Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 568. (Read 2347641 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Hey,

If anybody is interested: we added LBRY support to NiceHash.

Keep on mining! Wink


Best regards,
NiceHash team.

Well... that explains where all the extra has came from, Nicehash tards that just throw their hash at Nicehash and never check what's making money or how much.

Release #4 will have 5-10MHASH more boost on the 1070 cards. and 30-40MHASH on the 1060. (compared to #3)
That would be nice to see but you have to prove it first. Right now with sp-mod3 I can achieve stable 197 mhash on same card Gigabyte 1060 6GB, same OC clocks as in you're previous screenshot, that's only 10mhash improvement,...hope it was only a beta build.

yes a beta build..

The new kernel has some problems.. It pulls 120W from a card that only has a 6pin connector (gtx 1060). The 6pin provide 75W so 45Watt is taken from the mainboard. And I have problems with 6 cards in the rig... I need powered risers..

my testcard is this one:

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5978#kf

ALWAYS use powered risers. Either USB or ribbon, anything is better then no powered risers. Just make sure you plug your primary motherboard PSU into the powered risers or you'll have a lot of problems.


Even with SP#3, Lbry is earning less then Eth+SIA today...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
The cuda students. Wolf0,pallas,alexis,and the japanese motherfucker, cannot do +35%

Study harder dickheads...

+1% HuhHuh
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
sp-mod #3 is using 17 Watt less per card than the opensource. (gtx 1070)  (12 % power saving) and +5-25% more hash
sp-mod #4 is using the same watt as the opensource, but 15-35% more profit. (compute 5.2 and compute 6.1 cards)

(compute 5.2-6.1 cards is listed here:)

GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950, GeForce GTX 750 SE, GeForce GTX 980M, GeForce GTX 970M, GeForce GTX 965M   Quadro M6000 24GB, Quadro M6000, Quadro M5000, Quadro M4000, Quadro M2000, Quadro M5500, Quadro M5000M, Quadro M4000M, Quadro M3000M   Tesla M4, Tesla M40, Tesla M6, Tesla M60   
Tegra X1
Tesla P100   
TITAN X pascal, GeForce GTX 1080, GTX 1070, GTX 1060   
Quadro P6000, Quadro P5000   
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
LBRY sp-mod #4 is using more power, so you get the biggest boost without OC. Stable max oc clocks are -(50-100) mhz compared to sp-mod #3
Price?

0.1 BTC for the subscription and 3.3% fee
Release #4 is free for the LBRY donators
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
LBRY sp-mod #4 is using more power, so you get the biggest boost without OC. Stable max oc clocks are -(50-100) mhz compared to sp-mod #3
Price?
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
Price on Nicehash is for TeraHash!..... Shit.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
LBRY sp-mod #4 is using more power, so you get the biggest boost without OC. Stable max oc clocks are -(50-100) mhz compared to sp-mod #3
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Release #4 will have 5-10MHASH more boost on the 1070 cards. and 30-40MHASH on the 1060. (compared to #3)
That would be nice to see but you have to prove it first. Right now with sp-mod3 I can achieve stable 197 mhash on same card Gigabyte 1060 6GB, same OC clocks as in you're previous screenshot, that's only 10mhash improvement,...hope it was only a beta build.

yes a beta build..

The new kernel has some problems.. It pulls 120W from a card that only has a 6pin connector (gtx 1060). The 6pin provide 75W so 45Watt is taken from the mainboard. And I have problems with 6 cards in the rig... I need powered risers..

my testcard is this one:

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5978#kf
legendary
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
Hey,

If anybody is interested: we added LBRY support to NiceHash.

Keep on mining! Wink


Best regards,
NiceHash team.
member
Activity: 130
Merit: 10
Release #4 will have 5-10MHASH more boost on the 1070 cards. and 30-40MHASH on the 1060. (compared to #3)


That would be nice to see but you have to prove it first. Right now with sp-mod3 I can achieve stable 197 mhash on same card Gigabyte 1060 6GB, same OC clocks as in you're previous screenshot, that's only 10mhash improvement,...hope it was only a beta build.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Release #4 will have 5-10MHASH more boost on the 1070 cards. and 30-40MHASH on the 1060. (compared to #3)
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10


What am I doing wrong? Doesn't this CCMiner support Monero?

no

https://github.com/tsiv/ccminer-cryptonight

parameters differ from card to card
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Hello,

I am new to this. I have downloaded the CCMiner of the first post. I then started the following command :

ccminer -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u my address -p x

It comes with an error :

SP-Mod 1.5.79
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5

  Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
  CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
  Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2016-09-16 20:15:43] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333
[2016-09-16 20:15:43] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-09-16 20:15:43] 1 miner thread started, using 'x11' algorithm.
[2016-09-16 20:15:43] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-09-16 20:15:44] JSON-RPC call failed: {
   "code": -1,
   "message": "invalid method"
}
[2016-09-16 20:15:44] ...retry after 5 seconds
[2016-09-16 20:15:49] JSON-RPC call failed: {
   "code": -1,
   "message": "invalid method"
}
[2016-09-16 20:15:49] ...retry after 5 seconds
[2016-09-16 20:15:53] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete.  Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-09-16 20:15:54] Stratum connection timed out
[2016-09-16 20:15:54] Stratum connection interrupted

When I use an version which I found at : https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/guides/how-to-mine-monero It gets a rate of 265.47 H/s of a EVGA 1070 SC

What am I doing wrong? Doesn't this CCMiner support Monero?
legendary
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
LBRY net hash now 3.2t  Huh I dont understand because it suggests that something was being mined other than ETH and now ETH and LBRY are being dual mined by something large with private miner that just switched its hashrate over. DCR hashrate has been rising too. I didn't check SIA, but maybe someone is speculating on LBRY price holding from here forward. I would assume they are going to be holding their mined coins as well. I guess mining XMR.
Well, many parts of the world ppl are waiting for the new cards... mining boom is going on.Soon it will be better to buy coins, not mine them. Again.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
LBRY net hash now 3.2t  Huh I dont understand because it suggests that something was being mined other than ETH and now ETH and LBRY are being dual mined by something large with private miner that just switched its hashrate over. DCR hashrate has been rising too. I didn't check SIA, but maybe someone is speculating on LBRY price holding from here forward. I would assume they are going to be holding their mined coins as well. I guess mining XMR.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
1.2.3...

207.5MHASH!!

120Watt measured in the wall.

http://i67.tinypic.com/op8lkn.png


PLZ check PM.  thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Nice score yeah , can't wait to see what could 1070 do... Smiley
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
1.2.3...

207.5MHASH!!

120Watt measured in the wall.


sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Working on LBRY sp-mod #4... Managed to break 200MHASH stable on the 1060 6gb..
Small boost on the 1070 as well..


legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Guessing Nik bought it from Scrypt... He isn't responding because you didn't buy it from him.

CCminer has a bug with MRR, you have to use the dynamic port it tries to reconnect to as it doesn't tolerate stratum redirection for some reason. Epsylons version has this bug as well.

Still saying SP you should lower fee to 2% and it should be a free release.

I agree, but with the kernel from epsylon you haven't got a fee, and a "forced donation" the first 4 minutes it starts, or reconnects.

There might be an issue in #3. If you loose connection for a long time, it will switch to donation mining and do another 4mins.

4 minutes for me 116 for you. if you loose connection within the 116mins, the process restarts. (if you use the -R reconnect parameter in the bat, you should put it to a high value or remove it.)

With -R 5 it will try to reconnect to your pool 5 times.


If you try to connect to mrr, you need to specify first the general port, so MRR itself suggests the correct one later.

Doing this, means that you donate, every single time, to sp; if you choose a wrong port then, the donation time it's almost 100%, because of it reconnects then to the sp hidden pool (the "donation, or better to say paying, one")

The donations timer shouldn't be placed first, but last; 116.4 minutes to me and LATER 3.3% to you, not the opposite.

Will you continue to use this system or will you change it in the next release? As you can see there's a general opinion against these kind of methods of remuneration, from your customers.

I could think that these could be intentional, but I want to believe that it's not. This fee miner isn't working properly and I'm absolutely not satisfied with it.

I've just restrted my machines with tpruvot 1.8.1 open source, having paid for yours.

If you do this, someone can simply restart the miner before the donation takes place. Not sure why this is such a big deal. Obviously the redirect should be fixed, but this isn't a problem for me in the same way it seems to be for you.

O well  Shit

http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/quark-asic/

We need more memory hardened coins.

Quark and Qubit have been dead for about two months. They were already hit by the ASICs before people could receive these.
Jump to: