Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 151. (Read 2145058 times)

What msi afterburner settings are good for XMR mining on RX480, RX470, and 390?

Claymore, i was wondering if u can make ur miner auto-reconnect to the pool when we get any of the jsonrpc issues. I noticed that the miner mines well and then it has the "jsonrpc problem" and after 15 min it says "it didnt find a new job..." and it connects again with the pool and it works fine again.

But Right now i have around 5% of rejected shares cuz i have to wait 15 min or being live monitoring the miner to hit the "r" button. It would be great if the miner does it automatically.

btw thanks for the upgrade. Love this miner.

https://xmr.suprnova.cc/ is working perfectly for those looking for a proper pool, and the pool op is great.

9.7 is perfectly stable across my 20+ rigs. If you're having issues with it, it's either your pool crapping out or your rigs aren't properly configured.

also never i can no earn as the calculator tell
i earn the half always
so is not profit

i return to zec eth

to mining monero is awful
no pool is workingggggg

I think it could even be that dwarf pool op really dislikes the "invalid shares", so it responds with garbage on purpose.

No way, my old cards mining XMR with about 20-30% lower power than ZEC.

Power draw depends on overclocking. From my experience, with no overclocking,
for Rx 480 and R9 380,  ZEC draws around 10%   more power than XMR.
for Rx 470 ,  ZEC draws around 5%   more power than XMR.
for older card such as R9 280x,  ZEC draws almost same power than XMR.


So, which is profitable depends on how much costs electricity in your area.

All my rigs using 9.5 are very stable, some run 9.7 crash after few hours.All running on my own pool.

Hi Mr C

Thanks for new version, http monitoring is nice.
Would it be possible to introduce something like "-li 2" with even smoother Windows desktop?
If I compare with your ZEC miner, then there -li 1 works fine, but with XMR miner it is not nearly as good.

[/quote]I mean speed as H/sec, not Shares/sec ...vardif doesn't take place in this calculation?
Found too that overclock doesn't matter even with 20% downclock = always same mining speed.

Hey, can you please post what kind of hashrates are you getting for single cards ? Also I wandered what is power draw for mining xmr vs mining zec ? I'm mining Zcash at the moment but I think of switching to Monero

4th day ... rock stable 

for those who missed it in the OP: -

Q: I see too many devfee shares, it looks like devfee is 50%!

A: It's not true, please learn some theory about pool mining.
Some pools use vardiff - they change share target according miner speed. If miner is slow, pool set lower target share, and vice versa. It allows miner to send shares regularly, both fast and slow miners will send similar number of shares per minute, pool will not be overloaded by shares from fast miners and it will not lose slow miners that cannot find valuable shares often. By the way, when you mine solo the share target is block target (very high) so you will find shares very rarely but they will solve blocks and therefore will have maximal value.
Low share target means that miner will find a lot of cheaper shares, high share target means that miner will find fewer shares but they will be more valuable.
When share is found, miner displays share target, for example:

SHARE FOUND (target 10000)

or

DevFee: SHARE FOUND (target 1000)

Compare current targets for main and devfee connections. From example above, 10 devfee shares at target 1000 cost as one share at target 10000.
But devfee mining is very slow and therefore pool uses x10 lower target. So you see a lot of devfee shares but they are much cheaper than main shares.

READ THE FUCKING OP

Why fee mining speed differ from user speed?

Not a pool bug, it is version 9.7 issue, 9.6 runs fine.

seem running perfectly on an other pool ... must warn drawfpool ...

Dear Claymore,
Will you release Linux version also?
Thank you.

will try another pool now , if it 's only with drawfpool , better is to tell them , and wait for fix , they did , update today , website was offline all morning (europe)