Chips.gg |🎰 1000+ Slots |🎤 Live Casino |🎲 1% House Edge Dice |🏦 The Vault - page 2.

DaNNy001

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 520

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: PedroCunhaYori on November 14, 2024, 02:29:22 PM

Quote from: chipsgg on November 14, 2024, 02:00:14 PM

Quote from: PedroCunhaYori on November 14, 2024, 09:19:47 AM

I joined about 7 days ago, and in the first day when i tried to make withdrawal attempts at least 5 times it had some error to which i had to be refunded and wait for them to fix their website but i did withdraw after,
now 2 days ago after winning 2 bets i went to withdraw but for some reason it said it was temporarily disabled and contact support to which i did and they told me it was a account review and to do kyc.

i attempted to do the level 2 kyc but like before their site is completly full of bugs and whenever i try it says "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'status')"

i have contacted support about this 2 days ago and they tell me they are fixing it and i even offered to send all information required via email or something but nothing no help and im stuck without being able to withdraw for no fault of my own only errors on site end

very bad experience

I’m sorry to hear about the difficulties you’ve encountered with our platform. The error message “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading ‘status’)” typically indicates a technical issue on our end. Our development team is actively working to resolve this problem. In the meantime, please try the following steps:

   1.   Clear Browser Cache: Sometimes, outdated data can cause unexpected errors. Clearing your browser’s cache might help.
   2.   Use a Different Browser or Device: Switching to another browser or device can determine if the issue is browser-specific.
   3.   Update Your Browser: Ensure you’re using the latest version of your browser, as updates often fix compatibility issues.

If these steps don’t resolve the issue, please contact our support team directly. Providing screenshots of the error and details about your browser and device can assist us in diagnosing the problem more effectively. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience as we work to fix this issue.

funny after i post kyc finally becomes avaliable , but even after being fully verified my withdraw is still suspended , why? i dont know and neither does support apparently im still in review even though im fully verified , chips.gg is acting in bad faith i sugest not playing there.

Well I understand that it's frustrating but just as you have being answered, maybe you should just try and exercise patience since Op have said that particular error is a technical issue from their end and they are working on it so the best you can do now is trying out the option given and wait on them to fix the bug that's if it still doesn't work. I think this is actually the first complaint I have heard and seeing that am also an active user of the casino.

PedroCunhaYori

jr. member

Activity: 30

Merit: 3

Quote from: chipsgg on November 14, 2024, 02:00:14 PM

Quote from: PedroCunhaYori on November 14, 2024, 09:19:47 AM

I joined about 7 days ago, and in the first day when i tried to make withdrawal attempts at least 5 times it had some error to which i had to be refunded and wait for them to fix their website but i did withdraw after,
now 2 days ago after winning 2 bets i went to withdraw but for some reason it said it was temporarily disabled and contact support to which i did and they told me it was a account review and to do kyc.

i attempted to do the level 2 kyc but like before their site is completly full of bugs and whenever i try it says "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'status')"

i have contacted support about this 2 days ago and they tell me they are fixing it and i even offered to send all information required via email or something but nothing no help and im stuck without being able to withdraw for no fault of my own only errors on site end

very bad experience

I’m sorry to hear about the difficulties you’ve encountered with our platform. The error message “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading ‘status’)” typically indicates a technical issue on our end. Our development team is actively working to resolve this problem. In the meantime, please try the following steps:

   1.   Clear Browser Cache: Sometimes, outdated data can cause unexpected errors. Clearing your browser’s cache might help.
   2.   Use a Different Browser or Device: Switching to another browser or device can determine if the issue is browser-specific.
   3.   Update Your Browser: Ensure you’re using the latest version of your browser, as updates often fix compatibility issues.

If these steps don’t resolve the issue, please contact our support team directly. Providing screenshots of the error and details about your browser and device can assist us in diagnosing the problem more effectively. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience as we work to fix this issue.

funny after i post kyc finally becomes avaliable , but even after being fully verified my withdraw is still suspended , why? i dont know and neither does support apparently im still in review even though im fully verified , chips.gg is acting in bad faith i sugest not playing there.

chipsgg

copper member

Activity: 84

Merit: 42

The Future Of Cryptocurrency Gambling

Quote from: PedroCunhaYori on November 14, 2024, 09:19:47 AM

I joined about 7 days ago, and in the first day when i tried to make withdrawal attempts at least 5 times it had some error to which i had to be refunded and wait for them to fix their website but i did withdraw after,
now 2 days ago after winning 2 bets i went to withdraw but for some reason it said it was temporarily disabled and contact support to which i did and they told me it was a account review and to do kyc.

i attempted to do the level 2 kyc but like before their site is completly full of bugs and whenever i try it says "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'status')"

i have contacted support about this 2 days ago and they tell me they are fixing it and i even offered to send all information required via email or something but nothing no help and im stuck without being able to withdraw for no fault of my own only errors on site end

very bad experience

I’m sorry to hear about the difficulties you’ve encountered with our platform. The error message “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading ‘status’)” typically indicates a technical issue on our end. Our development team is actively working to resolve this problem. In the meantime, please try the following steps:

   1.   Clear Browser Cache: Sometimes, outdated data can cause unexpected errors. Clearing your browser’s cache might help.
   2.   Use a Different Browser or Device: Switching to another browser or device can determine if the issue is browser-specific.
   3.   Update Your Browser: Ensure you’re using the latest version of your browser, as updates often fix compatibility issues.

If these steps don’t resolve the issue, please contact our support team directly. Providing screenshots of the error and details about your browser and device can assist us in diagnosing the problem more effectively. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience as we work to fix this issue.

PedroCunhaYori

jr. member

Activity: 30

Merit: 3

I joined about 7 days ago, and in the first day when i tried to make withdrawal attempts at least 5 times it had some error to which i had to be refunded and wait for them to fix their website but i did withdraw after,
now 2 days ago after winning 2 bets i went to withdraw but for some reason it said it was temporarily disabled and contact support to which i did and they told me it was a account review and to do kyc.

i attempted to do the level 2 kyc but like before their site is completly full of bugs and whenever i try it says "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'status')"

i have contacted support about this 2 days ago and they tell me they are fixing it and i even offered to send all information required via email or something but nothing no help and im stuck without being able to withdraw for no fault of my own only errors on site end

very bad experience

hd49728

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1018

Not your keys, not your coins!

Quote from: RockBell on November 12, 2024, 11:08:09 AM

People have the right to choose wether centralized or decentralized, and anyone that people are using will have a reason because we all can not like the same thing

People are different in their personal traits, greed, carefulness, disciplined, they are more or less with these personal characteristics that decide what they want and actually do with their activities and money.

Quote

so people that want to go for vex and Dex can and if not for data protection cex is not that bad, but for the love of privacy Dex is okay and both are okay and even cex will not expose your data

It's not only about privacy (data protection for customers from centralized exchanges), but more important with your fund safety.

When you use centralized exchanges, you deposit your money there, and are no longer able to control your fund. Privacy is only one concern, and not most important concern. Care about your privacy or not, it is less important than your fund safety, because if you lose all money, your privacy means nothing when you are broken financially.
Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts

joniboini

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1789

Quote from: Synchronice on November 10, 2024, 11:29:31 AM

By the way, if hack happens on a casino, that doesn't necessarily mean that you'll lose your deposit. Some famous casinos have been hacked but users had zero problems. The casino has to have a good management of hot and cold wallets. In hot wallet, there must be money that casino can afford to lose and cold wallet should be protected very carefully.

I'm aware of that, but I don't like relying on chances and promises to secure my money. Sure, reputable casinos would have a backup wallet for emergency purposes or insurance promised to help users who were affected if a large-scale hack happened, but it's still outside of my control. This is a risk I'm willing to take, but a huge factor for me to choose which exchange or casino I choose.

Quote from: RockBell on November 12, 2024, 11:08:09 AM

even cex will not expose your data, they know how such situations will affect the image of the company so they are very careful all the kind of decisions they are making, concerning their customers, and that is why they try to protect the intrest of their customers no matter which one.

Judging from how exchanges or centralized services behave, sometimes it feels like they don't have the interest of the customers in their minds at all. Image means nothing if they plan to run with the money after all.

RockBell

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 391

Underestimate- nothing

Quote from: hd49728 on November 08, 2024, 09:34:13 AM

Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts.

The reminder is never old, and will be usable in future too. People are free to choose Centralized or Decentralized exchanges or platforms, they will need to assess risk and benefit between CEX and DEX, or generally centralized and decentralized platforms, and make their decisions. Like accept risk or not, want to prioritize lower transaction fee in long term or not, it's their choice after considering many factors.

People have the right to choose wether centralized or decentralized, and anyone that people are using will have a reason because we all can not like the same thing, so people that want to go for vex and Dex can and if not for data protection cex is not that bad, but for the love of privacy Dex is okay and both are okay and even cex will not expose your data, they know how such situations will affect the image of the company so they are very careful all the kind of decisions they are making, concerning their customers, and that is why they try to protect the intrest of their customers no matter which one.

hd49728

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1018

Not your keys, not your coins!

Quote from: Synchronice on November 10, 2024, 11:29:31 AM

I'm thinking now, is it a better idea to use one CEX or two CEXs are a better choice? In terms of mitigating risks.

It's bad risk mitigation method.

First, you only need to trade what you afford to lose in failed tradings or in massacre on exchanges especially on centralized exchanges.
Second, use one good exchanges in your assessment and belief for deposit your fund on it for trading, withdraw your fund when you see market is boring and no chance for trading.

Diversifying your fund on centralized exchanges, is not like good idea. Risk will increase, not smaller.

Quote

By the way, if hack happens on a casino, that doesn't necessarily mean that you'll lose your deposit. Some famous casinos have been hacked but users had zero problems. The casino has to have a good management of hot and cold wallets. In hot wallet, there must be money that casino can afford to lose and cold wallet should be protected very carefully.

Casinos are like centralized exchanges, if they get hacked, they possibly have very different endings.

Die shortly after a hack.
Scam exit shortly after a hack.
Pay compensation to users, instantly or gradually with time and recover from the hack.
Pay compensation to users, and close their services.
File for bankruptcy and users will have to wait for kind of refund from bankruptcy, it's long waiting time.

Synchronice

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 792

Watch Bitcoin Documentary - https://t.ly/v0Nim

Quote from: joniboini on November 09, 2024, 10:47:22 PM

Quote from: DaNNy001 on November 09, 2024, 03:10:58 PM

I mean everything around us is virtually risk so I think am good with risking having my coins on CEX as I understand fully all consequences will bounce back at me.

As of now I only use 1 CEX and tried to minimize exposure to other services. I'm not sure if people's behavior in choosing CEX over DEX is similar to web3 gambling or centralized casino. The risk is more or less the same but I feel like there are too many dapps that got hacked after release which shows either the lack of testing or terrible security practices from the users/casino. At least I don't have to make a huge deposit at a casino regularly so if a hack happens I'm less likely to be affected. CMIIW.

I'm thinking now, is it a better idea to use one CEX or two CEXs are a better choice? In terms of mitigating risks.
By the way, if hack happens on a casino, that doesn't necessarily mean that you'll lose your deposit. Some famous casinos have been hacked but users had zero problems. The casino has to have a good management of hot and cold wallets. In hot wallet, there must be money that casino can afford to lose and cold wallet should be protected very carefully.

hd49728

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1018

Not your keys, not your coins!

Quote from: DaNNy001 on November 09, 2024, 03:10:58 PM

I will be under the category of users that would prefer lesser cost than privacy, I mean everything around us is virtually risk so I think am good with risking having my coins on CEX as I understand fully all consequences will bounce back at me.

You will come to a time you prefer privacy more than cost of on chain transactions. Some people begin with privacy enthusiasts and maintain it with time, but some others start like you and only change to care more about privacy with time. It's nothing bad because it's natural change on their individual knowledge, capital availability and priority on privacy.

However, one very important thing to say as a warning, privacy if lost, lost forever. You will not be able to get your privacy back if you lost it on Internet.

Bitcoin privacy resources.

Jawhead999

legendary

Activity: 1820

Merit: 1207

Quote from: joniboini on November 09, 2024, 10:47:22 PM

As of now I only use 1 CEX and tried to minimize exposure to other services. I'm not sure if people's behavior in choosing CEX over DEX is similar to web3 gambling or centralized casino. The risk is more or less the same but I feel like there are too many dapps that got hacked after release which shows either the lack of testing or terrible security practices from the users/casino. At least I don't have to make a huge deposit at a casino regularly so if a hack happens I'm less likely to be affected. CMIIW.

Yeah that's true there are many cases where dApps got hacked or their wallet drained because they connected to wrong sites. This is why I'm really careful with dApps, if there's a choice to use CEX or dApps, I would choose CEX, because I have nothing to worry with the wallet I've used to sent the coins.

However, as a business, they need to upgrade, improve and follow the trend in order to grow their project.

joniboini

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1789

Quote from: DaNNy001 on November 09, 2024, 03:10:58 PM

I mean everything around us is virtually risk so I think am good with risking having my coins on CEX as I understand fully all consequences will bounce back at me.

As of now I only use 1 CEX and tried to minimize exposure to other services. I'm not sure if people's behavior in choosing CEX over DEX is similar to web3 gambling or centralized casino. The risk is more or less the same but I feel like there are too many dapps that got hacked after release which shows either the lack of testing or terrible security practices from the users/casino. At least I don't have to make a huge deposit at a casino regularly so if a hack happens I'm less likely to be affected. CMIIW.

DaNNy001

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 520

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: hd49728 on November 08, 2024, 09:34:13 AM

Quote from: chipsgg on November 08, 2024, 09:25:59 AM

You’re highlighting the essential trade-off between centralized and decentralized platforms. Centralized exchanges typically offer lower transaction fees, which can be attractive for users focused on cost efficiency. However, this comes with the need to deposit funds into the platform, meaning users sacrifice some control over their assets.

On the other hand, decentralized exchanges and Web3 dapps provide users with complete control over their funds, aligning with the ethos of decentralization and self-custody in crypto. However, as you noted, users often face higher transaction fees and potential network congestion. For many, the choice depends on whether they prioritize control and decentralization over cost efficiency. This trade-off is central to the decision-making process for users as they navigate both options.

Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts.

The reminder is never old, and will be usable in future too. People are free to choose Centralized or Decentralized exchanges or platforms, they will need to assess risk and benefit between CEX and DEX, or generally centralized and decentralized platforms, and make their decisions. Like accept risk or not, want to prioritize lower transaction fee in long term or not, it's their choice after considering many factors.

I think that's literally what Op just said as he clear the air that the whole issue is still tied down to the particular user making the decision to actually chose lesser cost of transaction than full privacy control over their asset. Although I won't lie if am to be drawn under the same radar I think I will be under the category of users that would prefer lesser cost than privacy, I mean everything around us is virtually risk so I think am good with risking having my coins on CEX as I understand fully all consequences will bounce back at me.

hd49728

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1018

Not your keys, not your coins!

Quote from: chipsgg on November 08, 2024, 09:25:59 AM

You’re highlighting the essential trade-off between centralized and decentralized platforms. Centralized exchanges typically offer lower transaction fees, which can be attractive for users focused on cost efficiency. However, this comes with the need to deposit funds into the platform, meaning users sacrifice some control over their assets.

On the other hand, decentralized exchanges and Web3 dapps provide users with complete control over their funds, aligning with the ethos of decentralization and self-custody in crypto. However, as you noted, users often face higher transaction fees and potential network congestion. For many, the choice depends on whether they prioritize control and decentralization over cost efficiency. This trade-off is central to the decision-making process for users as they navigate both options.

Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts.

The reminder is never old, and will be usable in future too. People are free to choose Centralized or Decentralized exchanges or platforms, they will need to assess risk and benefit between CEX and DEX, or generally centralized and decentralized platforms, and make their decisions. Like accept risk or not, want to prioritize lower transaction fee in long term or not, it's their choice after considering many factors.

chipsgg

copper member

Activity: 84

Merit: 42

The Future Of Cryptocurrency Gambling

Quote from: hd49728 on November 06, 2024, 12:12:27 AM

Quote from: joniboini on November 06, 2024, 12:01:36 AM

My experience with dapps is not deep but you can feel it if you've made dozens of interactions daily. Maybe gassless dapps can be a solution but who knows if the cost to sponsor it will be worth it. CMIIW.

Interactions with dapps, smart contracts cost people a lot in transaction fees and in long term, transaction fees for these interactions make them poorer. I believe that trading on centralized exchanges is better than on decentralized exchanges if the only consideration is trading fee.

Centralized platforms require users to deposit money in accounts, before trading or betting, and it's another concern on user side because some of them want to have full control of their fund. On centralized platforms, they don't have that full control on their fund and DEX, Web3, dapps can help them to have it. In return they will have to accept risk and loss in transaction fees.

You’re highlighting the essential trade-off between centralized and decentralized platforms. Centralized exchanges typically offer lower transaction fees, which can be attractive for users focused on cost efficiency. However, this comes with the need to deposit funds into the platform, meaning users sacrifice some control over their assets.

On the other hand, decentralized exchanges and Web3 dapps provide users with complete control over their funds, aligning with the ethos of decentralization and self-custody in crypto. However, as you noted, users often face higher transaction fees and potential network congestion. For many, the choice depends on whether they prioritize control and decentralization over cost efficiency. This trade-off is central to the decision-making process for users as they navigate both options.

hd49728

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1018

Not your keys, not your coins!

Quote from: joniboini on November 06, 2024, 12:01:36 AM

My experience with dapps is not deep but you can feel it if you've made dozens of interactions daily. Maybe gassless dapps can be a solution but who knows if the cost to sponsor it will be worth it. CMIIW.

Interactions with dapps, smart contracts cost people a lot in transaction fees and in long term, transaction fees for these interactions make them poorer. I believe that trading on centralized exchanges is better than on decentralized exchanges if the only consideration is trading fee.

Centralized platforms require users to deposit money in accounts, before trading or betting, and it's another concern on user side because some of them want to have full control of their fund. On centralized platforms, they don't have that full control on their fund and DEX, Web3, dapps can help them to have it. In return they will have to accept risk and loss in transaction fees.

joniboini

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1789

Quote from: RockBell on November 05, 2024, 02:49:17 PM

Definitely they won't force it on users but if it's creation will bring more people to the platform then why not bring it forward and in every business new initiative will help their people that will love it on the web3 so if the casino is ready to comsider does that mean that they are forcing it on the users this what will be of benefits to the people because if you will you will definitely make withdrawal even if ot is web3.

I mean there can be many ways to attract new users. Offering new games, faster payment options, faster CS response time, quick withdrawal process etc. That being said, I wonder if the demand for web3 is that high. Is there research on how much volume for web3 comes from gambling dapps? IIRC most transactions for web3/layer 2 apps are about lending and DEX. At the end of the day if the demand is there they'll probably offer it eventually, as long as they can patch things around so they won't get hacked after running it for a few months or so.

Quote from: RockBell on November 05, 2024, 02:49:17 PM

nd their will be people that won't mind at wether the fee is expensive on not on the chain since it won't be compulsory.

My experience with dapps is not deep but you can feel it if you've made dozens of interactions daily. Maybe gassless dapps can be a solution but who knows if the cost to sponsor it will be worth it. CMIIW.

RockBell

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 391

Underestimate- nothing

Quote from: tranthidung on November 03, 2024, 12:18:55 PM

They can not create products and force users to use this or that, it's freedom for their users.

Main concern of the team is not technical things because if many scam altcoin projects can launch their platforms, games like Play to Earn, Metaverse with Web3 infrastructure, a high competent team like Chips.gg can do it easily.

So their main concern to build up and deploy Web3 for users, will be other things, and on top of my head, it is legal-related issues. If they feel clear with it, we will see Web3 products from Chips.gg team. Remember that with Web3 interactions, all things are on chain so users will have to pay more for on chain transaction fees and interactions with smart contracts.

Definitely they won't force it on users but if it's creation will bring more people to the platform then why not bring it forward and in every business new initiative will help their people that will love it on the web3 so if the casino is ready to comsider does that mean that they are forcing it on the users this what will be of benefits to the people because if you will you will definitely make withdrawal even if ot is web3.

We all know they are competent enough and we know that chipps will and others will put things I place and that is why it is very important, and their will be people that won't mind at wether the fee is expensive on not on the chain since it won't be compulsory.

tranthidung

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 4085

Farewell o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: RockBell on November 01, 2024, 02:55:20 PM

If they add it I don't see anything that is bad in that it can be like an upgrade just that it won't be nice if all the games are to web3 and they should select a few games for that web3 people can also participate in playing most of the games so anyone can decide which one they want to play, those that are on web3 should have their games so that they don't have to think otherwise than to stick to their web3

They can not create products and force users to use this or that, it's freedom for their users.

Main concern of the team is not technical things because if many scam altcoin projects can launch their platforms, games like Play to Earn, Metaverse with Web3 infrastructure, a high competent team like Chips.gg can do it easily.

So their main concern to build up and deploy Web3 for users, will be other things, and on top of my head, it is legal-related issues. If they feel clear with it, we will see Web3 products from Chips.gg team. Remember that with Web3 interactions, all things are on chain so users will have to pay more for on chain transaction fees and interactions with smart contracts.

RockBell

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 391

Underestimate- nothing

Quote from: joniboini on November 01, 2024, 02:07:14 AM

That's true. To be fair I do think it's fine if Chips or other casino add new features or open new markets for web3 users as long as they don't move all of their games over there. I believe I'm not alone in this. Some people are also not comfortable with web3 dapps due to their experiences, and I doubt the number is small. Maybe things will change with reputation and verifiable contracts, but the beginning would probably take some time to take off, especially for new casinos.

If they add it I don't see anything that is bad in that it can be like an upgrade just that it won't be nice if all the games are to web3 and they should select a few games for that web3 people can also participate in playing most of the games so anyone can decide which one they want to play, those that are on web3 should have their games so that they don't have to think otherwise than to stick to their web3, in the crypto space there is a lot of things and different people with what they are comfortable with and what they are comfortable with is what they are experienced with and they might want to continue that way. it is a good suggestion and the trust is that the number of web3 will be few but there might be people that will try it out and they might want to stick to it, even for new Cainos the take won't be bad but might depend on their developers.

Topic: Chips.gg |🎰 1000+ Slots |🎤 Live Casino |🎲 1% House Edge Dice |🏦 The Vault - page 2. (Read 24304 times)