Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 8. (Read 1995 times)
Both casino owner and game owner can still generate the income anyone desires, I will go for casino although growing a name is difficult in the field when I’m fully aware of the competition and the high rate of gamblers increasing daily. It all boils down to knowledge, how can my casino function good yet it’s not so difficult if only the money is available meanwhile game owners get paid for those games provided, if anyone is not an expert it’s difficult being a game owner.
I would prefer to be the game owner. I think they make more money because of their kind of royalty (something like this) they get each time the game is played or for how long the casino chooses.tonhave their game in their catalog. There are many casinos and now calculate how many casinos uses the game of the provider and how much they have to pay to use it. Also calculate the times they'll do an upgrade and the fees also go up. I think the game providers are the ones making the more money than casino owners.
Yeap both have different positive and negative both side. As for me game provider income would be more steady and stable from the casino earning specially we know Just as there is potential for profit in the online casino business, a wrong marketing strategy or step can make the casino vanish. And for this, safe is game development. In this case, the only concern is selling the service and upgrading it in the future and trying to provide more games by constantly generating new ideas. In my case, if I had a lot of money, I would prefer to be a casino owner, and if I only had skills, I would lean towards game development.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
This is mostly depending on how the condition of our pocket is, then what we prefer to also go for as taste, in everything we do, there are laid down conditions with it and which we may have to fulfil some of their terms before going into them deeply, i also want to believe that we will not venture into what we don't know about, aside that we have passion for it, we have to also get the necessary experience before going into it, this is what is mostly expected of us in taking as decision before knowing what to do from the available options.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
it depends, for me I will like to be game own instead of owning casino, because I know that game owners make money than casino owners if you're well knownWhich of them do you think there will be more profit in?
I know that casino owners makes money, but the is that I will prefer building game's than owning, the process of owning casino two things is involved, your casino might not be influential as you have in mind, and you may experience loss via many wining in casino, so I will run a business my mind will be at peace.
I would choose to be a casino owner, because it would allow me to have contact with many people in the real world, especially in the political part, and it would make it easier for me to expand my casino business to more places in my country and it would also make it easier for me to operate the casino with a license and all documents. Whereas if I chose to be a game developer, I would be an anonymous guy on the internet, gambling game developers hardly have physical headquarters in any country.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
I would prefer to be the game owner. I think they make more money because of their kind of royalty (something like this) they get each time the game is played or for how long the casino chooses.tonhave their game in their catalog. There are many casinos and now calculate how many casinos uses the game of the provider and how much they have to pay to use it. Also calculate the times they'll do an upgrade and the fees also go up. I think the game providers are the ones making the more money than casino owners. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Casino owner would be better option if we think about the profit.Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Games provider mean the developer it means it required only the programming knowledge to provide these kinds of service to the casino owners. But if we want to be the casino owners we have to have the knowledge about the marketing and as well the management knowledge and also know some hacks to run the casino. It will much difficult than Games provider. But if we looks about the profit it will give us return big as this is the most profitable business in this ERA but we also must know that if we want to be successful here we have to have ability to make a good license and well the good budget for promotion. Otherwise this will be just a loss project.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
It depend on the sharing formula, been a game owner means you have to be ahead of your game, everything you do must strike a balance between casino that will be using your service and the users that will be playing the game because if they don't find it entertaining, fun, and profitable, they will not play it again. Same goes with the sharing service but there is limitations on every copyright on the games you are hosting for casino, you can't get all the royalty.
There is no person in casino ecosystem that makes money like the casino owner. If you own a casino company and you want to be big, it's your money and investment that will determine how it will be, so you will be the one to be setting % to service providers for your casino. If they are not going to give you on agreed amount that you need, you can always go for another service casino provider and your casino company will continue to bring huge amount of money.
Since we know a lot of stories about casino owners, it's to our advantage.
Maybe the game providers are the same in terms of profit.
Lately, casinos are always growing rapidly from year to year, just look at some new casinos can create high opportunities in terms of wagered volume, so being a casino owner is the most profitable.
Maybe the game providers are the same in terms of profit.
Lately, casinos are always growing rapidly from year to year, just look at some new casinos can create high opportunities in terms of wagered volume, so being a casino owner is the most profitable.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Though owning a casino owner may seems lucrative than been a regular casino game provider who develop games that will be used by a majority of casinos. But the truth of the fact is that there are always advantages and disadvantages of choosing any of the business modelWhich of them do you think there will be more profit in?
What to note about been a Casino owner
* You can host lots of games and generate income from it when people loses their bets.
* You needs to first promote your casino to get lots of awareness before you can start earning from it.
* You will need to have a huge budget before you can start up a casino
What to note about been a Game provider
* You don't need a huge budget or start up capital before been a game provider who develeps interesting games.
* You could host your game on multiple casinos and make money from it.
* Lower revenue sharing form the casino
A game owner for sure. You're taking profit with 0 risk. It's the same situation as being an owner of a construction company vs someone who just rents them all the equipment. None of the result is your fault. If the building comes down or the contractor fails in any way, it's between them and the client. You're standing in the sidelines making profit while they duke it out.
Making a game requires less money than running a casino and you don't have to worry about anything like licensing, hacks, managing accounts...
This is what I also support. I see quite a few users mentioning casino owners, but that includes various business risks as well. Game providers earn a steady percentage for each game they deliver, rendering it a much safer option in this hypothetical scenario. Owning a casino also has a lot of responsibilities, whether we're talking about a physical or an online one, such as dealing with customers, staff, support, financials, etc. To me, it looks like a much more complicated sector, while it requires a ton of capital to keep up. Making a game requires less money than running a casino and you don't have to worry about anything like licensing, hacks, managing accounts...
This is a great question, actually it needs a lot of thinking, learning more about how to make profit from your game is you own one, or many games as a provider. From my own experience in several online casinos, I learned that providers are giving licenses to casinos after paying yearly taxes beside a fixed rate for the income they make from players. For example, slots providers, games, table games, and live casinos.
Personally, if I was to choose between a casino or a provider, I will definitely pick having several games, live games to offer for casinos, making more money than owning one casino. Taking multiple incomes from different casinos is a very profitable investment than relaying on one casino only.
Personally, if I was to choose between a casino or a provider, I will definitely pick having several games, live games to offer for casinos, making more money than owning one casino. Taking multiple incomes from different casinos is a very profitable investment than relaying on one casino only.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As a white label game provider, there is probably a commission that you take on every single game played - both to cover running costs and also as a basic profit incentive. If you build up a big library of games, it makes casinos much more likely to use your services and effectively they have to do all the hard work of gathering customers who will use these games. Once you have created a new game and adequately tested it is secure, you probably have very minimal ongoing maintenance costs related to it, but it will earn you a lot of money over the long run. I would much rather be a game provider (once they have built a reasonably sized list of casinos who trust them) than a single casino that relies on third party game providers.
A game owner for sure. You're taking profit with 0 risk. It's the same situation as being an owner of a construction company vs someone who just rents them all the equipment. None of the result is your fault. If the building comes down or the contractor fails in any way, it's between them and the client. You're standing in the sidelines making profit while they duke it out.
Making a game requires less money than running a casino and you don't have to worry about anything like licensing, hacks, managing accounts...
Making a game requires less money than running a casino and you don't have to worry about anything like licensing, hacks, managing accounts...
Both are good, have their own pros and cons but I'd like to be a game developer. Being a developer has little or no risk because of little capital required to start up. And If you get to develop a game that's highly sought after, every casino is going to pay you commission for having your game integrated on their platform and that's real money. To be a casino owner on the other hand, you need to have a large capital to buy the game from a developer, acquire licenses, recruit and pay staffs and if things doesn't go well you may lose your investment.
It depends on the opportunities - if a player has enough money to start out a casino they could fund it and run the business, but gaming providers like pragmatic, evolution, and Bgaming tend to be limited to some certain companies. That not all games form any kind of developer could be taken or integrated into the casino. Yet in comparison the benefits of being a gaming provider is the low level of risk. They have multiple platforms socket to and make money. Unlike a casino that may be vulnerable to bankruptcy due to financial crashes caused by massive pay outs.
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
I better choose to be a casino owner because it seems easier than being a provider because of various obstacles with the many systems about the game that must be set well and I don't do it while the casino owner is a third party and becomes a home for various games that I can adopt and Sell to customers in my casino, talking about the benefits is relatively depending on how you run the business you can be very profitable if you are smart if you become a provider and you can also be very profitable if you have a casino and can compete with many casinos so that it becomes a large gambling platform from other. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Both are good, have their own pros and cons but I'd like to be a game developer. Being a developer has little or no risk because of little capital required to start up. And If you get to develop a game that's highly sought after, every casino is going to pay you commission for having your game integrated on their platform and that's real money. To be a casino owner on the other hand, you need to have a large capital to buy the game from a developer, acquire licenses, recruit and pay staffs and if things doesn't go well you may lose your investment. Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
We know that some people choose a career because of the love and good idea they have about that career path. Personal I don't have idea in creating games, so I will choose to become a casino owner. If we want to consider the profit and returns from those two, casino owners make more money than the game owners which will still make me choose the casino.
It will depend on which game you own. It will be good if the game is played by a lot of people. I didn't hear crash game back in 2018 but someone just launched it and casinos added it. I'm assuming the owner did earn a lot through the casino owners adding it.
Casino owners will earn profit as well but all because of one game alone. If the owner won't invest in marketing the casino, he wouldn't be making big profits as well.
Casino owners will earn profit as well but all because of one game alone. If the owner won't invest in marketing the casino, he wouldn't be making big profits as well.
Exactly aa casino owner, you must do a lot of marketing to attract more players, which increases your profit. However, as a game provider, you only need to be known for making good games, and casino owners will seek you out and do all of the adding and marketing while you profit from their hard work and promotions.
It will depend on which game you own. It will be good if the game is played by a lot of people. I didn't hear crash game back in 2018 but someone just launched it and casinos added it. I'm assuming the owner did earn a lot through the casino owners adding it.
Casino owners will earn profit as well but all because of one game alone. If the owner won't invest in marketing the casino, he wouldn't be making big profits as well.
Jump to: