Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 362. (Read 2347659 times)

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Nothing can be confirmed on bitcointalk.

I just ask for binaries uploaded to his git.
When I compile myself I get a 6% slower kernel on the gtx 1060 3gb, than my modded kernel..
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
I can confirm that the alexis78 btc account is legitimate (99%).
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
A lot of miners are tards, I wouldn't be surprised if their cards are either throttling or they have a low TDP selected from mining Equihash.

Someone is instigating drama here. Not sure who pissed in Alexis's cheerios today, but it's showing. Probably something in a IRC channel somewhere. I've never actually seen him post on BCT before. It's a brand new account.

Epsylon can you confirm this is the same guy that made the miner? Based on the hate SP gets around here and the seemingly lack of any sort of coding knowledge by this 'Alexis' (can't deconstruct .exes for comparison for instance, just wants github code), I'd say it's a smurf account for trolling.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
ALTER EGO--

Really, s7icky never shows up until the thread gets hostile.  I suspect he is another coder.  The language was not offensive until the last post, even if the discussion was heated.

We are all stuck in the same pot, like beans in a slow-cooker.  Please try to allow the flavors to mellow...       --scryptr
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Oh Sp... still upto the same fuckery as always..... You need to give up already. Such Pleb... Many Scams.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
First of all, as everyone who tried the binary and shared his result here, it's not faster, and even if we assume it is, it is not +6%.

Faster than what?
You haven't provided a binary to compare with. I need to know wich compiler, driver and compute version your sourcecode  is compiled with.
If not the binary will never be comparable.

You are asking for something impossible.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
I want you to release the sources of my fork from which, if i compile them, i'll get the same binaries with the lbry_spmod#5 and lbry_spmod#6 you have on github. Thank you

Why do you want that? Because my kernel is 6% faster and you want to see what I did?

I will publish the donation code, then you will compile a binary with the compiler of your choice.

First of all, as everyone who tried the binary and shared his result here, it's not faster, and even if we assume it is, it is not +6%.
Second of all, Since the kernel is part of ccminer, it is affected by GPL. And we all have to live with that, not just every developer except you Smiley

I'd mostly love to see your struggle in the source code, the things you changed and then reverted and so on, between #5 and #6.
Also i'd like to see how much different the source is from the public one if you dont mind Smiley
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I don't know if you are familiar with the nvidia profiling tool.

nvprof.

Do you want me to run on the gtx 1070? I am more than happy to share my results.


sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I want you to release the sources of my fork from which, if i compile them, i'll get the same binaries with the lbry_spmod#5 and lbry_spmod#6 you have on github. Thank you

Why do you want that? Because my kernel is 6% faster and you want to see what I did?

I will publish the donation code, then you can compile a binary with the compiler of your choice.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
I said...  if you released all the revisions of the public one with the fee

I will release the donation code create a pull requast, and then you can compile a version of your github yourself.

I want you to release the sources of my fork from which, if i compile them, i'll get the same binaries with the lbry_spmod#5 and lbry_spmod#6 you have on github. Thank you

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I said...  if you released all the revisions of the public one with the fee

I will release the donation code create a pull request, and then you can compile a version of your github yourself.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
Would be really helpful for the flow if you released all revisions of the public one with the fee Smiley

You meen all the LBRY sp-mod kernels with 0% increase right? What's the point. 0% increase as you said.

0% increase, but higher profit poolside.

I said...  if you released all the revisions of the public one with the fee
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Would be really helpful for the flow if you released all revisions of the public one with the fee Smiley

You meen all the LBRY sp-mod kernels with 0% increase right? What's the point. 0% increase as you said.

0% increase, but higher profit poolside.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
Can we see the changes to my source code throughout all your public revisions of the binary based on my fork which gave a 0% increase and 1.7% fee? Thank you Smiley

Yes. I will release the donation code later.

Would be really helpful for the flow if you released all revisions of the public one with the fee Smiley
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Can we see the changes to my source code throughout all your public revisions of the binary based on my fork which gave a 0% increase and 1.7% fee? Thank you Smiley

Yes. I will release the donation code later.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
nodoby compiles for compute 6.1 because it's slower: pascal cards run just fine with compute 5.2.

My latest Nexus mod is compiled with cuda 6.1.

Why do you think NVIDIA release a new compute version?  You just need to rewrite abit for more speed.

member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
@pallas

My point is not whether the source was public or not.
My point is that people got nervous when they could not find the source code.

@SP_

speed and stabillity does for sure.
Can we see the changes to my source code throughout all your public revisions of the binary based on my fork which gave a 0% increase and 1.7% fee? Thank you Smiley
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
speaking of... Nicehash... i remember people arguing here regarding the publication of the "source code" of nanashi's improvements and how the binary was violating licenses and stuff. (He did not just mess with the default intensity, Nanashi's lyra2v2 was a marvelous complete rewrite of the kernel).

TSIV had a shuffle kernel right after the launch of lyra2v2. I think Djm34 had one as well.  Marvellous code doesn't give you the profit, speed and stabillity does.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
nanashi version added warp shuffle (which is not trivial and a very good speed improvement, even though probably not his own idea).
his sources has always been open, but nicehash chose to pay him anyway.
nodoby compiles for compute 6.1 because it's slower: pascal cards run just fine with compute 5.2.
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
Because when I compile your work, I get a 6% slower LBRY Kernel. I might have missed something?? The speed is not there. Are you compiling with compute 6.1?

I'm not compiling for compute 6.1 the configuration of the compilation is already set there in order to make sure that non-tech people can compile their own binaries, and they managed to Smiley

Why can't you?

And why can't you just release the source code of all your revisions to my code so that everyone can read/check/test/comment? Smiley

speaking of... Nicehash... i remember people arguing here regarding the publication of the "source code" of nanashi's improvements and how the binary was violating licenses and stuff. (He did not just mess with the default intensity, Nanashi's lyra2v2 was a marvelous complete rewrite of the kernel).
Jump to: