Guys,
Please add statistics data here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-dual-miner-settings-and-statistics-1550780
Everybody uses their own settings, tweaks etc - so please share it in separate topic.
That will really help us to understand the limits of GPUs and CDM.
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1216. (Read 6590757 times)
July 17, 2016, 08:59:18 AM
July 17, 2016, 08:50:43 AM
You got some bug in showing GPU temp. It strange but only one rig has that issue. Actually there 4 GPU.
July 17, 2016, 08:37:55 AM
use -dcri 40 on the 390 you should get around 600 SIA. and no loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
If i do dcri 40 i loose about 3 mh per rig so x 12 = 36 mhs of course i have not ran the calculations and it might be worth doing if there is no gain in wattage. I need to bust out the kilo-watt meter and check i guess.
I run all 390 units 6 card rigs with dual 1300 watt ps.
You really don't loose anything? If so can you tell me what your config file looks like? Thanks!
July 17, 2016, 06:47:03 AM
I'm mining siacon on nanopool but my balance after 24h is still unconfirmed, do u know why ? there r any problem with this pool ?
Confirmations are block finds, not a time lasted. Current difficulty is a bit high comparing to the network hashrate. So it takes more then 24 hours to confirm. When there was no dual miner it was vice versa - confirmations took 15 hours, not 24 or more.Due to a lot of people going to dual mining ETH+SIA the profit every day decreases. The more miners, the less profit. It is yet profitable, but not as much as was 10 days ago. And don't forget that it takes much more power that means increased electricity bills, higher power supply loads and higher temperatures.
This is great news for the coin SIA.
Yesterday there were 1200 miners doing SIA on nanopool.
That means the coins are spread over 1200 accounts, instead of everything going to the few previous miners.
I do understand teh suck for them .. who were used to beeing rewarded in tons and taking it all for themselves.
But the advantages here are bigger.
Bigger spread is smaller dumps too.
The big SIA bagholders are the ones who has mined for a long time when it was very lucrative.
Its also these holders that can do the big dumps crashing the price to bottom.
But the biggest plus for SIA is all the attention it gets.
How many new users know about SIA because of Claymore?
July 17, 2016, 05:26:25 AM
I'm mining siacon on nanopool but my balance after 24h is still unconfirmed, do u know why ? there r any problem with this pool ?
Confirmations are block finds, not a time lasted. Current difficulty is a bit high comparing to the network hashrate. So it takes more then 24 hours to confirm. When there was no dual miner it was vice versa - confirmations took 15 hours, not 24 or more.Due to a lot of people going to dual mining ETH+SIA the profit every day decreases. The more miners, the less profit. It is yet profitable, but not as much as was 10 days ago. And don't forget that it takes much more power that means increased electricity bills, higher power supply loads and higher temperatures.
July 17, 2016, 04:17:20 AM
Hi All,
I'm fairly new to GPU mining and have just got an RX480 and installed Claymores Dual Miner v5.1. Eth is mining fine with no rejected blocks, but on Decred I'm getting about 10% rejected. Is this normal?
Currently mining Eth at 23.1m/h and Decred at 349M/h, Power consumption according to newest GPU-Z is between 89-92 watts. Radeon software version is 16.7.1
The card is not overclocked and the only adjustments I have made are the power target is now set to 83%, and a manual fan speed of 65%.
I have found these values to keep the card within about 68-69 degrees temperature, and have had no loss of mining speed. Below 83% mining speeds starts to decrease, above 83% mining speeds are the same and Decred rejected blocks are still at 10%
If anyone can offer any insight/tips it would be appreciated.
Thanks
I'm fairly new to GPU mining and have just got an RX480 and installed Claymores Dual Miner v5.1. Eth is mining fine with no rejected blocks, but on Decred I'm getting about 10% rejected. Is this normal?
Currently mining Eth at 23.1m/h and Decred at 349M/h, Power consumption according to newest GPU-Z is between 89-92 watts. Radeon software version is 16.7.1
The card is not overclocked and the only adjustments I have made are the power target is now set to 83%, and a manual fan speed of 65%.
I have found these values to keep the card within about 68-69 degrees temperature, and have had no loss of mining speed. Below 83% mining speeds starts to decrease, above 83% mining speeds are the same and Decred rejected blocks are still at 10%
If anyone can offer any insight/tips it would be appreciated.
Thanks
July 17, 2016, 03:10:36 AM
Guys,
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
Here is super calculator
https://www.whattomine.com/merged_coins/2-eth-sc
I switched to dual mining 2 days ago
July 17, 2016, 03:10:28 AM
Guys,
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
use this
http://www.whattomine.com/merged_coins/2-eth-sc
July 17, 2016, 02:39:12 AM
Guys,
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
Is dual mining SIA coins profitable?
how much would I get from SIA mining, if I am doing ETH+SIA dual mining on a 5 x 390 (150MHs)?
I am exclusively just using Claymore for ETH currently.
Thanks
July 17, 2016, 01:16:12 AM
Claymore, can you add e-mail notification to your Remote Manager ?
July 16, 2016, 11:06:16 PM
I'm mining siacon on nanopool but my balance after 24h is still unconfirmed, do u know why ? there r any problem with this pool ?
change to siamining. I had the same problem on nanopool for eth and sia... mined for few hours, shares sent but website does not recognize.
July 16, 2016, 07:51:51 PM
use -dcri 40 on the 390 you should get around 600 SIA. and no loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
Thanks for that, with -drci 40 ETH 32.2MH/s SIA 644MH/s per R9 390 gpu and $ return up 11% according to https://www.whattomine.com/merged_coins/2-eth-sc (if power consumption remains the same).
Cheers
Please add statistics data here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/claymores-dual-miner-settings-and-statistics-1550780
Thank you!
July 16, 2016, 06:56:19 PM
use -dcri 40 on the 390 you should get around 600 SIA. and no loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
Thanks for that, with -drci 40 ETH 32.2MH/s SIA 644MH/s per R9 390 gpu and $ return up 11% according to https://www.whattomine.com/merged_coins/2-eth-sc (if power consumption remains the same).
Cheers
July 16, 2016, 05:01:18 PM
use -dcri 40 on the 390 you should get around 600 SIA. and no loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
-dcri 64 works best on the Nanos 700-800MHASH SIA. and lo loss in etherum hashrate.
July 16, 2016, 04:58:00 PM
Anyone how's R9 390 performance in dual mode ETHSIA comparing to ETHDCR? I see huge performance drop on same settings
yeah same! Im running 5 R9 390s in a rig, and running 1055 core 1500 mem I was getting 150MH/s ETH and 4000MH/s DCR. Now with SIA Mining, I'g getting 134MH/s ETH 3370MH/s SIA. Didnt change any settings in the config file. :/
When I switched from ETH/DRC to ETH/SIA my R9 390's started hitting their power limiter which was set to the stock value 0.
I removed the power limit by adding -powlim 50 to the config file and the hash rate went to 33MH/s ETH and 495MH/s SIA per card (-cclock 1155 -tt -100 -dcri 30)
Check that your power supplies are able to do a bit more, my rig increased it's power consumption by 7.2% with ETH/SIA.
July 16, 2016, 04:08:38 PM
I'm mining siacon on nanopool but my balance after 24h is still unconfirmed, do u know why ? there r any problem with this pool ?
July 16, 2016, 03:48:27 PM
Hardware problem with GPU0 that hangs, maybe due to overclocking/downvolting.
Either fix it or add -r 1 and a reboot script file to reboot the rig. Miner restart usually does not help in such case.
Either fix it or add -r 1 and a reboot script file to reboot the rig. Miner restart usually does not help in such case.
July 16, 2016, 01:58:46 PM
Hi DEV,
I have a small issue. GPU 0 seems to stop after about 50 minutes of running. Here is the cut log
An almost full log can be consulted here http://pastebin.com/fhzcHqid
I have a small issue. GPU 0 seems to stop after about 50 minutes of running. Here is the cut log
An almost full log can be consulted here http://pastebin.com/fhzcHqid
Code:
20:20:59:636 660 commandline: EthDcrMiner64.exe
20:20:59:636 660
20:20:59:636 660 ÉÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ»
20:20:59:636 660 ş Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC AMD GPU Miner v5.1 Beta ş
20:20:59:636 660 ČÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍĽ
20:20:59:636 660
20:20:59:838 660 ETH: 1 pool is specified
20:20:59:838 660 Main Ethereum pool is eu2.nanopool.org:9999
20:20:59:838 660 SC: 1 pool is specified
20:20:59:838 660 Main Siacoin pool is sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980
20:21:00:197 660 OpenCL platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
20:21:00:197 660
Cards available: 2
20:21:00:197 660 GPU #0: name: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
20:21:00:197 660 GPU #1: name: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 28 compute units
20:21:00:197 660 Total cards: 2
20:21:00:213 660 Initializing...
20:21:00:213 660 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 285/380
20:21:00:213 660 GPU #1 recognized as Radeon 285/380
20:21:00:213 660 POOL/SOLO version
20:21:00:213 660 b170
20:21:00:213 660 start building OpenCL program...
20:21:06:968 660 done
20:21:06:968 660 GPU #0: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
20:21:06:968 660 GPU #1: set -etha as 0 (ETH algo for fast cards)
20:21:07:108 660 DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN
20:24:20:985 1654 parse packet: 242
20:24:20:985 1654 eth: job is the same
20:24:20:985 1654 new buf size: 0
20:24:25:712 2b4 recv: 51
20:24:25:712 2b4 srv pck: 50
20:24:25:728 2b4 srv bs: 0
20:24:25:743 2b4 sent: 184
20:24:25:946 12c0 http send request:
20:24:26:024 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e00000000000005e60a2ccb4d062a56d52d4b1ea1c66f7bde90e8905ebabb33380000000000000000bc6d8a57000000008ca21e192d89cfd8656c805f6053158f77aad95598fe0204619b767bdd003d4a
20:24:26:024 12c0 SIA job updated
20:24:30:704 1654 send: {"id":6,"worker":"rigclay","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x262a936", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ddf8ce2"]}
20:24:30:720 1690 recv: 51
20:24:30:720 1690 srv pck: 50
20:24:30:735 1690 srv bs: 0
20:24:30:735 1690 sent: 184
20:24:30:860 1654 ETH: checking pool connection...
20:24:30:860 1654 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
20:24:31:032 1654 got 243 bytes
20:24:31:032 1654 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x76c636e19287ba72b2ada693ec4a49082c0a2cbaf3c86d375930a9b12b6eff14","0x1e484311694bb35f3eb466a15767b60533ec91a7971f53a09837bc946bd861db","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
21:00:44:318 1654 got 243 bytes
21:00:44:318 1654 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdcc67c51cb57d882cf1c3403d7ca2c148451558399a79ac3298c63df5ae6789b","0x1e484311694bb35f3eb466a15767b60533ec91a7971f53a09837bc946bd861db","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
21:00:44:318 1654 parse packet: 242
21:00:44:318 1654 eth: job is the same
21:00:44:318 1654 new buf size: 0
21:00:48:515 12c0 http send request:
21:00:48:702 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000503f2a8afaaae53f5730757ebc21a71e8a6b25f8d2bce498d8800000000000000003b768a57000000003afa5d57e1486dfe30c04b5e7987b72f962bcda667e22460c05f0cc1bf554193
21:00:48:702 12c0 SIA job updated
21:00:49:076 1a24 recv: 51
21:00:49:076 1a24 srv pck: 50
21:00:49:107 1a24 srv bs: 0
21:00:49:107 1a24 sent: 178
21:00:52:352 1654 send: {"id":6,"worker":"rigclay","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x131dfc5", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ddf8ce2"]}
21:00:53:725 12c0 http send request:
21:00:53:803 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000503f2a8afaaae53f5730757ebc21a71e8a6b25f8d2bce498d88000000000000000047768a5700000000de0e8d8292c0cef4c691de233a0756fa7372d592de6f15b00b54eb8530a2a606
21:00:53:803 12c0 SIA job updated
21:00:54:099 1480 recv: 51
21:00:54:099 1480 srv pck: 50
21:00:54:131 1480 srv bs: 0
21:00:54:131 1480 sent: 178
21:00:54:193 1654 ETH: checking pool connection...
21:00:54:193 1654 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
21:00:54:333 1654 got 243 bytes
21:00:54:333 1654 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xdcc67c51cb57d882cf1c3403d7ca2c148451558399a79ac3298c63df5ae6789b","0x1e484311694bb35f3eb466a15767b60533ec91a7971f53a09837bc946bd861db","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
21:00:54:333 1654 parse packet: 242
21:00:54:333 1654 eth: job is the same
21:00:54:333 1654 new buf size: 0
21:00:58:826 12c0 http send request:
21:00:58:904 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000503f2a8afaaae53f5730757ebc21a71e8a6b25f8d2bce498d88000000000000000047768a57000000007c789809d2ca35f38cf27f6de09f2c1f8cf8267971e9b0fec4a346896c3e8b24
21:00:58:904 12c0 SIA job updated
21:00:59:138 d84 recv: 51
21:00:59:138 d84 srv pck: 50
21:00:59:154 d84 srv bs: 0
21:00:59:154 d84 sent: 178
21:01:03:927 12c0 http send request:
21:01:03:974 1654 got 243 bytes
21:01:03:974 1654 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xcf5849b8f7d79f342d30c3c71f882c8b3fa461355197d2dffdc73256366e54e0","0x1e484311694bb35f3eb466a15767b60533ec91a7971f53a09837bc946bd861db","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
21:01:03:974 1654 parse packet: 242
21:01:03:974 1654 eth: job changed
21:01:03:974 1654 new buf size: 0
21:01:03:974 1654 ETH: 07/16/16-21:01:03 - New job from eu2.nanopool.org:9999
21:01:03:974 1654 target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch #63
21:01:03:974 1654 ETH - Total Speed: 20.056 Mh/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:39
21:01:03:974 1654 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 20.056 Mh/s
21:01:03:974 1654 SC - Total Speed: 220.618 Mh/s, Total Shares: 15, Rejected: 0
21:01:03:974 1654 SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 220.618 Mh/s
21:01:04:052 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000503f2a8afaaae53f5730757ebc21a71e8a6b25f8d2bce498d88000000000000000047768a570000000054c9e78324d4f673253f99dd823e518841aa8b0dc2988a6111c09b523819b792
21:01:04:052 12c0 SIA job updated
21:01:04:146 1608 recv: 51
21:01:04:146 1608 srv pck: 50
21:01:04:161 1608 srv bs: 0
21:01:04:161 1608 sent: 178
21:01:04:208 1654 ETH: checking pool connection...
21:01:04:208 1654 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
21:01:04:333 1654 got 243 bytes
21:01:04:333 1654 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xcf5849b8f7d79f342d30c3c71f882c8b3fa461355197d2dffdc73256366e54e0","0x1e484311694bb35f3eb466a15767b60533ec91a7971f53a09837bc946bd861db","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}
21:01:04:333 1654 parse packet: 242
21:01:04:333 1654 eth: job is the same
21:01:04:333 1654 new buf size: 0
21:01:09:075 12c0 http send request:
21:01:09:122 149c recv: 51
21:01:09:122 149c srv pck: 50
21:01:09:153 149c srv bs: 0
21:01:09:153 149c sent: 178
21:01:09:153 12c0 http got answer: 0000000015fd7fe17964955fdef1ed34a2a73ae91e5fe71947db5116127c069e0000000000000503f2a8afaaae53f5730757ebc21a71e8a6b25f8d2bce498d88000000000000000052768a5700000000e6609b2856e3aebb0e6b12577243dc087bb5cba1a64bb2c52b89cb9165bd4434
21:01:09:153 12c0 SIA job updated
21:01:10:011 660 GPU0 t=57C fan=39%, GPU1 t=76C fan=55%
21:01:10:027 660 em hbt: 0, dm hbt: 858, fm hbt: 16,
21:01:10:027 660 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 85286
21:01:10:027 660 WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
21:01:10:027 660 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 85036
21:01:10:027 660 WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
21:01:10:027 660 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 281
21:01:10:027 660 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 31
21:01:11:072 660 Restarting OK, exit...
July 16, 2016, 01:34:12 PM
With a WIN7 PC running just GETH and Claymore,
why is there several hundred megabytes of disk space consumed every day?
why is there several hundred megabytes of disk space consumed every day?
If you point miner on geth than logs (-dbg 0 or -dbg 1 parameter) grow quick enough (about 3-4 Mb/hour). The 2nd disk hungry monster is blockchain database (try to look in c:\users\(your user)\appdata\ethereum).
Logs can be swith off (RTFM is a right habbit)))), but blockchain db should be kept. You cannot mine solo otherwise.
Thanks, so I will run Claymore with -dbg 1 parameter to stop logs
If I don't want to mine solo I can delete c:\users\(your user)\appdata\ethereum?
i have a question will that effect production "effective hashrate" when change it to -dbg -1
Thanks that worked perfectly!
July 16, 2016, 12:30:31 PM
-li low intensity mode. Reduces mining intensity, useful if your cards are overheated. Note that mining speed is reduced too.
More value means less heat and mining speed, for example, "-li 10" is less heat and mining speed than "-li 1". You can also specify values for every card, for example "-li 3,10,50".
Default value is "0" - no low intensity mode.
Which overheating temperature, this parameter is calculated? On specified in -tstop? More value means less heat and mining speed, for example, "-li 10" is less heat and mining speed than "-li 1". You can also specify values for every card, for example "-li 3,10,50".
Default value is "0" - no low intensity mode.
Jump to: