Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 6. (Read 993 times)
Aren't these different things? What does a casino owner do? He runs a casino, working with several developers, programmers, lawyers, and a dozen more people to make his casino run smoothly. That's his business. On the other hand, a game developer creates a game and regularly improves it if there are any glitches or if there is a need to improve its quality. He owns the game, sells it, and depending on how many games he has created, he gets money from those who buy his game. In my opinion, both areas have a huge responsibility and must be very skillfully managed in each region. Now talking about preferring something better is just a conversation of someone who sees each area only from the outside, thinking more about profit, but does not know all the stuffing and all the difficulties and problems that can be encountered.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
If I had to choose between casino owner and game provider, I would definitely choose casino owner. Between owning a casino and providing games at different casinos, the option of owning a casino is definitely considered to be more profitable. The game provider is definitely not an easy matter as it is constantly updated and the various competitive changes that a casino provides with games can create opportunities to work if the casino authority chooses. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
if you can own a casino that features multiple of games on your platform, I think that should be more profitable than just owning a game that is in different casinos. The implication is that, the chances of going out of business for someone that just owns a game is very high because as long as the game goes obsolete is reduces in it popularity, you might be going out of the market unlike someone who owns a casino where other games are being listed in.Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
At the end, what matters most is which of the option is going to yield the greater profit and as long as it's also going to be sustainable in the long run I will choose that as my preferred option.
between the two I feel like I'd be more interested in being a game developer, I like to gamble but I'd also like to make games that I find interesting, also, I feel like if your games are used in a lot of different casinos it could be more profitable than being a casino owner especially if the casino that has your games are popular and the games you make is also very popular and you are consistent with it.
Me either. I also feel that it's nice to be a game developer and work for various projects than to get stuck with one business and focus on it. While I want to have my own business run by me, it's a different feeling for me to have this into reality since it was a childhood dream for me to become a game developer. Although as I grew older, it didn't happened and if there will be by some chance that it can happen, I'd prefer to be a developer than owner of a casino. But for sure there will be some perks given to me by a casino owner that will avail my service and game development. 
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
obviously owning a casino will be the best option than having your games featured in different casinos. although the game providers makes money featuring their games in different gambling platform, but i dont think all casino will accept most of their offer because a lot of casino owners are also game developes and will want their games to be included to their casino and thereby reducing the number of game developers who literarily include there games on different site. beside that, caison owners have many gambling option in their site than the game developer or owner. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Game owners and casinos owners works in hands with each others, because for game owners you must need a casino owners to list or add your games to their casino sites which enables you to earn some certain amount of money at once or Quarterly, depending on the whole arrangement with both parties. Usually becoming a casino owner as well a game providers profits more. However, casino owner is more better than becoming a game provider which you would also plead with casinos to get your games listed since more games are being launched and casino's are being selective based on the demands of players. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Just few weeks ago, a newly casino asked for the game to list and almost everyone on the topic requested to add sports book, meaning the casino operators works on the demand of their players or gamblers. they can't just get games listed without them seeing how frequents people asked for it, and if you are a game provider and casino owner do not request for your game to get listed meaning there will be low income as people do not need it at that moment, but casino operate still get profits from other games or sportsbook.
Being an owner doesn't mean that the I own the whole thing and that's why there are other coowners that will cooperate and work with me. I think that it's a better feeling to have partners work for the same goal and vision with the gambling company that we're building.
And that's what I think I wanna be if ever I have some reliable partners and they are also going to rely to whatever I can offer to reciprocate each other's efforts.
And that's what I think I wanna be if ever I have some reliable partners and they are also going to rely to whatever I can offer to reciprocate each other's efforts.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
The obvious answer is obviously being a game provider to different casinos. With a good clientele, you are pretty much set for life. You can expand onto bigger places and much quicker too. In my opinion it would also be less stressful than being a casino owner. Having a casino would require you to overlook much more things compared to if you were just focusing on providing machines and/or instruments for the game but still giving enough profit. You would enjoy good profit if you manage to breakthrough a line of casinos. 
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
There is always a better feeling when you own something and have control over it even though we know owning a casino comes with certain responsibilities and challenges like regulatory compliance and more and also owning a casino can be more complex, requires higher financing and has more disadvantages than owning a game hosted on different casinos but if successful will be more profitable in the long run IMO. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
To answer your question I think I will prefer owning a game hosted on different casinos than being a casino owner because of the complexity of operating a casino.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Both are making money but if I have to choose between Casino owner or game owner I will definitely choose the game owner it simply because it is very hard for the new casino to thrive with big player like stake and another well player that are already in space for such a long time.
But it different if you choose as the game owner let alone pragmatic play i mean I believe everyone here knows these slot providers with their famous Zeus slot game. and the game provider like pragmatic has been used by many online casino all over the world can u imagine that how much profit the pragmatic earn
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Being a game owner is easier than being a casino owner because it is not easy running a casino; you will have to deal with the legal huddles, the marketing and the responsibility of paying winnings as well as protecting people's funds. Another aspect that makes owning a casino very challenging is the stress of building the needed reputation and facing the competition that exist in the casino business. Instead of these difficult processes and despite the profits that can be raked in from running a casino, it is just easier being a game provided as the the requirements are less and the risk lower. Just develop a game that is fair and seen to be worth featuring in casinos and the job of marketing will be easier. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Of course, this is a hypothetical situation for me, but nevertheless, if there was a situation of such a choice, I would prefer to be the owner of the games. In my opinion, this is a more "calm" activity, where the probability of various conflict situations, problems with compliance with laws, etc. is much lower. As for the profitability of such a business, I think it is quite sufficient. It may not be as profitable as a casino, but there are much fewer risks.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
It would depend on quality in both cases. If it would be the same - you will get more profit as a game owner. You can sell it to all casinos and get some stable profit from it and you don`t need any marketing expenses. You can just modify it time by time and that`s all. As casino owner you will have lots of expenses for stuff, marketing, buying games, equipment, etc. You have to attract gamblers to increase your profit. It would be really hard everyday work. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Both of them I have a desire because both are sources that can provide continuous income at any time as long as there are players playing at the casino.
From the casino I get income and from the game I can also receive money at any time.
I think everyone has hallucinations like me, not one but both. Maybe you are also one of those who want to have a casino and games that can be played at every casino.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
There is no way an ordinary dev would profit from a business more than the business owner himself, owning a casino is a business, while being a client or developer is just a contract, you make money on the royalty or subscriptions on your game and nothing else, worse still if your game was purchased on a one-time purchase, then you earn once and the casino owner keeps profiting from your game on his platform. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
The duty of the casino owner is to manage his workers and invest in marketing and drive more clients to the casino which you and I know that there are numerous gamblers and as little as an enticing welcome bonus can lure people into patronizing you and remaining loyal if your services are good and your website user friendly.
The casino owner is nowhere comparable in profits with the ordinary game developer and most times they are even employees of the casino, even if the game dev is a shareholder in the casino company, he doesn't even come close to profits compared to the casino owner.
If being a game owner means being the developer of a specific game then that is nothing different from a software developer having a full time job. The casino owner is a different business altogether and that is something that I would always wish to become because their job is a always profitable job.
Being the developer of the game, you have to be ready with bugs, exploits that people will try to use and be on your toes to fix them. But by being the owner of the casino, everyone will come and pay their money to you to fuel their addiction, less chances of being nagged all day. Although that does not mean that the job has no cons, you have to be a big face for the company, run the marketing and tide over the high rollers.
Being the developer of the game, you have to be ready with bugs, exploits that people will try to use and be on your toes to fix them. But by being the owner of the casino, everyone will come and pay their money to you to fuel their addiction, less chances of being nagged all day. Although that does not mean that the job has no cons, you have to be a big face for the company, run the marketing and tide over the high rollers.
I prefer to be casino owner because that can produce me more money especially if I can have many members who play in my casinos. That will happen if I can promote my casino and become popular among the other casinos.
Becoming a game owner or provider is not easy because we must have skills to create the games and spends much time. But I don't know which will be more profit between both because I am not one of that.
Becoming a game owner or provider is not easy because we must have skills to create the games and spends much time. But I don't know which will be more profit between both because I am not one of that.
between the two I feel like I'd be more interested in being a game developer, I like to gamble but I'd also like to make games that I find interesting, also, I feel like if your games are used in a lot of different casinos it could be more profitable than being a casino owner especially if the casino that has your games are popular and the games you make is also very popular and you are consistent with it.
I feel it’s going take lots of work to get your game to be at the top since you’re entering into a competitive market - unlike a casino which you can get people to enroll in by giving them decent bonus than their current casino was giving them getting people to leave their favorite game to start playing yours will need some extra time and work.
They both have disadvantages (like for the casino owner you’d need a huge capital) and advantages but personally if the funding is available I definitely would go with being a casino owner, and make sure I hire people who have experience and have some proof that they have been able to work with a casino that turned out good in the past.
For the development of the casino industry and to attract gamblers, both online and physical should be taken into account in any situation so that they can get the right quality service. It is important to keep a regular review of the cost increase for any product or casino promotion because you depend on the increase in income through the promotion of your services.
I'd choose to be one of those game providers, but in terms of profits, I assume the casino owners are way ahead because we've seen how casinos grow immensely and even branch out to other fields.
I remember back when the crash game became the trend and casinos would only need to pay once before adding the game to their site. It somewhat made me think game providers don't make as much even though there could be thousands of casino owners who are willing to pay for their games to be implemented in their casino.
I remember back when the crash game became the trend and casinos would only need to pay once before adding the game to their site. It somewhat made me think game providers don't make as much even though there could be thousands of casino owners who are willing to pay for their games to be implemented in their casino.
between the two I feel like I'd be more interested in being a game developer, I like to gamble but I'd also like to make games that I find interesting, also, I feel like if your games are used in a lot of different casinos it could be more profitable than being a casino owner especially if the casino that has your games are popular and the games you make is also very popular and you are consistent with it.
I feel it’s going take lots of work to get your game to be at the top since you’re entering into a competitive market - unlike a casino which you can get people to enroll in by giving them decent bonus than their current casino was giving them getting people to leave their favorite game to start playing yours will need some extra time and work.
They both have disadvantages (like for the casino owner you’d need a huge capital) and advantages but personally if the funding is available I definitely would go with being a casino owner, and make sure I hire people who have experience and have some proof that they have been able to work with a casino that turned out good in the past.
Jump to: