Hey guys,
I was using claymore cryptonote to mine intensecoin for awhile, had no issues - worked like a charm. I switched to mining eth with the other claymore miner for awhile, and am now trying to mine some more intensecoin being the recent price increase and ROI.
However I keep getting this damn devfee error -
DevFee: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.....
then there are some shares found, tries dev fee again, disconnects, and repeats this over and over. I lost some mining time over night cause I didn't realize it didn't sort itself out (not sure why I assumed it would, just was used to have it on eth/etc the last few weeks and not even paying attention to it hah)
Any one else have this type of issue - any tweaks / recommendations of what I can try? Or possibly a different GPU miner for Cryptonote ? (got 6 AMD cards)
I'm running Windows 10. I did try a reboot, didn't work.
Thanks in advance
Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 53. (Read 2145056 times)
Zawawa, you are doing great with a lot of algos and dual mining, But you should focous for example in equihash for amd , there is only claymore miner , if you get better hashes (or at least something equal), you ill see a mass of miners coming to you.
Finish equihash and release a cli for windows and linux
Finish equihash and release a cli for windows and linux
R9 Fury NITRO, proper claymore-xmr settings? I'm getting terrible hashrates (450H/sec) out of the box, running EthOS. Z270MB, 3 other 290 cards.
even the old HD7950's get 550.
I figured the fury would be 900+
TIA
even the old HD7950's get 550.
I figured the fury would be 900+
TIA
Is there any notes if it will be compatible with Electroneum?
I've been using Claymore's Cryptonote miner to mine Electroneum for some time now and it works just fine, no problems at all.
If you are interested here is my configuration.
Code:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.etn.spacepools.org:3333 -xwal -xpsw x -nofee 1 -allpools 1 -ftime 10 -mport 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.etn.spacepools.org:3333 -xwal
Thanks for reply, seems legit as most likely automatic -dmem 1 was the problem.
Soon as I set it for my r9 270s on -h 512 -dmem 0 everything started to be just fine, but no changes on their hashrates.
Other rig with rx570s had overall jump from 2770h/s to 2910h/s
Is there any notes if it will be compatible with Electroneum?
I've been using Claymore's Cryptonote miner to mine Electroneum for some time now and it works just fine, no problems at all.
If you are interested here is my configuration.
Code:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.etn.spacepools.org:3333 -xwal -xpsw x -nofee 1 -allpools 1 -ftime 10 -mport 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://pool.etn.spacepools.org:3333 -xwal
With a bit of tweaking I've managed to get my Aorus Hynix 580's up to 838 H/s. Can't seem to squeeze any more out of them.
However with the same settings they can now achieve a stable 30.1 Mh/s dual mining ETH which is roughly 5 Mh/s more than I was getting from them to start with!
I just don't think the Gigabyte cards are that good. They only have a single strap setting in the bios (0:xxxx) rather than the 1:xxxx and 2:xxxx other 580s have. Not sure of this is a sign of their inferiority or not?
I've just ordered a couple of MSI Armor 580's which are supposed to perform better so will see what I can do with them when they arrive.
If there are 2 strap sets, that is because the card may have different memory vendors, and bios just has both sets available. Most 5xx cards have 2 sets due to memory shortage. 4xx cards had only a single set. However with the same settings they can now achieve a stable 30.1 Mh/s dual mining ETH which is roughly 5 Mh/s more than I was getting from them to start with!
I just don't think the Gigabyte cards are that good. They only have a single strap setting in the bios (0:xxxx) rather than the 1:xxxx and 2:xxxx other 580s have. Not sure of this is a sign of their inferiority or not?
I've just ordered a couple of MSI Armor 580's which are supposed to perform better so will see what I can do with them when they arrive.
They do. Hynix is not such a bad memory.
I have a bunch of RX 570 4GB cards with different Hynix memory types and they all run between 970 and 980 h/s @1200/2000.
Most can be bumped well over 1k h/s, but it's not very effective consumption wise.
All you need is the right custom made strap that's all, which you can get online for the right price i guess or if someone wants to make them for you.
Maybe the 580 8GB ones can even push 1.2k if Wolf is behind the wheel, but i haven't gotten that far yet, most i can push out of Hynix memory is about 1060 h/s, but you need higher voltage for that, mostly beyond 920mV.
Same story with Micron & Elpida memory, you just need a good strap.
I prefere keeping them at 1200/2000@860-880mV, runs cool and power efficient
Which make 580's do you have? Any made by Gigabyte? From everything I've read, most Hynix cards can be ok, apart from the ones made by Gigabyte that just don't seem to perform quite as well. I have a bunch of RX 570 4GB cards with different Hynix memory types and they all run between 970 and 980 h/s @1200/2000.
Most can be bumped well over 1k h/s, but it's not very effective consumption wise.
All you need is the right custom made strap that's all, which you can get online for the right price i guess or if someone wants to make them for you.
Maybe the 580 8GB ones can even push 1.2k if Wolf is behind the wheel, but i haven't gotten that far yet, most i can push out of Hynix memory is about 1060 h/s, but you need higher voltage for that, mostly beyond 920mV.
Same story with Micron & Elpida memory, you just need a good strap.
I prefere keeping them at 1200/2000@860-880mV, runs cool and power efficient
With a bit of tweaking I've managed to get my Aorus Hynix 580's up to 838 H/s. Can't seem to squeeze any more out of them.
However with the same settings they can now achieve a stable 30.1 Mh/s dual mining ETH which is roughly 5 Mh/s more than I was getting from them to start with!
I just don't think the Gigabyte cards are that good. They only have a single strap setting in the bios (0:xxxx) rather than the 1:xxxx and 2:xxxx other 580s have. Not sure of this is a sign of their inferiority or not?
I've just ordered a couple of MSI Armor 580's which are supposed to perform better so will see what I can do with them when they arrive.
However with the same settings they can now achieve a stable 30.1 Mh/s dual mining ETH which is roughly 5 Mh/s more than I was getting from them to start with!
I just don't think the Gigabyte cards are that good. They only have a single strap setting in the bios (0:xxxx) rather than the 1:xxxx and 2:xxxx other 580s have. Not sure of this is a sign of their inferiority or not?
I've just ordered a couple of MSI Armor 580's which are supposed to perform better so will see what I can do with them when they arrive.
^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Code:
777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17
They do. Hynix is not such a bad memory.
I have a bunch of RX 570 4GB cards with different Hynix memory types and they all run between 970 and 980 h/s @1200/2000.
Most can be bumped well over 1k h/s, but it's not very effective consumption wise.
All you need is the right custom made strap that's all, which you can get online for the right price i guess or if someone wants to make them for you.
Maybe the 580 8GB ones can even push 1.2k if Wolf is behind the wheel, but i haven't gotten that far yet, most i can push out of Hynix memory is about 1060 h/s, but you need higher voltage for that, mostly beyond 920mV.
Same story with Micron & Elpida memory, you just need a good strap.
I prefere keeping them at 1200/2000@860-880mV, runs cool and power efficient
Hi,
and where to get good memory straps???
^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Code:
777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17
Thx a lot but i use it, this is ubermix strap for Hynix.
Still cant believe that my 4 gb elpida get 120 h/s more than my 8 gb hynix((
^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Code:
777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17
They do. Hynix is not such a bad memory.
I have a bunch of RX 570 4GB cards with different Hynix memory types and they all run between 970 and 980 h/s @1200/2000.
Most can be bumped well over 1k h/s, but it's not very effective consumption wise.
All you need is the right custom made strap that's all, which you can get online for the right price i guess or if someone wants to make them for you.
Maybe the 580 8GB ones can even push 1.2k if Wolf is behind the wheel, but i haven't gotten that far yet, most i can push out of Hynix memory is about 1060 h/s, but you need higher voltage for that, mostly beyond 920mV.
Same story with Micron & Elpida memory, you just need a good strap.
I prefere keeping them at 1200/2000@860-880mV, runs cool and power efficient
I haven't had luck with custom Hynix straps. I get very good results with Samsung Ubermix straps, and paid Elpida ones. Paid Hynix straps are crap, either no better than 1500 strap, or instant freeze. Plus there are several different models, so very difficult to optimize. Tried multiple custom straps.
I did not notice a performance boost with new version but the overall mining process has become more stable and got less broken shares. Thank you Claymore
^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Code:
777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17
They do. Hynix is not such a bad memory.
I have a bunch of RX 570 4GB cards with different Hynix memory types and they all run between 970 and 980 h/s @1200/2000.
Most can be bumped well over 1k h/s, but it's not very effective consumption wise.
All you need is the right custom made strap that's all, which you can get online for the right price i guess or if someone wants to make them for you.
Maybe the 580 8GB ones can even push 1.2k if Wolf is behind the wheel, but i haven't gotten that far yet, most i can push out of Hynix memory is about 1060 h/s, but you need higher voltage for that, mostly beyond 920mV.
Same story with Micron & Elpida memory, you just need a good strap.
I prefere keeping them at 1200/2000@860-880mV, runs cool and power efficient
Is there any notes if it will be compatible with Electroneum?
Moving from sgminer-gm-xmr to claymore-xmr 11, makes RX580's increase hash quite a bit, but makes RX480's totally unstable. I get errors on one GPU, and the other just fails out quickly.
I've tried decreasing -h down from 1125 down to 900, no help.
Anyone else have this issue?
I've tried decreasing -h down from 1125 down to 900, no help.
Anyone else have this issue?
Yeah here too nanopool reports 8500hs and claymore 9400hs
Hmmm. +1Claymore, what can you say about this?
Check GPU load in gpu-z (must be 100% all the time).
I will do some tests in 1-2 days to confirm that the miner produces correct number of shares, though I already did it for v11.
UPD: It seems I found the reason, when pool sends new job, v11.0 drops old job too late (loses 1-2 sec). I have fixed this bug but it will take 1-2 days to test it properly and release an update. However, you can test a fix right now if you want and tell me if it helps:
https://mega.nz/#!TlYQAJSZ!291Swk4GbJLC5JYmax_fc-tLWjfwKsFTnOUSVGqsDlA
Having some trouble getting my rig running. I'm on Ubuntu, using Claymore's 11. I can't get things configure right or something because I keep getting:
'./nsgpucnminer: error while loading shared libraries: libOpenCL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory'
as an error message. I've been scouring the forum for hours and haven't seen a simple answer to this problem. It's also worth mention that I'm a Linux noob.
Trying to get 3 amd vega 64s up and running asap so any help is highly appreciated
'./nsgpucnminer: error while loading shared libraries: libOpenCL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory'
as an error message. I've been scouring the forum for hours and haven't seen a simple answer to this problem. It's also worth mention that I'm a Linux noob.
Trying to get 3 amd vega 64s up and running asap so any help is highly appreciated
Yeah here too nanopool reports 8500hs and claymore 9400hs
Hmmm. +1Claymore, what can you say about this?
I am seeing a nearly 10% jump in hash rate on my RX 570 rigs for version 11 compared to version 10. Not sure about power usage but I don't think it changed much if at all (and who cares for that kind of jump in hash rate). Now to see if that actually translates to hash rate gain at the pool.
Anyone else seeing this kind of improvement with version 11?
I've been using claymore v11 for around one day, and yes it seems there's hashrate increase - judging from the miner info.Anyone else seeing this kind of improvement with version 11?
However, I've been keeping an eye on actual statistics of the pool I'm mining on - and it looks like hashrate is actually quite lower.
To give an example - 2 of my GPUs (RX 570 btw) are mining with claymore v9.7 with 1650 H/s total on average (stat from the miner) - pool statistics are similar.
Another 2 GPUs are mining with claymore v11 with 1830 H/s (same pool, BIOS, OC settings).
However, if I bluntly compare average shares per hour ratio (I know the difficulties can differ though), I get around 375 for BOTH sets of GPUs on v9.7 and v11.
I'm starting to get suspicious (and a bit paranoid) about v11.
Same for me!
I'am using:
6 * hd 7790 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
6 * rx 460 with version 10.2 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
4 * hd 7850 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)
2 * hd 7850 + 2 * R9 270 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)
i changed the rx 460 the hd 7850 and the r9 270 to version 11.0 and now
for all these three rigs the hashrate is 5 % better at miners site but round about 10% lower at pool site ( i tested two pools)
so i switched back !
I already used this strap, but my hash still around 800 
I think PC RX580 8G Hynix not good for Cryptonight, it can run ETH 180Mhs. I think I need Wolf0 support
No, some users copy their 1500 strap to 2000/2250: this is a custom strap for 2000/2250.
I think PC RX580 8G Hynix not good for Cryptonight, it can run ETH 180Mhs. I think I need Wolf0 support
Do you mean put this strap to 1500 only? I have PowerColor RX580 8G Hynix but I get only 800hs
Anyone here have rom for my card, please share me. Thanks alot.
Anyone here have rom for my card, please share me. Thanks alot.
^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.
Hynix:
Code:
777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17
No, some users copy their 1500 strap to 2000/2250: this is a custom strap for 2000/2250.
Jump to: