Why do religious posters put the onus of disproving god on atheists! Usually if some one was trying to sell me on a product they need to convince me, not the other way round.
Not that the talking heads for Atheism are any better they tend to have serious axes to grind.
Topic: Christianity is Poison - page 45. (Read 52639 times)
If God hates fags, why does he keep making them?
God doesn't hate fags, nor does He make them. God makes straight people. Fags make themselves. God simply tries to turn fags from the mess they are making of their own lives by being fags. He does this because He loves them.Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
God doesn't command his followers to hate and murder gays. Rather, He commands His followers to love gays, and try to move them out of their self-destructive nature. Difficult thing to do.Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Sounds like gay activity in gays.Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
It's the gays that are getting together to fight non-gays, just so that they can prove themselves a minority, get funds from government, and make Christians and others support them. Why should Christians support fags? Let them support themselves.
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Yahweh, but Elohim (plural)
Christianity has a method of changing multiplicity into unary by means of a Mystery (eg the trinity) so I don't expect logical argument about that.
Sure, I understand they don't care, but I do
Every other time the bible uses Elohim, it is translated as gods, not God...
The bible uses the word Elohim to describe the Egyptian gods... the same word used as the creator of the universe... that's not Jehovah... not the same God
Though really... none of it makes any sense, so I don't know why I'm all picky about the semantics
That's because you are unwilling to accept the idea that multitudes of people, worldwide, throughout all of time from the Beginning, have understood that there is one God. Sure, they had their idols. Sure they had their "imaginary friends." But they also understood the one God Creator over all.
Until recently, people believed in dragons, unicorns, leprechauns, fairies and sea monsters (most of these are even mentioned in the bible)...
Seems to me that you are the one that is a bit off in not accepting reality.
Do you seriously think that, because a bunch of stone-age people believed something, it must be true?
Do you seriously think that a bunch of modern thinkers can disprove the facts of nature and God?What is your point? Throughout history there have been more people who were polytheistic than monotheistic... but this still means absolutely nothing... it is certainly not evidence that there are multiple gods
That's right. It means nothing. We all go to the grave (or the crematory flames). Believing the pure fiction of atheism doesn't even allow the atheism believer a chance for a glorious resurrection.
Find it interesting to see religion dividing people up in the South,I know it has always been a bible belt but I do not think this is a issue that will be sorted out quickly with out a fight.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/06/us/gay-rights-mississippi-north-carolina.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/06/us/gay-rights-mississippi-north-carolina.html?_r=0
Religion separates country and people. For example, ISIS will kill you if they found out that you are a christian. They will let you live if you're one of them. Religion somehow saved your life if that happened to you. Have you guys watched the movie 'PK'? It is about Religion. The man tried to worship all Gods and he has received nothing in return, just a lesson that God does not exist.
christianity is not a poison but it is a religion.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
No one needs to be taught by religion, you either have a certain goodness about you or you don't.
Religion has poisoned many people, who tell others it is gods will.
It actually makes no sense at all
Q: Who the f is god anyhow?
A: Just a figment of your imagination.
Ya i remember this qoute saying "God didn't create people, it was people who created God". Many wars was caused by religion alone. Atheist or not each people has a belief supernatural or not. It's on an individual to be mature enough to think on his own opinion.
I'm not sure this kid is old enough to be preaching religious hatred... seems a bit like brainwashing at that age...
christianity is not a poison but it is a religion.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
No one needs to be taught by religion, you either have a certain goodness about you or you don't.
Religion has poisoned many people, who tell others it is gods will.
It actually makes no sense at all
Q: Who the f is god anyhow?
A: Just a figment of your imagination.
If God hates fags, why does he keep making them?
Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
There's no such thing as God then if the Bible is making absolutely no sense at all. Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
The bible doesn't make sense, it's a mixed up mess.
The problem is people are too stubborn and proud to admit it's very very flawed, and like to pretend it isn't flawed.
christianity is not a poison but it is a religion.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
i think atheist is a poison who have no religion.
and most importantly when we say that this religion is poison then saying like this against any religion is the most dangerous poison.
If God hates fags, why does he keep making them?
Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
There's no such thing as God then if the Bible is making absolutely no sense at all. Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Yahweh, but Elohim (plural)
Christianity has a method of changing multiplicity into unary by means of a Mystery (eg the trinity) so I don't expect logical argument about that.
Sure, I understand they don't care, but I do
Every other time the bible uses Elohim, it is translated as gods, not God...
The bible uses the word Elohim to describe the Egyptian gods... the same word used as the creator of the universe... that's not Jehovah... not the same God
Though really... none of it makes any sense, so I don't know why I'm all picky about the semantics
That's because you are unwilling to accept the idea that multitudes of people, worldwide, throughout all of time from the Beginning, have understood that there is one God. Sure, they had their idols. Sure they had their "imaginary friends." But they also understood the one God Creator over all.
Until recently, people believed in dragons, unicorns, leprechauns, fairies and sea monsters (most of these are even mentioned in the bible)...
Do you seriously think that, because a bunch of stone-age people believed something, it must be true?
What is your point? Throughout history there have been more people who were polytheistic than monotheistic... but this still means absolutely nothing... it is certainly not evidence that there are multiple gods
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Yahweh, but Elohim (plural)
Christianity has a method of changing multiplicity into unary by means of a Mystery (eg the trinity) so I don't expect logical argument about that.
Sure, I understand they don't care, but I do
Every other time the bible uses Elohim, it is translated as gods, not God...
The bible uses the word Elohim to describe the Egyptian gods... the same word used as the creator of the universe... that's not Jehovah... not the same God
Though really... none of it makes any sense, so I don't know why I'm all picky about the semantics
That's because you are unwilling to accept the idea that multitudes of people, worldwide, throughout all of time from the Beginning, have understood that there is one God. Sure, they had their idols. Sure they had their "imaginary friends." But they also understood the one God Creator over all.
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Yahweh, but Elohim (plural)
Christianity has a method of changing multiplicity into unary by means of a Mystery (eg the trinity) so I don't expect logical argument about that.
Sure, I understand they don't care, but I do
Every other time the bible uses Elohim, it is translated as gods, not God...
The bible uses the word Elohim to describe the Egyptian gods... the same word used as the creator of the universe... that's not Jehovah... not the same God
Though really... none of it makes any sense, so I don't know why I'm all picky about the semantics
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Yahweh, but Elohim (plural)
Christianity has a method of changing multiplicity into unary by means of a Mystery (eg the trinity) so I don't expect logical argument about that.
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
Genesis 1:1 clearly states that there are multiple gods
Elohim created the universe, not El or Jehovah/Yahweh, but Elohim (generic plural form for gods)
When the bible is speaking of God, God... it specifically calls him Jehovah
Science is religion. How can you tell? Over the last 300 years especially, many things of science have been found out. People have accepted them as truth. Then, later science found out that some of these things were not correct. So it is that people had believed something that was not correct.
Science is a religion of faith in the abilities of scientists to be able to find out the truth. Scientists often don't have the ability to find out the truth. But when people believe that they do, there is a religion of science going.
Science is a religion of faith in the abilities of scientists to be able to find out the truth. Scientists often don't have the ability to find out the truth. But when people believe that they do, there is a religion of science going.
Same logic as your definition of atheism as a religion:
If science is religion, you're an atheist. How can you tell? There are thousands of religions and many more gods that exist (with our without followers today), and we can realistically expect that in our prehistoric past that there have been many times this number. Yet you believe in only one.
One definition of an atheist is that it is someone who does not believe in gods. To believe in only one of thousands of gods means that you're 99.9% atheist.
Therefore you are approximately an atheist, and as the number of gods that have ever been claimed to exist approaches infinity, your atheism approaches 100%.
There have been over 2870 Gods in recorded history (Moloch is on the list!)... from the books that survived the book burnings of the dark ages, etc
If you are an atheist with respect to 2869 out of 2870 Gods... you are an atheist... you do not believe in 99.97% of gods...
(and who the fuck knows why you believe last one)
I also find it incredibly dishonest for a person to claim the know for certain that their God exists, but the other 2869 gods are bullshit make-believe... seriously... get a fucking clue... not to mention you don't know jack shit about any of the other gods... not a single fucking one of them... you base everything on what your parents told you was true... who based it on their parents, etc... nobody actually bothered to stop and think, or check their facts
The scientifically understood facts of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy were not taught as religion by all parents to all children who understand it. That's why the fact of God's existence is not a religious fact. It is a scientific fact. The religions are the attempts of people to explain the attributes of the proven-to-exist God.
I think the polytheists would disagree with you. Why do you think they're wrong and you're right? What's the science behind choosing one god over many?
I thought it was god that was at the center of the christian faith. God and Jesus aren't the same thing. At most, Jesus is part of god. Worshiping Jesus is forgetting the father and the holy spirit.
People saying that Jesus is god have to conclude that he was talking with himself in the Olive garden and in the cross.
We also had to conclude that Jesus sent himself to be slaughtered and then changed his mind on the cross and started protesting, against him self?
Of course, being forced to conclude that god sent his own son to be crucified also doesn't make sense.
Why not just forgive us without the need to sacrifice Jesus? They answer it was a way to show us that he loves us.
Damn, if he abolished Hell we would believe on his love much more easily. But it seems he wants some guaranty that we are going to love him back.
Pointless sacrificing Jesus doesn't make the father look good.
The bible (with the usual contradictions) says people shouldn't sacrifice their sons, but it seems god, the father, didn't care about his own rules.
Well, the son clearly didn't like the experience. He complained a lot. I bet there was a major family discussion when Jesus arrived home.
People saying that Jesus is god have to conclude that he was talking with himself in the Olive garden and in the cross.
We also had to conclude that Jesus sent himself to be slaughtered and then changed his mind on the cross and started protesting, against him self?
Of course, being forced to conclude that god sent his own son to be crucified also doesn't make sense.
Why not just forgive us without the need to sacrifice Jesus? They answer it was a way to show us that he loves us.
Damn, if he abolished Hell we would believe on his love much more easily. But it seems he wants some guaranty that we are going to love him back.
Pointless sacrificing Jesus doesn't make the father look good.
The bible (with the usual contradictions) says people shouldn't sacrifice their sons, but it seems god, the father, didn't care about his own rules.
Well, the son clearly didn't like the experience. He complained a lot. I bet there was a major family discussion when Jesus arrived home.
Christianity is not a poison because the Lord Jesus Christ is the center of their faith.
If God hates fags, why does he keep making them?
Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
Why does he command his followers to hate and murder gays instead of doing it himself?
Is it some form of addiction, where he hates it but cannot stop doing it?
Does he get off on watching his little humans murder each other over where a man sticks his penis?
Jump to: