this miner should've been updated a long time ago, so I could "justifiably" call Claymore a thief as well... cause it won't be appropriate while using SGminer...I guess
Seriously though I think his business model of dev fees and closed source works fine as long as he's giving the highest returns. (I doubt the unconditional love of "Calymore's fans") It makes miners happy for getting the best rates and it makes him work hard to get the best performance.
Also whenever you want to accuse anyone of being anything, be very careful your wishful thinking just may be sufficient enough to make it so.
Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 107. (Read 2145056 times)
How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Saying that a tail is a leg doesn't make it a leg. - Abraham Lincoln
Don't go making accusations about someone just because you don't agree with his fee and don't know the facts.
Don't go making accusations about someone just because you don't agree with his fee and don't know the facts.
Come on Claymore, gives us a new miner so this thread has something else to focus on!! The never ending belly aching of the turds that can't get over a dev fee, and then feel to the need to come to this thread and post some horse shit needs to be over-powered by others bragging of how much money they are making by using your improved miner. I am willing to pay a fee for use of a capable and reliable miner to anyone who makes one, especially one that doesn't require me to know open source. If you don't like it, then go use a different miner and be happy with your choice and leave us poor lost souls shackled to a dev fee alone.
And by the way Wolf, I appreciate your candor on substantiating Claymore's efforts. One with as much knowledge about these things as you brings a lot of credibility to the discussion and brings light to Claymore's integrity.
And by the way Wolf, I appreciate your candor on substantiating Claymore's efforts. One with as much knowledge about these things as you brings a lot of credibility to the discussion and brings light to Claymore's integrity.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Uhm yeah, they can be, if they rip off GPL'ed code they're obligated to provide the source otherwise they're in breach of the license. There were quite a few fiascos between major corporations over ripping off code. Like it or not it is the LAW.Uhm, yeah, ...asshole, no shit. You have any proof that this developer did that? If not, thanks for the third grade legal lesson.
You're welcome my mentally challenged friend. Do you have any proof that I am making accusations against this developer? Or I am just pointing the obvious error in your statement that developers can't be criminals.
Context, ...asshole, context. My post, which you quote states in part, "this software developer..." So why would you make a comment of a general nature? Guilt by association because someone, somewhere did that? Weak, very weak. Furthermore, no where in my comment did I suggest that "developers can't be criminals." But please continue, I am sure most are laughing pretty hard at your attempt to live up to your name.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Uhm yeah, they can be, if they rip off GPL'ed code they're obligated to provide the source otherwise they're in breach of the license. There were quite a few fiascos between major corporations over ripping off code. Like it or not it is the LAW.Uhm, yeah, ...asshole, no shit. You have any proof that this developer did that? If not, thanks for the third grade legal lesson.
You're welcome my mentally challenged friend. Do you have any proof that I am making accusations against this developer? Or I am just pointing the obvious error in your statement that developers can't be criminals.
Context, ...asshole, context. My post, which you quote states in part, "this software developer..." So why would you make a comment of a general nature? Guilt by association because someone, somewhere did that? Weak, very weak. Furthermore, no where in my comment did I suggest that "developers can't be criminals." But please continue, I am sure most are laughing pretty hard at your attempt to live up to your name.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Uhm yeah, they can be, if they rip off GPL'ed code they're obligated to provide the source otherwise they're in breach of the license. There were quite a few fiascos between major corporations over ripping off code. Like it or not it is the LAW.Uhm, yeah, ...asshole, no shit. You have any proof that this developer did that? If not, thanks for the third grade legal lesson.
You're welcome my mentally challenged friend. Do you have any proof that I am making accusations against this developer? Or I am just pointing the obvious error in your statement that developers can't be criminals.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Uhm yeah, they can be, if they rip off GPL'ed code they're obligated to provide the source otherwise they're in breach of the license. There were quite a few fiascos between major corporations over ripping off code. Like it or not it is the LAW.Uhm, yeah, ...asshole, no shit. You have any proof that this developer did that? If not, thanks for the third grade legal lesson.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Uhm yeah, they can be, if they rip off GPL'ed code they're obligated to provide the source otherwise they're in breach of the license. There were quite a few fiascos between major corporations over ripping off code. Like it or not it is the LAW.
I grow weary of the mental midgets intimating that this software developer is somehow a criminal. Grow up.
Here comes the justice knight.
the losers who defend the thief ?
Hi master, sorry from newbie, I'm just about to start mining cryptonight, does claymore support the RX Vega series?
Thanks for information
Thanks for information
Here comes the justice knight.
maybe its time for you remove your address and put something like "insertyourwalletadresshere" dont you think ? Oh right, I forgot your the 2% thief...
Thanks for your advice. Here is my experience, if I remove it:
1. People won't be able to launch "start.bat" just to check that miners works, with default settings at least.
For example, when I get PMs with support requests, often I say "just launch start.bat to check if miner works at all" and it helps in many cases, because sometimes people break something when they change options.
2. A lot of newbies won't even know the wallet address format at all.
sad and pathetic reasons, no surprise...
Im so glad I dont use your miners anymore.
Im curious, did you ever made donations to the people who made the open source code you are using ?
@Claymore will you release new miner today?
New version is almost ready, I will release it in 1-2 days.
maybe its time for you remove your address and put something like "insertyourwalletadresshere" dont you think ? Oh right, I forgot your the 2% thief...
Thanks for your advice. Here is my experience, if I remove it:
1. People won't be able to launch "start.bat" just to check that miners works, with default settings at least.
For example, when I get PMs with support requests, often I say "just launch start.bat to check if miner works at all" and it helps in many cases, because sometimes people break something when they change options.
2. A lot of newbies won't even know the wallet address format at all.
Hi claymore,
i sent an message to you.
did u read it ?
regards
i sent an message to you.
did u read it ?
regards
Yes, yesterday, if you check your private messages you will find it. If you cannot find it, please check again, "My messages" text at the top.
PS. For everyone (newbies specially) who mines to default wallet address in the miner for some reason:
Some people mine to this address sometimes, by accident or when they test my miner with default settings to check if it works, all my test rigs mine to it all the time too.
Please do not contact me directly with requests to return your coins, I cannot do it because I don't know if these coins are really yours or you are trying to cheat.
Instead, ask your pool support to contact me via PM on this forum (all popular pools have accounts here and I know them) and confirm that it is your coins, after it I will return it immediately.
I will not comment the idea to mine to default wallet, but please read Readme and find the phrase "Do not forget to specify your wallet address!" there, it will save some time for everyone.
maybe its time for you remove your address and put something like "insertyourwalletaddresshere" dont you think ? Oh right, I forgot your the 2% thief...
Hi,
Would you recommend buying RX580 rx 580 red devil 8GB?
Also will you power only 8Pin or need 6 Pin+8 Pin need to be connected to PSU?
Thanks
Would you recommend buying RX580 rx 580 red devil 8GB?
Also will you power only 8Pin or need 6 Pin+8 Pin need to be connected to PSU?
Thanks
Of all my cards the XFX and PowerColor are the worst. So no I would not recommend. If I had to buy again I would stick with Sapphire and MSI in that order.
For the other question, to mine XMR/Cryptonote currency you don't need that much energy so a single 8 PIN connector is usually enough.
the Sapphire I have are by far the worst cards I ever bought. They also have the worst customer service IMO.
@Claymore will you release new miner today?
Hi All. Looking to hopefully resolve an issue I have using Claymore's 9.7 miner.
Whenever I boot up the software, I receive a, "Error: AMD HSA Code Object loading failed".
I have browsed the Wiki, this page, and other sites and cannot find a reason behind the error nor a solution.
Here's to problem solving!
Whenever I boot up the software, I receive a, "Error: AMD HSA Code Object loading failed".
I have browsed the Wiki, this page, and other sites and cannot find a reason behind the error nor a solution.
Here's to problem solving!
Also will you power only 8Pin or need 6 Pin+8 Pin need to be connected to PSU?
Thanks
Thanks
As far as I understand the powering schemes, 2 sockets are made for using in "one or another" kind. I.e. no necessity connect both of them to PSU. 8-pin connector is enough for powering, while 6-pin sometime not.
Jump to: