Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 132.

Er0l

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: big_daddy on May 23, 2019, 04:12:23 AM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 01:47:58 PM

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

I use bios modded straps, not the freaky on the fly, looks like some of the gpus already bricked with this when i go back some pages here.
Elpida and hynix the same, 32.7 to 32.9mh/s with rxboost and phoenixminer.

big_daddy

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 583

xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol

Quote from: Bojcha on May 22, 2019, 07:29:22 AM

Latest one, i personally use 19.3.2 with compute mode switcher and atikmdag patcher.

are your cards stock or modded bios and what are your results?

big_daddy

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 583

xUSD - The PRIVATE stable coin - Haven Protocol

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 01:47:58 PM

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

I have some rx470's Samsung, Elpida and Hynix, using rxboost my rigs are crashing
what driver are you using and are your cards bios modded or stock?

RAKOT

jr. member

Activity: 152

Merit: 8

Quote from: Er0l on May 23, 2019, 01:42:49 AM

Quote from: RAKOT on May 23, 2019, 01:34:25 AM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 01:47:58 PM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 08:54:42 AM

Quote from: joaocha on May 21, 2019, 12:23:24 PM

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ?

I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1

I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 core 2150 mem 32.7mh/s with phoenixminer + rxboost on Linux

Thanks for info , Im on W10 m maybee i should try Linux-based environment.

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: adaseb on May 23, 2019, 01:34:54 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on May 22, 2019, 06:53:19 PM

Quote from: rigspec on May 22, 2019, 05:16:33 PM

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? Cheesy

) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.

Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP

Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'

https://www.RigSpec.io

Memory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.

You are correct that the memory chips don't consume that much power with better straps but the GPU compute part of the graphic card actually does use more power overall.

Think of it this way. The GPU compute is actually idle alot because there is a bottle-neck in the memory, when the memory is faster the GPU compute is idle less and overall there is more power consumption. This is why back in 2017, it was very popular to dual mine coins with ETH because most of the time the memory is busy while the GPU compute part of the video card stays inactive and does nothing.

Hmmm, maybe you're right. I don't think this way...

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: jeremyismer on May 22, 2019, 10:08:11 PM

Does rxboost require the Claymore driver install? I tried to run it last night and got a bunch of errors, but I hadn't run the driver install setting but wanted to check if I needed the driver before I tried other troubleshooting.

Yes.

Er0l

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: RAKOT on May 23, 2019, 01:34:25 AM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 01:47:58 PM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 08:54:42 AM

Quote from: joaocha on May 21, 2019, 12:23:24 PM

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ?

I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1

I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 core 2150 mem 32.7mh/s with phoenixminer + rxboost on Linux

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Quote from: UnclWish on May 22, 2019, 06:53:19 PM

Quote from: rigspec on May 22, 2019, 05:16:33 PM

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? Cheesy

) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.

Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP

Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'

https://www.RigSpec.io

Memory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.

You are correct that the memory chips don't consume that much power with better straps but the GPU compute part of the graphic card actually does use more power overall.

Think of it this way. The GPU compute is actually idle alot because there is a bottle-neck in the memory, when the memory is faster the GPU compute is idle less and overall there is more power consumption. This is why back in 2017, it was very popular to dual mine coins with ETH because most of the time the memory is busy while the GPU compute part of the video card stays inactive and does nothing.

RAKOT

jr. member

Activity: 152

Merit: 8

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 01:47:58 PM

Quote from: Er0l on May 22, 2019, 08:54:42 AM

Quote from: joaocha on May 21, 2019, 12:23:24 PM

Simplemining just implemented Rxboost on linux Cool

I am running Rxboost on ethOS (Linux), RX474 32.1mh/s , before 31.4mh/s

Finally got 33 mh/s with RX470 - with rxboost

Please share wit us command line options and GPU OC settings ?

I have a lot of different 474's and cant get more then 30.8 with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1

Blooregardqcazoo

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 1

Quote from: Blooregardqcazoo on May 19, 2019, 11:10:02 PM

Same here.. Seems to have happened after using -rxboost 1 while trying different -strap values. My RX580 hangs after starting the miner now. In fact, it hangs with any other miner as well. Tried -driver uninstall, and the driver was apparently uninstalled, but the card still hangs. Not sure what to do now.

Guys.. for the record, this turns out to be unrelated to Claymore's miner. My USB riser died while I was testing this version, and I didn't realize that right away, as Windows seemed to still see the card but saying that the card was reporting problems. I verified the card works well on another machine and narrowed it down to the faulty riser. Sorry about the noise.

Er0l

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: hustleman on May 23, 2019, 12:01:28 AM

I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1. The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner. So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings?

Example:

RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)

Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.

Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.

Give more mem clock

I am running rx470 4Gb 1180 vore 2150 mem 32.7mh/s

hustleman

jr. member

Activity: 155

Merit: 6

I'm only getting about a 2.2% increase on a 12gpu (9 580 and 3 570) rig with -rxboost and -strap 1. The -mclock OC setting I have for these cards were the most stable OC I could do on older versions of claymore miner. So my question is with the rxboost and -straps, do some card perform better with less OC with the miners new memory timings?

Example:

RX580 4gb -cclock 1150-cvddc 820 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 900 hashes at 29.7mhs (NO rxboost or strap)

Same card with same UV/OC with -rxboost 1 and -strap 1 now hashes at 30.2mhs.

Will this card perform any better with different -mclock or strap variable??? Or do you believe this card is maxed out at 30.2mhs due to rxboost 1 and strap 1 being most memory intensive.

jeremyismer

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Does rxboost require the Claymore driver install? I tried to run it last night and got a bunch of errors, but I hadn't run the driver install setting but wanted to check if I needed the driver before I tried other troubleshooting.

SerpentXSF

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 5

-Only for 1080 Ti Graphics Cards-

When enabling command "-strap 1" after correct setup and running as administrator. While using the ETH largement Pill, you will possibly get a crash or the following. However, this is to be expected as that is two programs attempting to modify memory timings.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934350531592217/20190522_193835.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934486456533002/20190522_212209.jpg

If above image didn't work...

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934350531592217/20190522_193835.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/579834089448800258/580934486456533002/20190522_212209.jpg

MapleCircuit

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

I'm seeing about a 1% power increase on my 8 card 570/580 rig with about 3% hashrate increase using rxboost.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Think again

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: rigspec on May 22, 2019, 05:16:33 PM

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain withing the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? Cheesy

) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.

Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP

Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'

https://www.RigSpec.io

Memory doesn't consumes so much power... Memory clock up to 2250 MHz on GDDR5 increases it a bit. But memory timings not so important to power, i think.

evlo

jr. member

Activity: 155

Merit: 4

Quote from: haliy-2017 on May 22, 2019, 10:23:59 AM

Who achieved what speed on the claymore 14.5 on maps 1060 6gg (Samsung, micron).
I have Samsung GPU0 26.806 Mh / s, GPU1 27.239 Mh / s, GPU2 26.377 Mh / s, GPU3 27.224 Mh / s, GPU4 27.171 Mh / s, micron GPU5 26.300 Mh / s, -strap 1 -sintensity 80
PO, core 1480, memory 4644-4706-4551-4704-4698 micron 4532, curvia 812v, PL80, firewood 391.24. (On new ones, the speed is 1-1.5 Mh / s lower). Who will share their settings.

Does someone other experience better hashrates with 391.24 then newer drivers?

tytanick

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 1096

Simplemining.net Admin

Claymore, would you be able to write some near download links that 14.5 is for windows only and for linux there is v12 ? Cheesy

I get like like 10-15 requestes per day "when i will upload claymore-eth v14.5" and the answer is "there is no v14.5 for linux" Tongue

Something like:

DOWNLOAD LINK
(Windows): v14.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w
(Linux) latest version is v12.x https://mega.nz/#F!O4YA2JgD!n2b4iSHQDruEsYUvTQP5_w

What do You think ?

rigspec

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 1

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain within the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease? Cheesy

) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.

Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP

Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'

https://www.RigSpec.io

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 132. (Read 6590757 times)