Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 54.

Call_Me_Bambi

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 261

Quote from: LUA2018 on December 24, 2017, 03:53:58 PM

Quote from: Call_Me_Bambi on December 24, 2017, 02:23:08 PM

Have a look at the first page in this thread there are a couple of examples for the *.bat file which might help. I'm not sure but the Minergate setting may be for an older version of this miner.
I'd use one of the pools in the given examples (such as Mining Pool Hub - good support) rather than Minergate as it's had some bad press over it's actual hashrates versus what you get.

-------
Thanks for your feedback. I took your advice and just got rid of anything Minergate altogether and being using Mining Pool Hub. I'm getting closer!

So, now I'm at the point where I'm connected to the pool and new jobs are coming in. The miner acknowledges my card (Processor: AMD A6-5400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics, 3600 Mhz, 1 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s)), yet the error messages, "No ASM Binary found for GPU 0," and "OpenCL Error 0 #101/101A: Cannot create GPU memory buffer." And I have no hash rate at all.

http://prntscr.com/hrtp6v

I've increased my virtual memory to 16GB and, from my research today, my AMD processor should work just fine. I saw a recommendation to download/install Catalyst v15.12 as a possible solution.

Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

From the screenshot 'GPU #0: Scapper, 512 MB Available, 3 Compute Units' it looks like you are trying to mine on a laptop with integrated graphics - this will not work, forget GPU mining (you need at least 2MB GPU vRAM). On the otherhand, CPU mining Cryptonote (Monero, Sumokoin, Electroneum) is doable - just.

arvonceda

newbie

Activity: 66

Merit: 0

Quote from: notbatman on December 26, 2017, 07:30:33 AM

Quote from: arvonceda on December 26, 2017, 07:25:57 AM

i have RX460 and RX470 1 rig, i try claymore 11, run not smooth, and my hashrate down from 915 h/s to 500h/s
now i use claymore 10.2 againt

-h 896

i use many varian
-h 800
-h 850
-h 750
and dafult from dev...

blink not smooth and constan, my rig freeze a sec to normal again.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: rongphuongnam on December 26, 2017, 07:19:39 AM

Do you mean put this strap to 1500 only? I have PowerColor RX580 8G Hynix but I get only 800hs
Anyone here have rom for my card, please share me. Thanks alot.

Quote from: notbatman on December 26, 2017, 06:44:08 AM

^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.

Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.

Hynix:

Code:

777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17

No, some users copy their 1500 strap to 2000/2250: this is a custom strap for 2000/2250.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: arvonceda on December 26, 2017, 07:25:57 AM

i have RX460 and RX470 1 rig, i try claymore 11, run not smooth, and my hashrate down from 915 h/s to 500h/s
now i use claymore 10.2 againt

-h 896

arvonceda

newbie

Activity: 66

Merit: 0

i have RX460 and RX470 1 rig, i try claymore 11, run not smooth, and my hashrate down from 915 h/s to 500h/s
now i use claymore 10.2 againt

rongphuongnam

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Do you mean put this strap to 1500 only? I have PowerColor RX580 8G Hynix but I get only 800hs
Anyone here have rom for my card, please share me. Thanks alot.

Quote from: notbatman on December 26, 2017, 06:44:08 AM

^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.

Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.

Hynix:

Code:

777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Some users claim sgminer-gm can put a Hynix card over 1k, I think wolf claims 1.2k but he's a special case. I recommend the MSI Armor RX580-8GB (Samsung) for use with Claymore's miner, you'll do 1k no problem with the ubermix straps and it's also the cheapest card to buy.

Carocus might want to try this Hynix strap, it's faster than the 1500 strap and he should be able to get 900+ H/s on that Gigabyte.

Hynix:

Code:

777000000000000022AA1C00B56A6D46C0551017BE8E060C006AE6000C081420EA8900AB030000001B162C31C0313F17

trooperx

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Quote from: Carocus on December 25, 2017, 10:34:45 PM

The same situation, but i cant even reach 860 h/s.
Recently i bought 5 Asus Dual OC RX 580 8gb with hynix memory. I flashed it with uber mix straps, in stock it showed 570 h/s, after flashing - 772 h/s. Changing cclock and mclock hash only a slight effect. With cclock 1100 it shows 760 h/s and with 1360 - 772 h/s. Exactly the same situation with mclock. MSI Afterburner and wattman show that clocks change correctly. I also tried to change -dmem and -h, -dmem 0 decreases hashrate to 550 h/s, changing -h has no effect. MB - BIOSTAR TB250-BTC.
I also have another 1 rig that runs 3 Asus Dual OC rx 580 8gb with samsung memory and 2 asus dual oc rx 580 4gb with elpida memory.
I was able to get stable 1020 hashes with 8gb version (cclock 1330, mclock 2000) with samsung memory and 925 hashes with 4gb version with elpida memory. MB - AsRock Z170 Extreme 3.
I tried differrent miners with different settings - no effect, the hashrate even lower.
Mb smb can help me with an advice?

I've read so much advice in the last few days and it just seems like the Hynix memory is inferior to the Samsung. If you also have an inferior make of card (I've now realised that the Gigabyte RX580's I have are not the best) AND Hynix memory, you're pretty much stuffed.

Carocus

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: Soliqesh on December 19, 2017, 07:02:07 PM

I tried a lot of options, but I cant achieve more than 860h, maybe it's because of memory hynix (with samsung memory peoples report 1000h+), I'll have to go back to SG miner. RX 580 8gb with Hynix have 970h. Cry

The same situation, but i cant even reach 860 h/s.
Recently i bought 5 Asus Dual OC RX 580 8gb with hynix memory. I flashed it with uber mix straps, in stock it showed 570 h/s, after flashing - 772 h/s. Changing cclock and mclock hash only a slight effect. With cclock 1100 it shows 760 h/s and with 1360 - 772 h/s. Exactly the same situation with mclock. MSI Afterburner and wattman show that clocks change correctly. I also tried to change -dmem and -h, -dmem 0 decreases hashrate to 550 h/s, changing -h has no effect. MB - BIOSTAR TB250-BTC.
I also have another 1 rig that runs 3 Asus Dual OC rx 580 8gb with samsung memory and 2 asus dual oc rx 580 4gb with elpida memory.
I was able to get stable 1020 hashes with 8gb version (cclock 1330, mclock 2000) with samsung memory and 925 hashes with 4gb version with elpida memory. MB - AsRock Z170 Extreme 3.
I tried differrent miners with different settings - no effect, the hashrate even lower.
Mb smb can help me with an advice?

trooperx

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

I'm using Gigabyte Aorus RX580's and just can't get past 831 H/s per card.

This is my first rig and the riser cards didn't turn up (thanks Amazon!!) so I can only run one card at a time at the moment plugged directly in to the mobo. Can the hash rates increase once I have them attached via the riser cards?

I realise now these were not the best choice of RX580s out there but is anyone else with an Aorus seeing better results?

gaetans

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote

No ASM binary found for GPU 0

Which package I forgot to install?
Thanks!
G.

nowaltcoin

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

Quote from: 7anonminer7 on December 25, 2017, 12:47:17 AM

Quote from: tf2addict on December 24, 2017, 03:05:41 PM

I am seeing a nearly 10% jump in hash rate on my RX 570 rigs for version 11 compared to version 10. Not sure about power usage but I don't think it changed much if at all (and who cares for that kind of jump in hash rate). Now to see if that actually translates to hash rate gain at the pool.

Anyone else seeing this kind of improvement with version 11?

I've been using claymore v11 for around one day, and yes it seems there's hashrate increase - judging from the miner info.
However, I've been keeping an eye on actual statistics of the pool I'm mining on - and it looks like hashrate is actually quite lower.

To give an example - 2 of my GPUs (RX 570 btw) are mining with claymore v9.7 with 1650 H/s total on average (stat from the miner) - pool statistics are similar.
Another 2 GPUs are mining with claymore v11 with 1830 H/s (same pool, BIOS, OC settings).
However, if I bluntly compare average shares per hour ratio (I know the difficulties can differ though), I get around 375 for BOTH sets of GPUs on v9.7 and v11.

I'm starting to get suspicious (and a bit paranoid) about v11.

Same for me!

I'am using:

6 * hd 7790 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
6 * rx 460 with version 10.2 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site!
4 * hd 7850 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)
2 * hd 7850 + 2 * R9 270 with version 9.7 and hashrate at miner site is the same on pool site! (can not use 10.2 too much miscalculated)

i changed the rx 460 the hd 7850 and the r9 270 to version 11.0 and now
for all these three rigs the hashrate is 5 % better at miners site but round about 10% lower at pool site ( i tested two pools)

so i switched back !

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

I just had all my miners crash simultaneously, here's a screen cap from one miner:

Setting a failover pool doesn't work anymore, they all seg fault!!.

Claymore dude if you could fix this... or give NH a ring and tell them they're sending a kill signal to your miners right after payment processing.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: LUA2018 on December 24, 2017, 05:36:23 PM

Quote from: notbatman on December 24, 2017, 04:02:05 PM

^^^ Claymore makes a CryptoNote CPU miner.

Thank you for that information. While I'm getting the GPU miner figured out, I went ahead and setup the CPU miner. It is working, but all I have to do now is figure out how to increase the hash rate. I'm maxing out at about 32 h/s now.

32 H/s is about right for a single CPU core. You don't have a GPU BTW, that's integrated video you're seeing.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: gaetans on December 24, 2017, 11:16:54 PM

Hi, I tried both Claymore's CN (I mean 10.2 and 11).
I always get a Seg Fault error.
Here below the output.
Any suggestion?
I have a (single) radeon 580.
Thanks!
Gaetano

Quote

?ͻ
? Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.0 ?
Huh

?ͼ

XMR: 2 pools are specified
Main Monero pool is monero.crypto-pool.fr:3333
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 1
GPU #0: gfx803, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
POOL version
No ASM binary found for GPU 0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

The RX550 isn't supported.

joboy84

member

Activity: 122

Merit: 10

Hello,

I am facing a issue.

My rig is crashing 1 time per day, and I don't know why.

It isn't displaying that a GPU hang.

All GPU's are stopped, except the GPU 2 who's fan is turning (a little fast for me) and it seems it's the only one who is drawing power from the wall.

Here is le log file :

Code:

04:56:57:694 1ae8 GPU0 t=53C fan=24%, GPU1 t=63C fan=23%, GPU2 t=66C fan=22%, GPU3 t=61C fan=25%, GPU4 t=57C fan=25%, GPU5 t=66C fan=23%
04:56:57:710 1ae8 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 94,
04:56:57:710 1ae8 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 3453
04:56:57:710 1ae8 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 3547
04:56:57:710 1ae8 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 797
04:56:57:725 1ae8 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 812
04:56:57:725 1ae8 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 1797
04:56:57:725 1ae8 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 4500
04:56:57:725 1ae8 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 4516
04:56:57:741 1ae8 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 1781
04:56:57:741 1ae8 watchdog - thread 8, hb time 1609
04:56:57:741 1ae8 watchdog - thread 9, hb time 4219
04:56:57:741 1ae8 watchdog - thread 10, hb time 4219
04:56:57:757 1ae8 watchdog - thread 11, hb time 1625
04:56:57:757 1ae8 watchdog - thread 12, hb time 1750
04:56:57:757 1ae8 watchdog - thread 13, hb time 4484
04:56:57:757 1ae8 watchdog - thread 14, hb time 1766
04:56:57:772 1ae8 watchdog - thread 15, hb time 4469
04:56:57:772 1ae8 watchdog - thread 16, hb time 4891
04:56:57:772 1ae8 watchdog - thread 17, hb time 4891
04:56:57:772 1ae8 watchdog - thread 18, hb time 2156
04:56:57:788 1ae8 watchdog - thread 19, hb time 2156
04:56:57:788 1ae8 watchdog - thread 20, hb time 1578
04:56:57:788 1ae8 watchdog - thread 21, hb time 4312
04:56:57:788 1ae8 watchdog - thread 22, hb time 4234
04:56:57:803 1ae8 watchdog - thread 23, hb time 1562
04:56:58:741 1f20 XMR: put share nonce 10c9bc
04:56:58:757 1f20 XMR round found 1 shares
04:56:58:772 1f4c XMR: 12/25/17-04:56:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
04:56:58:772 1f4c send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "160143319214694", "job_id": "300860059773549", "nonce": "bcc91000", "result": "0bfa0dd6b948aea7c0d544867f612033bc6f0c356232592cb1b5a9cfaa280100"}, "id":4}

04:56:58:944 1f4c got 63 bytes
04:56:58:944 1f4c buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

04:56:58:944 1f4c parse packet: 62
04:56:58:944 1f4c Share accepted (171 ms)!
04:56:59:007 1f4c new buf size: 0
04:57:02:429 1ef8 XMR: put share nonce 1210b1
04:57:02:429 1ef8 XMR round found 1 shares
04:57:02:445 1f4c XMR: 12/25/17-04:57:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
04:57:02:445 1f4c send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "160143319214694", "job_id": "300860059773549", "nonce": "b1101200", "result": "d6230e4c864d3dbbc9a401dd5339d0c475535acea11f7bc6be855ea91cb60000"}, "id":4}

04:57:02:507 1f4c got 63 bytes
04:57:02:507 1f4c buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

04:57:02:507 1f4c parse packet: 62
04:57:02:507 1f4c Share accepted (63 ms)!
04:57:02:523 1f4c new buf size: 0
04:57:04:226 1f4c got 253 bytes
04:57:04:226 1f4c buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"0101d0ed81d20510a9b67775dce333bcf09cfa355878dfebe484b91749d9355bfa433c20aca3360000000046e719cf5b916b4aecd76837824e657b7e6fd361eb85bdcf184cf41fc849b1be0e","job_id":"633874448458664","target":"88ed0000"}}

04:57:04:226 1f4c parse packet: 252
04:57:04:226 1f4c new buf size: 0
04:57:04:242 1f4c XMR: 12/25/17-04:57:04 - New job from pool.etn.spacepools.org:5555
04:57:04:242 1f4c target: 0x0000ed88 (diff: 70631H)
04:57:04:242 1f4c XMR - Total Speed: 5184 H/s, Total Shares: 390, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:17
04:57:04:476 1f4c XMR: GPU0 857 H/s, GPU1 859 H/s, GPU2 901 H/s, GPU3 860 H/s, GPU4 853 H/s, GPU5 854 H/s
04:57:04:336 1f44 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:476 1f40 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:476 1f48 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:492 1f3c Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:695 1ef0 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:695 1eec Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:695 1ef4 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:04:710 1ef8 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:117 1f38 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:117 1f0c Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:117 1f34 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:117 1f18 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:132 1f2c Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:132 1f14 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:132 1f30 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:132 1f10 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:398 1efc Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:398 1f08 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:398 1f04 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:414 1f00 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:445 1f1c Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:445 1f24 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:445 1f20 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:06:445 1f28 Job changed, drop current round
04:57:28:494 1ae8 GPU0 t=53C fan=24%, GPU1 t=64C fan=23%, GPU2 t=66C fan=22%, GPU3 t=62C fan=25%, GPU4 t=57C fan=25%, GPU5 t=65C fan=23%
04:57:28:510 1ae8 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 47,
04:57:28:510 1ae8 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 4453
04:57:28:510 1ae8 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 1719
04:57:28:526 1ae8 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 1719
04:57:28:526 1ae8 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 4453
04:57:28:526 1ae8 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 94
04:57:28:526 1ae8 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 2813
04:57:28:541 1ae8 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 94
04:57:28:541 1ae8 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 2813
04:57:28:541 1ae8 watchdog - thread 8, hb time 3938
04:57:28:541 1ae8 watchdog - thread 9, hb time 3953
04:57:28:557 1ae8 watchdog - thread 10, hb time 1359
04:57:28:557 1ae8 watchdog - thread 11, hb time 1344
04:57:28:557 1ae8 watchdog - thread 12, hb time 47
04:57:28:557 1ae8 watchdog - thread 13, hb time 2766
04:57:28:572 1ae8 watchdog - thread 14, hb time 47
04:57:28:572 1ae8 watchdog - thread 15, hb time 2766
04:57:28:572 1ae8 watchdog - thread 16, hb time 219
04:57:28:572 1ae8 watchdog - thread 17, hb time 2953
04:57:28:588 1ae8 watchdog - thread 18, hb time 219
04:57:28:588 1ae8 watchdog - thread 19, hb time 2953
04:57:28:588 1ae8 watchdog - thread 20, hb time 1891
04:57:28:588 1ae8 watchdog - thread 21, hb time 1891
04:57:28:604 1ae8 watchdog - thread 22, hb time 4625
04:57:28:604 1ae8 watchdog - thread 23, hb time 4625
04:57:36:651 1f08 XMR: put share nonce 7de86
04:57:36:651 1f08 XMR round found 1 shares
04:57:36:667 1f4c XMR: 12/25/17-04:57:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
04:57:36:776 1f4c send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "160143319214694", "job_id": "633874448458664", "nonce": "86de0700", "result": "20b7ba1360e97389ec7bcfdf6a8e4bf1c9df9a204af8410f260e628f540f0000"}, "id":4}

04:57:36:949 1f4c got 63 bytes
04:57:36:949 1f4c buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

04:57:36:949 1f4c parse packet: 62
04:57:36:949 1f4c Share accepted (171 ms)!
04:57:36:964 1f4c new buf size: 0
04:57:40:511 1ef8 XMR: put share nonce 78993
04:57:40:511 1ef8 XMR round found 1 shares
04:57:40:527 1f4c XMR: 12/25/17-04:57:40 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
04:57:40:527 1f4c send: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "160143319214694", "job_id": "633874448458664", "nonce": "93890700", "result": "e1eac85e52d0c8214bf5823a51952097889934af6d2a0026f5a38853ccb90000"}, "id":4}

04:57:40:590 1f4c got 63 bytes
04:57:40:590 1f4c buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}

04:57:40:590 1f4c parse packet: 62
04:57:40:590 1f4c Share accepted (63 ms)!
04:57:40:605 1f4c new buf size: 0

Thank you

7anonminer7

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: tf2addict on December 24, 2017, 03:05:41 PM

I am seeing a nearly 10% jump in hash rate on my RX 570 rigs for version 11 compared to version 10. Not sure about power usage but I don't think it changed much if at all (and who cares for that kind of jump in hash rate). Now to see if that actually translates to hash rate gain at the pool.

Anyone else seeing this kind of improvement with version 11?

I've been using claymore v11 for around one day, and yes it seems there's hashrate increase - judging from the miner info.
However, I've been keeping an eye on actual statistics of the pool I'm mining on - and it looks like hashrate is actually quite lower.

To give an example - 2 of my GPUs (RX 570 btw) are mining with claymore v9.7 with 1650 H/s total on average (stat from the miner) - pool statistics are similar.
Another 2 GPUs are mining with claymore v11 with 1830 H/s (same pool, BIOS, OC settings).
However, if I bluntly compare average shares per hour ratio (I know the difficulties can differ though), I get around 375 for BOTH sets of GPUs on v9.7 and v11.

I'm starting to get suspicious (and a bit paranoid) about v11.

gaetans

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Hi, I tried both Claymore's CN (I mean 10.2 and 11).
I always get a Seg Fault error.
Here below the output.
Any suggestion?
I have a (single) radeon 580.
Thanks!
Gaetano

Quote

?ͻ
? Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.0 ?
Huh

?ͼ

XMR: 2 pools are specified
Main Monero pool is monero.crypto-pool.fr:3333
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 1
GPU #0: gfx803, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
POOL version
No ASM binary found for GPU 0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

LUA2018

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: notbatman on December 24, 2017, 04:02:05 PM

^^^ Claymore makes a CryptoNote CPU miner.

Thank you for that information. While I'm getting the GPU miner figured out, I went ahead and setup the CPU miner. It is working, but all I have to do now is figure out how to increase the hash rate. I'm maxing out at about 32 h/s now.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Claymore makes a CryptoNote CPU miner.

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 54. (Read 2145043 times)