Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1381. (Read 6590718 times)
April 19, 2016, 03:16:45 PM
Does Nvidia support is planned?
April 19, 2016, 03:15:11 PM
Mmm not seeing any improvements 
6x Nano, stock settings(cards), 175Mh
V2 - 175 Mh/s
V3 - 175 Mh/s
Exactly the same :p
6x Nano, stock settings(cards), 175Mh
V2 - 175 Mh/s
V3 - 175 Mh/s
Exactly the same :p
April 19, 2016, 03:12:10 PM
Time to code for solo and fuck the pools 
I like the solo mining. But the geth is not working too well. After certain network disruption, it will just hang.
April 19, 2016, 03:08:41 PM
Time to code for solo and fuck the pools
April 19, 2016, 03:06:29 PM
Wow, such hash, many speed, very code.
April 19, 2016, 02:59:26 PM
Thanks for the speedup
2x380 1x290x
with v2
11:15:57:350 13fc ETH - Total Speed: 66.403 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
11:15:57:355 13fc ETH: GPU0 19.538 Mh/s, GPU1 18.453 Mh/s, GPU2 28.411 Mh/s
11:15:57:361 13fc DCR - Total Speed: 664.028 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
11:15:57:365 13fc DCR: GPU0 195.380 Mh/s, GPU1 184.534 Mh/s, GPU2 284.114 Mh/s
with v3
21:58:24:128 21b4 ETH - Total Speed: 68.982 Mh/s, Total Shares: 27, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:35
21:58:24:135 21b4 ETH: GPU0 20.573 Mh/s, GPU1 20.089 Mh/s, GPU2 28.321 Mh/s
21:58:24:139 21b4 DCR - Total Speed: 689.822 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
21:58:24:145 21b4 DCR: GPU0 205.728 Mh/s, GPU1 200.889 Mh/s, GPU2 283.205 Mh/s
both dcri 20
2x380 1x290x
with v2
11:15:57:350 13fc ETH - Total Speed: 66.403 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
11:15:57:355 13fc ETH: GPU0 19.538 Mh/s, GPU1 18.453 Mh/s, GPU2 28.411 Mh/s
11:15:57:361 13fc DCR - Total Speed: 664.028 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
11:15:57:365 13fc DCR: GPU0 195.380 Mh/s, GPU1 184.534 Mh/s, GPU2 284.114 Mh/s
with v3
21:58:24:128 21b4 ETH - Total Speed: 68.982 Mh/s, Total Shares: 27, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:35
21:58:24:135 21b4 ETH: GPU0 20.573 Mh/s, GPU1 20.089 Mh/s, GPU2 28.321 Mh/s
21:58:24:139 21b4 DCR - Total Speed: 689.822 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
21:58:24:145 21b4 DCR: GPU0 205.728 Mh/s, GPU1 200.889 Mh/s, GPU2 283.205 Mh/s
both dcri 20
April 19, 2016, 02:51:27 PM
[
Plugged in a MSI R9 270X 4GB , cleared the DAGs, shutdown booted up
getting 14.5 MH on vers 3.
Starting to get there.
Plugged in a MSI R9 270X 4GB , cleared the DAGs, shutdown booted up
getting 14.5 MH on vers 3.
Starting to get there.
Are you using any special settings? Overclocking?
April 19, 2016, 02:50:23 PM
As I suspected... DAG recreation won't improve V3 performance 
April 19, 2016, 02:43:44 PM
Why does the program crash when I try to apply overclocking? Please help.
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us2.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x54DAcC4a74d5C75f0184E9093c210E6313ACc6Ed -eworker rig1 -epsw x -esm 1 -mode 1 -tt 60 -cclock 1100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us2.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x54DAcC4a74d5C75f0184E9093c210E6313ACc6Ed -eworker rig1 -epsw x -esm 1 -mode 1 -tt 60 -cclock 1100
April 19, 2016, 02:30:33 PM
Nano - i120, 28мx/1672мx
290X (1018 core, 1250 mem) - i70, 27.9мx/976мx
driver 16.4.1
290X (1018 core, 1250 mem) - i70, 27.9мx/976мx
driver 16.4.1
April 19, 2016, 02:20:20 PM
Just got my other two cards in, pulled the asus R9 270X 2GB from the riser.
Plugged in a MSI R9 270X 4GB , cleared the DAGs, shutdown booted up
getting 14.5 MH on vers 3.
Just have to hook its brother up....(now where's those other risers)
Starting to get there.
I used the old DAGs to test v3. Could this be the reason? Hummmm.... Testing now!
April 19, 2016, 02:19:37 PM
How to understand, which particular card is GPU0 etc?
April 19, 2016, 02:10:21 PM
I tested v2.0 and v3.0 on stock 270 and v3.0 is faster in both dual and non-dual modes:
v2.0: mode -0 11.5MH, mode -1 12.8MH.
v3.0: mode -0 13.2MH, mode -1 13.5MH.
Probably you use not 15.12 drivers.
Just got my other two cards in, pulled the asus R9 270X 2GB from the riser.
Plugged in a MSI R9 270X 4GB , cleared the DAGs, shutdown booted up
getting 14.5 MH on vers 3.
Just have to hook its brother up....(now where's those other risers)
Starting to get there.
April 19, 2016, 02:08:47 PM
Here with 3.0 im getting better results with 7950/7970 when dual mining, before it was lowering the eth, now when dual mining its stays close to the solo numbers 
With 2x 7950 and 1x 7970 im getting 61mh eth and 1200mh dcr. Good job Claymore
With 2x 7950 and 1x 7970 im getting 61mh eth and 1200mh dcr. Good job Claymore April 19, 2016, 02:08:22 PM
Not sure if am seeing any value to mining both the coins. I maybe make a little DCR a day maybe 1 coin if that. Is this worth the extra power it is using and giving rejected ?
I don't think so. I'm using this miner not because of DCR but because it produces better results in ETH single mode.
April 19, 2016, 02:07:01 PM
I tested v2.0 and v3.0 on stock 270 and v3.0 is faster in both dual and non-dual modes:
v2.0: mode -0 11.5MH, mode -1 12.8MH.
v3.0: mode -0 13.2MH, mode -1 13.5MH.
Probably you use not 15.12 drivers.
My rigs are optimized with Win 7 x64 and Catalyst 15.12. Trust me, I've tried more than once. But it not a big problem; I'm now running one instance for the 950s with V3 and another instance with V2 for the 270x
Note: I have 5 absolutely identical MSI 270x and they all produce different speeds. Go figure...
April 19, 2016, 02:06:55 PM
Not sure if am seeing any value to mining both the coins. I maybe make a little DCR a day maybe 1 coin if that. Is this worth the extra power it is using and giving rejected ?
April 19, 2016, 02:05:06 PM
On the 290x the speed was the same with the 15.12 and the 16.12 drivers.
April 19, 2016, 02:00:05 PM
My 270x are loosing 1%-5% performance with this new version. The same for 7870
My 7950s are gaining 5%
Final balance: Not worth the change, at least not with default settings.
Tried -ethi -8192 but it was even worst.
Maybe I'll try to run simultaneous instances; one for the 7950s another for the 270s
My 7950s are gaining 5%
Final balance: Not worth the change, at least not with default settings.
Tried -ethi -8192 but it was even worst.
Maybe I'll try to run simultaneous instances; one for the 7950s another for the 270s
I tested v2.0 and v3.0 on stock 270 and v3.0 is faster in both dual and non-dual modes:
v2.0: mode -0 11.5MH, mode -1 12.8MH.
v3.0: mode -0 13.2MH, mode -1 13.5MH.
Probably you use not 15.12 drivers.
April 19, 2016, 01:46:22 PM
My 270x are loosing 1%-5% performance with this new version. The same for 7870
My 7950s are gaining 5%
Final balance: Not worth the change, at least not with default settings.
Tried -ethi -8192 but it was even worst.
Maybe I'll try to run simultaneous instances; one for the 7950s another for the 270s
My 7950s are gaining 5%
Final balance: Not worth the change, at least not with default settings.
Tried -ethi -8192 but it was even worst.
Maybe I'll try to run simultaneous instances; one for the 7950s another for the 270s
Jump to: