Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 3. (Read 993 times)

Both will gives profit but to be a game owner or provider should have more skill because we create a game that will be used by the casino. The casino will like to use the game that we make but if they don't like, the casino will not add our game to their site. So that will not easy to have a good skill to creates a gambling games.

But if you are a casino owner, you can add many gambling games to your site including many providers so you can attracts people attention to visit and trying to play the games. The more they can feels excited, the more they will return to your site because they can satisfy with everything inside your site so they will spends more and more money.

Pretty sure that casino owners and providers will really be having that sometime thinking about on whose to make money even more but this will really be on their least concern on which as long they can be able to make money then this is where they will really be that focusing, come to think that casinos arent that just simply basing up with those slot games that has providers on which there are other games which are made out on which the casinos are really that getting that full profits. This is why if i were to choose then i would be liking on being a casino owner but it isnt bad either to be a provider on which you could be having that passive i should say on every agreement on which a certain gambling business that you could be able to deal with or uses up the game itself.

The positive thing about on this one for casino owners that they wont really be thinking about having that fixation if ever there's a problem on a particular game on which they will really be having that less hassle on fixing things up. Well, in overall on which this one wont really be mattering that much because both are really that indeed making serious money on here on this industry. Doesnt matter on which one is greater because that would really be just that part of reality on which there's always that one whose really that on  ahead when it comes to numbers.

Being a game owner is good, but the listing of the game is completely in the hands of the casino owner. It is possible to list our games in the casino, only after lots of reviews. So, the game needs to be unique and prove that it brings profit to the casino. At the same time, this needs to be attractive. As mentioned, being a game owner, one needs skills to develop the games, whereas for the casino owner, it is the funding. Based on the funding, he can add more games, and being a casino owner is riskier than being a game owner, as the responsibility is high. The game owner just provides the games, whereas the casino owner needs to take care of the security and different problems that arise.

When you are not in very good position to sustain a business, you can go to being a game owner as you are just providing a game to the casino and you have no other responsibilities to maintain any operations. But if you have the bankroll and the background to manage a business, you can try your hands on being a casino owner. However, there are other considerations that you need to look at as managing a business would take a lot of your resources and time to survive and compete with other competitors.

Exactly. Less risk but with massive income. Most especially if the kind of game you developed are being featured in high-class casinos, I think that also comes with great percentage.  

However, casinos may also be making a lot of money but it requires a lot of hardwork and patience as well, and definitely a lot of funds to start as capital. If you can't be competitive in the market, you will never be making good amount of income. That goes even for other businesses as well.

Both casino owner and game owner can still generate the income anyone desires, I will go for casino although growing a name is difficult in the field when I’m fully aware of the competition and the high rate of gamblers increasing daily. It all boils down to knowledge, how can my casino function good yet it’s not so difficult if only the money is available meanwhile game owners get paid for those games provided, if anyone is not an expert it’s difficult being a game owner.

Yeap both have different positive and negative both side. As for me game provider income would be more steady and stable from the casino earning specially we know Just as there is potential for profit in the online casino business, a wrong marketing strategy or step can make the casino vanish.
And for this, safe is game development. In this case, the only concern is selling the service and upgrading it in the future and trying to provide more games by constantly generating new ideas. In my case, if I had a lot of money, I would prefer to be a casino owner, and if I only had skills, I would lean towards game development.

This is mostly depending on how the condition of our pocket is, then what we prefer to also go for as taste, in everything we do, there are laid down conditions with it and which we may have to fulfil some of their terms before going into them deeply, i also want to believe that we will not venture into what we don't know about, aside that we have passion for it, we have to also get the necessary experience before going into it, this is what is mostly expected of us in taking as decision before knowing what to do from the available options.

it depends, for me I will like to be game own instead of owning casino, because I know that game owners make money than casino owners if you're well known

I know that casino owners makes money, but the is that I will prefer building game's than owning, the process of owning casino two things is involved, your casino might not be influential as you have in mind, and you may experience loss via many wining in casino, so I will run a business my mind will be at peace.

I would choose to be a casino owner, because it would allow me to have contact with many people in the real world, especially in the political part, and it would make it easier for me to expand my casino business to more places in my country and it would also make it easier for me to operate the casino with a license and all documents. Whereas if I chose to be a game developer, I would be an anonymous guy on the internet, gambling game developers hardly have physical headquarters in any country.

I would prefer to be the game owner. I think they make more money because of their kind of royalty (something like this) they get each time the game is played or for how long the casino chooses.tonhave their game in their catalog. There are many casinos and now calculate how many casinos uses the game of the provider and how much they have to pay to use it. Also calculate the times they'll do an upgrade and the fees also go up. I think the game providers are the ones making the more money than casino owners.

Casino owner would be better option if we think about the profit.
Games provider mean the developer it means it required only the programming knowledge to provide these kinds of service to the casino owners. But if we want to be the casino owners we have to have the knowledge about the marketing and as well the management knowledge and also know some hacks to run the casino. It will much difficult than Games provider. But if we looks about the profit it will give us return big as this is the most profitable business in this ERA but we also must know that if we want to be successful here we have to have ability to make a good license and well the good budget for promotion. Otherwise this will be just a loss project.

It depend on the sharing formula, been a game owner means you have to be ahead of your game, everything you do must strike a balance between casino that will be using your service and the users that will be playing the game because if they don't find it entertaining, fun, and profitable, they will not play it again. Same goes with the sharing service but there is limitations on every copyright on the games you are hosting for casino, you can't get all the royalty.

There is no person in casino ecosystem that makes money like the casino owner. If you own a casino company and you want to be big, it's your money and investment that will determine how it will be, so you will be the one to be setting % to service providers for your casino. If they are not going to give you on agreed amount that you need, you can always go for another service casino provider and your casino company will continue to bring huge amount of money.

Since we know a lot of stories about casino owners, it's to our advantage.

Maybe the game providers are the same in terms of profit.

Lately, casinos are always growing rapidly from year to year, just look at some new casinos can create high opportunities in terms of wagered volume, so being a casino owner is the most profitable.

Though owning a casino owner may seems lucrative than been a regular casino game provider who develop games that will be used by a majority of casinos.  But the truth of the fact is that there are always advantages and disadvantages of choosing any of the business model

What to note about been a Casino owner
* You can host lots of games and generate income from it when people loses their bets.
* You needs to first promote your casino to get lots of awareness before you can start earning from it.
* You will need to have a huge budget before you can start up a casino

What to note about been a Game provider
* You don't need a huge budget or start up capital before been a game provider who develeps interesting games.
* You could host your game on multiple casinos and make money from it.
* Lower revenue sharing form the casino

This is what I also support. I see quite a few users mentioning casino owners, but that includes various business risks as well. Game providers earn a steady percentage for each game they deliver, rendering it a much safer option in this hypothetical scenario. Owning a casino also has a lot of responsibilities, whether we're talking about a physical or an online one, such as dealing with customers, staff, support, financials, etc. To me, it looks like a much more complicated sector, while it requires a ton of capital to keep up.

This is a great question, actually it needs a lot of thinking, learning more about how to make profit from your game is you own one, or many games as a provider. From my own experience in several online casinos, I learned that providers are giving licenses to casinos after paying yearly taxes beside a fixed rate for the income they make from players. For example, slots providers, games, table games, and live casinos.

Personally, if I was to choose between a casino or a provider, I will definitely pick having several games, live games to offer for casinos, making more money than owning one casino. Taking multiple incomes from different casinos is a very profitable investment than relaying on one casino only.

As a white label game provider, there is probably a commission that you take on every single game played - both to cover running costs and also as a basic profit incentive. If you build up a big library of games, it makes casinos much more likely to use your services and effectively they have to do all the hard work of gathering customers who will use these games. Once you have created a new game and adequately tested it is secure, you probably have very minimal ongoing maintenance costs related to it, but it will earn you a lot of money over the long run. I would much rather be a game provider (once they have built a reasonably sized list of casinos who trust them) than a single casino that relies on third party game providers.

A game owner for sure. You're taking profit with 0 risk. It's the same situation as being an owner of a construction company vs someone who just rents them all the equipment. None of the result is your fault. If the building comes down or the contractor fails in any way, it's between them and the client. You're standing in the sidelines making profit while they duke it out.

Making a game requires less money than running a casino and you don't have to worry about anything like licensing, hacks, managing accounts...

It depends on the opportunities - if a player has enough money to start out a casino they could fund it and run the business, but gaming providers like pragmatic, evolution, and Bgaming tend to be limited to some certain companies. That not all games form any kind of developer could be taken or integrated into the casino. Yet in comparison the benefits of being a gaming provider is the low level of risk. They have multiple platforms socket to and make money. Unlike a casino that may be vulnerable to bankruptcy due to financial crashes caused by massive pay outs.