Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 606. (Read 6590565 times)

sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
If GPU-Z can be trusted:

Vega FE Air's

GPU_0 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1050 -cvddc 950 = 40.4Mh/s 51C, 78% fan, 15C ambient = 158w
GPU_1 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1100 -cvddc 950 = 42.4Mh/s 55C, 66% fan, 15C ambient = 168w

I ruined the earth ground on the killawatt I borrowed, so I currently cannot take a wall measurement.
what drivers are you using? also what rates are you getting foe 2nd coin?
I've got me some vegas on the way so any info would be appreciated at this stage:)
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
If GPU-Z can be trusted:

Vega FE Air's

GPU_0 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1050 -cvddc 950 = 40.4Mh/s 51C, 78% fan, 15C ambient = 158w
GPU_1 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1100 -cvddc 950 = 42.4Mh/s 55C, 66% fan, 15C ambient = 168w

I ruined the earth ground on the killawatt I borrowed, so I currently cannot take a wall measurement.

you need to add approx 60-70watt to what gpu-z says
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
If GPU-Z can be trusted:

Vega FE Air's

GPU_0 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1050 -cvddc 950 = 40.4Mh/s 51C, 78% fan, 15C ambient = 158w
GPU_1 = -cclock 1137 -mclock 1100 -cvddc 950 = 42.4Mh/s 55C, 66% fan, 15C ambient = 168w

I ruined the earth ground on the killawatt I borrowed, so I currently cannot take a wall measurement.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
The Vega is an R9, AMD cheesed it out on this one.

RX Vega 56 is great card for 2K gaming - UV and OC (223watts) makes it up to 18% faster than GTX 1070.

You can fault the GPUs gaming performance. Mining wise, it is nothing special and comes with lots of extra work.

It is selling really well to PC Gamers and lots of 2K freesync monitors are being sold on its performance advantage over the GTX 1070.

I'm not claiming the R9 and its relatives aren't really awesome gaming cards (they are), it's that power draw combined with the price tag that makes mining with them questionable. They're not next-gen tech like the RX480/580 IMO.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
So what is the verdict with 10.0 and blockchain drivers for 580 rigs?  Does undervolting work?
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
The Vega is an R9, AMD cheesed it out on this one.

RX Vega 56 is great card for 2K gaming - UV and OC (223watts) makes it up to 18% faster than GTX 1070.

You can fault the GPUs gaming performance. Mining wise, it is nothing special and comes with lots of extra work.

It is selling really well to PC Gamers and lots of 2K freesync monitors are being sold on its performance advantage over the GTX 1070.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
The Vega is an R9, AMD cheesed it out on this one.
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Here it is independent post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.21691298 and some posts next confirming that 43-44 mhs eth @ 160watt is current Vega "not bad" result ))
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004

That would be on UBIQ then?

And that is RX Vega 64 and not RX Vega 56?
It is vega 64 liquid. I tested only eth with dagger-hashimoto.

And, are you confident you will be able to run it at that for 2 years 24/7 or was it just something you just did for benchmarking?
I can't tell you cause now I'm running xmr 1600h/s @130 watt, 2 days stable ...

Can't fault that decision with those UV and OC settings, but the pools servers and implementations are terrible for Monero mining pools!

Ethereum mining pools are vastly superior - you can get within 1% of mining calculators estimates.
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003

That would be on UBIQ then?

And that is RX Vega 64 and not RX Vega 56?
It is vega 64 liquid. I tested only eth with dagger-hashimoto.

And, are you confident you will be able to run it at that for 2 years 24/7 or was it just something you just did for benchmarking?
I can't tell you cause now I'm running xmr 1600h/s @130 watt, 2 days stable ...
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004

That would be on UBIQ then?

And that is RX Vega 64 and not RX Vega 56?
It is vega 64 liquid. I tested only eth with dagger-hashimoto.

And, are you confident you will be able to run it at that for 2 years 24/7 or was it just something you just did for benchmarking?
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003

That would be on UBIQ then?

And that is RX Vega 64 and not RX Vega 56?
It is vega 64 liquid. I tested only eth with dagger-hashimoto.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
Vega 64 here.  

All the numbers below are dual mining eth+dcr.  

I also feel like the blockchain driver hashrate in Claymore is not real.  Two weeks of mining on ethermine with blockchain drivers and stuck at 24hr avg of 32 MH but reported is always 37 MH.  Perhaps that is expected?  32 MH is what I get with non-blockchain drivers and at least over 48 hours I got 24 avg of 32MH, perhaps that was luck?  

I run at -22% power and otherwise leave clock speed and voltage alone.  Not by choice.  Any changes to voltage wrecks hashrate.

On blockchain drivers.  Anytime I adjust any voltage or clock speed on either core or memory the cards hashrate drops ~-3MHs and gets stuck there.  Memory locks to 800Mhz on anything higher than 945Mhz.   I have not tried non-blockchain drivers.  Given I hear folks are hitting 40+ with non-blockchain drivers in recent news I might have to give it a try.


blockchain drivers have buggy clocks/voltage control and monitoring but there IS a way to make a serious downvolt without loosing the speed. As I already posted in vega thread - 44.2 mhs @ 160watt from the wall (1408gpu/[email protected]).
There IS a big problem to make clocks low with this drivers so I still need to keep them high (1408mhz) and this is bad for dual-mining.
To be stable at 1408gpu/1100hbm2 in dual mode I need 0.975v core voltage and this leads to high 300watt consumption (43eth+240lbc)

new 17.8.2 and 17.9.1 drivers have clocks/voltage issues fixed but speed is not so good and you need some hack to keep memory oc (1100 instead of 800) when running low gpu clocks.
Max I was able to get is 43 mhs @140-150 watt (1000gpu/[email protected]) and 41mhs+210lbry @230watt (1300gpu/[email protected])

That would be on UBIQ then?

And that is RX Vega 64 and not RX Vega 56?
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
when my internet falls and back the boards do not return to render as they were rendering before.

do you have any command to restart the miner in case of a drop in yield or to rebound the os?

I have Teamviewer installed on my RIG to do tasks like this ^^
But it's strange, when my internet falls Claymore restart mining by itself ..
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
hey Guys. what is more profitable now? eth+lbc, or eth+sc?
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

HBM is stacked memory.  I don't think its one 4GB Module its like four 1GB modules stacked ontop of each other.

You do realise the R9 290 4GB was not affected by the Dag File size issue this year!

Does it mean there is no need to upgrade the drive for 290/390 owers?

The 4GB limit will be hit around mid-September 2019
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0

HBM is stacked memory.  I don't think its one 4GB Module its like four 1GB modules stacked ontop of each other.

You do realise the R9 290 4GB was not affected by the Dag File size issue this year!

Does it mean there is no need to upgrade the drive for 290/390 owers?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
The MEGA files are infected with viruses / trojans, but the GOOGLE ones are fine....

This is why I kept repeating over and over and over again to Claymore.

POST THE HASHES OR THE SIGNATURES OF YOUR EXECUTABLES and he never listens.

His MEGA account might of been compromised.
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Vega 64 here.  

All the numbers below are dual mining eth+dcr.  

I also feel like the blockchain driver hashrate in Claymore is not real.  Two weeks of mining on ethermine with blockchain drivers and stuck at 24hr avg of 32 MH but reported is always 37 MH.  Perhaps that is expected?  32 MH is what I get with non-blockchain drivers and at least over 48 hours I got 24 avg of 32MH, perhaps that was luck?  

I run at -22% power and otherwise leave clock speed and voltage alone.  Not by choice.  Any changes to voltage wrecks hashrate.

On blockchain drivers.  Anytime I adjust any voltage or clock speed on either core or memory the cards hashrate drops ~-3MHs and gets stuck there.  Memory locks to 800Mhz on anything higher than 945Mhz.   I have not tried non-blockchain drivers.  Given I hear folks are hitting 40+ with non-blockchain drivers in recent news I might have to give it a try.


blockchain drivers have buggy clocks/voltage control and monitoring but there IS a way to make a serious downvolt without loosing the speed. As I already posted in vega thread - 44.2 mhs @ 160watt from the wall (1408gpu/[email protected]).
There IS a big problem to make clocks low with this drivers so I still need to keep them high (1408mhz) and this is bad for dual-mining.
To be stable at 1408gpu/1100hbm2 in dual mode I need 0.975v core voltage and this leads to high 300watt consumption (43eth+240lbc)

new 17.8.2 and 17.9.1 drivers have clocks/voltage issues fixed but speed is not so good and you need some hack to keep memory oc (1100 instead of 800) when running low gpu clocks.
Max I was able to get is 43 mhs @140-150 watt (1000gpu/[email protected]) and 41mhs+210lbry @230watt (1300gpu/[email protected])
sr. member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 353
Xtreme Monster
@Claymore, anyway you could add a reset overclock settings command at the beginning of the program? So we don't need to wait the card to crash till new settings are applied or maybe a keyboard command in which will reset the overclock settings to default and will exit the program?
Jump to: