Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 110. (Read 2145056 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
September 20, 2017, 05:05:51 AM
I got an RX550 4G that does 400 H/s @ 30W but AMD refuses to release opencl linux drivers. Amdgpu-pro doesn't support this card.
member
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
September 20, 2017, 05:04:15 AM
Mr Claymore is the new  ver 9.8 coming out today
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 556
September 20, 2017, 04:38:25 AM
All my 14 RX 570s hash at 800H/s using Mattthev's modded bios. 1120/1925. 800W at the wall per 7-GPU rig. Could probably go lower (Claymore is quite power hungry I'm reading, compared to XMR-Stak).
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
September 19, 2017, 09:54:07 PM
They also skim hashes and eat babies.

I never knew about the hash skimming... Smiley
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
September 19, 2017, 08:42:24 PM
They also skim hashes and eat babies.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
September 19, 2017, 08:08:24 PM
Is it possible to dual mine with cryptonight algorithms?
Minergate offers XDN-XMR mining; but is there a way to mine XMR-SUMO?
Wink
It's called merged mining, what minergate is offering.

They offer quite a few merged coins I see:

Quote
BCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://bcn.pool.minergate.com:45550 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

XMR
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

QCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://qcn.pool.minergate.com:45570 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

XDN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xdn.pool.minergate.com:45620 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

FCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://fcn.pool.minergate.com:45610 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

MCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://mcn.pool.minergate.com:45640 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

DSH
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://dsh.pool.minergate.com:45720 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

INF8
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://inf8.pool.minergate.com:45750 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

XDN+XMR
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xdn-xmr.pool.minergate.com:45790 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

FCN+XMR
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://fcn-xmr.pool.minergate.com:45590 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

FCN+QCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://fcn-qcn.pool.minergate.com:45600 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

FCN+DSH
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://fcn-dsh.pool.minergate.com:45730 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

FCN+INF8
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://fcn-inf8.pool.minergate.com:45760 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

MCN+QCN
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://mcn-qcn.pool.minergate.com:45670 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

MCN+DSH
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://mcn-dsh.pool.minergate.com:45740 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

MCN+INF8
NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://mcn-inf8.pool.minergate.com:45770 -u YOUR_EMAIL -p x

https://minergate.com/altminers/claymore-gpu
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
September 19, 2017, 06:20:29 PM
Is it possible to dual mine with cryptonight algorithms?
Minergate offers XDN-XMR mining; but is there a way to mine XMR-SUMO?
Wink
It's called merged mining, what minergate is offering.
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
September 19, 2017, 06:17:45 PM
Is it possible to dual mine with cryptonight algorithms?
Minergate offers XDN-XMR mining; but is there a way to mine XMR-SUMO?
Wink
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
September 19, 2017, 03:01:10 PM
Registered just to say thank you, Claymore, your fee is greatly outweighed by the 10+% increase I get in hashrates on my old 270s compared to any of the other miners.

Also, now that there are other coins based off of cryptonight that are getting profitable, it would be nice if you make a sumo and/or generic cryptonight miner.

Thanks for all you do.
hero member
Activity: 794
Merit: 1000
Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable
September 19, 2017, 01:43:04 PM
What's the best -h value for 4/580?

It really depends on how hard you want to push the card / what the extra power consumption is worth to you. I'm running:

-a 4
-h 1920
-cvddc 850
-mvddc 850
-cclock 1150
-mclock 2250

Average Hashrate for last 6 hours: 2,963.3 H/s (or ~493.9 H/s per card)

Runs about 80-85w/card and maxes out around 779w total from the wall (total rig - 6 RX580's, 1000wPSU + 850wPSU). Temp 45 (fan 60%),

I'm kinda curious what the flags are to get 700+ H/s though?!
My rx 470 are doing much better. Something is wrong with your settings.
724 H/s @ <80W from the wall average per card from 12x rx 470 nitro (non-plus), using sgminer-gm. Modded bios - Samsung memory 1750 -> 2000 straps (last PBE can't recognize the memory and there are better mixed straps I suppose). Memory @ 1950-1980, GPU clock @ 1169, both downvolted using AB (-96) and Wattool (additional core downvolt and memory @ 870 (two of the cards are @ 900 or they are not stable - they were stable at 870 too, but I'm not sure what happened). 63C @ 35% fan, stable, <0.4% rejected, no HW errors. It goes to 740+ average stable, but with 15-20% more power and <1% rejects. I didn't tried the blockchain drivers yet.
member
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
September 19, 2017, 01:15:45 PM
Use sgminer?

-i 896
-w 8
-g 2
cpu 1100 memory 2100

rig from wall: 630w

https://imgur.com/a/orVtM

Just 1750 -to- 2000 memory straps and thats all.



What's the best -h value for 4/580?

It really depends on how hard you want to push the card / what the extra power consumption is worth to you. I'm running:

-a 4
-h 1920
-cvddc 850
-mvddc 850
-cclock 1150
-mclock 2250

Average Hashrate for last 6 hours: 2,963.3 H/s (or ~493.9 H/s per card)

Runs about 80-85w/card and maxes out around 779w total from the wall (total rig - 6 RX580's, 1000wPSU + 850wPSU). Temp 45 (fan 60%),

I'm kinda curious what the flags are to get 700+ H/s though?!
member
Activity: 131
Merit: 13
In the fray since 2013.
September 19, 2017, 12:19:44 PM
Memory is what counts my Sapphire 470's with  Samsung ram and uber-mix timings are hitting 780  (1100/2075) while my poor asus with micron and 1425 memory straps top out at 662 (1100/1750)
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
September 19, 2017, 11:50:43 AM
What's the best -h value for 4/580?

It really depends on how hard you want to push the card / what the extra power consumption is worth to you. I'm running:

-a 4
-h 1920
-cvddc 850
-mvddc 850
-cclock 1150
-mclock 2250

Average Hashrate for last 6 hours: 2,963.3 H/s (or ~493.9 H/s per card)

Runs about 80-85w/card and maxes out around 779w total from the wall (total rig - 6 RX580's, 1000wPSU + 850wPSU). Temp 45 (fan 60%),

I'm kinda curious what the flags are to get 700+ H/s though?!
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
September 19, 2017, 07:35:18 AM
Have you tried running on nicehash I tried and keep getting stratum disconnects also what monitor program are you using Id like to check it out Ive been using minerstat and its constantly updated if you have a problem coinscrow gets it fixed asap

Nope. Don't see a point of using nicehash, but there's nicehash' fork of SGM
It's "awesome miner" app which in many cases more preferable than third party web hosted service
 
hero member
Activity: 906
Merit: 507
September 19, 2017, 07:06:53 AM

Got 6 470 4GB cards but I only get 575 h/s a card. What am I doing wrong?

this is GatelessGate:


I have also SGMiner-GM that gives higher rate (2-3%) but it produces way more rejects on XMR dwarf(even with no stale shares submitted), while it could do just fine with monero clones on other pools.
Had no time to check whether these rejects are of any substance, but it hurts my eyes:)
Have you tried running on nicehash I tried and keep getting stratum disconnects also what monitor program are you using Id like to check it out Ive been using minerstat and its constantly updated if you have a problem coinscrow gets it fixed asap
hero member
Activity: 906
Merit: 507
September 19, 2017, 07:03:08 AM
Was just reading claymore eth tread I think claymore going to release a update he said he just finished asm kernels for all cards but vega for xmr so Im thinking a updated miner will probably be faster
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
September 19, 2017, 07:02:05 AM

Got 6 470 4GB cards but I only get 575 h/s a card. What am I doing wrong?

this is GatelessGate:


I have also SGMiner-GM that gives higher rate (2-3%) but it produces way more rejects on XMR dwarf(even with no stale shares submitted), while it could do just fine with monero clones on other pools.
Had no time to check whether these rejects are of any substance, but it hurts my eyes:)

EDIT: Note that Samsung mem on 470 is set to 1750MHz, it's because it gives higher rates than on 2000MHz and this is a complete mystery to me... No mem errors and same GPU mem timings. Algo seems to be getting a boost from some "good sync" issue.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
September 19, 2017, 06:23:42 AM

820H/s+ on 470 here. Tongue

Yeah... sure...
You just forgot to mention that you have custom modded memory straps and private optimized kernel.
Without going above 1180MHz core and using ETH straps on public miners (GG is the most stable for now) I'm not able to see more than 730H on 470

EDIT: wtf... my mistake... I've just replied to some ancient post

730 h/s is not to be spat on, the 470 is a relatively cheap card after all and it does much better than more expensive gpus.

Got 6 470 4GB cards but I only get 575 h/s a card. What am I doing wrong?
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
September 19, 2017, 06:15:47 AM

820H/s+ on 470 here. Tongue

Yeah... sure...
You just forgot to mention that you have custom modded memory straps and private optimized kernel.
Without going above 1180MHz core and using ETH straps on public miners (GG is the most stable for now) I'm not able to see more than 730H on 470

EDIT: wtf... my mistake... I've just replied to some ancient post

730 h/s is not to be spat on, the 470 is a relatively cheap card after all and it does much better than more expensive gpus.
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
September 19, 2017, 06:11:11 AM

820H/s+ on 470 here. Tongue

Yeah... sure...
You just forgot to mention that you have custom modded memory straps and private optimized kernel.
Without going above 1180MHz core and using ETH straps on public miners (GG is the most stable for now) I'm not able to see more than 730H on 470

EDIT: wtf... my mistake... I've just replied to some ancient post
Jump to: