First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.
Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.
What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.
I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.
Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.
For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.
In my opinion, it would be correct to draw a clear line between fiat payments in casinos, which are completely personalized and use verified bank accounts, and payments in cryptocurrencies, which are completely anonymous and the owner of a cryptocurrency deposit in a casino can maintain this complete anonymity.
Unfortunately, now legislators, introducing de-anonymization into cryptocurrency, completely ignore and have spoiled the main property of cryptocurrency as anonymous money. And this offensive from exchanges and casinos is also very active. Fewer and fewer casinos do not require identity verification. And voluntarily reporting and distributing your personal data to dozens of not very reliable businesses, in my opinion, can generally be considered a crime against a person’s right to privacy.
Legislators need to start protecting these very human rights to privacy in the issue of cryptocurrency payments. Unfortunately, no one from Congress even says anything on this topic. In any case, I have not heard anything intelligible from congressmen about this approach to the problem.
But the problem exists, this is obvious.