ChronoBank vs. Qtum, which you choose? - page 7.

Zaducis

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 250

Quote from: Nevsky on February 10, 2017, 10:49:10 AM

Quote from: bravehearth0319 on February 09, 2017, 01:47:01 PM

Quote from: Nevsky on February 09, 2017, 10:26:20 AM

Quote from: Mbah Slamet on January 31, 2017, 03:48:00 AM

ChronoBank vs. Qtum

2 altcoins it looks heavily in marketing, they advertise in various media, and in the near future day these will available in exchanger. Which would you choose? And why?

It is a difficult choice. Especially ICO Qtum has not yet started. If you look at a team of experts and expertise in cryptography, then I choose Qtum. But at the moment I like the idea ChronoBank. I hope that the project will be successful.

If we talk about the comparison between Chronobank and QTUM, the progression of there project are both in good progress, yesterday only I read in their thread that this week will be the last round of their campaign, because of many issues happened. I don't know if this will affect their project. But even is last round of their campaign I saw that QTUM is still generous to their participants in the campaign, and that is good actually. Wish them good luck to their project.

I subscribe to your words completely. I understand that everything is fine. The last round, probably because it has a lot of money to spend on public relations. The campaign has been very generous, for which they thank you very much. Or maybe even this is enough. We do not know this.

Better to study white paper, and ask questions to developers. Qtum is really very strong project from technical point of view.

Nevsky

sr. member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 250

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: bravehearth0319 on February 09, 2017, 01:47:01 PM

Quote from: Nevsky on February 09, 2017, 10:26:20 AM

Quote from: Mbah Slamet on January 31, 2017, 03:48:00 AM

ChronoBank vs. Qtum

2 altcoins it looks heavily in marketing, they advertise in various media, and in the near future day these will available in exchanger. Which would you choose? And why?

It is a difficult choice. Especially ICO Qtum has not yet started. If you look at a team of experts and expertise in cryptography, then I choose Qtum. But at the moment I like the idea ChronoBank. I hope that the project will be successful.

If we talk about the comparison between Chronobank and QTUM, the progression of there project are both in good progress, yesterday only I read in their thread that this week will be the last round of their campaign, because of many issues happened. I don't know if this will affect their project. But even is last round of their campaign I saw that QTUM is still generous to their participants in the campaign, and that is good actually. Wish them good luck to their project.

I subscribe to your words completely. I understand that everything is fine. The last round, probably because it has a lot of money to spend on public relations. The campaign has been very generous, for which they thank you very much. Or maybe even this is enough. We do not know this.

bravehearth0319

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 500

Quote from: Nevsky on February 09, 2017, 10:26:20 AM

Quote from: Mbah Slamet on January 31, 2017, 03:48:00 AM

ChronoBank vs. Qtum

2 altcoins it looks heavily in marketing, they advertise in various media, and in the near future day these will available in exchanger. Which would you choose? And why?

It is a difficult choice. Especially ICO Qtum has not yet started. If you look at a team of experts and expertise in cryptography, then I choose Qtum. But at the moment I like the idea ChronoBank. I hope that the project will be successful.

If we talk about the comparison between Chronobank and QTUM, the progression of there project are both in good progress, yesterday only I read in their thread that this week will be the last round of their campaign, because of many issues happened. I don't know if this will affect their project. But even is last round of their campaign I saw that QTUM is still generous to their participants in the campaign, and that is good actually. Wish them good luck to their project.

Nevsky

sr. member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 250

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: Mbah Slamet on January 31, 2017, 03:48:00 AM

ChronoBank vs. Qtum

2 altcoins it looks heavily in marketing, they advertise in various media, and in the near future day these will available in exchanger. Which would you choose? And why?

It is a difficult choice. Especially ICO Qtum has not yet started. If you look at a team of experts and expertise in cryptography, then I choose Qtum. But at the moment I like the idea ChronoBank. I hope that the project will be successful.

royalfestus

hero member

Activity: 2408

Merit: 516

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI

Quote from: JeffBrad12 on February 01, 2017, 10:18:14 PM

Quote from: Riddikulo on February 01, 2017, 07:07:14 AM

ChronoBank, Qtum looks so shady, never trust in Chineses.

Eh, i will be correcting my previous word, depend on the past history like antshare and it looks like another failure.

Their current price is so silly to compare with the ico price. The Chinese dev is so terrible. neither one is good.

They are registered to Singapore not china, singapore has a better pedigree than china. Compared with the antshare, the project managers are more western, even the antshare website was written in chinese

Zadicar

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1018

Cashback 15%

Quote from: bravehearth0319 on February 07, 2017, 05:34:50 AM

Quote from: addias on January 31, 2017, 11:12:30 AM

I have invested in Chronobank, and I have never heard of Qtum. Why not invest in both?

I think they are both good, because right now according to the cryptonews update chronobank has been patnership to NEM, And NEM was a good atlcoin, they have a lots of project that being implemented so far, and many more upcoming unto it. same thing with chronobank.

Both are promising altcoin which do really have the potential and also they are putting really decent money regarding on their marketting on their coins which means they do really have the funds and we could see that they can develop their coin even more.If i have the money i will surely put up on these two coins.

bravehearth0319

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 500

Quote from: addias on January 31, 2017, 11:12:30 AM

I have invested in Chronobank, and I have never heard of Qtum. Why not invest in both?

I think they are both good, because right now according to the cryptonews update chronobank has been patnership to NEM, And NEM was a good atlcoin, they have a lots of project that being implemented so far, and many more upcoming unto it. same thing with chronobank.

Teraboy

hero member

Activity: 2282

Merit: 505

Qtum looks like goof rather than chronobank and why? it has caused by their target is more reasonable and make sense in my mind. And what about the chronobank, is totally shit with the fixed rate of their coin and I don't think of the launch of time coin and it will not on the fixed rate also. A lot of the investors will be losing his money.

jossiel

hero member

Activity: 2842

Merit: 625

Those 2 are good Chronobank upon reading and doing some research with their future plans. I can say that they are good.

QTUM is also good but for me, it is better if you are going to choose both. We really can't predict what will happen with these.

But it seems that both has strength in development.

SimpeleSimpele

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: juras54 on January 31, 2017, 09:37:56 PM

Chronobank solid company, qtum not even heard

qtum is above choronobank, is good dev, good financial to promote you ca see in signature campaign, twitter campaign
and good technology develop coin use beetween ethreum technology and bitcoin technology

ivanst776

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1003

Quote from: electronicash on February 02, 2017, 03:57:17 AM

Quote from: ivanst776 on February 02, 2017, 03:51:03 AM

Quote from: Mbah Slamet on January 31, 2017, 03:48:00 AM

ChronoBank vs. Qtum

2 altcoins it looks heavily in marketing, they advertise in various media, and in the near future day these will available in exchanger. Which would you choose? And why?

Chronobank has received really good amount in their ICO and as far as I know there is still few weeks left until the ICO ends.

But QTUM is still in the beginning but from what I saw is that in QTUM the team behind them and their bakers are very known for the public, they are founders, co-founders of many successful projects and I think QTUM will worth investing just need to wait a little bit.

yes. its the platform era. they just discover platforms are profitable as hell and they wanted to take everything from investors. too late for them though because someone else had figured it out long before them. there are alot of them already and the rest are clones from lisk, rise, ark, waves and one thats going to be difficult to compete is eth.

I think that waves and eth are different platforms while others like ark are not but use one of the platforms because I saw that they were accepting also waves.

Chronobank for me seems to be the next ICN but unfortunately I haven't invested any satoshi there yet but I'm planning to invest at the end of the ico since the price is same.

Carmen_Sandiego

sr. member

Activity: 399

Merit: 250

I think it is too early to say which is the best investment, since the two projects have not yet yielded much results, and it seems that most of the efforts so far have been directed at promoting the two platforms. So far I've just had time to analyze the Qtum project, and I think the possibility of making the first move regarding PoS integration may bring some competitive advantages with regard to Ethereum.

arbitrage

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: Zicadis on February 04, 2017, 04:14:23 AM

I choose Qtum as it looks like a bigger project judging from their signature campaigns.

Yes this is my perspective also. I mean look how much they have invested in signature campaign and how many participants are in game. Both projects are awesome and have great potential. But who knows, lot of ideas are here and evry time we got better solutions. We might be suprised in 2017 with something completly new.

ujang1

hero member

Activity: 558

Merit: 500

Quote from: Zicadis on February 04, 2017, 04:14:23 AM

I choose Qtum as it looks like a bigger project judging from their signature campaigns.

Do not judge the project on signature campaign, better read the white paper.

Musbecklo

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

chronobank certainly more widely known

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1440

Quote from: metropolia on February 03, 2017, 09:47:40 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on February 02, 2017, 08:35:20 PM

Quote from: electronicash on February 01, 2017, 10:48:58 PM

Qtum isn't heavily advertised, i can't see them doing adwords unlike what liqui did which their ads are displayed anywhere on the internet. Beside qtum is nothing compare to chronobank.

Qtum will be more successful than Chronobank. Look at the team of Qtum. Some of them are seasoned pros at siphoning money from the community. Bo Shen and Vitalik is also involved in the project so I trust them to make my investment 10x the ICO price. Chronobank has an unknown and an unproven team. I do not know if they can give us 10x returns on our investment after ICO.

10X? I doubt that, no doubt QTUM will raise more than 10k BTC, but if it is overfunded like waves raised 30k btc, qtum won't give you 10X profit, but you may lose money. Waves is a good example of ICO investment. Vitalik and jl777 were both involved with Waves, but they can't help the price pump.

I am not aware that Vitalik is involved in Waves. What is his role in Waves? I do not think he is directly involved. While Jl777 has not created anything that stayed in the top 10 of coinmarketcap.com. If he is a scammer then he is a good one because he keeps a low profile. He always gets money from all of his ICO's of projects that nothing happens.

You are right there is always that chance that QTUM and other ICOs to fail and bust. Comparing it to Chrono, QTUM has the better chance to make 10x returns.

Zicadis

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1027

Dump it!!!

I choose Qtum as it looks like a bigger project judging from their signature campaigns.

ice18

hero member

Activity: 2492

Merit: 542

Both projects comes from a great idea, heavily advertised especially chonobank I have seen a lot of advertisement on social media , but I hope that chronobank will be more useful altcoin in the near future especially in recruitment industry.

ironm@n

sr. member

Activity: 259

Merit: 250

The developers of both projects, in fact, have invested heavily in marketing, I have seen ads of the two projects on most common websites related to cryptocurrencies. I think that both currencies have different proposals, and apparently geared to different markets. Qtum is a cryptocurrency focused on smart contracts. And chronobank is a currency more targeted to the recruitment industry. I have not done a thorough study of the two projects yet, so I still could not say which one is better.

Clement Kaliyar

hero member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 532

Quote from: DomainMagnate on February 03, 2017, 05:55:36 PM

Well both projects look promising but if I have to choose one,I would definitely go for Qtum as they already have raised million dollar,all their dev team includes well known figures and they have some very unique idea of combining etherium and bitcoin platform

I am not sure how these things are true and since i am not following these coins as there is a coin released every week and it is really difficult to keep track on everything and both of them have invested heavily into advertisement and hope they will be a good project so that we will be having more options while hitting the exchange.

Topic: ChronoBank vs. Qtum, which you choose? - page 7. (Read 12768 times)