if you are trying to be too precise with what you are doing in terms of timing the bottom.. and getting it wrong.

I have buy orders set down every $1k down to $20k.. but it is not like I really even want then to fill.. I would prefer that the price goes up....

Remember around December 3, we had a dip down to $41k-ish... so then there might have been some thought that the dip was over because we recovered to $52k by Christmas time.. but then resumed our gradual plodding DOWNity... so sure there has been buying from me in this second round starting at $44k-ish.. and then every thousand dollars down to $38k-ish, so far.. and my order did not fill in the $37ks, yet... and I would prefer that it does not.... so are those favorable skills and circumstances?

Some people have ongoing cashflow.. but should they buy at any price, or try to buy on the dip, and how do they know if they are buying on a sufficient dip or should be hanging onto some of their cash in case there is more dip?
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 21, 2022, 11:43:29 AM
[edited out]
I simply wanted a discussion.

Yes... And, we more than sufficiently discussed - way beyond any relevance in regards to the topic of this thread.  

Seems that if you are so inclined to discuss StocktoFlow then either you make a topic on it or take it to one of the stock to flow threads.  

I think that fillippone has a pretty good thread on the topic, and it would be great to see you raising your "concerns" there.. whether it is death of the stock to flow model, or your other various questions about PlanB.. and even questioning why you might still have questions about matters that you cannot even figure out ways to separate stock to flow from the floor model and from PlanB's statements.. so sure.. maybe you could not even stay on point if you were to go to some already existing thread.. and you might need a thread for the ramblings of Wind_FURY... .. and sure, I have already seen that you likely are not inclined to raise your points in places where they would actually be relevant because you seem to have difficulties staying on topic.. not just in this thread.  
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 21, 2022, 06:05:51 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

The debate is not about me, it’s about the model.

Huh?  Since when have I given any shits about you?

Largely my criticisms of you have to do with how you are criticizing the model and spouting out baloney... so in that sense, I am talking about your ideas not you.

Quote

Haha remember when everyone was taking stock-to-flow models seriously? The early bitcoin community was so silly.

https://twitter.com/aaronvanw/status/1479462225895206912

It was not on “my idea”, I’m the stupid one.

That was tweeted by one of the most respected Bitcoiners in the community. Is he full of “baloney” too?

If you are repeating the dumb ideas of others, then you have to take responsibility for what you are saying.... Seems that my interaction is with you, and I am not interacting with Aaron Vanwirdum.. .. you are the one who has both been making the bold and dumb statements and then subsequently mischaracterizing even what is going on by suggesting that PlanB's assertions about the floor model is the same as his assertions about stock to flow and also presuming that anyone gives too many shits about specifically what PlanB is saying on an ongoing basis in order to understand some of the concepts underlying the stock to flow model.


Aaron Van Wirdum’s scarcasm aside, is questioning the validity of the model a dumb idea?


Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy?

I have already explained.  the model is correlated to data..  Of course, you do not have to agree with it, and you can give it little weight, but totally ignoring it or acting like it has no value seems to be quite detached from reality..

In the end, we are talking about various ways of framing BTC price movements where we have been, where we are at and from that, where we might be going.
The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much?

Stock to flow model did not say that.  How many times does this need to be repeated?

Yes it did, https://stats.buybitcoinworldwide.com/stock-to-flow/

Yes.. I see a line at the $100k level.. that does not mean that the price has to be on the line at a specific date.


The line is near $100,000 ends during the first half of 2024, then next horizontal line is $1,000,000. If price regresses below the $100,000 line, and never surges to $1,000,000 during 2026, what now? Move goal posts because “reasons”, right?

I believe that would be an admission that the model has been invalidated in the face of new data.

Plan B was always tweeting “right on schedule” before the model started to break apart,

So fucking what in regards to what PlanB was saying about being on schedule, and the model is not broken.. in spite of all your fantasies and the various fantasies of other supposed "smart people."

and everybody started laughing at him. Currently he goes around saying that Bitcoin’s price is being suppressed, probably the message is “I’m not wrong, the market is wrong”. Hahaha.

You are easily distracted.  If there is a mean that is expected by the model there should be deviance from the mean on both sides of the mean.. .. so yeah, the longer that the price is below the mean, the more likely that the mean would need to be shifted or maybe there is something else wrong with the model.. too early to call like I said about 10,000 times..


Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?

You seem to be living in a fantasy.... and failing to even grapple with the topic that you are criticizing.  So in that regard, you are both living in a fantasy and even difficult to follow about what the fuck you are talking about.

Am I? Cool

Seems to me.,. that you have some kind of difficulties to deal with matters for what they are rather than just exaggerating various topics and talking a lot of nonsense rather than really attempting to grapple with real concepts.. you cannot even stick to the topic of this thread.. sure I understand the future BTC price can affect how much any of us might consider there to actually be a dip or if more dip might be coming and also attempt to inform us about what we might do right now in terms of our own cash flow.. just buy blindly and regularly or attempt to time some buys or just give up and don't do anything.  If we are in BTC accumulation stage, it would be good to have some kind of a buying plan. whether that is on some kind of regular basis such as daily / Weekly or some kinds of price targets, as I am expecting that there may have been a lot of folks who already bought at several times in these lower $40ks since the first time we got to lower $40ks was December 3, and then we been revisiting lower $40ks in the past two weeks-ish.


Exaggerating? Your over-reaction is exaggerating. I simply wanted a discussion.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 20, 2022, 04:17:42 PM
[edited out]
You provide good advice and input for those who read your arguments, especially @JayJuanGee who never wants to budge but your words make a lot of sense and there is a lot of truth in each argument when I read it.
 Grin
and I just want to comment on the topic title?
because for now I am using DIP method instead of Hodl for bitcoin which I think is a good choice and also a good time for me to add my holdings and for long term.
and I think dip is just a term used when a trader decides to accumulate an asset as it falls or falls. For example, when I buy bitcoin because its value is going down, I'm basically "buying down"

I am not a complete advocate of ONLY buying BTC on the dip, because I believe that dollar cost averaging (DCA) is a better BTC accumulation strategy overall rather than merely buying on the dip, and buying on the dip as well as lump sum investing can actually supplement any somewhat sound and already established DCA strategy.... In other words, I consider DCA to be the core BTC accumulation strategy and buying on dip and lump sum investing as supplemental strategies.

So for sure, there are some needs to figure out your budget and your cashflow... and how much cash you want to regularly invest into bitcoin, and if you should be saving any cash for buying on dips, in case that there are further dips.

You can also study your situation as you go along, and create target amounts of BTC that you would like to accumulate (of course accounting for its dollar value and where you expect it to go), so in that regard, it is good to know your other investments, figure out your view on bitcoin as compared with your other investments, your timeline, your risk tolerance and your skills, time and ability to plan, learn along the way and tweak your strategies from time to time, which might involve the use of more sophisticated practices.. though for sure, starting out by getting your basics in place tends to be a better way to get some grounding regarding figuring out if what you are doing is working for you both financially and psychologically.

So after you go through a lot of looking at your own circumstances, you should be in a better position to feel comfortable about whatever strategies you employ and whether you feel that it is working for you in terms of financial and psychological balance.

None of us also are going to know whether the BTC price might drop further, even though it could be helpful to already have a tentative plan and budget that allows you to continue to buy if the BTC price does fall without necessarily running out of money; however, since we don't really know for sure how much the price might drop at any time or how long it might stay down, ultimately we have to find a kind of balance that is comfortable for us.  The longer that you are in BTC, it becomes more likely that you are better able to figure out more comfortable ways to prepare yourself for various extremes that can happen in BTC's price movements, and I am not even proclaiming that it is ever really easy.. even though I have found that being in greater profits, there does tend to be somewhat less worry about large price drops because even with the price drops, after a while they no longer take you out of profits.. so there is a certain comfort with that, even though it could take 4 years or longer to build your BTC holdings (and your practices) to that level.
sr. member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 448
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
January 20, 2022, 12:28:24 PM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

The debate is not about me, it’s about the model.

Huh?  Since when have I given any shits about you?

Largely my criticisms of you have to do with how you are criticizing the model and spouting out baloney... so in that sense, I am talking about your ideas not you.

Quote

Haha remember when everyone was taking stock-to-flow models seriously? The early bitcoin community was so silly.

https://twitter.com/aaronvanw/status/1479462225895206912

It was not on “my idea”, I’m the stupid one.

That was tweeted by one of the most respected Bitcoiners in the community. Is he full of “baloney” too?

If you are repeating the dumb ideas of others, then you have to take responsibility for what you are saying.... Seems that my interaction is with you, and I am not interacting with Aaron Vanwirdum.. .. you are the one who has both been making the bold and dumb statements and then subsequently mischaracterizing even what is going on by suggesting that PlanB's assertions about the floor model is the same as his assertions about stock to flow and also presuming that anyone gives too many shits about specifically what PlanB is saying on an ongoing basis in order to understand some of the concepts underlying the stock to flow model.

So your ongoing desires to keep talking about stock to flow is dead blah blah blah.. does not really seem to be progressing any kind of discussion in any kind of meaningful way... especially when you do not even seem to know what the fuck you are talking about so now you resort to saying "other smart people are saying it. blah blah blah."  So what.



Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy?

I have already explained.  the model is correlated to data..  Of course, you do not have to agree with it, and you can give it little weight, but totally ignoring it or acting like it has no value seems to be quite detached from reality..

In the end, we are talking about various ways of framing BTC price movements where we have been, where we are at and from that, where we might be going.
The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much?

Stock to flow model did not say that.  How many times does this need to be repeated?

Yes it did, https://stats.buybitcoinworldwide.com/stock-to-flow/

Yes.. I see a line at the $100k level.. that does not mean that the price has to be on the line at a specific date.

Plan B was always tweeting “right on schedule” before the model started to break apart,

So fucking what in regards to what PlanB was saying about being on schedule, and the model is not broken.. in spite of all your fantasies and the various fantasies of other supposed "smart people."

and everybody started laughing at him. Currently he goes around saying that Bitcoin’s price is being suppressed, probably the message is “I’m not wrong, the market is wrong”. Hahaha.

You are easily distracted.  If there is a mean that is expected by the model there should be deviance from the mean on both sides of the mean.. .. so yeah, the longer that the price is below the mean, the more likely that the mean would need to be shifted or maybe there is something else wrong with the model.. too early to call like I said about 10,000 times..


Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?

You seem to be living in a fantasy.... and failing to even grapple with the topic that you are criticizing.  So in that regard, you are both living in a fantasy and even difficult to follow about what the fuck you are talking about.

Am I? Cool

Seems to me.,. that you have some kind of difficulties to deal with matters for what they are rather than just exaggerating various topics and talking a lot of nonsense rather than really attempting to grapple with real concepts.. you cannot even stick to the topic of this thread.. sure I understand the future BTC price can affect how much any of us might consider there to actually be a dip or if more dip might be coming and also attempt to inform us about what we might do right now in terms of our own cash flow.. just buy blindly and regularly or attempt to time some buys or just give up and don't do anything.  If we are in BTC accumulation stage, it would be good to have some kind of a buying plan. whether that is on some kind of regular basis such as daily / Weekly or some kinds of price targets, as I am expecting that there may have been a lot of folks who already bought at several times in these lower $40ks since the first time we got to lower $40ks was December 3, and then we been revisiting lower $40ks in the past two weeks-ish.
You provide good advice and input for those who read your arguments, especially @JayJuanGee who never wants to budge but your words make a lot of sense and there is a lot of truth in each argument when I read it.
 Grin
and I just want to comment on the topic title?
because for now I am using DIP method instead of Hodl for bitcoin which I think is a good choice and also a good time for me to add my holdings and for long term.
and I think dip is just a term used when a trader decides to accumulate an asset as it falls or falls. For example, when I buy bitcoin because its value is going down, I'm basically "buying down"
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 20, 2022, 11:43:03 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

The debate is not about me, it’s about the model.

Huh?  Since when have I given any shits about you?

Largely my criticisms of you have to do with how you are criticizing the model and spouting out baloney... so in that sense, I am talking about your ideas not you.

Quote

Haha remember when everyone was taking stock-to-flow models seriously? The early bitcoin community was so silly.

https://twitter.com/aaronvanw/status/1479462225895206912

It was not on “my idea”, I’m the stupid one.

That was tweeted by one of the most respected Bitcoiners in the community. Is he full of “baloney” too?

If you are repeating the dumb ideas of others, then you have to take responsibility for what you are saying.... Seems that my interaction is with you, and I am not interacting with Aaron Vanwirdum.. .. you are the one who has both been making the bold and dumb statements and then subsequently mischaracterizing even what is going on by suggesting that PlanB's assertions about the floor model is the same as his assertions about stock to flow and also presuming that anyone gives too many shits about specifically what PlanB is saying on an ongoing basis in order to understand some of the concepts underlying the stock to flow model.

So your ongoing desires to keep talking about stock to flow is dead blah blah blah.. does not really seem to be progressing any kind of discussion in any kind of meaningful way... especially when you do not even seem to know what the fuck you are talking about so now you resort to saying "other smart people are saying it. blah blah blah."  So what.



Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy?

I have already explained.  the model is correlated to data..  Of course, you do not have to agree with it, and you can give it little weight, but totally ignoring it or acting like it has no value seems to be quite detached from reality..

In the end, we are talking about various ways of framing BTC price movements where we have been, where we are at and from that, where we might be going.
The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much?

Stock to flow model did not say that.  How many times does this need to be repeated?

Yes it did, https://stats.buybitcoinworldwide.com/stock-to-flow/

Yes.. I see a line at the $100k level.. that does not mean that the price has to be on the line at a specific date.

Plan B was always tweeting “right on schedule” before the model started to break apart,

So fucking what in regards to what PlanB was saying about being on schedule, and the model is not broken.. in spite of all your fantasies and the various fantasies of other supposed "smart people."

and everybody started laughing at him. Currently he goes around saying that Bitcoin’s price is being suppressed, probably the message is “I’m not wrong, the market is wrong”. Hahaha.

You are easily distracted.  If there is a mean that is expected by the model there should be deviance from the mean on both sides of the mean.. .. so yeah, the longer that the price is below the mean, the more likely that the mean would need to be shifted or maybe there is something else wrong with the model.. too early to call like I said about 10,000 times..


Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?

You seem to be living in a fantasy.... and failing to even grapple with the topic that you are criticizing.  So in that regard, you are both living in a fantasy and even difficult to follow about what the fuck you are talking about.

Am I? Cool

Seems to me.,. that you have some kind of difficulties to deal with matters for what they are rather than just exaggerating various topics and talking a lot of nonsense rather than really attempting to grapple with real concepts.. you cannot even stick to the topic of this thread.. sure I understand the future BTC price can affect how much any of us might consider there to actually be a dip or if more dip might be coming and also attempt to inform us about what we might do right now in terms of our own cash flow.. just buy blindly and regularly or attempt to time some buys or just give up and don't do anything.  If we are in BTC accumulation stage, it would be good to have some kind of a buying plan. whether that is on some kind of regular basis such as daily / Weekly or some kinds of price targets, as I am expecting that there may have been a lot of folks who already bought at several times in these lower $40ks since the first time we got to lower $40ks was December 3, and then we been revisiting lower $40ks in the past two weeks-ish.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 20, 2022, 04:57:18 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

The debate is not about me, it’s about the model.

Huh?  Since when have I given any shits about you?

Largely my criticisms of you have to do with how you are criticizing the model and spouting out baloney... so in that sense, I am talking about your ideas not you.


Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy?

I have already explained.  the model is correlated to data..  Of course, you do not have to agree with it, and you can give it little weight, but totally ignoring it or acting like it has no value seems to be quite detached from reality..

In the end, we are talking about various ways of framing BTC price movements where we have been, where we are at and from that, where we might be going.



The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much?

Stock to flow model did not say that.  How many times does this need to be repeated?


Yes it did, https://stats.buybitcoinworldwide.com/stock-to-flow/

Plan B was always tweeting “right on schedule” before the model started to break apart, and everybody started laughing at him. Currently he goes around saying that Bitcoin’s price is being suppressed, probably the message is “I’m not wrong, the market is wrong”. Hahaha.

Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?

You seem to be living in a fantasy.... and failing to even grapple with the topic that you are criticizing.  So in that regard, you are both living in a fantasy and even difficult to follow about what the fuck you are talking about.


Am I? Cool
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 19, 2022, 01:51:27 PM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

The debate is not about me, it’s about the model.

Huh?  Since when have I given any shits about you?

Largely my criticisms of you have to do with how you are criticizing the model and spouting out baloney... so in that sense, I am talking about your ideas not you.


Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy?

I have already explained.  the model is correlated to data..  Of course, you do not have to agree with it, and you can give it little weight, but totally ignoring it or acting like it has no value seems to be quite detached from reality..

In the end, we are talking about various ways of framing BTC price movements where we have been, where we are at and from that, where we might be going.

The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much?

Stock to flow model did not say that.  How many times does this need to be repeated?

Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?

You seem to be living in a fantasy.... and failing to even grapple with the topic that you are criticizing.  So in that regard, you are both living in a fantasy and even difficult to follow about what the fuck you are talking about.

By the way, the topic of this thread was supposed to be concerning buying the dip, so getting into discussion about where the BTC price might be going has something to do with attempting to figure out how much of a dip might be necessary before beginning to buy.... and yeah of course, if there is some credence that we might still be going up and the UP portion of this cycle is not yet over, then of course, then there would be both emphasis on continuing to buy the dip and surely that is part of the reason that the S2F model was relevant to the discussion in the first place.  Furthermore, it is not ONLY S2F that is conjecturing that the UP portion of this cycle is not yet over.

Nothing is guaranteed for sure, and each of us has to come to our own conclusions, and in that regard, people are going to arrive at differing conclusions regarding how much of a dip there might be coming in the near term (and is the bottom in) and then what strategies are best employed to prepare for future BTC prices.

Of course, there could be some crying if the BTC price goes down instead of up, but any of us should be prepared for either direction and be able to figure out what we are going to do and/or how we might talk to others about what they should do, in the event that they ask what we think about BTC.

I know in the past, you Wind_FURY have gone into silent mode when you don't know what to tell people, and my own philosophy has always been to tell people that if they do not have any BTC accounts or BTC, then to get the fuck started. 

Another thing is that for about two weeks we have been bouncing around in a correction zone of $39,559 to $45k (which would be more or less 35% to 41% down from the so far $69k top from November 9), and in recent times so much around $42k so not even in the high end of the correction zone, currently, so for sure if guys are buying on the dip, they may have already bought in these price ranges, but they still might have cash flow coming in with the passage of time, so sometimes there can be questions regarding whether to wait, buy now or even do some kind of combination... and this thread has never really been about selling...(especially in a correction zone), even though I know that sometimes people do likely end up engaging in that kind of conduct which can be quite disastrous to be selling in a pretty decently sized correction zone.. but peeps are going to peep.. in spite of potentially following the alternative suggestion which would be to HODL through it... if you don't buy more, then just HODL.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 19, 2022, 09:40:32 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  


The debate is not about me, it’s about the model. Plus why is questioning the validity of the model be a person living in fantasy? The model said $100,000 by December, it was off by how much? Does a model being wrong by that much still should be considered a valid model? BUT Plan B is allowed to move the goal posts, then who is living in a fantasy?
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 17, 2022, 01:06:05 PM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool

I never said that we follow that model or any other model without attempting to grapple with its meaning and context.  Also, I never said that the parameters of the model might become invalidated... I don't even claim to understand exactly what are all the parameters of the model including some of the underlying mathematical assumptions regarding the projection of BTC price curves into the future.

I have surely said that currently we have a valid and insightful model front of us, and I have acknowledged that any of us can give the model whatever weight that we want, including ignoring it at your peril, if that is what you choose.  

If you choose to NOT give the model any weight and to poo poo what it is saying, then you have a right to live in a fantasy, and it seems to me that you are ignoring a presentation of facts and logic that is right in front of you.  

Another thing is accounting for the stock to flow model does not require you to agree with all of the conclusions of others who are accounting for that same model, whether that is PlanB, me or someone else, and furthermore certain BTC price dynamics could pass such as the price moving within a range for a certain period of time that causes you to read the model differently from someone else.

Let's say for example, PlanB is suggesting that even if it appears that we are off course from the expected price average of the model, which from his view would be $100k for the whole 4-year halvening period from May 2020 until March 2024 (or whenever the halvening period ends up ending), he believes that we are still sufficiently on target to reach $100k within this 4-year period, and maybe someone else (hypothetical person 2) believes that it is more likely that this 4-year halvening period is only going to reach $80k  for the average price for the period, and still someone else (hypothetical person 3) believes that it is more likely that we are going to reach $60k for the halvening period.. and each one of these different hypothetical persons could assert that the S2F model should be accounted for and tweaked in order to show why their interpretation of the S2F model is valid and consistent with bitcoin's history.

In other words, maybe you are trying to assign way the hell too much certainty into what you believe the stock to flow model is saying.  You just make shit up about what you believe the model to be saying and you poo poo it.

Any of us should realize that any model should already attempt to account for variance of the data that can take place within its parameters - especially when projecting out into the future....

Also, frequently a lot of the time, when regular people talk about any kinds of ideas about the future, there is a tendency to want to present future matters in terms of specific numbers rather than a range because we want to be more precise in what we are trying to say, but if we are trying to be more accurate that future is going to already acknowledge the existence variance and a range in terms of what are the various possible futures that could happen.  

PlanB is not unaware of the concept of variance in terms of projecting out into the future, and he already frequently talks about that kind of a variance dynamic in terms of a certain amount of expectation that actuality will vary from the mean, even while he is continuing to expect that the mean of $100k for this particular halvening period is going to be met in the subsequent 2 years by making up for the so far underperformance of the first two years, so that the total 4-year period will end up averaging out to his expectation of a $100k average price for the whole 4-year period.

Maybe you are not even wanting to project something like $60k for the whole 4-year period because right now we might be not even have a current average that is even quite up to $40k for the nearly two years that have passed so far, so you doubt that $60k is going to be achievable, and you also are inclined to throw out the whole model and make up some of your own nonsense that is not attached to anything besides your own pie in the sky and detached from reality whimsical ideas.,.

I have my doubts about whimsical ideas in terms of whether they help anyone to prepare for much of anything.. and sure you have been busy in poo pooing the whole time and believing that you are actually contributing something of possible value with your ongoing poo pooing.... Do what you like?  refuse to get value and insight out of an already existing comprehensive and credible model.. that's your choice to continue with your own whimsicalities rather than trying to grapple with and bound yourself to some kinds of acceptable and valid frameworks and parameters.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 17, 2022, 04:31:00 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..


OK, then we should blindly follow, and believe PlanB’s Stock to Flow Model as a working Model, and accept that he can move the goal posts on a whim whenever there’s new circumstances/data that affects Bitcoin’s price. That’s a “Model” that will never be invalidated. Cool
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 14, 2022, 12:25:25 PM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

This has been mentioned several times, and shows both your lack of interaction (just spouting out your own talking points over and over), and your not even understanding what the fuck you are talking about..

Maybe I should attempt one more time.  Not for you, but because this is a public thread.

PlanB has at least three models.  One is stock to flow that is ONLY about bitcoin, the other is stock to flow that also incorporates other assets and the third is his floor model.  His floor model predicted $98k for November and $135k for December as floor prices, and they were obviously wrong.

Stock to flow has a means price of $100k for the 4 years after the halvening.  We are less than two years into the halvening period, and probably the means price is around $40k at this time.




Right now, we have some pretty damned good models and stock to flow is amongst the best of the models in my opinion

OK, then until when, or at what point, will you admit that it has been invalidated?

Probably I answered this question several times, but for the sake of some kind of redundant clarity, we likely should watch how the remainder of this four year period goes.. and sure at some point we might end up seeing that  BTC prices are not even close to the $100k mean or maybe some other reasonable mean that might be incorporated.  I find no need to talk about hypotheticals that would cause me to give less credibility to the model, even though there likely would be various kinds of underperformance over this cycle that might cause it or even over a couple of cycles into the future, if we might have trouble theorizing any kind of cycle and there are better explanations for what is happening in terms of the BTC price dynamics.


Snip

It’s now hard to take you seriously. I thought you were one of those people we can learn from.

You do what you like in terms of what you believe to be sound ways of thinking about matters or what you seem to be credible sources or how much weight to give to sources of information, whether those are facts, logic, conclusions or some ways of considering the combination of those matters.... Ongoingly, you have seemed to get easily distracted into areas of questionable relevance.. but whatever... you do you.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 14, 2022, 06:27:46 AM

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.


S2F predicted $135,000 by December 2021. How can you “tweak” a predictive model if it’s wrong by obviously a very large percentage? It can’t be taken seriously after the “tweak”.

Quote

Right now, we have some pretty damned good models and stock to flow is amongst the best of the models in my opinion


OK, then until when, or at what point, will you admit that it has been invalidated?

Quote

Snip


It’s now hard to take you seriously. I thought you were one of those people we can learn from.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 12, 2022, 02:12:38 PM
[edited out]

OK, let’s simplify the question. As smart as you are, would you say that the S2F Model would never be invalidated in the next 50 years, and that we should still take it seriously? Yes, or no? It doesn’t require a long post from you.

I am having some troubles recognizing and appreciating why such a question might matter?

Because many people believe the model is based on Science, and the model doesn’t, or cannot, account for Black Swans and Human Behavior.

Your question had focused on way the fuck out there considerations of 50 years into the future.. why do we need to consider our own expectations about what various now existing BTC price prediction models might still be working so far out?

yeah, if we have a model (or models) currently that is applicable, we apply that model as far out as we reasonably can, but the closer the timeline of 4-10 years should be more important and relevant in terms of motivating our plannings, strategizing and actions.. and sure there are potentially extreme events that could happen that either change any model's trajectory, predictive powers or invalidate the model, but still should not justify throwing our hands up in the air with a sense of futility.  

Seems to me that we should be attempting to use the best tools that are in front of us instead of proclaiming them all to be potentially invalid 50 years into the future and then making up our own models that are not tethered to anything.

So, yeah, if we are using any model, and facts are changing in such a way that had not been anticipated by the model whether it is in the near-term or further out in the model's life then we either tweak the model as we go or throw it out and substitute with a better model(s) if such better model(s) then exist.

Sure it could be the case that we have some fairly convincing BTC price prediction models in place, and then some actual events put their validity and applicability into question, and then when end up invalidating our previous models (that we thought were going to be good and sufficient) potentially we could then end up being stuck with much inferior models.. and surely that is not the case currently.  

Right now, we have some pretty damned good models and stock to flow is amongst the best of the models in my opinion so long as it is coupled with the four-year fractal and exponential s-curve adoption based on network effects and Metcalfe principles... and sure I am not even going to deny that there are some other minority factors that could also be brought into considering such BTC price dynamic expectations such as momentum, various changes in sentiment, and attempts at predicting black swans or accounting for various macro-governmental factors, but surely from my perspective those various other factors are likely a lot of noise as compared with: 1) stock to flow 2) four-year fractal and 3) exponential s-curve adoption based on network effects and Metcalfe principles.

 

[edited out]

Are you debating that it would OK for PlanB to move the goal posts everytime the model is in danger to be invalidated?

I doubt that I am debating.  It seems that I said that if there are changes in the data and perhaps changes in the logic then the model might need to adapt to the new data and logic.

I believe then it shouldn’t be called a “Model”, which some known Bitcoiners have started not to take it seriosuly.

Yes.. there are a lot of people who seem to easily get distracted, including yourself if you are buying into such nonsense.

Of course, you can give the model whatever weight you believe including completely discounting it (seemingly prematurely).... but do what you like.. and rely on whatever other voo doo baloney that you believe to be better indicators/descriptors regarding where we are, how we got here and where we might be going.  You might end up guessing correctly... good luck with that.


So what is your deal right now, Wind_FURY?  Are you trying to figure out if we have dipped enough? or are you going to go back to recommending that folks stop buying bitcoin when they may well be served by continuing to DCA into bitcoin, especially if they do not really have a lot of confidence which way BTC prices might be going in the short term, but they have a long enough timeline that they are investing 4-10 years or more.

Do I, as a pleb, have no right to question the “S2F Model” because it might offend some people?

You can do what you like, and you can say what you like, and if you say stuff that seems to be untethered to reality, then you should expect that some people are going to question what you are saying.

Frequently, you yourself seem to be mischaracterizing even what the stock to flow model is saying and then you seem to persist with your mischaracterization and makes it appear that you are being purposeful in your own delusions.. so yeah do what you like, but sometimes it comes off as a wee bit disingenuous.

For example, if the model is anticipating a $100k average price for the 4 years after the halvening, and we are nearly two years into the halvening but the average might ONLY be $40k-ish, so either the model is under performing or it is invalid.. and sure there are guys like you who seem to want to say that the model is completely full of shit merely because it is underperforming some specific targets or even the mean of where it should be and also make some other claims about the model having no value, and seem to be even making misstatements about the level of certainty that the model is propounding.

Yeah.. maybe the model is wrong.. but still we are less than 2 years into this halvening period.. so there is another two years to see how the whole 4 year period after the halvening plays out and to verify if the model ends up underperforming.. and if so whether such underperformance is enough to invalidate the model or would it be better to tweak the model.. to account for the underperformance.. maybe even shift the curve downward if that might help to make the data more in line and which could even cause some need to adjust the theory and the math that is involved..

You seem to believe that tweaking the model in order to account for data, including if the curves of the model or the math might end up getting changed would be cheating.. which seems to be a lack of understanding regarding how good faith efforts are made when attempting to analyze these kinds of matters..   Even if models are tweaked, they can also be reviewed for their earlier iterations and how they might have gotten changed over the years and whether those changes might end up having had been substantially and meaningfully changing the model in such a way that is not "true science" in the event we are striving for "true science" and sure, there could be differences in opinions about methodologies or all kinds of ways to criticize how much weight to give to any model including ones that you might propose to be better models... or if you believe that the amount of tweaking of any model is substantially changing its original vision to cause such model to be "unscientific," so therefor you prefer to find some better model to help you to make better projections about how the BTC is likely to perform into the future.

Should we merely accept it as “truth”, or be in silence if the “Model” is actually invalidated?

No one is saying that.  If you are making a variety of valid criticisms, then that could be helpful.  

If you are devolving into your own absolutism interpretations, then that could end up coming off as misleading, when you merely proclaim that other people believe the model is broken, and some of those folks seem to be mixing up stock to flow and the floor model.. which are two different models and of course, the floor model had been shown to be quite wrong regarding November and December numbers of $98k and $135k respectively, especially since PlanB pronounced such specific floor number expectation numbers that quite largely underperformed his assertions.. as we know the actual BTC price at the end of November and the end of December was in the ballpark of $57k and $48k respectively.

In the end, everyone is free to decide how much weight to give to any model (if any), and surely each of us may well decide aspects of our own BTC investment strategies based on these kinds of factors. Seems to me that anyone who overly assigns specifics is setting themselves up for failures in various ways.. so if any of us are prepared for a variety of scenarios, we can also assign weight to a variety of models that we consider to be valid without expecting even that the models might require some kind of specific performance into the future that may or may not end up happening... and I have difficulties understanding how any BTC price performance model would have been wrong regarding specifics, if in September 2020 we had been prepared for either BTC prices to go down or to go UP, so our preparation for UP would have been a good thing because we would have gotten something like a 6.5x to 6.9x appreciation in the value of our BTC holdings - even though some folks might proclaim that they are depressed because right now we are only about 4.2x to 4.4x positive, when they thought that we would have been more than 10x positive by now... and I would blame people for putting themselves into too high of expectations rather than blaming the model.. but hey, Wind_FURY... you do you.. if you want to whine and complain that the model mislead you regarding your level of richie.. then that seems to be on you (and people with seemingly similar sentiments) more than anything.

By the way, I am personally prepared for BTC prices that could end this cycle within this calendar year as high as supra $1.5 million** .. so I am psychologically and financially prepared for such an outrageous price performance to happen.. while at the same time I am prepared for the bottom to go down to the 208-week moving average which is currently around $19k, and sometimes the BTC price will dip below the 208-week moving average for even as long as a few weeks.  

**If you want, you can look at my as of December 16 projection of BTC price probabilities and my expectations of the 208-week moving average trajectory, including number of coins to reach entry-level fuck you status.

I feel that I am financially and psychologically prepared for either extreme, even though I expect actual BTC price performance for this calendar year to play out at various points between the extremes, and surely in my own contemplation of the matter, the BTC price points that end up getting hit between the extremes that could end up happening are not assigned equal probabilities of happening, even though in the end, when we get through this whole calendar year, a certain set of events will have happened, even though at this particular time, a variety of scenarios are projected with varying probability levels... only one scenario will end up playing out and that is currently unknown but based on a whole bunch of probabilities of various events and factors.  Some events/factors are known, unknown and unknowable unknowns.. but by the end of the calendar year, they will all become known, and the past will be in place, and we will just be in a similar place as we are now in terms of attempting to assign new probabilities to the next calendar year (to the extent any of it matters in terms of tweaking our own planning and carrying out of strategies).
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
January 12, 2022, 06:12:22 AM
[edited out]

OK, let’s simplify the question. As smart as you are, would you say that the S2F Model would never be invalidated in the next 50 years, and that we should still take it seriously? Yes, or no? It doesn’t require a long post from you.

I am having some troubles recognizing and appreciating why such a question might matter? 


Because many people believe the model is based on Science, and the model doesn’t, or cannot, account for Black Swans and Human Behavior.

[edited out]

Are you debating that it would OK for PlanB to move the goal posts everytime the model is in danger to be invalidated?

I doubt that I am debating.  It seems that I said that if there are changes in the data and perhaps changes in the logic then the model might need to adapt to the new data and logic


I believe then it shouldn’t be called a “Model”, which some known Bitcoiners have started not to take it seriosuly.

Quote

So what is your deal right now, Wind_FURY?  Are you trying to figure out if we have dipped enough? or are you going to go back to recommending that folks stop buying bitcoin when they may well be served by continuing to DCA into bitcoin, especially if they do not really have a lot of confidence which way BTC prices might be going in the short term, but they have a long enough timeline that they are investing 4-10 years or more.


Do I, as a pleb, have no right to question the “S2F Model” because it might offend some people? Should we merely accept it as “truth”, or be in silence if the “Model” is actually invalidated?
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
January 08, 2022, 02:03:45 AM
[edited out]

OK, let’s simplify the question. As smart as you are, would you say that the S2F Model would never be invalidated in the next 50 years, and that we should still take it seriously? Yes, or no? It doesn’t require a long post from you.

I am having some troubles recognizing and appreciating why such a question might matter?  We have general guidelines about the future and we attempt to use the best models in front of us, and the more that we try to box in specifics that are far out into the future, then the more likely there are going to be known unknowns or unknowns that affect relevant facts and logic that change the outcomes.  In other words, we consider whatever we model that we feel to be most relevant for what dynamics that we have in front of us and we do the best that we can with what information that we have in front of us.

Of course, we have a halvening of the new bitcoin issued (or coming available into the system) every 4 years, so with the longer passage of time, the new bitcoin supply becomes less of the overall proportion of the whole bitcoin supply.... so surely that ongoing reduction of the new supply would be an issue that might cause some other model to become more applicable... so whatever models we are using will be relevant to the extent that we believe that they are informing us regarding things that we want to attempt to know or project.

[edited out]

Are you debating that it would OK for PlanB to move the goal posts everytime the model is in danger to be invalidated?

I doubt that I am debating.  It seems that I said that if there are changes in the data and perhaps changes in the logic then the model might need to adapt to the new data and logic.  I don't see any whimsical changing of any models by PlanB, even though there are some folks who seem to have convoluted what he was saying in his floor model and his StocktoFlow model., and the floor model was way too specific and high.. but the floor model is not the same as stock to flow, even though the floor model was partly relying upon information in stock to flow, too.

So what is your deal right now, Wind_FURY?  Are you trying to figure out if we have dipped enough? or are you going to go back to recommending that folks stop buying bitcoin when they may well be served by continuing to DCA into bitcoin, especially if they do not really have a lot of confidence which way BTC prices might be going in the short term, but they have a long enough timeline that they are investing 4-10 years or more.
Pages:
Jump to: