Topic: Claymore&#039;s Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 131. (Read 6590757 times)

Quote from: aminal on May 22, 2019, 05:29:30 AM

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs

https://www.RigSpec.io

Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

rxboost + 30mhz more Core on Rx470 gives huge Bump in hashrate, it was near nothing when i was running 1150mhz + custom Straps, but these 30mhz Core was the Key to the big Change

niros

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Got quite a few ASRock H110 Pro BTC+, also not working. Doesn't matter what card.
Locks up Windows immediately as it tries to load straps. RX470/RX580
Working fine without any -strap or -rxboost, which is ok but not as good as it could be...
Claymore could you look into this for us? Thank you sir.

Quote from: Claymore on April 11, 2016, 10:30:36 AM

Claymore's Dual Ethereum + Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal/Blake2s/Keccak AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner.
=========================

Hi Guys,
Why are my 8cards setups crashing? The rig freezes immediatly after applying the first straps. When i remove the rxboost 1 it works fine. I dont have issues with my 5 and 6 cards setup.
The cards are 8x rx580 8gb. with Asrock h110.
Using Adrenalin 19.5.1 and Claymore 14.5

Please HELP!

P00P135

full member

Activity: 1124

Merit: 136

Quote from: mirny on May 23, 2019, 12:51:42 PM

Quote from: Claymore on May 23, 2019, 12:47:26 PM

Quote from: tytanick on May 22, 2019, 05:35:48 PM

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy

I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue

...
What do You think ?

Done

Both links are same, so what should solve this?

Are you serious?

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote from: Claymore on May 23, 2019, 12:47:26 PM

Quote from: tytanick on May 22, 2019, 05:35:48 PM

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy

I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue

...
What do You think ?

Done

Both links are same, so what should solve this?

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: tytanick on May 22, 2019, 05:35:48 PM

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy

I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue

...
What do You think ?

Done

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

No v14.5 for linux, or Am I blind?

rigspec

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 1

Quote from: laik2 on May 23, 2019, 11:44:55 AM

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand.
To provide more understandable meaning:
Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR].
Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB].

Thanks for clarifying.... we actually built this farm in a way that all rigs had GPUs of similar memory manufacturers together (ie: Samsung, Micron, Elpida, Hynix).... we just need to figure out now which one gets the best performance with the rxboost with our tests and configurations

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: laik2 on May 23, 2019, 11:28:38 AM

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

I don't deny your results. What I am saying is a bit more technical probably for you to understand.
To provide more understandable meaning:
Elpida[EDW4032BAB], SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] will get the most of -rxboost, Micron[MT51J256M3],Samsung[K4G80325FB] and least SK Hynix[H5GQ8H24MJ/H5GQ8H24MJR].
Only exception might be Samsung[K4G41325FE] which is somewhere in the middle between SK Hynix[H5GC4H24AJ/H5GC4H24AJR] and Samsung[K4G80325FB].

rigspec

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 1

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs

https://www.RigSpec.io

Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: big_daddy on May 23, 2019, 04:15:09 AM

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs

https://www.RigSpec.io

Claymore already revealed what rxboost does, gave entire specification of "Memory refresh period". In order for "-rxboost" to work as what is meant for you need to keep core a bit higher than usual and clock latency tighter.

rigspec

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 1

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs

https://www.RigSpec.io

Smokeyw

full member

Activity: 228

Merit: 100

still no big boost for amd vii ??

Bojcha

hero member

Activity: 848

Merit: 500

Quote from: Bojcha on May 22, 2019, 07:29:22 AM

Latest one, i personally use 19.3.2 with compute mode switcher and atikmdag patcher.

are your cards stock or modded bios and what are your results?

Yes all cards uses modded bios since my straps still kinda better then straps in miner. So i only use rxboost on top.
btw if you change rxboost number or GPU clock its good to always pre-tune dcri at asm2,

gedeonodn

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: Eliovp on May 23, 2019, 07:09:05 AM

Quote from: Er0l on May 23, 2019, 07:06:35 AM

Quote from: big_daddy on May 23, 2019, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: Er0l on May 23, 2019, 07:06:35 AM

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing?

No i use the rxboost tool for linux from simplemining os, best you switch to simpleminingOS run your own straps and run with phoenixminer... for rx400/500

You can use Amd Memory Tweak and use "REF" flag, it's the same thing, free to use

Cheers!

I wrote about the same few posts ago, people not read before ask

Would you share some infomation? What is correct interval of values for --ref, if you have some stats, what is most used values for GPUs, if possible by models?

Eliovp

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1293

Huh?

Quote from: big_daddy on May 23, 2019, 06:49:37 AM

Quote from: big_daddy on May 23, 2019, 06:49:37 AM

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing?

No i use the rxboost tool for linux from simplemining os, best you switch to simpleminingOS run your own straps and run with phoenixminer... for rx400/500

You can use Amd Memory Tweak and use "REF" flag, it's the same thing, free to use

Cheers!

Er0l

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing?

No i use the rxboost tool for linux from simplemining os, best you switch to simpleminingOS run your own straps and run with phoenixminer... for rx400/500

big_daddy

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 583

xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol

Quote from: RAKOT on May 23, 2019, 06:01:29 AM

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

what rxboost are you combining here? the rxboost is on Clay or what am I missing?

Er0l

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

Wait a minute , ist rxboost only ClaymoreMiner option ?

No for sure not :-)

RAKOT

jr. member

Activity: 152

Merit: 8