I released Nexus sp-mod #6 with a reverted celeron cpu fix.
Release #6 works on small chunks of hashes like in #3, so the performance is down abit, but faster block finding. (works best when the diff is small)
This version use more CPU, so if you have a fast CPU you get more hash..
I already found a block with 300MHASH, so it seems to work good..
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 360. (Read 2347659 times)
I have found blocks with both release #4 and release #5. and it works on the celeron. #5 has been out 3 weeks, and noone have complained but you.
In release #6 I will add gpu selection. so you can split into 6 seperate windows processes.
In release #6 I will add gpu selection. so you can split into 6 seperate windows processes.
OK, I appreciate your feedback and thanks for trying to help out.
I know that there are many others in the Nexus Slack with the same problem on #5. Most people have stopped using #5 and have gone back to #3 or Majoh.
Just wanted to make you aware and help you to try and fix it. Any chance you could add the celeron fix to #3? That seemed to find a lot of blocks for me.
I have found blocks with both release #4 and release #5. and it works on the celeron. #5 has been out 3 weeks, and noone have complained but you.
In release #6 I will add gpu selection. so you can split into 6 seperate windows processes.
In release #6 I will add gpu selection. so you can split into 6 seperate windows processes.
As I mentioned earlier, I've been using #3 on a single 1080 and finding ~1-2 blocks a day (Acc = 1 or Acc = 2 etc)
Now with #5 it runs exactly the same but never finds a block. Everything else is the same, no system change or wallet change, just using miner #5.
Problem is #3 won't run properly on celeron.
Now with #5 it runs exactly the same but never finds a block. Everything else is the same, no system change or wallet change, just using miner #5.
Problem is #3 won't run properly on celeron.
Here is my output with 6 10 47 - looks fine.
If i use default (remove 6 10 47) it's the same just 1ghs (200mhs lower)
If i use default (remove 6 10 47) it's the same just 1ghs (200mhs lower)
I am running with default intensity like this:
:loop
skminer.exe 127.0.0.1 9325
goto loop
a healthy output looks like this:
Did your output show Acc=0 and REJ=0 in 48 hours? If you get Acc>0 it will take a while until it shows in the wallet and you can spend it.
:loop
skminer.exe 127.0.0.1 9325
goto loop
a healthy output looks like this:
Did your output show Acc=0 and REJ=0 in 48 hours? If you get Acc>0 it will take a while until it shows in the wallet and you can spend it.
Everything seems fine?
:Run
skminer.exe 192.168.0.2 9325 6 10 47
goto Run
skminer.exe 192.168.0.2 9325 6 10 47
goto Run
Try to run in benchmark mode
skminer.exe 192.168.0.2 9325 6 10 47 1
Do you get accepted solutions?
I have cpu verfication of the hash in the benchmarkmode.
The problem is it finds no blocks.
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
Can you show me your batfile please?
:Run
skminer.exe 192.168.0.2 9325 6 10 47
goto Run
The problem is it finds no blocks.
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
Can you show me your batfile please?
The problem is it finds no blocks.
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
The miner runs fine at 1.2ghs (200mhs per 1080). Runs for hours, height updates perfectly and in sync.
On your version #3 I would find 1-2 blocks per day on my single 1080 gaming rig. Unfortunately I cannot use #3 on my 6 gpu celeron rig as it crashes all the time.
It cannot be right that I haven't found a block on a combined 7 1080s in 48 hours using #5.
Cheers,
Jimmy
So what is your problem?
Did you add a failover in the batfile
:loop
skminer (...)
timeout 10
goto loop
If the blockchain is ddos'es and the wallet loose connection, the miner will sometimes exit.
Did you add a failover in the batfile
:loop
skminer (...)
timeout 10
goto loop
If the blockchain is ddos'es and the wallet loose connection, the miner will sometimes exit.
OK, thanks for the update.
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
You don't need to add more ram. You just have to increase the ram in windows. (harddrive ram)
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2840886/if-windows-virtual-memory-is-too-low-you-can-increase-it-but-there-are-trade-offs.html
It's already set to over 18GB.
Do I need to further increase?
OK, thanks for the update.
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
You don't need to add more ram. You just have to increase the ram in windows. (harddrive ram)
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2840886/if-windows-virtual-memory-is-too-low-you-can-increase-it-but-there-are-trade-offs.html
OK, thanks for the update.
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
Do you think I can start with 4 threads whilst I buy more RAM? Should this work?
I have 8GB or RAM. Apologies if you stated that it needed 16GB (Haven't seen it mentioned anywhere).
It's currently on using 50% of my 8GB. I assume it requires 16GB?
It's currently on using 50% of my 8GB. I assume it requires 16GB?
If you have more than 4 cards in the rig, you need 16 GB virtual memory
I have 8GB or RAM. Apologies if you stated that it needed 16GB (Haven't seen it mentioned anywhere).
It's currently on using 50% of my 8GB. I assume it requires 16GB?
It's currently on using 50% of my 8GB. I assume it requires 16GB?
Are there any minimum system req?
Did you add 16gig of virtual memory?
OK, will try that. I have 1.6 ghs and haven't found a block in 48 hours....
very strange diff is not that high, with the open source version that was way slower, and this current diff i was finding 10 blocks a day
sp you need to check if it work because last tiem i got a reject with your build
Are there any minimum system req?
At the moment none of your miners work reliably for me.
At the moment none of your miners work reliably for me.
Jump to: