Topic: Casino owner or game owner? - page 5. (Read 1995 times)

As players, we actually only enjoy the games in the casino so far regardless of how the procedure runs between the casino owner and the game developer , but I personally also assume that actually online casinos are no different from malls, while developers or game providers are no different from people who open stores in that the mall, so that in the end the two parties will benefit each other in the cooperation,  I think that in terms of who benefits more will probably depend a lot on the initial agreement, but if we look at how every game developer has a lot of games in the casino and even the same game is also available in various different casinos such as Pragmatic Play, Nolimit City, Spadegaming and Microgaming, so tha it is clear that the game provider will have a very large income from many casinos that they has been working with so far.

I think that this gambling business is quite promising, a fairly certain profit, that's why I myself have a plan to build a casino even though I won't be able to do it because I think it takes a lot of capital to run this one business. And I also know that it's not easy to build a casino because you have to pay attention to many things that can't be considered trivial.

We should have good self-control, because with good control it will keep us awake and in a safe state. Depositing more money on gambling is the same as the more money that can be lost.

Most deals will have the game owners selling the rights to their games to the casino unless they get into a partnership that they both share a percentage of the revenue being made from the game but most casino won't want that deal since they know they can make a better deal by just buying the rights to the game. A game owner can make money buy selling his games to different casino but his potential profits can't be the same as a casino owner as most casino owners don't only own one casino but they have other branches that generate revenue for them. They always start with one big as the get more richer, they invest into different casinos and also have other businesses of theirs. I'll choose to be a casino owner as making more revenue is easier that way.

Game provider assuming that my games is very popular all over different casino like Pragmatic play since I can gain profit from different source compared to casino owners that rely on their strong marketing to beat other casino while offering same games.

However, assuming you have a mediocre games and mediocre casino in comparison then I will choose the casino owners since you have flexibility to market your casino through affiliate and other type of marketing while game provider is always stuck on licking casino ass to promote their game often on their website.

It does not only depends on the skills and abilities one could have at the time of choosing between one of those two options, though. One also would need to keep on mind what one likes the most between having one's own casino or having a company/business which develops games for casinos. In my opinion, being the owner of a casino sounds rather like an administrative job in which one needs to be up-to-date of all kinds of data's and events going on in the casino and within the gambling industry as well, having some regular meetings with the chiefs of each departments of the casino,etc. On the other hand, there is more creativity and art involved in the creation of casino games or slots to provide to casinos and gaming websites, one gets more involved in administration of resources and gets to approach the artistic side of the industry by interacting with animations, concept artists, ect.

Both positions would generate important amounts of income, but the have characteristics which are very different apart from one another.

Building up a casino which we do know that it wont come cheap and this is really that a very profitable business on which we know and obviously be seen into this market because if we do really tend to look at on the overall revenue on which this business could make tons and this is something which is really that showing that this is indeed a good business. Providers could also make tons of money too. Therefore, it will really be that just depending on you on which one you will really be that trying out to choose but in overall no matter which one you would be choosing then this will be bringing out that profitability into its owners. The only issue on here is that not all will be having that sufficient amount that they can be able to start up this kind of business. For those who are having those huge money or simply the rich people will always be having the advantage when it comes into this manner because they do have that financial capacity.

This is where we can be able say that rich becoming even more rich and thats the the reality of this life and there's nothing we can do about it. For us who do have been sitting on average finances or the poor ones then they are the ones will be that feeding up with those casinos and making its owners to be even more richer and this is indeed the basic cycle. Somehow there's no issue when it comes to gambling as long you do make yourself having that control.

If I had enough money, I myself have thought about building a casino because I think the profits are guaranteed to last in the long term, besides that in my environment there are many people who like to gamble from young to old, I have a friend who is an expert in IT, and I once suggested him to create a casino site but he was reluctant to make it.

In my opinion, casino owners clearly make bigger profits compared to game providers, but I don't know the casino that provides the game, whether the game is paid for every certain time or is paid for forever to belong to the casino?

Being a casino owner is the best because it's your business and you are in charge of everything. It's just like asking someone if he would love yo to own a company or be a contractor to a company. Everyone is under the owner of the casino and he pays their bills. Huge capital ia needed to achieve this, unlike the game provider.

Landbase or online casinos, it's very hard to open and operate because first, you really have a lot of money to start with as a bankroll. And then there's the operational expenses as well and then as you said, promoters and marketers and obviously there is that part that you need to take care and that is the law and legal expenses. But once you got the ball rolling, just like any other business, there will be a lot of challenges in the beginning too.

Maybe some big whales are going to hit a huge jackpot that can drain your bankroll. So there could be some entities that will create fake scam accusation against you to destroy your image because in this niche, competitive is very though as well.

I don't know how easy it is to open a casino, but I can assume that it is quite a profitable business if so many of them appear. On the other hand, there is a lot of competition among them, so I can assume that not all of them will be successful, and for successful work you need a good team of marketers and lawyers, that taking into account everything that is needed for legal work, a good team is expensive. Because of the large expenses, not everyone is ready to do this, so maybe it is not technically difficult now, but there are many pitfalls that need to be avoided.

I would love to be the casino owner bud, being a game owner is limiting, you probably have to depend on the casinos to list your game, and you only make money when gamblers find your game interesting to play it all the time, of which you know there are alot of game around and the competition is very very high..

But as a casino owner, you make money regardless of which game from which provider or game owner the player or user chooses to play, you as the owner of the casino gets your commission and other benefits, and you also have a chance of creating your own games, it's called in-house games.
So, I believe casino owners make more profit than game owners/providers, so If I have to choose to own one, I rather own a big and popular casino than be a game owner/provider.

But in any case, such work on organizing a casino is so multifactorial that it requires quite a lot of labor from the organizers of the casino or bookmaker's office. It is also necessary to accurately take into account the quality and professional training of the hired employees and somehow control them 24/7. All this, of course, determines that the initial costs of organizing such a business are large. But the profits from the work of the casino or bookmaker are also quite large.
Although I would still call the work of the owners, organizers of the casino very intense and troublesome.

Whatever it is will be good for your own income because after all, the most important thing about it all is about whether you have the ability and knowledge to develop it or not. Because anyway, if you just choose but without having the knowledge and effort to have your own platform, then I think it's just wishful thinking or just a fantasy that can't be realized. Because of course,  if you have the ability to have one of them or maybe you  are able to develop both of them simultaneously, then of course it will be very good for any income generated which will certainly be very profitable.

Now that anyone can manage a casino business very easily, the important thing is that you have a lot of money to pay the workers who develop the casino.
whether it is an experienced entrepreneur, game supplier or whoever it is not important, If you have the money then you can do it easily.

The big bookies started with big capital, and they built casinos very seriously.
Most of the big bookies do rise from the land-based casinos they once managed and then switch to online casinos that can make greater profits because they reach the rest of the world very easily.

Definitely, the difference in initial capital investment in these two different types of business in the gambling industry differs by an order of magnitude in terms of scale towards big money for organizing casino operations. And accordingly, the difference in complexity of implementing commercial successful businesses is also big.
So we can say that preference for these options is most likely given by people or legal entities that are completely different in character and financial capabilities.
It is quite possible that casinos are usually organized by experienced businessmen who have experience working in a physical casino or bookmaker's office. These are the people who are well suited for such a business. But game suppliers are not such gifted specialists in organizational talents. But they certainly do their job and they are obviously needed by the entire industry.

There is a huge difference between the casino owner and the game provider, but we will only consider one thing on the dividend. You will notice that a game provider only provides his game and gets some benefits from it, but a casino owner controls everything.
And the casino owner is constantly getting benefits from those who are constantly playing this game, the game provider will get some part of the profit but the rest of the benefits will go to the casino owner. From this we can see that the casino owner has the power to remove the game provider at any time, and it takes a lot of money to build a casino.

Exactly since its like you are just becoming a provider and to many of you out there will compete so that you can get a contract from the casino.

So its really better to be a casino owner since we all know that favor always goes with those who own this kind of business. And players is already stepping their one foot on danger and if they commit mistake for placing their bets or becoming more greedy then chances to lose is huge for these people.

Although running a casino is so expensive but its really cool to be an owner since there's provably huge money will come unto their pockets especially if the handle their business so well.

Both options can bring in big earnings, but I’d choose the one with unlimited opportunities to earn, and that is becoming a casino owner. 
Of course, it all depends on our capabilities. Running a business is difficult, especially if we don’t have the knowledge and passion for it. But being a game provider isn’t easy as well because without the right experience and reputation, no one will trust our services. 

So, before deciding between the two, we need to take a look at our skills to make sure that we can deliver excellent service.

If given a great chance, I would embrace being an owner of a casino because the profit is given already. You will run the establishment through trusted and reliable people on this kind of gambling industry, and you only need to monitor the operation with its ongoing progress unlike those who managed to work as an owner of the gameplay. They're more pressured compared with the actual owner who's the whale of the system.

There is no doubt that casino owners can definitely make a lot of profit, I even think every new casino that operates will definitely make a lot of profit in a short period of time, besides it is true what you said about no game owner sponsoring any sport, many of which sponsor sports are the name of the casino not the name of the game. With the current number of casinos operating, I am sure that at least they have hundreds of customers who gamble in their casinos so that it makes them survive and maybe think of ways to attract more customers such as making advertisements that can be reached by many people, especially now that many people are interested in gambling, it is likely that they can get new customers quickly as well as the profits.