Topic: Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw - page 7. (Read 9397 times)

Do you mean to say that casino with mandatory KYC is more trusted than those casinos with no mandatory KYC? If you think so, I have to disagree because once players created an account in casinos where KYC is not mandatory but there is clear statement that the casino reserves the right to ask KYC at anytime or for special cases, means that players agreed with this terms already. Casinos asking KYC for big amount of withdrawal can be said as normal thing, although I dont like KYC but I can accept this situation. As long as the casino release the withdrawal once KYC is completed, there is nothing wrong with it.

I will repeat it once again, casinos dont ask for kyc just for fun, even though it wasnt a mandatory. Ok, there are times when security team randomly send kyc requests, when they have nothing to do, but they must show that they are working. % of such random cases is tiny. They are busy all the time. If gambler hasnt dont anything bad, there is nothing bad from passing kyc. After, they might be just curious who they are about to send money to. But in most cases there is always a strong reason to ask for kyc. With the amount of casinos today, not a single casino would ask for kyc for nothing and be endangered of losing a customer (maybe loyal).

Well, knowing all this, assuming that customers will have greater clarity in trust and security, do you think that some players can expect something from casinos? So what do we know or what can we expect, for example, traditional casinos are the first to They can do it, the competition has to fulfill it as well, I am sure that if a reliable casino takes the initiative, all the other casinos will follow, because that is how it works, there is no other way, things with the competition are like that, as long as yes There is something that will take them forward, they will do it, plus the most reliable casinos do not lose anything and have their customers and many are already fully registered with their KYC at high levels, I think that would be a great difficult requirement for nascent or relatively new casinos.

If it had been easy, i know many would have also established one gambling casino and operate their own rules which i believe could have even been wore than the ones we are seeing them complaining about, the problem with the people is that they don't put their self in such conditions that if they were the ones involved operating a casino, wouldn't they demand more than that or even do the worse, if we think we cant go by their rules, then the better we take a leave and find a more suitable platform and if none is found, we can as well go ahead in creating one and see how easy it is.

If you live in most developed countries you better learn this lesson very quick, as it'll end up expensive for you otherwise. There are some casinos that even try going to the lengths of wanting to identify the company that you work for which seems like a gross amount of excess data gathering. In fairness, you'll find lots of them have huge welcome bonuses and if you've capitalized off them, then it's a small price to pay for them to complete identity verification at the payout stage. Sometimes they might catch a few people breaking the terms and retain any winnings, but they should always return the original deposit if that is the case - to be fair. You'll see KYC plastered all over this forum, so should learn to expect it these days.

I completely agree with you, but unfortunately decentralized casinos do not provide the same features and are not of the same quality compared to central casinos. You know the lack of decentralization culture among the majority who come from the background of traditional fiat casino platforms.

There is no problem with the casino requesting verification procedures every time it is necessary. Even if the user has completed these procedures during registration, the platform may request that the verification process be repeated to match it with the first approved documents. On this basis, I find it normal for the platform to request a repeat of the verification procedures when the withdrawal amount is large. I think this increases the security feature on the platform, unless the casino’s goal is to disrupt withdrawals and not to perform a normal verification procedure.

The best solution to avoid any unexpected disruptions is to use reliable platforms that are sure of the large amount of liquidity they have.

Actually it is really just that simple as that for a particular gamble to do such thing on which they would really be just simply skip out if there would really be that outright asking of KYC documents on the time that they do register into a certain site. Although there are some sites now that asking for some lite KYC on which this is something that happens or asked out on Roobet on where asking some basic information and those KYC have that levels on which it would really be basing up on how much  you do deposit or possibly be able to withdrawal on which on the time that you would really be able to hit up such threshold then they would really be just that
basically asking out on whats recommended.

This is why on the time that you would really be having that kind of approach about KYC then there's so much options that we could really be able to take. Due to that tough or high competition
within this industry then you could really be having tons of options when choosing up on a platform. There are still places on which you could really be able to play without minding
that much about those KYC thing or simply you can play anonymously.

We think that all the time we are ready to receive new things from casinos , and sometimes not very pleasant ones, because basically things in casinos Always do things in their favor, nothing in favor of the customers, and it is abnormal, it is a casino, As you know, many advertisements, contests and various things like bonuses are done in an attractive way so that they can attract the attention of the players, but if we know how things are, sometimes they tend to be a little more difficult. Well, when you see that there are very big requirements, sometimes people back off and there is nothing to do, because they are very difficult requirements to meet, I am one of those who this happens to, and especially because I am very impatient for playing, so when it comes to making withdrawals, if we do not encounter problems due to the KYC, for me it is enough to go to that Casino for each year I play more, and that is why the one who loses the most is the casino, not as a player, because one always finds Opportunities to play.

Gamblers are free to make decisions about registering with a particular casino. Now if a casino makes KYC verification mandatory and a gambler is not interested in doing kyc then that gambler will refrain from joining this casino because casinos will never force gamblers to join their casino. However, if some casinos do not make kyc mandatory, casinos use kyc as an excuse to withhold the gambler's winning funds when the gambler wins big. And the casinos that engage in such activities can never be trusted casinos, they can create even worse situations for the gambler in the future.

Yes, you are right that they want to very know your customer identity if they suspect you. But they only suspect you when anyone wins or tries to withdraw funds. Many a gambling site won't restrict anything until there is a withdrawal request. So, it is good for gamblers? If we aren't ready to fulfill these terms then we must stop gambling on those sites that require any types of verification.

Well, there is talk of spending money that you do not want to lose, it is normal, but you have to comply with it to be able to do things better, that is, it is preferable to have a controlled balance. to lose a total of the balance, that is something that many eprosn do not consider and that is why the problems come later, of the money they lost when they should not have lost, then basically it is a security measure for ourselves as players, it is something which should be avoided, of course we are people who will always seek to win, but sometimes it is inevitable to lose.

The thing about money willing to lose is a strategy that I use for trading and that I brought to the game to avoid constant losses.

The problem is that casinos don`t want to do it. They like this opportunity and say something about "we allow gambler not to spend time waiting the KYC. He can begin gambling after his first deposit immediately". But the truth is that they can freeze your money for a long enough time. And it is difficult enough to change casino because the main part of them have something about it.



I know about it. But the problem that we often has no opportunity to KYC ourselves. I try to make several small deposits before big betting to get KYC but not always it is possible.

I find it simple - dont gamble at all if you dont want to play under their rules. Open your own casino and do whatever you want. I strongly believe that casino will never ask for KYC just for fun, just because you are some kind of a special player and their security team decided to pay attention to you. They do ask KYC if they find there is something suspicious about you. If you havent violated anything, there will be no problem to pass it. Scared of loosing identity, go to decentralized casinos. Quite simple, clear and no need to stretch this situation, turning topic into hundred pages long.

I understand the school of thought you are bringing this from and I love it as well because the two of them (casinos and exchanges) are dealing with people's deposits and withdrawals. However, to buttress your points, there are many financial services and payment gateways doing this even before online casinos came into operation, and they still do this now. These are companies with the highest level of regulations operating in strict countries like the UK, US and Europe. This is possible because it is allowed by the rules of their regulators to provide a limited financial service for a particular customer/client without verification, and just as you explained what exchanges do, these companies do such as well.

There will be limitations to the amount they can transfer and there can be a certain grace time they can go without verification. This also varies depending on the transaction of the customer/client, the country of residence and how suspicious the customer is. These 3 factors are important and could prompt what many call unjustified calling for KYC completion by casinos, neglecting that the casino they are dealing with is not a no-KYC type. I simply see no fault in any regulated entities calling for the completion of KYC at any time, so far they are regulated and have not advertised no-KYC to you, just know that it might only be a matter of time if you do not do it now, they will ask you to complete it later.

I disagree with the part where you said they will allow you to deposit without KYC, this is already common with crypto exchanges too and I believe that all gamblers on this forum know this about crypto exchanges too, why blame the casinos only?

Few crypto exchanges will restrict you from withdrawing if your amount is big and will only allow a certain amount to be withdrawn every 24 hours and some don't even give room for such.

If we can put the blame on online casinos for this act, then gamblers have their blame too, what's stopping them from passing KYC first before even starting to gamble on every online casino they choose to use?

KYC and online casinos are like 5 and 6, always in one, be ready to pass it or forget online gambling, I would rather pass KYC first before using it instead of trying to pass it after I won some money.

There is no doubt that gambling is the risky game and those who gamble know that they are taking risk with their money in order to gain profits and in the process they may lose money too.

However, being not able to KYC even after winning is not termed as bad luck but a scam by the new gambling sites. They will allow you to gamble and deposit without KYC but when you win something and place a withdrawal order they may start to ask for KYC. The bad ones won't approve the KYC and hence your money is stuck in the casino.

To avoid this situation it is always recommended that we do the KYC first so this risk of getting scammed by casinos is eliminated to some extent. Now it only leaves us with luck in gambling and if we have good luck we can make money in gambling and cash it out.

lets not mentioned those who deserves such restrictions because as gambler we must know what rules in each
site we are dealing and we must comply to never experience issues , but what we need to understand here is that
the casino that is victimizing players because we have seen this many times than players are cheating  gambling site.

The suggestion to make KYC verification a prerequisite for deposits could indeed streamline the process, setting clear expectations for users while aiming to enhance trust and transparency.
From other side, it could make signing up harder and slower for new users, raising concerns about privacy right from the start. While aiming for more trust and transparency, it's key to think about how this might put off newcomers or complicate the initial steps. Your "dragon spheres" analogy adds a fun twist, highlighting the tough task of changing how things are done to be more user friendly. It's crucial to keep looking for ways to balance security, privacy, and ease of use for everyone.

KYC is bloody mandatory these days, mate, but it saves ya heaps of strife when ya wanna have a fair go against the pokies joint that's holding onto ya winnings. Normally, they don't hang onto ya dosh when ya strike it rich and wanna cash out. Once ya've already verified yaself, they don't hassle ya again. So, reckon KYC's a necessary annoyance, but worth it in the end.

Normally a person who always enters a casino the only thing they think about is winning and withdrawing, I think that is something basic, however all this is sometimes wrapped in an endless number of things that can be very welcoming to please others, Some say it is for fun, others for enjoyment, but I have noticed that almost no one tells the truth, the truth is money, fun and enjoyment if they are on one side, but I think that here the main thing is that, money, In fact, no one goes to a casino just to have fun using play money, everyone goes with money and to spend, but when that right is skewed by something as non-elementary for us as players as a KYC, where the majority is full of rage, because here the common thing is to do things well, so good that the KYC is accepted and verified, but it enters another complication that the verification can last up to days and that complicates everything.


Well then, because of these things, we must see that as now the KYC is a Mandatory process, well, the cais should not do that, they do not lose anything, in fact so many Problems would be avoided that they would almost be an example for others to copy from them. Of course, not everyone would do this for the simple fact that they believe that people will not enter , but sooner or later everything should only be done by us, of course I Always say something, it is better to trust the casinos that have a high reputation, a high degree of trust so that relatively new casinos are not generated by Others, I am Someone who does not trust much, I am always somewhat suspicious of them.