Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 7. (Read 1995 times)

I think being an both is not easy because they have their own competitors to be successful especially casino owner that the competitions of online casinos currently is very tight that almost every current casinos has attempts to increases their reputation and popularities by doing some promotions to attract new players to joining with them but if some of casinos are successful and has plenty of active players who willing to spend their money to play then i am sure the casino owner can enjoying huge profit from their casinos and it will be steady for long term so that's why if i have to pick between them i think being an casino owner is more profitable rather than game provider

I don't mind being the two as they will make me insanely rich $$$. Still, my preference is owning a casino because a casino is easier to set up than owning games. You need to be very creative, and a unique coder with a lot of resources before you can build an outstanding game that will be easily marketable in an existing competitive market. Even if you want to use the existing talents if you are a novice in the coding field, you will pay a fortune for it. And how are you sure the security of your game(s) will not be compromised? But you can easily get into business as a casino owner with less worries, you only need to work on the right marketing.

Casino owner is the best if I'm to select between the three because you cannot compare the privileges of casino owners to any provider because the game owner are just people who build the game and keep it for sell but the buyers which is the casino owners are the ones who make a very good use of those game and in terms of profit they made a lot compare to the amount of money they use to acquire the game, so actually were the real deal lies is on the casino owners because you do not just own the casino but also the games and everything that comes out of it.

In general, it seems to me that the gambling market is now saturated with both the casinos themselves with a lot of all kinds of promotions and bonuses, and with specific games themselves, including those made very well, so great that I just can’t really imagine what else can be invented that is truly new and innovative in this industry. Although of course there may be such super talented devs or game designers who can generally invent something really cool that can attract masses of players. And maybe some casino will come up with such unique marketing techniques, which are usually not promotions and bonuses, which will also cause a massive stir among players and attract millions of new users. However, in any case, even if this can be implemented, it will cost millions of dollars, which, by the way, still need to be found somewhere or borrowed from the banking sector. But this is difficult to do since these are extremely risky investments without reliable guarantees of return of funds.

If we talk about the competition, both becoming casino owner or game owner/creator are so tough. The number of popular game providers are high enough now so it will also hard for new game creator/provider to compete with those existing popular providers. Being casino owners requires much more money than being game creator/provider, but the chance to make money is bigger as casino owner (if the casino gets much players obviously). This fact makes me think, how if we become both game provider but also game provider as well? In other words, we have our own casino but we also provide our own created games?

I would chose being a game owner or provider, rather than experience all the risks involved when you are a casino owner. Know that when you are a game developer, your profit sources will be spread out depending on how many casinos will buy your game. But if your a casino owner, your scope of profits will only be limited, only from those games in your casino that are mostly played by your customers.

Right now, becoming a casino owner is not an easy thing. The competence is very high, and so is the investment and the risk associated with it. Considering all these factors, I prefer to make myself strong as a game owner, which is to create games. This requires skills, and if we were able to make good ones automatically, we could get into the next move of having our own casino. So, the priority is to be a game owner to a casino owner.

I have noticed there is a lack of casinos which give support to Monero as a coin to carry out deposit, beyond it is obviously a currency which was conceived to enhance anonymity and privacy, it would be great to find some reliable and registered casino which allowed people to deposit and withdraw their wins using such cryptocurrency, instead the staplers like Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin. There are even casinos which support fully coins like Shiba Inu and yet, they do not seem to care to give a chance to Monero, perhaps because the terms of the licenses they have to sign with regulators. who knows...

Game owners and casino owners are 2 different businesses. If I am going to make a choice, that is going to be a casino owner. Why? It was not about the stress we may get but the opportunity to grow more as we can spread our business to other places and likely earn more than just being a game provider.

Of course, both are earning opportunities, but they differ in how we strategize them, and yes, that depends also on our capabilities. 

After which we must have conducted a research survey about the two, we may try to ensure having a satisfying level of information could help in many ways to have a desired decision, however, we should never forget that each of them has their own obligations and what it may take to go for one.

I may be fairly new to gambling, but what makes casino owners go bankrupt when they make a lot of money from casinos, and of course their money reserves are quite a lot in gambling with thousands or even tens of thousands of customers playing. What is it about jackpots that arise or are tied to other businesses or also to the government, because many factors of course will make them bankrupt.

Casino owners  are associated ^{more than often} as persons whose pockets are staffed with money  but they  may go to bankruptcy no matter even at massive investments  into their business. ^{Statics evidences this, just DYOR.}. Thus to be a casino owner is not only "opportunities to make money " but, at the same time, the high probability to loose everything you have. To be game owner is much easy ^{so to say, " haste makes waste" also in terms of money.} 

like most people here, i would choose to be a casino owner, it has more opportunities to make money and you only focus on developing how your casino can succeed. even though i will be facing many big players who already have many players on their platform, i don't feel that there is no place for new players, the most important thing is how i as a casino owner can include various interesting games and integrate various payments which will make it easier for players to play at my place.

Not only casino owners, but I think with everyone who has a business they must do a way to attract more people to be interested in the business they run because that is one thing that is definitely done by promoting their business or making interesting advertisements so that many people who see it also feel interested in being interested in their products or businesses and the goal is to get more profit.
So there is no doubt that people who own casinos will definitely think about this if they can't do it then they will hire people who are experts in marketing even though they have to spend money to pay for advertising costs or people who make advertisements but for now many people are interested in gambling then the profit can be sure to be obtained in a short period of time.

As a casino owner you have the final say in what happens in your casino. This means you can choose to allow a particular game to be played in your casino or you choose not to accept it. So you can remove a game and that provider won't earn through your casino.

A casino owner has more advantage to profit than the game provider who would go applying to different casinos or lobbying, advertising their game on different platforms. Therefore, I would prefer to own a casino than to just be a game provider but to also provide the two won't be a bad idea.

Both will gives profit but to be a game owner or provider should have more skill because we create a game that will be used by the casino. The casino will like to use the game that we make but if they don't like, the casino will not add our game to their site. So that will not easy to have a good skill to creates a gambling games.

But if you are a casino owner, you can add many gambling games to your site including many providers so you can attracts people attention to visit and trying to play the games. The more they can feels excited, the more they will return to your site because they can satisfy with everything inside your site so they will spends more and more money.

Pretty sure that casino owners and providers will really be having that sometime thinking about on whose to make money even more but this will really be on their least concern on which as long they can be able to make money then this is where they will really be that focusing, come to think that casinos arent that just simply basing up with those slot games that has providers on which there are other games which are made out on which the casinos are really that getting that full profits. This is why if i were to choose then i would be liking on being a casino owner but it isnt bad either to be a provider on which you could be having that passive i should say on every agreement on which a certain gambling business that you could be able to deal with or uses up the game itself.

The positive thing about on this one for casino owners that they wont really be thinking about having that fixation if ever there's a problem on a particular game on which they will really be having that less hassle on fixing things up. Well, in overall on which this one wont really be mattering that much because both are really that indeed making serious money on here on this industry. Doesnt matter on which one is greater because that would really be just that part of reality on which there's always that one whose really that on  ahead when it comes to numbers.

Being a game owner is good, but the listing of the game is completely in the hands of the casino owner. It is possible to list our games in the casino, only after lots of reviews. So, the game needs to be unique and prove that it brings profit to the casino. At the same time, this needs to be attractive. As mentioned, being a game owner, one needs skills to develop the games, whereas for the casino owner, it is the funding. Based on the funding, he can add more games, and being a casino owner is riskier than being a game owner, as the responsibility is high. The game owner just provides the games, whereas the casino owner needs to take care of the security and different problems that arise.

When you are not in very good position to sustain a business, you can go to being a game owner as you are just providing a game to the casino and you have no other responsibilities to maintain any operations. But if you have the bankroll and the background to manage a business, you can try your hands on being a casino owner. However, there are other considerations that you need to look at as managing a business would take a lot of your resources and time to survive and compete with other competitors.

Exactly. Less risk but with massive income. Most especially if the kind of game you developed are being featured in high-class casinos, I think that also comes with great percentage.  

However, casinos may also be making a lot of money but it requires a lot of hardwork and patience as well, and definitely a lot of funds to start as capital. If you can't be competitive in the market, you will never be making good amount of income. That goes even for other businesses as well.