Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 42.

primer10

sr. member

Activity: 249

Merit: 250

Quote from: realdasho on April 19, 2014, 09:53:24 PM

Quote from: primer10 on April 19, 2014, 08:59:18 PM

Quote from: realdasho on April 19, 2014, 06:06:36 PM

I just wanted to say thanks @ Claymore for a really awesome miner. I found 3 blocks in the first 2 days of using it. Great job, keep it up!

solo?

No, on ypool. I don't think it can do solo.

Looking at what you said.. if Claymore can do solo, it will be great! ypool is getting too much hashrate

SpeedDemon13

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: tacotime on April 19, 2014, 09:33:01 PM

this program causes severe memory leak errors on a couple machines with 7950s and 7970s... not sure what the issue is

That's not good... Huh

realdasho

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: primer10 on April 19, 2014, 08:59:18 PM

Quote from: realdasho on April 19, 2014, 06:06:36 PM

I just wanted to say thanks @ Claymore for a really awesome miner. I found 3 blocks in the first 2 days of using it. Great job, keep it up!

solo?

No, on ypool. I don't think it can do solo.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

this program causes severe memory leak errors on a couple machines with 7950s and 7970s... not sure what the issue is

primer10

sr. member

Activity: 249

Merit: 250

Quote from: realdasho on April 19, 2014, 06:06:36 PM

I just wanted to say thanks @ Claymore for a really awesome miner. I found 3 blocks in the first 2 days of using it. Great job, keep it up!

solo?

realdasho

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

I just wanted to say thanks @ Claymore for a really awesome miner. I found 3 blocks in the first 2 days of using it. Great job, keep it up!

ozzy1926

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: user2 on April 19, 2014, 03:50:43 PM

Quote from: seljak on April 19, 2014, 11:18:33 AM

Not realy sure that xpm is the most profitable coin out there anymore since recently multipools are getting 0,008BTC/Mh/day wich is about twice as much what i get from xpm. Can someone confirm that?

What pool? Here is what I see on multipool.us:

Period     Avg. Scrypt Profitability
(BTC/MH/day)
1 day (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00516499
3 days (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00546087
10 days (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00448038

lol he is talking about this:
http://poolpicker.eu

user2

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 10

Quote from: seljak on April 19, 2014, 11:18:33 AM

Not realy sure that xpm is the most profitable coin out there anymore since recently multipools are getting 0,008BTC/Mh/day wich is about twice as much what i get from xpm. Can someone confirm that?

What pool? Here is what I see on multipool.us:

Period     Avg. Scrypt Profitability
(BTC/MH/day)
1 day (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00516499
3 days (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00546087
10 days (ending 2014-04-19 0:00 UTC)     0.00448038

MarcusDe

hero member

Activity: 796

Merit: 505

Asus 280X works at 1070/1600 default.
Yo can do it little more.

incognitoworker

hero member

Activity: 736

Merit: 500

Quote from: mitache365 on April 19, 2014, 11:22:28 AM

HI guyz. On my 280x dual-x get 109k 4ch with 1020/1500 TRT 410-420 variable.
280x vapor-x 118k 4ch 1120/1550 TRT 375-390 variable.
280x toxic 122k 4ch 1180/1600 360-375 variable.
I think everything is good. Can I drop the memlock. What will be the change of performance ?!

You can drop it litle bit, but not needed, less oc means more stable running!
Your numbers looks ok, no reason to stress it more, unless you are oc maniac!
Happy mining

mitache365

hero member

Activity: 732

Merit: 500

HI guyz. On my 280x dual-x get 109k 4ch with 1020/1500 TRT 410-420 variable.
280x vapor-x 118k 4ch 1120/1550 TRT 375-390 variable.
280x toxic 122k 4ch 1180/1600 360-375 variable.
I think everything is good. Can I drop the memlock. What will be the change of performance ?!

seljak

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

Not realy sure that xpm is the most profitable coin out there anymore since recently multipools are getting 0,008BTC/Mh/day wich is about twice as much what i get from xpm. Can someone confirm that?
@Claymore : Maybe you should release that speedup version a little sooner so we can stay in the game?

revilo

sr. member

Activity: 543

Merit: 250

I tried 512 and that seemed to fail completely. I've got one at 364 and the rest on 256. I'll let them mine for a day and see the difference in results.

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: revilo on April 19, 2014, 09:15:36 AM

And for those that are interested this works with ATI 7990 graphics cards

I am running with i7-990x cpu and plenty of RAM . 2 x ATI 7990s (MSI brand) at default clock settings on 13.12 drivers. No Crossfire.

I tweaked a little and I've found this worked best for me

Bat files..:
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 0 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 1 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 2 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 3 -t 8 -hc 256

Have you tried "-hc 320"? Must be a bit faster. Also may be "-hc 512" for 2-3 cards and "-hc 256" or "-hc 320" for the rest.

revilo

sr. member

Activity: 543

Merit: 250

And for those that are interested this works with ATI 7990 graphics cards

I am running with i7-990x cpu and plenty of RAM . 2 x ATI 7990s (MSI brand) at default clock settings on 13.12 drivers. No Crossfire.

I tweaked a little and I've found this worked best for me

Bat files..:
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 0 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 1 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 2 -t 8 -hc 256
NsXpmMiner.exe -o ypool.net -u user.worker -p ** -di 3 -t 8 -hc 256

primer10

sr. member

Activity: 249

Merit: 250

Quote from: djm34 on April 19, 2014, 05:40:39 AM

Quote from: MarcusDe on April 19, 2014, 02:25:00 AM

Quote from: smoothie on April 19, 2014, 12:53:33 AM

If it were me I would not have released the GPU miner until I was well mined up with XPMs over time.

To have an edge like a primecoin GPU miner is golden. Get some hardware to mine with and optimize it for that type of GPU and bam....mega profits.

Then down the road release it and possibly charge people or just open source it so others can keep the mining momentum going.

Right, and you belive he didnt mine with it long time before public release?
And you belive he hasn't more optimized version for himself?

In view of the difficulty, I would say those miners existed for a pretty long time and got only released when it become less profitable for them to mine...

Actually the difficulty shoots up only recently, with the mass usage of GPU miners. XPM price has been quite stagnant, even now.. but I must say it was brilliant for primeGPU to sell his miner using XPM.. that might have helped to push up the price a little bit as ppl went to exchange to buy XPM.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: MarcusDe on April 19, 2014, 02:25:00 AM

Quote from: smoothie on April 19, 2014, 12:53:33 AM

If it were me I would not have released the GPU miner until I was well mined up with XPMs over time.

To have an edge like a primecoin GPU miner is golden. Get some hardware to mine with and optimize it for that type of GPU and bam....mega profits.

Then down the road release it and possibly charge people or just open source it so others can keep the mining momentum going.

Right, and you belive he didnt mine with it long time before public release?
And you belive he hasn't more optimized version for himself?

In view of the difficulty, I would say those miners existed for a pretty long time and got only released when it become less profitable for them to mine...

hero18688

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: SpeedDemon13

Stability over speed is always important. Some times the cpu can be a bottleneck if your running more than one card.

Hi,what's the v2.1's improvement?

MarcusDe

hero member

Activity: 796

Merit: 505

Quote from: smoothie on April 19, 2014, 12:53:33 AM

If it were me I would not have released the GPU miner until I was well mined up with XPMs over time.

To have an edge like a primecoin GPU miner is golden. Get some hardware to mine with and optimize it for that type of GPU and bam....mega profits.

Then down the road release it and possibly charge people or just open source it so others can keep the mining momentum going.

Right, and you belive he didnt mine with it long time before public release?
And you belive he hasn't more optimized version for himself?

... and good for him, everybody could learn cl programming and make miners, but didnt :-D

SpeedDemon13

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: incognitoworker on April 18, 2014, 10:54:28 PM

Could undervolting make it slower?
I have normal speeds when scrypt mining unervolted like this, but cant OC as much as alot of others.
Then again, stability for long runs is more inportant than a litle speed increase.
So far for me, better not OC above 1100 core.
Stable with 1075-1100 core, so will not try to go above.
trt goes from 360-420 on the different gpus. 7970/280x.
Seems also cpu could be some botleneck?

Stability over speed is always important. Some times the cpu can be a bottleneck if your running more than one card.

Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion - page 42. (Read 142112 times)