Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 158. (Read 2145058 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
When there is a new version? Huh

Waiting .. When coming from Thailand)))
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
When there is a new version? Huh
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Yeah, I've checked that site as well but it does not seem to be as reliable as coinwarez. The 2 big issues I have seen is that I is usually WAY off on ETH difficulty (a spot check now of the 2 sites at the exact same time has CW with 92.6 and WTM at 85.4), which really skews profitability. Every time I've checked, CW has been right and WTM has been wrong, so there must be something wrong with how they are pulling ETH diff.  Also, the $ values that WTM uses also usually seem to be off by some degree. Based on these 2 factors, seems to me that CW is much more reliable.

maybe you're right.

Hi I have AMD video cards on windows 64. Does anybody have worked settings for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.6 or another working miner for Monero. Thank you in advance.
then sign up
https://minergate.com

and then download the finished bat file for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9. 6 after registration. here it is very easy! https://minergate.com/altminers/claymore-gpu
full member
Activity: 232
Merit: 100
Why linux version loads 100% cpu?
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
Hi I have AMD video cards on windows 64. Does anybody have worked settings for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.6 or another working miner for Monero. Thank you in advance.
sr. member
Activity: 600
Merit: 261
ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc.  But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now.  Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it.  ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd.

Absolutely right! But I like more http://whattomine.com

And in my pool https://minergate.com calculator  https://minergate.com/calculator , too right!

Yeah, I've checked that site as well but it does not seem to be as reliable as coinwarez. The 2 big issues I have seen is that I is usually WAY off on ETH difficulty (a spot check now of the 2 sites at the exact same time has CW with 92.6 and WTM at 85.4), which really skews profitability. Every time I've checked, CW has been right and WTM has been wrong, so there must be something wrong with how they are pulling ETH diff.  Also, the $ values that WTM uses also usually seem to be off by some degree. Based on these 2 factors, seems to me that CW is much more reliable.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc.  But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now.  Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it.  ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd.

Absolutely right! But I like more http://whattomine.com

And in my pool https://minergate.com calculator  https://minergate.com/calculator , too right!
sr. member
Activity: 600
Merit: 261
ZEC is still better at this point
and how did you reach this conclusion?

ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc.  But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now.  Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it.  ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd.

http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency
legendary
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
Anyone managed to connect to dwarf using a Kraken address?

Their support answered me stating this feature was available starting from yesterday but so far I haven't been able to connect.

 Huh
sr. member
Activity: 600
Merit: 261
Whats up guys.

What card do you recommend me?

I am interested in mining ETH, XMR, ZEC ...

Thank you.

For ETH & XMR, rx 470's are probably the consensus winner... they hash slightly slower than 480s but consume less power and cost less, so the ratios are the best, at least for most people/systems.  For ZEC, it's a bit more confusing since older cards seem to get more hashes on it (but probably also suck a lot of power). Check out the ZEC thread for better recommendations on that. As for 470's, I prefer the MSI 4GB Gaming.  Super quiet, easy to mod the bios, look great and run pretty cool. Many people in this forum love that GPU so check it out.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
16:12:42:997   1244   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Low difficulty share"}}

16:12:42:997   1244   parse packet: 76
16:12:42:997   1244   Error in server response
: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
16:12:43:012   1244   buf was cleared
16:12:43:028   1244   Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com' <188.165.34.183> port 8005
16:12:43:043   e70   GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1389 ms, hashrate = 737 h/s
16:12:43:075   1244   Stratum - Connected
16:12:43:137   1244   got 303 bytes
16:12:43:137   1244   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"353713814029470","job":{"blob":"0305a2a0b4c3052fbbfd61b76dac28ea7b1c2c37deedf02d8b56519a5ebf7c2b7e6986f09499730 0000000f598a896f601b68487a070c5bd4893a3834e723ac87a0dcc80a207f020be590806","job_id":"963475246937014","target":"b88d0600"},"status":"OK"}}

16:12:43:137   1244   parse packet: 303
16:12:43:137   1244   new buf size: 0
16:12:43:153   1244   Pool Diff 10000
16:12:43:168   1244   df has same pool, skip
16:12:43:278   e70   Round
16:12:43:606   176c   Job changed, drop current round
16:12:43:606   176c   Round
16:12:43:669   1774   Job changed, drop current round
16:12:43:684   100   Job changed, drop current round
16:12:43:684   100   Round
16:12:43:762   660   Job changed, drop current round
16:12:43:762   660   Round
16:12:45:059   480   GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1407 ms, hashrate = 727 h/s
16:12:45:075   480   Round
16:12:45:106   1774   GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1394 ms, hashrate = 734 h/s
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Whats up guys.

What card do you recommend me?

I am interested in mining ETH, XMR, ZEC ...

Thank you.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
pffff even at 9.5 i still get "lowdifficulty" share error ,

rx 480 samsung 1120/1850

did you add -a 4 -h 0 to your batch file ?




Can you show me full exempel on this dude? I don't get it where to put it? Btw i have 2x rx470 xfx 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig.


in fodler you have pool batch file, right click and edit

my code
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005 -u yourwallet -p x -a 4 -h 1024

With -a 4 I have same speed but also I got 20W lower consumption from wall which is also nice





i still have the error ... my cards do from 720-735
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Hi everyone!
Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?

740-750 for me
What is your clocks and voltage? Did you mode your bios?
full member
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
Hi everyone!
Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?

740-750 for me
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
ZEC is still better at this point
and how did you reach this conclusion?
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Hi everyone!
Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
btc pro r2, proper setup: 1150-1180 core 1950-2000 mem at 900-918mv 


same settings for 480 produce 750-760
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Yes it's planned in upcoming release. Unfortunately, I had to postpone it a bit because I decided to release an update for XMR miner firstly (it will be released in 1-2 days).

ETA for the new XMR miner? Any speedups?

No speedup for now because I have to add many features from my other miners (config.txt, allpools, etc). New version will be released in several hours.

how about lowdifficulty share error some are getting ? when rx 480 goes more than 720 h/s
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
pffff even at 9.5 i still get "lowdifficulty" share error ,

rx 480 samsung 1120/1850

did you add -a 4 -h 0 to your batch file ?




Can you show me full exempel on this dude? I don't get it where to put it? Btw i have 2x rx470 xfx 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig.


in fodler you have pool batch file, right click and edit

my code
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005 -u yourwallet -p x -a 4 -h 1024

With -a 4 I have same speed but also I got 20W lower consumption from wall which is also nice





Thx! Works great big up!
Jump to: