Topic: Can this be effective against the increasing numbers of gamblers? - page 2. (Read 1063 times)

In that aspect you are absolutely right, the publicity does not end there, consequently the casino you name is known to be one of those with the biggest scams in the world, and it is only necessary to show, all the evidence is there, but now so that the number of players can continue to grow, there is nothing better than offering something in return, to keep them there and make them defend the casino at the worst times, I think it is an investment, there are many ways, rewards with social networks, with the things that can be devised, but they have to give something, something in exchange for work.

It's never effective in reducing the number of gamblers. Once there's a game, and bookies are offering betting odds, people will still want to bet. We cannot eliminate gambling from the equation as it makes watching the game more entertaining. Moreover, gambling isn't necessarily destroying lives, as long as we understand how to gamble responsibly.

If they don't want to increase the number of gamblers, then they should ban gambling in their country.

For online casinos, it is really important to make effective advertisements to promote the website. It is the fuel for them to be known and discovered by other gamblers. It is crucial especially to those newly established and are just arising websites because they have to be known in order for players to deposit and play so they could profit and continue operating in the long run. If the advertisements are not effective in gathering clients, casinos should step up their game to make it more appealing and more encouraging and this applies to both online and offline casinos. After all, who would want to try something that has a lousy advertisement that won't even leave a good taste to you.

Well, one at a time, I guess. They can't simply just remove all the advertisements of gambling platforms since those platforms pay a bunch of money to get those advertisement spots in the stadium, but if they have a plan to totally vanish such promotions, they will probably do it slowly so that they can get a cover for those places instead of these.

But, I think they won't completely clear off the casino advertisements and there will always be one out there maybe not on the t-shirts or shorts but somewhere in the stadium or outside of it.

I still don't see any reason why this will reduce the rate at which people gamble. There are many sites online that people can use to place there bet without any third party knowing so if the premier league team take this kind of move then it would never reduce the rate at which people bet and gamble on a daily basis. Running such a ad can be done in a simple and substle manner but it is all depend on how they want it. I really don't know the major reason for this but I am very sure that this may be in order to reduce the number of adolescent from thinking of going to bet when they see that kind of ads.

There are regulatory boards specially on media which it might really be that blocking out those type of ads which its neither  they would be blocking up gambling or not but in most cases it would really be which we know that broadcasted shows and at the same time with those advertisements could really be viewed by young or children which it is really just that right that they should really be that mindful on prohibiting it out.
As for the plans on removing out those ads via not letting those sponsorship on jerseys then it would really be that possible but it would be only effective on a place or country which does have this
gambling restrictions, but since this market is huge and not only limited on on place then it would be somewhat pointless.

Speaking about increasing numbers of gamblers then it isnt really that new or shocking anymore because this industry becomes even more bigger.Doesnt matter on which one we do talking but the
rate is increasing which does simply means that gambler counts also increasing up too. So whats the issue on this one?

For the online casinos, yes but for the offline ones, I think many of them are doing an offline promotions. For a crypto casino, many of them are only using this forum to promote because they know that people here are very familiar in crypto than the people in social media sites. There might also be restrictions when placing a post or an ad related to gambling.

Promotions are important because this is how the gamblers discovers your site but as a casino owner, we must understand that there are some things too which are essential in order to become successful in this field like building a fun and profitable game to our customer and having a responsive customer support.

There’s a possibility that they will overturned this kind of decision because it doesn’t make sense at all. Online gambling is popular online due to the existence of streamers and other form of social media odds. It’s impossible for those people that watching the game to not browse on social media or watch streamers since it’s already part of our society.

It’s very hard to determine if their move is effective because there’s no metrics that will show gambling activities of the league fan.

They will probably review it because it is possible that what the OP has explained may not be the final decision, gambling has contributed greatly to sports fans especially for football games and even gambling has sponsored popular teams, so there are other decisions that may be announced and we hope sponsors gambling can be accepted as an arena for gambling promotion to the world.

It will be too early to conclude if the move to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts. I will like to know the metric that will be used to measure the effectiveness of this move. The gambling industry is a large one and I think that, there should be a follow up thing such "gamble responsibly" or "Reach out to this number if you need help with your gambling addiction". It should be a chain of actions not just one action like the one the OP has mentioned.

Maybe an ad using a name printed on a soccer jersey and in a place where sporting events take place will be left behind and not have a big impact, but I'm sure this type of advertising marketing will continue to be done even in the future because this is the easiest way even if you have to spend money to sponsor it.
But for advertisements on TV it is unlikely that this will happen if there are indeed those who carry out gambling fishing on TV, only in countries that really free gambling activities and can freely move in the gambling industry.
What's more, many underage children like to watch TV, so if they are going to broadcast advertisements, maybe only in the middle of the night.

To be sincere, if the team in premier league decides that they can no longer advertise gambling casinos, it won't stops gambling casinos from having new customers, and this is to say that, casinos will continue to grow, and this will not reduce gambling addiction in any way.
Casinos don't only advertise in the premier leagues, I believe that when we visit social media, some crypto websites that allow google ads like etherscan, bscscan, poocoin website and so on, we see casino ads there, this are websites hundred of thousands of person visit every day, and those who the casino ads are displayed to mostly, are those who are into gambling in some way, since Google ads are mostly targeted.

to be honest I don't understand how this could be a very effective measure if it's only going to come into force in the 2025 - 2026 season, it's many years until 2025 and until then a lot can change, maybe the governments will put stricter or lighter laws on crypto casinos and with that the premier league continues to allow teams to put casinos on their shirts, in terms of effectiveness for preventing losses and gambling addictions, this measure does not change anything currently, so think about how things will be in 2025 and something very difficult, for example, until a few years ago bitcoin was not as popular as it is today, but in less than 6 years bitcoin became very popular and accepted in countries that were very strict about bitcoin

with acceptance of bitcoin many people also started to use online casinos, because as altcoins provided more privacy so it would make more sense to use altcoins than to use bank account directly to deposit in the casino, but governments introduced KYC in casinos so today it is no longer there is more privacy, the teams even if they don't put the address or logo of a casino on the shirts, they can put it on the field during only games, they can put it in press conferences, they can put it on their social networks and on their website, so I don't see how this measure would change something

Everyone uses social media to advertise a casino game and platform. Online casino social media strategies, on the other hand, work similarly to people marketing their businesses on the same platform. Promotions can reach many people unfamiliar with casino platforms, casinos need social media platforms to advertise their business, but they cannot rely on them. This may be a small component of their larger plan. Every gambling site is now experiencing its biggest boom in history for social media advertising. Interested people watch the games as they want on TV and mobile.

In my opinion the whole idea of public advertising is going to shift more in the future and taking down gambling ads from football T-shirts is not going to have a big impact. Having flashy big advertising on TV is nice to promote a company, but haven't we all already heard of the company before? It's not like we see it for the first time. Usually the TV ads is just one part of their whole marketing strategy, which is likely going to change more in the next year. It's all about having ads reaching directly the people who are interested in the topic.  These big football matches have millions of people watching the games on TV, which all has to be paid for by the company to display their company logo, even though many of the viewers are not even interested in gambling. It would make much more sense to have advertising on the phones and internet which focuses on people who have gambled in the past.

Promotion is paramount but do people actually gamble because they saw the platform on a match day shirt? I don't think so and basically  I think people come to watch live matches after the bets has already been placed and if English premiere  leagues think it wise then its fine what these sponsors ought to do is simply move to where they are accepted and if you'll  agree with me that they're also major sponsors of these leagues.

Well for people who haven't seen this news, I think taking down those sponsors from their match day shirts will reduce the rate of gambling  as people might be scared of what might have prompted  such action.

By three years from now, this will be effectively implemented. There's nothing that needs to be worry. Gambling companies can still advertise its service in the different area of tshirt that used by the football players.
Gambling has been also contributing a lot through sponsorship. It's caused by the regulators just wanna try to save young generation from gambling but i think that it will not give impact.

The main concern by regulators to stop legalizing gambling that was triggering the young generation to play. KYC verification can also become the best way for this.

Well, it is a good solution indeed if that is their target. But I think they should also take out the gambling advertisements being shown on live television at the dome or the court. Then, there are names on the sidelines too so the kids can still get a glimpse of it.
Those who also watch in pay-per-view and local sports channels are making advertisements about the gambling platforms, heck even the commentators are the ones telling where the trusted sportsbook is.
Example: NBA commentators announce Fanduel, and then most of the time they also present how much the Over and under before the game and the spreads. Kids can still see that.
If they will take this all out, a lot of money will be gone and I don't think even the league itself will like that idea.

Advertising never ends on the internet. Even if the casino is not welcome here in bitcointalk such the 1xbit, we still could see them on different crypto sites because the crypto adnetworks welcome them.

 Social media is use more in this time, so even if they forbid the influencers and bloggers promote those casinos and sportbetting platforms.

Well, Actually I would like to have some understanding when it comes to Restricting ads on TV channels in the UK or in any country, things are like that in the country I live too, and that seems to me not correct,there are Things that are worse and allow them, then a Government that says it wants to protect a people (when for me a government does not protect anything because they are Things that do not fit me and will never fit me, then those who want to make life and business with their casino-based ideas they can't, I honestly don't see any point in it.