Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 6. (Read 1995 times)

That is right because we only see the name of the casino and not the developer of the games. Well, perhaps one or two of them sponsoring the sporting event or other events but mostly, we see the casino name on the sponsorship.

People who see the casino name will visit to check the truth and if they see that is real, they will use that casino to gambling and have fun. But becoming the developer can also makes money as long as many casinos use all of their games in their site. Each will have the benefits which we can not compare.

Going by their respective functions it shouldn't be such a difficult thing to no between the two because through there names you had already no what they are talking about and how limited or unlimited each of them could be in making profit, though as we are all choosing casino owner doesn't mean that owners does not run into loss because there are sometimes huge win can pull the casino down for a bit before rising back but that doesn't mean it will be like that always, so we should also no the challenges but however just like you said is very rare for the owners to be hit hard, meanwhile undermining the functions some persons will look up to the second one because everybody cannot be owners because there are people who would only love to create and give people to use.

So I prefer to be a casino owner over a game owner. As a game owner I have to work on getting more games that's when I can make more money. I will only be making money from my game  and when building game you have to be careful because if the game is complex people might be frustrated while playing it and lose interest.  And you have to pay developers, you have to pay for certain things from the revenue you make from one source you make

But as a casino owner you can divert to get funds, you can have entertainment, you can have bars, you have multiple options of games where.  So the diversifying  income stream is what gives it an advantage. As you can always improve and expand but if you have to be building multiple games you know that takes a lot of time, a lot of investment getting developers and people from different skills defining the components of the game is not an easy fit to achieve so yes, I  prefer being a casino owner.

I think that all the large casinos we know usually combine these two areas of work. But in my opinion, servicing a casino is still a much more complex management job than developing codes. We all have to take into account the variety of management actions in financial matters, in legal matters, in working with clients. All these are quite troublesome and stressful areas of work.
The work of top casino management, in my opinion, is more complex in terms of work organization, but probably brings more profit than just a game supplier.

Whether a small or big, a casino business doesnt really come cheap on which if we do really tend to look around on what are the things that you would really needing up then you could be able to tell that this do involves big money. Yes, when it comes on being provider then you are really just that being focused too much on software or something like that on which this isnt really that kind of hassle as long there's no technical problems or code related issues on which if its compared into a physical form then it will really be that pain in the ass on making that kind of management but well in any business on which you would really be needing up that kind of handling since its part of running a business. Therefore, if i were to choose in between the two then i would really be going for casino owner on which just like said by other people that you arent that just that getting some money or revenue into those provided games but also you can have your own too on which you can be able to purchase on which you are the ones that will be solely be getting that kind of profits on which as the more things be having then the more revenue that you could really be able to obtain. Well, being both isnt that bad option too but it will really be that too hassle and stressful on dealing up with both scenarios on which its much better that you do really get on your own into this aspect.

I have tired to picture out the possibility of being both but I feel like the picture still fall clearer on actually being a casino owner although it depends on how big or represent the casino that you are owning is, because you can be a casino owner and yet the casino doesn't pull off much benefits as like being a game provider which games you host will be featured on so many other casino which ofcourse some of those casino are top ones but on generally, I feel the casino owner should be more lucrative seeing how massive the profit is on gambling gaming industry.

As a casino owner, the opportunities and the profit is very unlimited, you can earn a lot by including a lot of games in your platform. Well, game owner is pretty impressive but casino owner have wide range of choices and the gain is limitless depends on the user of the gambling platform. But of course, casino owner requires experience and funds at start to make things successful, remember that there are bunch of gambling platforms out there offerring countless bonus just to register to their platform.

the casino owner makes more money. I have never seen a game owner sponsor any sporting event. It is only the casino owners  I see their ads everywhere.Check the internet, you will not find any game owner ads. Casinos are spreading and more people are getting visiting them.

Game owner's project are only restricted to the casino they worked with. The profit is on the casino owner for know hisvtn

Operating a casino is great and it brings forth exposure and funds for the owner but the cost is much and demanding. A lot of management is required which when not gotten right harms the progress of the business. Generally, we could count the cons of growing a casino including bankruptcy and not all can point out any from building games.

However, it's a part of gaming business that's not always questioned, the casino is the center of attraction. And such a business is quite great for starters if the opportunity is there.

To be able to choose properly, I think you have to know the pros and cons involved in both of them. I can’t really say for either side since, I’m not quite knowledgeable on both and the OP didn’t give any pointers for easy pickings. If I’m to choose with the limited knowledge I’ve got on both, I’ll very much go for owing the casinos. I think that’s where the most profit is given the risk of running a casino. You stand at a great loss should gamblers win more than they lose but, this is rear and with that, you could always profit and that works when you have a good publicity campaign and a managing team.

Since we have not also heard the story of game developers, we can't predict fully how much they make if it's as much as the casino makes too, even if they have limited offers, or if they offer their games and services based on an agreed amount. Whichever be the case, we can only assume, which is why most people stick with what we know, which is being a casino owner we see as a money generation industry without limit.

It's hard for me to say which of these is more profitable, and we may never know what their exact profits are at the end of the year. But if I were to answer, I would choose to be a casino owner because it would allow me to be creative in the issues of approving the design of my casino theme. I would be able to consult with designers and would like to take part in this. And also in various events of my casino, its promotion, I would be interested in this in addition to dry profit. I think sitting and raking in money is not very interesting, for example, I would be interested in the process of building a business, although I do not have such experience, but I think that even with a casino it would be possible to find some interest.

I also believe that a successful casino owner makes more profit than a successful game owner.
But at the same time, I think that the risk in the casino business is high and requires a lot of funds, besides, as we know, casino marketing or promotion is very expensive. And if you can't do this, you won't be able to compete with big competitors in the market.
And that's why my initial choice will be to become a game owner from these two options because it will work only if I have creativity and work skills. And later when I can earn a good amount of money from here, if I want, I can also become a casino owner from there by launching a new casino.

If you talk about profits, it is very clear in the world of gambling, they both provide gambling sites and provide various kinds of profitable games, both of them have real contracts for both, you could say the sharing percentage.

But in this case, as far as I know, the average casino owner has their own types of games such as slots, poker and so on, some of them are rented and some also share the profits, back to the OP's question, Who makes the biggest profits, of course those who own online casinos and they have their own games, not rentals or profit sharing.

Well both scenarios are purely hypothetical because I will never be either of the two options implied. I think I would rather be a casino owner than a game owner. I feel like being a casino owner has more longevity than being an individual game owner.

I’m confident there is more profit as a casino owner too, plus it would be cool AF to own a casino.

I was recently thinking about how hard it would have been for casino owners to build their business from scratch. A casino is not an enterprise, in a casino if you were able to reach the masses, then your business will pay off, because all you sell is profitable mathematics to people who believe that they will be lucky.
Therefore, I think it is very dangerous to be a casino owner, especially in countries where law and order are just words. I am 100% sure that in such countries, competitors are very aggressive with each other, and therefore there is a lot of crime there.

In general, this is a very peculiar business.

But the question is which is more profitable between the casino owner or the provider, all have their own risks and also their respective realms in the process so that the difficulties and also the ease will be seen from both differently, but in my opinion it is more profitable for the casino owner, because if you succeed in having a large casino then you can create a special game for your casino that you issue yourself, and of course with a large customer base your game will be more easily recognized than creating a game first before having a casino.

Will be easy when you can have very large capital support, business can only be built and developed rapidly if it is truly capitalized in all things such as marketing and employing several people as team that is able to handle the sustainability of the gambling business, if we talk about difficulties then becoming game maker or provider is also not easy because there are many factors that must be considered such as security and feasibility and even trials for the success of the game itself so that there are no problems such as bugs.
As someone who thinks in the long term, they definitely prefer to be businessman, build casino and make money in the long term, this can be much more guaranteed success.

If it is possible to become a casino owner or CEO of a casino it seems to be a pretty promising job but on the other hand something like this apart from the big risk in the end our qualifications are demanded whether or not we can run it and I am quite aware that maybe that is too big a position for me so I will return to the mainland as a player because this is more possible for me to do

Not meaning to make myself pessimistic here but in the end something like that is sometimes not as easy as imagined. Indeed, the impression of being a casino owner is very good where money can flow easily but in the end in a business we also have to be able to think and how to make our site attractive and sometimes not everyone can run a casino well especially of course there must be a large capital from the start so even though that position is a good position but in the end not everyone can occupy it and I am aware that I also cannot occupy that position even though there is an opportunity.

Do you think the edge of some of the games is also decided by the casino owner? Maybe they have advisors for that too, of course. But asking in general

Definitely being the owner has more advantages